BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Mar 20, 2026; 16(1): 108875
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108875
Table 1 Clinical questionnaire to select potential donors

Question
Medical historyAny history of
Concurrent acute, medical illness?
Any symptoms pertaining to gastrointestinal disease (nausea/ vomiting/ pain abdomen/ diarrhea/ blood in stool)?
Chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disease (personal or family history), including functional GI disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease or other chronic GI disease
Any history of chronic illness (such as diabetes/ hypertension/ heart disease/ kidney disease/ liver disease/ HIV/malignancy)?
Acute diarrhea (in the prospective donor or his/her contacts) in the past four weeks
Typhus or other salmonellosis
Tuberculosis (acute or past)
Systemic autoimmune diseases, e.g., multiple sclerosis, connective tissue disorders
Atopic diseases
Neurological or psychiatric diseases [depression, chronic pain (fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, etc.)]
Obesity (body mass index > 30)
Known food or medication allergy
Cancer, including GI cancer or polyposis syndrome
Travel historyAny history of high-risk travel in the past six months
Social historyAny history of
High risk sexual behavior
Imprisonment
Illicit drug use
Body modifications such as tattooing, piercing, etc., in the past six months
Occupational activity in a hospital or other health-care institution with patient contact; occupational activity in agriculture
Family historyAny history of premature colon cancer or early onset polyposis syndromes in first-degree family members
Treatment historyAny history of
Recent hospitalization/discharge from long-term care facilities (past 6 months)
Antibiotic treatment in the past three months
Blood transfusions in the past five years
Long-term drug treatment (e.g., with antibiotics, immunosuppressants, proton pump inhibitors, chemotherapy)
Tissue/organ transplant
Having been a participant in any clinical trial in the past six months
Bowel resection or gastric reduction surgery
Table 2 Donor blood and stool testing
Blood testing
    Complete blood count with differential
    Blood sugar, renal and liver function tests
    Hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and hepatitis E viruses
    HIV-1 and HIV-2
    Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus serology
    Treponema pallidum (syphilis)
    Nematodes (Strongyloides stercoralis)
Stool testing
    Clostridioides difficile
    Common enteric pathogens, including Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Yersinia and Vibrio cholerae
    Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and antimicrobial resistance gene testing
    Norovirus, rotavirus, adenovirus
    Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium spp., Isospora, Cyclospora and Microsporidia
    Protozoa and helminths/ova and parasites (including Entamoeba histolytica, Blastocystis hominis and Dientamoeba fragilis)
    Helicobacter pylori faecal antigen (for upper route of FMT delivery)
Table 3 Stool collection, processing and storage
Processing step
Description
Common variations/methods
Stool collectionFreshly passed stool is collected from a healthy, screened donor in a sterile container[17]Anaerobic conditions: Certain protocols recommend oxygen-free collection and processing methods to preserve strict anaerobes[14,18,19]
Pre-collection diet: Some studies suggest a high-fiber diet prior to donation to enhance microbial diversity[20,21]
Stool quantityThe amount of stool collected varies based on the protocolTypically, 50-60 g of stool added to 250-300 mL of diluent[5,17]. A minimum of 25 g of feces is recommended for lower GI delivery, and 12.5 g for upper GI delivery[14,15]
Diluents/buffer solutionsStool is diluted with a buffered solution to create a homogeneous slurry, and to a consistency that can be injected through the biopsy channel of scopeCommonly used diluents[5,22]:
Normal saline (0.9% NaCl)-Most commonly used
Sterile water (less preferred due to hypotonicity)
Phosphate buffered saline
Non-bacteriostatic saline (used to avoid antimicrobial preservatives)
Milk or milk-based solutions (rarely)
HomogenizationStool sample is mixed with the diluent to create a uniform suspension, ensuring even distribution of microbiota and removal of large particulate matter before filtrationDone by manual stirring with sterile spatula; laboratory blender. Performed under aerobic or anaerobic conditions[18,19]
FiltrationLarge particles (undigested fiber, debris) are removedUsing[5]:
Gauze filtration
Stainless steel sieve (250-500 μm)
Sterile mesh filters
CentrifugationFurther purification or concentration of microbiota; retain microbial rich supernatantLow (3000-4000 × g), medium (5000-6000 × g) or high (up to 10000 × g) speed centrifugation; relative centrifugal force = 6000 × g for 15 minutes[23]. May be followed by re-suspension in diluent
Washing (optional step)Component of microfiltration plus centrifugation, called washed microbiota transplantationIntegration of multiple filtration and washing steps, often performed using automated purification systems[16]; automated systems (e.g., GenFMTer) reduces host cells, debris, endotoxins (one-hour FMT protocol)[16]
Storage and handlingStool preparation is handled under strict sterile conditions to prevent contamination. Can be used fresh or storedFresh use: Stored at 4 °C and used within 6 hours
Frozen use: Stored at -80 °C with glycerol (10%) for long-term use (up to 2 years)
Table 4 Comparative analysis of different stool processing methods
Method
Pros
Cons
Recommended setting
Rough filtration Simple, low costLow microbial purity, higher adverse eventsSuitable for basic setups
Filtration plus centrifugationImproved bacterial concentrationModerate technical demandsUsed in standard protocols
Microfiltration plus centrifugationHigh microbial purity, fewer toxic reactions, delivers a precise dose of the enriched microbiota instead of using the weight of stoolExpensive, automated system e.g., GenFMTer neededIdeal for advanced centers
Table 5 Comparison of common methods of fecal microbiota transplantation administration

Enema
Capsule
Colonoscopy
Nasogastric, nasoduodenal or nasojejunal tube
DeliveryDistal colonSmall intestine/colonRight colon/terminal ileumUpper GI tract to stomach/duodenum/jejunum
Starting amount of feces25-200 g80-100 g25-200 g12.5-150 g
Final delivery volume per dose300-500 mL30-40 capsules30-500 mL30-500 mL
ProsWell tolerated, no sedation, can be done at homeNon-invasive, faster, well-toleratedHigher efficacyMinimally invasive, avoids sedation risks
ConsRetention difficulty, lower efficacyRequires multiple doses, risk of gastric acid degradation; avoid FMT capsules if the patient has dysphagia, difficulty swallowing pills or gastroparesisInvasive, requires sedation, risk of perforationRisk of aspiration, patient discomfort
Table 6 Fecal microbiota transplantation: Current uses and future horizons
Established indication
Clostridioides difficile infection[7,11-14,48]
Investigational/emerging indications
Ulcerative colitis[45,49]Primary sclerosing cholangitis[62,63]
Crohn’s Disease[47,50]Intestinal pseudoobstruction[64]
Pouchitis[51]Neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis)[65]
Irritable Bowel Syndrome[52]Graft vs host disease[66]
Alcoholic hepatitis[53]Human immunodeficiency virus[67]
Cirrhosis or hepatic encephalopathy[54]Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus enterocolitis[68]
Obesity/metabolic syndrome[55]Multidrug-resistant organisms[69]
Diabetes mellitus[56]Post-stem cell transplant[70]
NAFLD/NASH[57]Autologous FMT (preventive)[71,72]
Hepatitis B[58,59]Autism spectrum disorders[73]
Pancreatitis[60]Cancer[74]
Immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance[61]Fecal incontinence[75]
Table 7 Regulatory variations in fecal microbiota transplantation
Country
FMT classification
United StatesRestricted use in CDI in line with FDA enforcement discretion policy[78]; investigational new drug approval used in context of clinical trials for other diseases
Belgium, Netherlands, ItalyRegulated as a tissue transplant, under European Union Tissue and Cells Directive
AustraliaRegulated as a biological drug
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Ireland, SwitzerlandRegulated as a medicinal drug -flexible use allowed