©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Mar 20, 2026; 16(1): 108875
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108875
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108875
Table 1 Clinical questionnaire to select potential donors
| Question | |
| Medical history | Any history of |
| Concurrent acute, medical illness? | |
| Any symptoms pertaining to gastrointestinal disease (nausea/ vomiting/ pain abdomen/ diarrhea/ blood in stool)? | |
| Chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disease (personal or family history), including functional GI disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease or other chronic GI disease | |
| Any history of chronic illness (such as diabetes/ hypertension/ heart disease/ kidney disease/ liver disease/ HIV/malignancy)? | |
| Acute diarrhea (in the prospective donor or his/her contacts) in the past four weeks | |
| Typhus or other salmonellosis | |
| Tuberculosis (acute or past) | |
| Systemic autoimmune diseases, e.g., multiple sclerosis, connective tissue disorders | |
| Atopic diseases | |
| Neurological or psychiatric diseases [depression, chronic pain (fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, etc.)] | |
| Obesity (body mass index > 30) | |
| Known food or medication allergy | |
| Cancer, including GI cancer or polyposis syndrome | |
| Travel history | Any history of high-risk travel in the past six months |
| Social history | Any history of |
| High risk sexual behavior | |
| Imprisonment | |
| Illicit drug use | |
| Body modifications such as tattooing, piercing, etc., in the past six months | |
| Occupational activity in a hospital or other health-care institution with patient contact; occupational activity in agriculture | |
| Family history | Any history of premature colon cancer or early onset polyposis syndromes in first-degree family members |
| Treatment history | Any history of |
| Recent hospitalization/discharge from long-term care facilities (past 6 months) | |
| Antibiotic treatment in the past three months | |
| Blood transfusions in the past five years | |
| Long-term drug treatment (e.g., with antibiotics, immunosuppressants, proton pump inhibitors, chemotherapy) | |
| Tissue/organ transplant | |
| Having been a participant in any clinical trial in the past six months | |
| Bowel resection or gastric reduction surgery |
Table 2 Donor blood and stool testing
| Blood testing |
| Complete blood count with differential |
| Blood sugar, renal and liver function tests |
| Hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and hepatitis E viruses |
| HIV-1 and HIV-2 |
| Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus serology |
| Treponema pallidum (syphilis) |
| Nematodes (Strongyloides stercoralis) |
| Stool testing |
| Clostridioides difficile |
| Common enteric pathogens, including Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Yersinia and Vibrio cholerae |
| Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and antimicrobial resistance gene testing |
| Norovirus, rotavirus, adenovirus |
| Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium spp., Isospora, Cyclospora and Microsporidia |
| Protozoa and helminths/ova and parasites (including Entamoeba histolytica, Blastocystis hominis and Dientamoeba fragilis) |
| Helicobacter pylori faecal antigen (for upper route of FMT delivery) |
Table 3 Stool collection, processing and storage
| Processing step | Description | Common variations/methods |
| Stool collection | Freshly passed stool is collected from a healthy, screened donor in a sterile container[17] | Anaerobic conditions: Certain protocols recommend oxygen-free collection and processing methods to preserve strict anaerobes[14,18,19] |
| Pre-collection diet: Some studies suggest a high-fiber diet prior to donation to enhance microbial diversity[20,21] | ||
| Stool quantity | The amount of stool collected varies based on the protocol | Typically, 50-60 g of stool added to 250-300 mL of diluent[5,17]. A minimum of 25 g of feces is recommended for lower GI delivery, and 12.5 g for upper GI delivery[14,15] |
| Diluents/buffer solutions | Stool is diluted with a buffered solution to create a homogeneous slurry, and to a consistency that can be injected through the biopsy channel of scope | Commonly used diluents[5,22]: |
| Normal saline (0.9% NaCl)-Most commonly used | ||
| Sterile water (less preferred due to hypotonicity) | ||
| Phosphate buffered saline | ||
| Non-bacteriostatic saline (used to avoid antimicrobial preservatives) | ||
| Milk or milk-based solutions (rarely) | ||
| Homogenization | Stool sample is mixed with the diluent to create a uniform suspension, ensuring even distribution of microbiota and removal of large particulate matter before filtration | Done by manual stirring with sterile spatula; laboratory blender. Performed under aerobic or anaerobic conditions[18,19] |
| Filtration | Large particles (undigested fiber, debris) are removed | Using[5]: |
| Gauze filtration | ||
| Stainless steel sieve (250-500 μm) | ||
| Sterile mesh filters | ||
| Centrifugation | Further purification or concentration of microbiota; retain microbial rich supernatant | Low (3000-4000 × g), medium (5000-6000 × g) or high (up to 10000 × g) speed centrifugation; relative centrifugal force = 6000 × g for 15 minutes[23]. May be followed by re-suspension in diluent |
| Washing (optional step) | Component of microfiltration plus centrifugation, called washed microbiota transplantation | Integration of multiple filtration and washing steps, often performed using automated purification systems[16]; automated systems (e.g., GenFMTer) reduces host cells, debris, endotoxins (one-hour FMT protocol)[16] |
| Storage and handling | Stool preparation is handled under strict sterile conditions to prevent contamination. Can be used fresh or stored | Fresh use: Stored at 4 °C and used within 6 hours |
| Frozen use: Stored at -80 °C with glycerol (10%) for long-term use (up to 2 years) |
Table 4 Comparative analysis of different stool processing methods
| Method | Pros | Cons | Recommended setting |
| Rough filtration | Simple, low cost | Low microbial purity, higher adverse events | Suitable for basic setups |
| Filtration plus centrifugation | Improved bacterial concentration | Moderate technical demands | Used in standard protocols |
| Microfiltration plus centrifugation | High microbial purity, fewer toxic reactions, delivers a precise dose of the enriched microbiota instead of using the weight of stool | Expensive, automated system e.g., GenFMTer needed | Ideal for advanced centers |
Table 5 Comparison of common methods of fecal microbiota transplantation administration
| Enema | Capsule | Colonoscopy | Nasogastric, nasoduodenal or nasojejunal tube | |
| Delivery | Distal colon | Small intestine/colon | Right colon/terminal ileum | Upper GI tract to stomach/duodenum/jejunum |
| Starting amount of feces | 25-200 g | 80-100 g | 25-200 g | 12.5-150 g |
| Final delivery volume per dose | 300-500 mL | 30-40 capsules | 30-500 mL | 30-500 mL |
| Pros | Well tolerated, no sedation, can be done at home | Non-invasive, faster, well-tolerated | Higher efficacy | Minimally invasive, avoids sedation risks |
| Cons | Retention difficulty, lower efficacy | Requires multiple doses, risk of gastric acid degradation; avoid FMT capsules if the patient has dysphagia, difficulty swallowing pills or gastroparesis | Invasive, requires sedation, risk of perforation | Risk of aspiration, patient discomfort |
Table 6 Fecal microbiota transplantation: Current uses and future horizons
| Established indication | |
| Clostridioides difficile infection[7,11-14,48] | |
| Investigational/emerging indications | |
| Ulcerative colitis[45,49] | Primary sclerosing cholangitis[62,63] |
| Crohn’s Disease[47,50] | Intestinal pseudoobstruction[64] |
| Pouchitis[51] | Neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis)[65] |
| Irritable Bowel Syndrome[52] | Graft vs host disease[66] |
| Alcoholic hepatitis[53] | Human immunodeficiency virus[67] |
| Cirrhosis or hepatic encephalopathy[54] | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus enterocolitis[68] |
| Obesity/metabolic syndrome[55] | Multidrug-resistant organisms[69] |
| Diabetes mellitus[56] | Post-stem cell transplant[70] |
| NAFLD/NASH[57] | Autologous FMT (preventive)[71,72] |
| Hepatitis B[58,59] | Autism spectrum disorders[73] |
| Pancreatitis[60] | Cancer[74] |
| Immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance[61] | Fecal incontinence[75] |
Table 7 Regulatory variations in fecal microbiota transplantation
| Country | FMT classification |
| United States | Restricted use in CDI in line with FDA enforcement discretion policy[78]; investigational new drug approval used in context of clinical trials for other diseases |
| Belgium, Netherlands, Italy | Regulated as a tissue transplant, under European Union Tissue and Cells Directive |
| Australia | Regulated as a biological drug |
| United Kingdom, Germany, France, Ireland, Switzerland | Regulated as a medicinal drug -flexible use allowed |
- Citation: Mundhra SK, Kochhar R. Methodological insights into fecal microbiota transplantation: Dissecting key approaches for success. World J Methodol 2026; 16(1): 108875
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i1/108875.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108875
