BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Mar 20, 2026; 16(1): 106277
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.106277
Table 1 Risk of bias assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool
Criteria
An et al[19]
Liu et al[18]
Zeng et al[17]
Zhang et al[16]
Xu et al[15]
Lau et al[14]
Liu[13]
Similar groups from the same populationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Exposures measured similarlyYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Exposure is measured validly and reliablyYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Confounding factors identifiedYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Strategies to deal with confounding factorsYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Groups are free of outcome at the startYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Outcomes are measured validly and reliablyYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Follow-up time reported and sufficientYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Follow up complete or reason for loss describedYesYesYesYesYesYesUnclear
Strategies to address incomplete follow-upYesYesYesYesYesYesUnclear
Appropriate statistical analysisYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Overall appraisalIncludeIncludeIncludeIncludeIncludeIncludeInclude
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of population from included studies- demographics, n (%)
Ref.
Study type
Country
Duration in years (n)
Follow up in years (n)
Sample size (n)
Age in years (mean ± SD)
Males
Body mass index (kg/m2) (mean ± SD)
An et al[19]PChina2413853 ± 1781 (58.7)21.9 ± 2.7
Liu et al[18]RChina79177847.4 ± 15.61058 (59.5)21.5 ± 3.0
Zeng et al[17]RChina7.53150251 ± 15.5a852 (56.7)a22.1 ± 3.04
Zhang et al[16]PChina5.42.414054.7 ± 15.7a84 (57.1)23.47 ± 3.7
Xu et al[15]PChina15N/A378N/AN/AN/A
Lau et al[14]RChina2122559 ± 12.3129 (57.3)N/A
Liu[13]RChina1N/A189N/AN/AN/A
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of study population from included studies- blood parameters and comorbidities, n (%)
Ref.
Serum albumin (g/dL) (mean ± SD)
Absolute neutrophil (109/L) (mean ± SD)
Absolute lymphocytes (109/L) (mean ± SD)
Leukocytes (109/L) (mean ± SD)
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (mean ± SD)
Hemoglobin (g/dL) (mean ± SD)
C-reactive protein (mg/dL) (mean ± SD)
Cholesterol (mg/dL) (mean ± SD)
Diabetes mellitus
An et al[19]3.9 ± 0.55.0 ± 1.7a1.5 ± 0.5aN/A3.33 ± 3.4100.2 ± 20.31.3 ± 0.9a216.6 ± 5833 (23.9)
Liu et al[18]3.7 ± 0.5N/AN/A6.6 ± 0.522.87 ± 0.3101 ± 21N/A189 ± 11449 (25.3)
Zeng et al[17]3.5 ± 0.5a4.1 ± 1.6a1.2 ± 0.52a6.1 ± 2.0a3.3 ± 1.5a8.7 ± 1.9aN/A162.4 ± 42.9342 (22.8)
Zhang et al[16]3.5 ± 54.4 ± 2.1a1.4 ± 0.6a6.5 ± 2.4a2.87 ± 0.48.8 ± 2.23.15 ± 1.7162.02 ± 44.931 (22)
Xu et al[15]3 ± 0N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Lau et al[14]3.5 ± 0.44.6 ± 2.0a1.1 ± 0.4a6.6 ± 2.2a3.9 ± 3.06a8.9 ± 1.30.41 ± 0.3N/A115 (51.1)
Liu[13]3 ± 0N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Table 4 Subgroup meta-analysis for all-cause mortality
Variables
Number of studies
Number of patients
Adjusted hazard ratio (95%CI)
P value
I2
Study design
    Prospective36561.06 (0.58-1.97)0.8483.6
    Retrospective321291.10 (1.00-1.21)0.04777
Sample size
    < 35046921.27 (0.74-2.15)0.3884.8
    ≥ 350336581.11 (1.03-1.19)0.00461.3
Males
    < 59216400.90 (0.37-2.18)0.8190.1
    ≥ 59321431.08 (1.02-1.14)0.0145.8
Diabetes
    < 32317801.18 (0.55-2.56)0.6785.4
    ≥ 32220031.07 (1.04-1.10)< 0.0001< 0.0001
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (109/L)
    2.87-3.2219181.47 (0.64-3.41)0.3772.2
    3.3-3.89318650.99 (0.69-1.42)0.9680.4
Serum albumin (g/dL)
    < 3.5320691.42 (1.01-1.99)0.0476.4
    ≥ 3.5422811.05 (0.95-1.17)0.3273.6