Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Dec 20, 2025; 15(4): 107166
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.107166
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.107166
Table 1 Various trials on artificial intelligence in ophthalmology
Ref. | Data included | Results |
Kanagasingam et al[43], 2018 | A total of 216 patients, out of which 193 agreed to undergo eye screening. 386 images were evaluated by an AI-based system and by an ophthalmologist | Specificity: 92%; Positive predictive value 12%; Detection of false positive cases attributed to poor image quality |
Arenas-Cavalli et al[44], 2022 | Examination of 1123 diabetic eyes, utilizing a well-designed protocol endorsed by the Chilean Ministry of Health Personnel and Retina Specialists | Sensitivity: 94.6%; Specificity: 74.3% |
Peeters et al[10], 2023 | Analysis of a dataset comprising 16,772 cases of DR and 16833 cases of DME unique patient visits | Specificity for DR: 94.24%; Sensitivity for DME: 90.91%; Sensitivity in patients aged over 65 years: 82.51% |
Brown et al[45], 2018 | Utilization of 100 test images in Retinopathy of Prematurity using Inception–V1 and U-Net CNN | Predicted sensitivity: 100%; Predicted specificity: 94% |
Ting et al[9], 2019 | Incorporation of ten external datasets from various countries (Japan, United States, Hong Kong, Mexico, and Australia) employing the Deep Learning Algorithm VGG-19 | Sensitivity in referable DR: 90.5%; Specificity in referable DR: 91.6% |
Morya et al[52], 2021; Morya et al[53], 2021 | World's first Smartphone based AI Annotation tool for grading multiple retinal images in a shortest span – quantitative and qualitative analysis | DR; AMD; Glaucoma; Retinitis Pigmentosa; CSR etc. |
Table 2 Various algorithms used in diabetic retinopathy as follows
Study conducted | Algorithms used | Identified and diagnosed |
A retrospective study by Liu et al[46], 2022, using traditional fundus images | EfficientNet-B5 | DME |
A retrospective study by Dai et al[47], 2021 | ResNet and Mask R-CNN | DR grading |
A retrospective study by Lee et al[48], 2021 | OpthAI, AirDoc, Eyenuk, Retina AI Health, Retmarker | Referable DR detection |
A prospective study by Heydon et al[49], 2020 | EyeArt v2.1 | Referable DR detection |
A prospective study by Gulshan et al[50], 2019 | Inception-v3 | Referable DR detection |
Akram et al[51] proposed an automated module | MESSIDOR database used | Proposed an automated module for the grading of diabetic maculopathy |
Table 3 Artificial intelligence use in non-ophthalmologic disease
Diseases | Artificial intelligence algorithm |
Autism spectrum disorder[68] | DL model based on OCT images and automatic retinal image analysis |
Chronic kidney disease[69] | Elevated urine albumin/creatinine ratio associated with reduction in retinal and choroid vasculature density in OCT or OCT angiography studies |
Iron deficiency anemia[70] | Lower retinal vessel density and reduced vessel light reflectance observed in OCT images |
Intracranial hypertension[71] | Brain and Optic nerve study (BONSAI) AI, U-Net and DenseNet networks used and Papilledema, optic atrophy and optic disc drusen observed, with 96.4% sensitivity and 84% specificity in detecting papilloedema and normal ONH |
Alzheimer’s disease[62] | DL model using retinal images showed 83.6% accuracy, 93.2% sensitivity, 82.0% specificity, and an AUROC of 0.93 for detecting Alzheimer's disease-dementia |
- Citation: Kaur R, Morya AK, Gupta PC, Aggarwal S, Menia NK, Kaur A, Kaur S, Sinha S. Artificial intelligence-based apps for screening and diagnosing diabetic retinopathy and common ocular disorders. World J Methodol 2025; 15(4): 107166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i4/107166.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.107166