Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Dec 20, 2025; 15(4): 104497
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.104497
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.104497
Table 1 Indications for different thickness cords
| Cord | Indications |
| 000 | Anterior teeth |
| Double packing | |
| Substitute for black silk suture as lower cord in the “two-cord” | |
| technique | |
| 00 | Preparing and cementing veneers |
| Restorative procedures dealing with thin, friable tissues | |
| 0 | Lower anteriors |
| When luting near gingival and subgingival veneers | |
| Class III, IV and V restorations | |
| Second cord for “two-cord” technique | |
| 1 | Tissue control and/or displacement when soaked in coagulative hemostatic solution prior to and/or after crown preparations |
| Protective “pre-preparation” cord on anteriors | |
| 2 | Upper cord for “two-cord” technique |
| Tissue control and/or displacement when soaked in coagulative | |
| Hemostatic solution prior to and/or after crown preparations | |
| Protective “pre-preparation” cord on anteriors | |
| 3 | Areas that have fairly thick gingival tissues where a significant amount of force is required |
| Upper cord for those desiring the “two-cord” technique |
Table 2 The advantages and disadvantages of different chemical agents
| Chemicals | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Epinephrine | Good tissue displacement | Systemic reactions |
| Minimal tissue loss | Epinephrine syndrome | |
| Good hemostasis | Risk of inflammation of the gingival cuff | |
| Rebound hyperemia | ||
| Risk of tissue necrosis | ||
| Alum | Minimal tissue loss | Less hemostasis and tissue displacement |
| Extended working time | Offensive taste | |
| Risk of necrosis if in high concentration | ||
| Aluminum chloride | Minimal tissue loss | Local tissue destruction |
| Good hemostasis | Less vasoconstriction than epinephrine | |
| No systemic effects | Risk of sulcus contamination | |
| Least irritating of all chemicals | Modifies surface detail reproduction | |
| Hemostasis | Inhibits set of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impressions | |
| Little sulcus collapse after cord removal | ||
| Ferric sulfate | Compatible with aluminum chloride | Non compatible with epinephrine |
| Tissue discoloration | ||
| Good displacement | Acidic taste | |
| Risk of sulcus contamination Inhibits set of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impressions | ||
| Tannic acid | Good tissue response | Less displacement |
| Minimal hemostasis |
- Citation: Chauhan R, Chauhan S, Padiyar N, Kaurani P, Gupta A, Khan FN. Present status and future directions: Soft tissue management in prosthodontics. World J Methodol 2025; 15(4): 104497
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i4/104497.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.104497
