Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Methodol. May 20, 2022; 12(3): 83-91
Published online May 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.83
Published online May 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.83
Ref. | Diagnostic method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Time to result |
Liu et al[23] | ELISA (IgM/IgG) | 57.9%-90.7% | No cross-reactivity observed | About 100 min |
Cai et al[24] | CLIA (IgM/IgG/IgM and IgG) | 57.2%-81.5% | No cross-reactivity observed | ND |
Montesinos et al[25] | LFA (IgM/IgG/IgM and IgG) | ~70.0% | 95.8%-100% | About 10 min |
Scohy et al[52] | Antigen detection | 30.2% | 100% | About 15 min |
Porte et al[54] | Antigen detection | 93.9% | 100% | About 15 min |
Suo et al[19] | RT-PCR | 94.0% | 100% | ND |
Österdahl et al[26] | RT-LAMP | 80.0% | 73%–100% | About 25 min |
Dao Thi et al[27] | RT-LAMP | 97.5% | 99.7% | About 30 min |
Ai et al[28] | Chest CT | 97.0% | 25% | ND |
- Citation: Luz MS, da Silva Júnior RT, Santos de Santana GA, Rodrigues GS, Crivellaro HL, Calmon MS, dos Santos CFSM, Silva LGO, Ferreira QR, Mota GR, Heim H, Silva FAFD, de Brito BB, de Melo FF. Molecular and serology methods in the diagnosis of COVID-19: An overview. World J Methodol 2022; 12(3): 83-91
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v12/i3/83.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.83