BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews Open Access
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 111485
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.111485
Eco-corona: A new frontier in understanding micro- and nanoplastic-gut interactions
Jean Demarquoy, Université de Bourgogne, Institut Agro-INRAe, Dijon 21000, France
Haifa Othman, Université de Bourgogne, Institut Agro-INRAe, Unité Mixte de Recherche Procédés Alimentaires et Microbioogiques, Dijon 21000, France
ORCID number: Jean Demarquoy (0000-0002-0787-219X); Haifa Othman (0000-0002-8202-6153).
Author contributions: Demarquoy J and Othman H authors contributed to the information gathering, manuscript writing, figure creation, and revision of the document.
AI contribution statement: Grammarly was used for language polishing only. No other AI tools were employed, and no AI-generated content, data analysis, or images were included. All work was done independently by the authors.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this.
Corresponding author: Jean Demarquoy, PhD, Professor, Université de Bourgogne, Institut Agro-INRAe, 6 Blvd Gabriel, Dijon 21000, France. jean.demarquoy@u-bourgogne.fr
Received: July 1, 2025
Revised: August 4, 2025
Accepted: November 26, 2025
Published online: September 20, 2026
Processing time: 374 Days and 21.1 Hours

Abstract

Plastics released into natural environments undergo complex transformations, ending in the spontaneous formation of an “eco-corona”, a dynamic layer of adsorbed organic molecules, biomolecules, and microorganisms. This eco-corona profoundly alters the physicochemical identity of micro- and nanoplastics, modulating their environmental fate, pollutant adsorption, cellular uptake, and toxicity. Emerging evidence shows that eco-corona-coated plastics can act as vectors for environmental pollutants and microbial pathogens, raising significant concerns for ecosystems and human health, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract. Eco-corona dynamics influence colloidal stability, pollutant vectorization, immune responses, and interactions with the gut microbiota, potentially contributing to barrier dysfunction, inflammation, and microbiota dysbiosis. However, major knowledge gaps persist regarding the real-world composition and evolution of eco-coronas, their interplay with biological coronas, and their long-term impacts on health. This mini review synthesizes current insights into eco-corona formation, its modulation of micro- and nanoplastic behavior and toxicity, and highlights critical research priorities to better understand and mitigate the emerging risks at the interface between plastic pollution and gastroenterology.

Key Words: Eco-corona; Microplastics; Nanoplastics; Environmental toxicity; Gut microbiota; Pollutant vectorization; Gastrointestinal health; Gastrointestinal barrier

Core Tip: Eco-coronas form spontaneously on micro- and nanoplastics in natural environments, giving them new bioactive surfaces that influence their interactions with living systems. By modifying the behavior of plastics in the gut, influencing microbial composition, immune responses, and barrier integrity, eco-coronas appear as a critical yet insufficiently explored factor in evaluating the health risks associated with plastic ingestion. Understanding these transformations is key to advancing both environmental and gastrointestinal toxicology.



INTRODUCTION

Plastics released into the environment undergo a series of physical, chemical, and biological transformations that progressively reduce their size and alter their surface properties, ultimately leading to the formation of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs). The initial stages typically involve photodegradation induced by ultraviolet radiation, which breaks down polymer chains and introduces oxygen-containing functional groups[1]. This oxidation weakens the plastic matrix, making it more susceptible to mechanical fragmentation from wind, wave action, or abrasion against sediments and rocks[2]. Over time, thermal oxidation, hydrolysis, and biofouling by microbial communities further degrade the material and facilitate its disintegration[3]. These processes result in MNPs with increased surface roughness, altered chemical reactivity, and enhanced potential for eco-corona formation. The rate and extent of degradation depend on the polymer type, environmental conditions, and exposure duration, with plastics like polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene showing particularly high fragmentation potential in both marine and terrestrial environments[4]. While the concept of protein coronas on engineered nanomaterials is well established[5], the eco-corona on environmental plastics has only recently gathered attention, particularly regarding health and ecological implications. Eco-corona-coated plastics no longer behave as pristine materials; instead, they acquire new biological identities that modulate cellular uptake, immune responses, pollutant adsorption, and toxicity[6].

Recent studies show that eco-coronas can act as vectors for environmental pollutants, heavy metals, and microbial pathogens, thereby amplifying potential health risks through mechanisms such as synergistic toxicity, immune system modulation, and Trojan horse effects, in which harmful substances or microorganisms are covertly transported into biological systems by being hidden within or adsorbed onto MNPs, allowing them to bypass biological defenses and enter cells more easily[7]. Their composition is highly dynamic, shaped by environmental conditions (such as organic matter type, pH, and ionic strength) and intrinsic particle properties (such as polymer type and surface aging)[8]. Despite growing concern, substantial knowledge gaps persist regarding how eco-corona formation influences the interactions between MNPs and host organisms, particularly the gut microbiota and immune barriers[9]. This mini review aims to summarize the current understanding of eco-corona formation, its drivers, its modulation of MNPs properties, its role in transporting chemical and biological hazards, and its emerging impact on health, while highlighting critical research perspectives.

ECO-CORONA FORMATION: MECHANISMS AND COMPOSITION

Upon release into natural environments, MNPs interact immediately with surrounding biomolecules, leading to spontaneous eco-corona formation[10]. This process is governed by a combination of van der Waals forces, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic attractions[6]. Adsorbed molecules include humic substances, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), proteins, lipids, polysaccharides, and small metabolites[11]. The eco-corona composition is highly sensitive to both the type of polymer, which determines surface energy and hydrophobicity, and environmental parameters such as ionic strength, temperature, and pH[12]. Aging processes, including photochemical degradation and oxidative weathering, generate surface functional groups (e.g., carbonyl, hydroxyl) that enhance the complexity and reactivity of the eco-corona[13].

Recent studies have shown that eco-corona composition varies significantly across environments, shaping how plastics interact with surrounding biotic and abiotic components. In freshwater systems, eco-coronas are typically enriched with humic substances, whereas in marine environments they are dominated by microbial EPS[14,15]. In soils, the eco-corona is generally composed of humic and fulvic acids, proteins, lipids, polysaccharides, microbial cells, and inorganic particles such as clay minerals[16]. Compared to aquatic systems, the soil eco-corona reflects a more complex and heterogeneous mixture. These compositional differences influence the surface properties of plastic particles and modulate their interactions with pollutants such as heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and pesticides[17], as well as with soil microbiota and biotic interfaces like plant roots or soil fauna.

Significantly, the eco-corona evolves dynamically through competitive adsorption phenomena, commonly referred to as the “Vroman effect”, where higher-affinity biomolecules gradually displace weaker ones[18,19]. This continual remodeling further complicates predictions of MNP behavior and biological interactions in real environments[20,21]. Advanced spectroscopic and omics approaches are necessary to resolve the molecular diversity and functional properties of eco-coronas[22]. Table 1 presents the main components identified in the eco-corona, including those commonly found in soil, freshwater, and seawater environments. Figure 1 illustrates the sequence of eco-corona formation, pollutant adsorption, microbial colonization, and the subsequent impacts on gut physiology and microbiota.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the origin and potential toxic effects of eco-corona-coated micro- and nanoplastics. The process begins with the fragmentation of plastic debris into microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics under the influence of environmental stressors such as ultraviolet radiation, mechanical abrasion (e.g., waves), microbial activity, and temperature fluctuations (step 1). Once fragmented, these pristine nano- and microplastics interact with environmental macromolecules, including lipids, proteins, humic substances, and pollutants, leading to the formation of an eco-corona on their surface (step 2). These eco-corona-coated nano- and microplastics can then interact with living organisms, including plants, animals, and humans, at cellular or systemic levels, potentially disrupting biological functions (step 3). Ultimately, these interactions may lead to ecotoxic effects in ecosystems and adverse health outcomes in humans, such as microbiota dysbiosis (step 4). NMs: Nano-microplastics. Some vector elements used in this figure were provided by Vecteezy (available from: https://www.vecteezy.com/).
Table 1 Adsorbed compounds on micro- and nanoplastics biomolecules.
Compound
Environmental occurrence
Environmental relevance
ProteinsAll environmentsFacilitate cellular uptake mechanisms
LipidsAll environmentsEnhance hydrophobic interactions
PolysaccharidesAquatic systemsPromote biofilm development
Nucleic acidsAll environmentsSupport intercellular communication and adhesion
Humic acidsSoil, freshwaterMajor organic fraction of soil and freshwater; influences sorption processes
Fulvic acidsSoilModulate redox reactions and metal mobility
Amino acidsSoilAdsorb onto plastic surfaces in terrestrial systems
NucleotidesSoilFundamental building blocks of genetic and metabolic materials
PhenylpropanoidsSoilDerived from plant degradation; may affect microbial and enzymatic interactions
Pollutants
Heavy metalsAll environmentsRepresent vectors for metal toxicity via surface binding
PAHsAll environmentsEnhance pollutant sorption and increase toxicological risks
PCBsAll environmentsPersistent organic pollutants; accumulate and biomagnify in ecosystems
PesticidesAll environmentsAgricultural contaminants transported via plastic vectors
Microbiological components
Microbial EPSMarine systemsContribute to biofilm formation and microbial colonization on plastics
ECO-CORONA MODULATION OF MNP PROPERTIES

Eco-corona formation alters the surface properties of plastics, modifying their physicochemical behavior and environmental interactions, significantly altering their fate and biological interactions. Surface charge modulation due to adsorbed biomolecules affects colloidal stability, aggregation, and interactions with cells and other particles. Changes in hydrophobicity impact the dispersibility of plastics in aquatic media and the tendency to sorb hydrophobic pollutants[23]. Colloidal stability can be improved through steric hindrance and electrostatic repulsion, but it can also be disrupted when particles are linked together by bridging flocculation. Consequently, eco-corona-modified plastics can persist longer in suspension or settle rapidly, influencing their environmental distribution[24].

Biologically, eco-corona-coated particles exhibit altered rates and pathways of cellular uptake. Recognition by scavenger receptors, modulation of endocytosis, and differential intracellular trafficking have been reported[15,17,18]. Experimental studies show that particles exposed to natural aquatic environments, acquiring an eco-corona, are more efficiently internalized by macrophages via scavenger receptor-mediated phagocytosis, whereas pristine particles exhibit minimal uptake under similar conditions[14]. Spectroscopic analyses confirm that the eco-corona comprises adsorbed biomolecules such as proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates, which enhance particle-cell interactions and facilitate endocytosis. Once internalized, these coated particles follow altered intracellular trafficking pathways and may accumulate in lysosomes[25], triggering oxidative stress and immune responses. Moreover, the eco-corona serves as a hotspot for pollutant accumulation, leading to enhanced vectorization of contaminants. This raises concerns regarding combined or synergistic toxicities, where MNPs act as carriers for chemicals and microorganisms that otherwise would have lower bioavailability[26].

ECO-CORONA AS A VECTOR FOR BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL HAZARDS

The eco-corona enables MNPs to act as efficient vectors for a broad spectrum of hazards. Ramsperger et al[14] demonstrated that MNPs exposed to aquatic environments show significantly higher internalization by macrophages, attributed to eco-corona formation. Conversely, Ekvall et al[15] reported that eco-coronas reduced nanoparticle toxicity in Daphnia magna, highlighting a complex balance between protection and facilitation of hazards. Giri et al[17] and Natarajan et al[19] showed that EPS-derived eco-coronas can mitigate the combined toxicity of pollutants such as bisphenol A and nanoplastics. Other studies demonstrated enhanced adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, and heavy metals onto eco-corona-coated plastics, facilitating bioaccumulation and secondary toxicity[27].

The composition of the eco-corona forming on MNPs is highly heterogeneous and depends on both the physicochemical properties of the plastic and the surrounding environmental matrix. Studies have shown that plastics exposed to soil environments acquire eco-coronas rich in lipids, nucleosides, phenylpropanoids, and amino acids, likely through direct adsorption or via macromolecule-mediated interactions[16]. In aquatic systems, the eco-corona often includes proteins, polysaccharides, and microbial EPS, which facilitate microbial colonization and biofilm formation[28]. Additionally, eco-coronas can enhance the adsorption of co-contaminants, thereby increasing the environmental mobility and toxicity of plastic particles[29].

Beyond chemical vectors, eco-coronas promote microbial colonization and survival on plastics. This “plastisphere” is enriched with potentially pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant bacteria[30], raising concerns about environmental and food chain transmission. Although the eco-corona is influenced by environmental context, detectable patterns emerge based on polymer properties. For instance, PE rapidly adsorbs metabolites from soil, forming a stable ecocorona via direct metabolite adsorption or macromolecule-mediated bridging[16]. Meanwhile, polymers such as PE terephthalate and polystyrene, especially after aging and exposure to ultraviolet, exhibit higher affinity for proteins, resulting in eco-coronas that support distinct biofilm communities. Surface aging increases roughness and oxygen-containing functional groups, enhancing corona complexity across polymer types and promoting pollutant binding and microbial adhesion[31,32].

IMPACTS ON HUMAN AND ANIMAL HEALTH

Eco-corona-modified plastics interact intimately with biological barriers. Upon ingestion or inhalation, eco-corona properties influence mucosal adhesion, epithelial penetration, and immune activation[33]. Altered cellular uptake and extended tissue retention of plastics, driven by eco-corona shielding mechanisms, may intensify the risks associated with chronic exposure. Elevated reactive oxygen species generation, mitochondrial damage, lipid peroxidation, and DNA fragmentation have been documented following eco-corona-modified MNP exposure. These stress responses contribute to inflammatory processes implicated in diseases such as asthma, cardiovascular disease, and neurodegenerative disorders[34]. The gut microbiota appears particularly vulnerable to disruption by MNPs, a susceptibility that may be further exacerbated when microplastics (MPs) acquire an eco-corona. Experimental studies in mice and zebrafish have demonstrated that ingested eco-corona-modified MPs can significantly alter the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota, leading to dysbiosis marked by a decline in beneficial commensal bacteria and a rise in opportunistic taxa[7].

These shifts are often accompanied by a reduction in short-chain fatty acid production, key microbial metabolites involved in maintaining epithelial integrity and regulating immune responses[35]. Furthermore, MPs have been shown to impair gut barrier function by disrupting tight junction proteins, increasing intestinal permeability, and promoting low-grade inflammation. While the role of the eco-corona in modulating these effects has yet to be fully elucidated, its influence on surface chemistry and co-contaminant loading may enhance the capacity of MPs to interfere with host-microbe interactions and barrier integrity[36].

These coated particles affect gastrointestinal health through multiple, interrelated mechanisms. By altering surface charge, hydrophobicity, and aggregation behavior, the eco-corona modifies the physicochemical properties of MPs. This may influence the bioavailability and interactions with the intestinal epithelial surfaces of these modified MNPs. Moreover, the eco-corona can act as a carrier for co-contaminants, such as heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, and pathogenic microorganisms, thereby increasing the likelihood of intestinal inflammation and immune activation upon ingestion. Once in the gut, these particles may exacerbate dysbiosis and metabolic disturbances[37]. They have also been shown to impair intestinal barrier function by disrupting tight junction proteins and promoting oxidative stress, ultimately contributing to increased gut permeability and chronic low-grade inflammation[27]. In aquatic organisms, eco-corona-coated plastics have been linked to bioaccumulation of pollutants, reproductive impairments, oxidative damage, and behavioral alterations[38]. While direct evidence in humans remains limited, parallels with findings from mammalian models justify serious concern.

To date, no epidemiological studies have directly examined the health impacts of ecocorona-coated MNPs in humans, largely because it remains extremely difficult to trace the environmental history and surface properties of internalized particles. However, a landmark observational study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2024) detected MNPs, primarily PE and polyvinyl chloride, in about 58% of carotid artery plaques taken from patients during surgical removal[39]. Over a mean follow-up of approximately 34 months, individuals with detectable MNPs in plaque exhibited a 4.5-fold higher risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death compared to those without detectable plastics (adjusted hazard ratio = 4.53, 95% confidence interval: 2.00-10.27).

Conducting epidemiological studies that explicitly link eco-corona characteristics to health outcomes would require advanced analytical techniques to characterize particle coronas in situ and rigorous control of confounders, complicating both study design and interpretation. The detection of MNPs in human feces confirms that ingestion and gastrointestinal transit occur[40]. However, whether these excreted particles retain their original environmental eco-coronas or instead acquire new biomolecular coatings during digestion remains unknown. As highlighted by Hartmann et al[41], the eco-corona critically alters MNP identity and biological interactions, yet its fate within the human gastrointestinal tract has not been investigated. This represents a major gap in our understanding of how MNPs interact with the gut environment and influence health outcomes through mechanisms such as barrier disruption, immune modulation, or microbiota alteration.

RESEARCH GAPS AND PERSPECTIVES

Despite recent advances, significant knowledge gaps persist in understanding the eco-corona and its implications for MNP toxicity. Comprehensive characterization of eco-corona composition under environmentally realistic conditions remains limited. Employing multi-omics approaches alongside advanced mass spectrometry and high-resolution microscopy is essential to map the molecular diversity and functional roles of eco-coronas. The dynamic evolution of eco-coronas across environmental gradients, such as freshwater, marine, soil, and atmospheric systems, and over time, remains poorly understood[32]. Clarifying how these variations affect plastic bioavailability, pollutant adsorption, and toxicity is critical for accurate hazard prediction.

Another emerging frontier involves the interplay between eco-corona formation and protein coronas that develop upon biological contact. The structure and function of hybrid coronas, and their influence on immune responses, intracellular trafficking, and microbial interactions, remain to be fully elucidated[42]. In addition, the mechanistic links between eco-corona-mediated disruption of the gut microbiota and downstream systemic health effects, including inflammation and epithelial barrier dysfunction, are still speculative and warrant focused investigation[43]. Current toxicological models often underestimate the complexity introduced by eco-corona-modified plastics. There is a pressing need for more sophisticated in vitro and in vivo models that reflect environmentally relevant corona compositions and behaviors.

Finally, studies addressing chronic, low-dose, and multigenerational exposures to eco-corona-coated plastics are scarce. Establishing dose-response relationships and identifying biomarkers of eco-corona exposure will be essential for future environmental and health risk assessments. To date, no epidemiological studies have directly examined the health impacts of eco-corona-coated MNPs in humans, largely because it remains extremely difficult to trace the environmental history and surface properties of internalized particles.

CONCLUSION

The eco-corona fundamentally redefines the environmental and biological behavior of MNPs. Far from being inert particles, eco-corona-coated plastics act as dynamic biological entities capable of transporting hazardous pollutants and microorganisms and triggering complex host responses. Future research must prioritize realistic environmental scenarios, mechanistic studies, and integrative modeling approaches. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to consider eco-corona dynamics when evaluating MNP risks. Recognizing the eco-corona as a critical mediator between MNPs and biological systems is essential to accurately assess, mitigate, and eventually control the health and environmental impacts of plastic pollution in the Anthropocene.

Managing the risks associated with eco-corona-coated MNPs presents a multifaceted challenge, as these dynamic surface layers can enhance pollutant adsorption, microbial colonization, and toxicity. Currently, no specific intervention strategies exist to selectively prevent or mitigate eco-corona formation in the environment. However, risk reduction can be approached through upstream actions such as reducing plastic emissions into natural environments, improving wastewater treatment technologies to retain or degrade MNPs, and limiting the release of co-contaminants that are known to adsorb onto plastic surfaces. In parallel, research efforts are needed to develop surface-engineered plastics with reduced corona-forming capacity or to identify microbial or enzymatic systems capable of degrading eco-corona-coated particles. Ultimately, understanding the eco-corona as a modifiable interface opens new avenues for controlling MNP behavior and toxicity. Incorporating eco-corona dynamics into environmental risk assessments and regulatory frameworks will be essential for anticipating long-term impacts and designing effective mitigation strategies.

References
1.  Gewert B, Plassmann MM, MacLeod M. Pathways for degradation of plastic polymers floating in the marine environment. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2015;17:1513-1521.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 743]  [Cited by in RCA: 873]  [Article Influence: 79.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Andrady AL. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011;62:1596-1605.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4085]  [Cited by in RCA: 4029]  [Article Influence: 268.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Pfohl P, Santizo K, Sipe J, Wiesner M, Harrison S, Svendsen C, Wohlleben W. Environmental degradation and fragmentation of microplastics: dependence on polymer type, humidity, UV dose and temperature. Micropl &Nanopl. 2025;5:7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
4.  Ter Halle A, Ladirat L, Martignac M, Mingotaud AF, Boyron O, Perez E. To what extent are microplastics from the open ocean weathered? Environ Pollut. 2017;227:167-174.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 254]  [Cited by in RCA: 293]  [Article Influence: 32.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:779-786.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2031]  [Cited by in RCA: 1989]  [Article Influence: 142.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Velzeboer I, Kwadijk CJ, Koelmans AA. Strong sorption of PCBs to nanoplastics, microplastics, carbon nanotubes, and fullerenes. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:4869-4876.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 597]  [Cited by in RCA: 623]  [Article Influence: 51.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Liu S, Zhang X, Zeng K, He C, Huang Y, Xin G, Huang X. Insights into eco-corona formation and its role in the biological effects of nanomaterials from a molecular mechanisms perspective. Sci Total Environ. 2023;858:159867.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Galloway TS, Lewis CN. Marine microplastics spell big problems for future generations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:2331-2333.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 246]  [Cited by in RCA: 296]  [Article Influence: 29.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Wright SL, Kelly FJ. Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue? Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:6634-6647.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1352]  [Cited by in RCA: 1663]  [Article Influence: 184.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
10.  Kihara S, Köper I, Mata JP, McGillivray DJ. Reviewing nanoplastic toxicology: It's an interface problem. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;288:102337.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in RCA: 76]  [Article Influence: 15.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Lambert S, Vercauteren M, Catarino AI, Li Y, Van Landuyt J, Boon N, Everaert G, De Rijcke M, Janssen CR, Asselman J. Aerosolization of micro- and nanoplastics via sea spray: Investigating the role of polymer type, size, and concentration, and potential implications for human exposure. Environ Pollut. 2024;351:124105.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Rex M C, Debroy A, Nirmala MJ, Mukherjee A. Ecotoxicological significance of bio-corona formation on micro/nanoplastics in aquatic organisms. RSC Adv. 2023;13:22905-22917.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Fadare OO, Wan B, Liu K, Yang Y, Zhao L, Guo LH. Eco-Corona vs Protein Corona: Effects of Humic Substances on Corona Formation and Nanoplastic Particle Toxicity in Daphnia magna. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54:8001-8009.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in RCA: 109]  [Article Influence: 18.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Ramsperger AFRM, Narayana VKB, Gross W, Mohanraj J, Thelakkat M, Greiner A, Schmalz H, Kress H, Laforsch C. Environmental exposure enhances the internalization of microplastic particles into cells. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabd1211.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 115]  [Cited by in RCA: 216]  [Article Influence: 36.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Ekvall MT, Hedberg J, Odnevall Wallinder I, Malmendal A, Hansson LA, Cedervall T. Adsorption of bio-organic eco-corona molecules reduces the toxic response to metallic nanoparticles in Daphnia magna. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10784.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Yao S, Li X, Wang T, Jiang X, Song Y, Arp HPH. Soil Metabolome Impacts the Formation of the Eco-corona and Adsorption Processes on Microplastic Surfaces. Environ Sci Technol. 2023;57:8139-8148.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Giri S, Christudoss AC, Chandrasekaran N, Peijnenburg WJGM, Mukherjee A. The role of algal EPS in reducing the combined toxicity of BPA and polystyrene nanoparticles to the freshwater algae Scenedesmus obliquus. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023;197:107664.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Kelpsiene E, Chang T, Khort A, Bernfur K, Odnevall I, Cedervall T, Hua J. The effect of natural biomolecules on yttrium oxide nanoparticles from a Daphnia magna survival rate perspective. Nanotoxicology. 2023;17:385-399.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Natarajan L, Annie Jenifer M, Peijnenburg WJGM, Mukherjee A. Algal extracellular polymeric substances (algal-EPS) for mitigating the combined toxic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics and nano-TiO(2) in Chlorella sp. Nanotoxicology. 2023;17:143-156.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Lambert S, Wagner M. Characterisation of nanoplastics during the degradation of polystyrene. Chemosphere. 2016;145:265-268.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 595]  [Cited by in RCA: 632]  [Article Influence: 63.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Schefer RB, Armanious A, Mitrano DM. Eco-Corona Formation on Plastics: Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Matter to Pristine and Photochemically Weathered Polymer Surfaces. Environ Sci Technol. 2023;57:14707-14716.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Dai W, Xie C, Xiao Y, Ma Y, Ding Y, Song Z, Wang Y, Jiao C, Zheng L, Zhang Z, He X. Bacterial Susceptibility to Ceria Nanoparticles: The Critical Role of Surrounding Molecules. Environ Sci Technol. 2024;58:12390-12399.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Rai PK, Sonne C, Brown RJC, Younis SA, Kim KH. Adsorption of environmental contaminants on micro- and nano-scale plastic polymers and the influence of weathering processes on their adsorptive attributes. J Hazard Mater. 2022;427:127903.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in RCA: 91]  [Article Influence: 22.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Yang H, Chen Z, Kong L, Xing H, Yang Q, Wu J. A Review of Eco-Corona Formation on Micro/Nanoplastics and Its Effects on Stability, Bioavailability, and Toxicity. Water. 2025;17:1124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
25.  Brandts I, Garcia-ordoñez M, Tort L, Teles M, Roher N. Polystyrene nanoplastics accumulate in ZFL cell lysosomes and in zebrafish larvae after acute exposure, inducing a synergistic immune response in vitro without affecting larval survival in vivo. Environ Sci Nano. 2020;7:2410-2422.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
26.  Abdollahi S, Raissi H, Farzad F. The role of microplastics as vectors of antibiotic contaminants via a molecular simulation approach. Sci Rep. 2025;15:27007.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Reilly, K, Davoudi H, Guo Z, Lynch I.   The Composition of the Eco-corona Acquired by Micro- and Nanoscale Plastics Impacts on their Ecotoxicity and Interactions with Co-pollutants. In Szpunar J and Jiménez-Lamana J. Earth and Environmental SciencesEconomics. United Kingdom: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2022: 132-155.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
28.  Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA. Life in the "plastisphere": microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:7137-7146.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1593]  [Cited by in RCA: 1784]  [Article Influence: 137.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Ribeiro F, Pavlaki MD, Loureiro S, Sarmento RA, Soares AMVM, Tourinho PS. Systematic Review of Nano- and Microplastics' (NMP) Influence on the Bioaccumulation of Environmental Contaminants: Part II-Freshwater Organisms. Toxics. 2023;11:474.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Stevenson EM, Buckling A, Cole M, Lindeque PK, Murray AK. Selection for antimicrobial resistance in the plastisphere. Sci Total Environ. 2024;908:168234.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Du T, Yu X, Shao S, Li T, Xu S, Wu L. Aging of Nanoplastics Significantly Affects Protein Corona Composition Thus Enhancing Macrophage Uptake. Environ Sci Technol. 2023;57:3206-3217.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 89]  [Article Influence: 29.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Cao J, Yang Q, Jiang J, Dalu T, Kadushkin A, Singh J, Fakhrullin R, Wang F, Cai X, Li R. Coronas of micro/nano plastics: a key determinant in their risk assessments. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2022;19:55.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in RCA: 83]  [Article Influence: 20.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Sadique SA, Konarova M, Niu X, Szilagyi I, Nirmal N, Li L. Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on human Health: Emerging evidence and future directions. Emerg Contam. 2025;11:100545.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
34.  Shi X, Chen Z, Wei W, Chen J, Ni B. Toxicity of micro/nanoplastics in the environment: Roles of plastisphere and eco-corona. Soil Environ Health. 2023;1:100002.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
35.  Jin Y, Lu L, Tu W, Luo T, Fu Z. Impacts of polystyrene microplastic on the gut barrier, microbiota and metabolism of mice. Sci Total Environ. 2019;649:308-317.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 431]  [Cited by in RCA: 725]  [Article Influence: 103.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (4)]
36.  Sofield CE, Anderton RS, Gorecki AM. Mind over Microplastics: Exploring Microplastic-Induced Gut Disruption and Gut-Brain-Axis Consequences. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024;46:4186-4202.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 63]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Chen X, Zhang Z, Hsueh Y, Zhang C, Yu J, Zhu J, Niu J, Yin N, Zhang J, Cui X, Liu X, Xu K, Yuan C. Interactions between environmental pollutants and gut microbiota: A review connecting the conventional heavy metals and the emerging microplastics. Environ Res. 2025;269:120928.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Ma MD, Zhao YC, Zhu L, Wang WP, Kang YL, An LH. [Research Progress on Characteristics of Human Microplastic Pollution and Health Risks]. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024;45:459-469.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Marfella R, Prattichizzo F, Sardu C, Fulgenzi G, Graciotti L, Spadoni T, D'Onofrio N, Scisciola L, La Grotta R, Frigé C, Pellegrini V, Municinò M, Siniscalchi M, Spinetti F, Vigliotti G, Vecchione C, Carrizzo A, Accarino G, Squillante A, Spaziano G, Mirra D, Esposito R, Altieri S, Falco G, Fenti A, Galoppo S, Canzano S, Sasso FC, Matacchione G, Olivieri F, Ferraraccio F, Panarese I, Paolisso P, Barbato E, Lubritto C, Balestrieri ML, Mauro C, Caballero AE, Rajagopalan S, Ceriello A, D'Agostino B, Iovino P, Paolisso G. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and Cardiovascular Events. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:900-910.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 871]  [Cited by in RCA: 652]  [Article Influence: 326.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Schwabl P, Köppel S, Königshofer P, Bucsics T, Trauner M, Reiberger T, Liebmann B. Detection of Various Microplastics in Human Stool: A Prospective Case Series. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171:453-457.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 586]  [Cited by in RCA: 1095]  [Article Influence: 156.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Hartmann C, Lomako I, Schachner C, El Said E, Abert J, Satrapa V, Kaiser AM, Walch H, Köppel S. Assessment of microplastics in human stool: A pilot study investigating the potential impact of diet-associated scenarios on oral microplastics exposure. Sci Total Environ. 2024;951:175825.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 32]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Dawson AL, Bose U, Ni D, Nelis JLD. Unravelling protein corona formation on pristine and leached microplastics. Micropl &Nanopl. 2024;4:9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
43.  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations  The impact of microplastics on the gut microbiome and health - A food safety perspective. 2023.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
Footnotes

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medical laboratory technology

Country of origin: France

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific quality: Grade B, Grade B, Grade C, Grade D

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade D

Creativity or innovation: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade D

Scientific significance: Grade B, Grade B, Grade C, Grade D

P-Reviewer: Jo J, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Indonesia; Qu HH, PhD, Associate Chief Physician, Postdoctoral Fellow, United States; Zhou HX, PhD, Assistant Professor, Post Doctoral Researcher, China S-Editor: Bai SR L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zheng XM

Write to the Help Desk