Review of treatment assessment using DCE-MRI in breast cancer radiation therapy

doi:10.5662/wjm.v4.i2.46

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 4, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9283)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-13) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

443

WORD

370

HTML

6131

Figures (1-13)

268

Tables (1-2)

274

Sum=7486

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

852

Download

945

Sum=1797

Jun 26, 2014 (publication date) through Nov 23, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (36)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Methodology

ISSN

2222-0682

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Methodol. Jun 26, 2014; 4(2): 46-58
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v4.i2.46

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Math 6 Math(A1).

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Math 7 Math(A1).

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 A sketch of two-compartment model. K^trans: Transport rate of CA from blood plasma to EES; k_ep: Transport rate of CA from EES to blood plasma; υ_e: Volume fraction of EES. The three quantities are related by k_ep = K^trans/υ_e. EES: Extravascular-extracellular space.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Math 8 Math(A1).

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Math 9 Math(A1).

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Math 10 Math(A1).

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Math 11 Math(A1).

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Math 12 Math(A1).

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Math 13 Math(A1).

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 A hierarchical relationship diagram of the introduced pharmacokinetic models. DP: Distributed-parameter; FXR: Fast-exchange regime.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Radiation treatment planning. A: A computed tomography simulation image for a selected patient breast stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRT) treatment plan; B: 3D planned beams view for the selected patient’s SBRT plan; C: Calculated conformal dose distribution of the selected patient’s SBRT plan.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Conventional radiation treatment workflow. The proposed workflow (A) with treatment assessment component (B). Radiation treatment assessment can be used in plan optimization based on understanding towards biological response.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 A comparison between pre-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging image (A) and post-treatment dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging image (B).

Citation: Wang CH, Yin FF, Horton J, Chang Z. Review of treatment assessment using DCE-MRI in breast cancer radiation therapy. World J Methodol 2014; 4(2): 46-58
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v4/i2/46.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v4.i2.46