Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Methodol. Jul 20, 2022; 12(4): 258-263
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.258
Reinfection, recontamination and revaccination for SARS-CoV-2
Tamás Kullmann, András Drozgyik
Tamás Kullmann, Department of Medical Emergencies, Petz Aladár Hospital, Győr 9024, Hungary
András Drozgyik, Department of Surgery, Petz Aladár Hospital, Győr 9024, Hungary
Author contributions: Kullmann T and Drozgyik A contributed equally to this minireview.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors declare having no conflict of interest related to the publication of this manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Tamás Kullmann, PhD, Consultant Physician-Scientist, Department of Medical Emergencies, Petz Aladár Hospital, Vasvári Pál u. 2-4, Győr 9024, Hungary. kullmanndoki@gmail.com
Received: March 7, 2022
Peer-review started: March 7, 2022
First decision: April 12, 2022
Revised: April 22, 2022
Accepted: July 11, 2022
Article in press: July 11, 2022
Published online: July 20, 2022
Processing time: 134 Days and 17.7 Hours
Core Tip

Core Tip: Reinfection: There is not enough evidence of the protective efficacy of the natural immunity induced by a primary infection with severe acute coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recontamination: Testing positive for a second time for SARS-CoV-2 does not necessarily mean a reinfection; it can also be interpreted as recontamination. Revaccination: The available evidence may suggest that the protective value of a prior infection could be better considered for vaccine distribution in the future.