©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Methodol. Jul 20, 2021; 11(4): 228-230
Published online Jul 20, 2021. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.228
Published online Jul 20, 2021. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.228
Simplified figure to present direct and indirect comparisons: Revisiting the graph 10 years later
Valeria Fadda, Laura Bartoli, Elisa Ferracane, Sabrina Trippoli, Andrea Messori, HTA, ESTAR Toscana, Firenze 50132, Italy
Author contributions: Fadda V and Messori A were the main contributors of this paper; The other authors were involved in checking the manuscript, identifying inconsistencies, and generating the figure.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Corresponding author: Andrea Messori, BCPS, PharmD, Academic Fellow, Associate Chief Pharmacist, HTA, ESTAR Toscana, Via San Salvi 12, Firenze 50132, Italy.
Received: March 19, 2021
Peer-review started: March 19, 2021
First decision: May 6, 2021
Revised: May 9, 2021
Accepted: May 27, 2021
Article in press: May 27, 2021
Published online: July 20, 2021
Processing time: 121 Days and 12 Hours
Peer-review started: March 19, 2021
First decision: May 6, 2021
Revised: May 9, 2021
Accepted: May 27, 2021
Article in press: May 27, 2021
Published online: July 20, 2021
Processing time: 121 Days and 12 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: A “simplified” figure was proposed in 2011 to summarize the results of controlled trials that evaluate different treatments aimed at the same disease condition. This graphical tool presents the network geometry along with the results of the analysis. The original criteria for classifying individual binary comparisons (direct or indirect comparisons) did not differentiate between no proof of difference vs proof of no difference. We have therefore updated the criteria employed in the original “simplified” figure to include this differentiation.