BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 117490
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.117490
Fragility fracture risk prediction using quantitative magnetic resonance and Vertebral Bone Quality scoring beyond density
Sanjith Manian, Arunagiri Gunasekar, Naveen Jeyaraman, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Sathish Muthu, Madhan Jeyaraman
Sanjith Manian, Department of Orthopaedics, Madras Medical College, Chennai 600003, Tamil Nadu, India
Arunagiri Gunasekar, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Thiruvallur 602001, Tamil Nadu, India
Naveen Jeyaraman, Madhan Jeyaraman, Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India
Naveen Jeyaraman, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Madhan Jeyaraman, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Agathisha Institute of Stemcell and Regenerative Medicine, Chennai 600030, Tamil Nadu, India
Naveen Jeyaraman, Sathish Muthu, Madhan Jeyaraman, Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore 641045, Tamil Nadu, India
Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Department of Orthopaedics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Karaikal 609602, Puducherry, India
Sathish Muthu, Central Research Laboratory, Meenakshi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Kanchipuram 631552, Tamil Nadu, India
Author contributions: Manian S, Gunasekar A, Jeyaraman N, and Nallakumarasamy A analyzed the articles for performing review and wrote the manuscript; Jeyaraman N and Jeyaraman M designed the research; Muthu S and Jeyaraman M finalized the manuscript; and all authors thoroughly reviewed and endorsed the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Madhan Jeyaraman, MD, PhD, Researcher, Department of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Velappanchavadi, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India. madhanjeyaraman@gmail.com
Received: December 9, 2025
Revised: January 21, 2026
Accepted: March 5, 2026
Published online: September 20, 2026
Processing time: 214 Days and 3.5 Hours
Abstract

Fragility fractures represent a significant global health burden, with osteoporosis affecting over 500 million individuals and contributing to nearly 9 million fractures annually. Conventional diagnosis relies on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to measure bone mineral density (BMD), yet BMD alone explains only part of fracture risk. Many fractures occur in patients without osteoporosis by DEXA criteria, underscoring the limitations of bone quantity-based assessment. Advances in imaging and biomarker research highlight the importance of bone quality, microarchitecture, and marrow composition in fracture prediction. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques - including T1ρ, T2 mapping, proton density fat fraction, and diffusion-weighted imaging - offer non-invasive insights into collagen integrity, proteoglycan content, water distribution, and marrow adiposity. These parameters correlate with trabecular deterioration and cortical porosity, enhancing risk stratification beyond BMD. Similarly, Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) scoring, derived from routine T1-weighted MRI, provides a practical surrogate for bone quality by quantifying vertebral marrow signal intensity relative to cerebrospinal fluid. Modified VBQ improves accuracy by minimising posterior vertebral artefacts, demonstrating stronger correlation with DEXA T scores and trabecular microarchitecture. Studies show VBQ predicts vertebral fragility fractures independently of BMD, with sensitivity exceeding 90% and discriminatory ability comparable to the fracture risk assessment tool and trabecular bone score. Integration of quantitative MRI and VBQ/modified VBQ into predictive models, supported by artificial intelligence, enables opportunistic, radiation-free screening and more precise fracture risk assessment. Together, these advanced imaging biomarkers represent a paradigm shift toward comprehensive evaluation of bone strength, bridging the gap between bone quantity and quality for improved prevention and management of fragility fractures.

Keywords: Fragility fractures; Bone mineral density; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; T2 mapping; Vertebral Bone Quality score

Core Tip: Fragility fractures remain a global health challenge, with many occurring in patients without dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-defined osteoporosis. Advanced imaging biomarkers such as quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (T1ρ, T2 mapping, proton density fat fraction, diffusion-weighted imaging) and Vertebral Bone Quality/modified Vertebral Bone Quality scoring provide deeper insights into bone microarchitecture and marrow composition. These tools enhance fracture risk prediction beyond bone mineral density, enabling radiation-free, opportunistic screening and artificial intelligence-driven models that bridge bone quantity and quality for improved prevention and management.

Write to the Help Desk