Fishing reviewing: A threat to research integrity and credibility

Abstract

The rise of the “fishing reviewer” phenomenon presents a significant threat to the integrity of academic publishing, undermining the credibility of the peer review process and eroding trust in scientific journals. This editorial explores the risk factors contributing to this troubling trend and identifies key indicators to recognize such reviewers. To address this issue, we propose strategies, including enhanced reviewer vetting, comprehensive training, and transparent recognition policies to foster a culture of accountability and ethical conduct in scholarly review. By implementing these measures, we can safeguard the quality and credibility of academic research.

Keywords: Fishing reviewer; Scientific publication; Academic research; Scholarly community; Scientific journal; Editor

Core Tip: “Fishing reviewers” conduct superficial peer reviews to gain recognition without providing meaningful feedback. This practice undermines the integrity of academic publishing by allowing substandard research to pass through the review process. Recognizing and addressing this issue is crucial for maintaining the credibility of scholarly communication. By implementing targeted strategies to identify and combat “fishing reviewers”, we can preserve the quality and reliability of scientific journals.