Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and catheter ablation has been demonstrated to achieve superior success rates compared with antiarrhythmic drugs. However, this procedure entails certain risks, including silent cerebral events (SCEs), which may affect cognitive function. This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the global incidence of SCEs in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation and to compare the incidence across energy sources and catheter types. Our analysis included 86 trials involving 10,456 patients with AF, with a pooled SCE incidence of 19.1%. For pulsed field ablation, the incidence of SCEs was 14.4%; thermal ablation techniques showed rates of 17.7% for radiofrequency ablation, 20.8% for cryoballoon ablation, and 32.7% for laser ablation. No significant differences were found between pulsed field ablation and thermal ablation in SCE incidence. The comparison of SCE incidence between different catheter types revealed variations. The HD Mesh Ablator demonstrated the lowest incidence rate (15.1%), whereas the PVAC catheter had the highest (36.2%). The Farawave catheter had an incidence rate of 18.5% and showed no significant differences compared with most thermal catheters, except for the HD Mesh Ablator (relative risk, 0.15; 95% credible interval, 0.03-0.89). Our findings indicate that a substantial proportion of patients experience SCEs after catheter ablation for AF, with an overall incidence of approximately 19.1% occurring within 1 week (mostly within 72 hours) after ablation. No significant differences were observed in SCE incidence between pulsed field ablation and thermal ablation or between the Farawave catheter and most thermal catheters.

Over the past 50 years, the number and invasiveness of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures globally have increased substantially. However, cardiovascular interventions are inherently associated with a risk of acute brain injury, both periprocedurally and postprocedurally, which impairs medical outcomes and increases health-care costs. Current international clinical guidelines generally do not cover the area of acute brain injury related to cardiovascular invasive procedures. In this international Consensus Statement, we compile the available knowledge (including data on prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and management) to formulate consensus recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute brain injury caused by cardiovascular interventions. We also identify knowledge gaps and possible future directions in clinical research into acute brain injury related to cardiovascular interventions.

The significance of micro-embolic signals (MESs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear. Previous studies had limitations, and cryoballoon (CB) ablation patients were under-represented. Minimizing MESs is recommended due to their uncertain neurocognitive impact.

This prospective observational study included AF patients from a German centre between February 2021 and August 2022. Patients were equally divided into paroxysmal (Group A) and persistent (Group B) AF. Group A received cryoballoon-pulmonary vein isolation only, while Group B also had left atrial roof ablation. MESs were detected using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography during ablation. Neurocognitive status was assessed pre- and post-procedure and at 3 months using the CERAD Plus battery. The study analyzed 100 patients with a median age of 65.5 years. A total of 19 698 MESs were observed, with 80% being gaseous and 20% solid in origin, primarily occurring during pulmonary vein angiography and the balloon freeze and thawing phase. The median MES per patient was 130 (IQR: 92-256) in total, 298 (IQR: 177-413) in bilateral (36%), and 110 (IQR: 71-130) in unilateral (64%) recordings. No significant difference in total MES counts was found between the groups. None of the 11 neuropsychological tests showed cognitive decline post-procedure or at 3 months.

Our observations confirm that neurocognitive abilities are not affected either 24 h or 3 months after AF ablation using the CB technique. However, despite the low MES burden associated with the CB, more work is needed to reduce small embolic events during AF ablation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is being performed more frequently and more widely at more centers. This stems from several factors including 1) demographic forces leading to an increased prevalence of the arrhythmia; 2) greater availability of ambulatory monitoring making diagnosis more frequent; 3) relative inefficacy of medications; and 4) improved safety and efficacy of the procedure. Ablation has become much more streamlined and reproducible than a decade ago, but life-threatening complications may still arise.

This review will focus on awareness, avoidance, and early recognition and management of complications of AF ablation. This literature review is challenged by differing approaches to ablation of AF both within a center and between centers, the rapid improvement of technology making the outcomes associated with a therapeutic strategy begun a few years prior relatively obsolete, as well as the heterogeneity of the population being studied.

Newer technologies are on the horizon which will allow us to ablate AF with increasing efficacy, efficiency, and hopefully safety. Such new technology and changing usage mandate vigilance to avoid complications.

There is considerable uncertainty regarding the impact of microembolic signals (MESs) on neuropsychological abilities in patients receiving pulmonary vein isolation and beyond using the cryoballoon technique. We conducted the largest prospective observational study on this topic, providing insights into the gradual unmasking of procedure-related MESs and their impacts on neuropsychological outcomes. MESs were continuously detected periprocedurally using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Neuropsychological status was evaluated comprehensively using the CERAD Plus test battery, which consists of 11 neuropsychological subtests. Patients with atrial fibrillation were included in the study with an equal distribution (50:50) of paroxysmal or persistent presentations. Of 167 consecutive eligible patients, 100 were included within the study enrollment period from February 2021 to August 2022. The study, including the documentation of all follow-up visits, ended in November 2022. This paper focuses on describing the study protocol and methodology and presenting the baseline data.

Doppler microembolic signals (MES) occur during atrial fibrillation ablation despite of permanent flushed transseptal sheaths, frequent controls of periprocedural coagulation status and the use of irrigated ablation catheters PURPOSE: To investigate the number and type of MES depending on the procedure time, prespecified procedure steps, the activated clotting time (ACT) during the ablation procedure and the catheter contact force.

In a prospective trial, 53 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation by super-irrigated "point-by-point" ablation. All patients underwent a periinterventional, continuous transcranial Doppler examination (TCD) of the bilateral middle cerebral arteries during the complete ablation procedure.

An average of 686±226 microembolic signals were detected by permanent transcranial Doppler. Thereby, 569±208 signals were differentiated as gaseous and 117±31 as solid MES. The number of MES with regard to defined procedure steps were as follows: gaseous: [transseptal puncture, 26 ± 28; sheath flushing, 24±12; catheter change, 21±11; angiography, 101±28; mapping, 9±9; ablation, 439±192; protamine administration, 0±0]; solid: [transseptal puncture, 8±8; sheath flushing, 9±5; catheter replacement, 6±6; angiography, not measurable; mapping, 2±5; ablation, 41±22; protamine administration, 0±0]. Significantly less MES occurred with shorter procedure time, higher ACT and the use of tissue contact force monitoring.

The current study demonstrates that during atrial fibrillation ablation using irrigated, "point-by-point" RF ablation, masses of microembolic signals are detected in transcranial ultrasound especially in the period of RF current application. The number of MES depends on the total procedure time and the reached ACT during ablation. The use of contact force monitoring might reduce MES during RF ablation.

Atrial fibrillation ablation results in microbubbles and particulate emboli formation. We aimed to develop and test the early feasibility of a novel ablation hood to contain microbubbles and particulate emboli with the ultimate goal of preventing systemic embolization.

In seven canines, we developed, iterated, and tested a novel retractable hood that can cover the catheter-tissue ablation site. The number and volume (nL) of microbubbles formed during ablation with and without the hood was measured using an extracorporeal circulation loop. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used to compare the number of bubbles detected with and without the hood.

The hood reduced systemic embolization of microbubbles in 21/28 (75%) of ablations. Both atrial and ventricular ablations showed a statistically significant reduction in bubble number (476 ± 811 without hood vs 173 ± 226 with hood, p = 0.02; 2669 ± 1623 without hood vs 1417 ± 970 with hood, p = 0.04, respectively) and bubble volume (3.3 ± 7.6 nL without hood vs 0.2 ± 0.56 nL with hood, p = 0.006; 6.1 ± 5.2 nL without hood vs 1.9 ± 1.4 nL with hood, p = 0.05, respectively).

Use of a novel hood to cover the ablation catheter at the site of catheter-tissue contact has the potential to provide a means to reduce systematic embolization of microbubbles. Further work is required to examine particulate emboli, but these data show the early feasibility of this design concept.

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is useful for investigation of intracranial arterial blood flow and can be used to detect a real-time embolic signal. Unfortunately, artefacts can mimic the embolic signal, complicating interpretation and necessitating expert-level opinion to distinguish the two. Resolving this situation is critical to achieve improved accuracy and utility of TCD for patients with disrupted intracranial arterial blood flow, such as stroke victims. A common type of stroke encountered in the clinic is cryptogenic stroke (or stroke with undetermined etiology), and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with the condition. An early clinical trial of PFO closure effect on secondary stroke prevention failed to demonstrate any benefit for the therapy, and research into the PFO therapy generally diminished. However, the recent publication of large randomized control trials with demonstrated benefit of PFO closure for recurrent stroke prevention has rekindled the interest in PFO in patients with cryptogenic stroke. To confirm that emboli across the PFO can reach the brain, TCD should be applied to detect the air embolic signal after injection of agitated saline bubbles at the antecubital vein. In addition, the automated embolic signal detection method should further facilitate use of TCD for air embolic signal detection after the agitated saline bubbles injection in patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO.

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation currently referred for catheter ablation is increasing. However, the number of trained operators and the capacity of many electrophysiology labs are limited. Accordingly, a steeper learning curve and technical advances for efficient and safe ablation are desirable. During the last decades several catheter-based ablation devices have been developed and adapted to improve not only lesion durability, but also safety profiles, to shorten procedure time and to reduce radiation exposure. The goal of this review is to summarise the reported incidence of complications, considering device-related specific aspects for point-by-point, multi-electrode and balloon-based devices for pulmonary vein isolation. Recent technical and procedural developments aimed at reducing procedural risks and complications rates will be reviewed. In addition, the impact of technical advances on procedural outcome, procedural length and radiation exposure will be discussed.