BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Nephrol. Sep 25, 2026; 15(3): 118797
Published online Sep 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.118797
Table 1 Key multidrug-resistant phenotypes in kidney transplant recipients - epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes
Phenotype
Epidemiology
Risk factors
Outcomes
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-EnterobacteralesCause 18%-31% of post-transplant urinary tract infections. Cause 29%-71% of Gram-negative bloodstream infections. Genitourinary tract is the predominant source of bloodstream infectionDiabetes mellitus. Previous antibiotic use. Delayed graft function. Relapsing infection/previous urinary tract infection. Perianal extended-spectrum beta-lactamase carriage (rectal swab). Second kidney transplantation/induction therapy3 × greater risk of recurrent urinary tract infection. Increased hospitalization needs. Lower 1-year epidermal growth factor receptor. Lower long-term death-censored graft survival. High mortality in bloodstream infection
Carbapenem-resistant EnterobacteralesIncidence in solid organ transplant is 5 × higher than general population. Common species: Klebsiella, Enterobacter. Sites: Urinary tract infection > surgical site infection > catheter-related bloodstream infectionColonization (21%-38% of colonized patients develop infection). Recipient age > 50 years. Lymphopenia (median 700 cells/mm3). Prior carbapenem use. Colonization by polymyxin-resistant strainsMortality up to 42%. Higher mortality compared to carbapenem-susceptible infections
Difficult to treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosaAccounts for up to 15% of solid organ transplant bloodstream infections. Up to 43% of isolates in solid organ transplant are multidrug-resistant-Pseudomonas aeruginosaPrior intensive care unit admission. Nosocomial acquisition. Previous carbapenem therapyMortality associated with: Age, urinary catheter, high-risk source, carbapenem resistance, severity of infection. Correct empirical therapy reduces mortality
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniiAlmost exclusively nosocomial. Sites: Soft tissue, urinary tract infection, catheter bloodstream infection, ventilator-associated pneumoniaHospital/intensive care unit exposure. Mechanical ventilation/invasive devicesHighest mortality among solid organ transplant multidrug-resistant organism infections (> 40%)
Vancomycin-resistant EnterococciEnterococcus causes 19% of urinary tract infections (mostly Escherichia faecalis). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci colonization prevalence approximately 14% in kidney transplant recipients. Escherichia faecium has higher vancomycin resistance ratesPerioperative prophylaxis targeting Gram-negatives. Previous vancomycin use. Ureteral stentsDifferentiating colonization from infection is vital; colonization does not always lead to infection
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus1.9% of kidney transplant recipients are methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus carriers. Infections occur early post-transplantPre-operative colonization. Presence of central venous catheters. Dialysis historyPre-operative colonization is an independent predictor of renal allograft failure at 5 years
Clostridioides difficile infectionLeading cause of post-transplant diarrhea. Prevalence approximately 2.4%Antimicrobial exposure (3rd gen cephalosporins, clindamycin, imipenem)Associated with worse outcomes in kidney transplant recipients
Table 2 Preferred and alternative agents for multidrug-resistant pathogens in kidney transplant: Dosing, key toxicities, and transplant-specific caveats
Pathogen
Preferred agents
Alternative agents
Dosing/administration
Key toxicities and transplant caveats
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-EnterobacteralesCystitis/pyelonephritis (if susceptible): Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, or levofloxacin. If resistant/toxic or non-urinary source: Ertapenem, meropenem, or imipenem-cilastatinPyelonephritis/complicated urinary tract infections: AminoglycosidesDuration: Short course (6-10 days) may be comparable to longer courses (11-21 days) for complicated urinary tract infectionsAminoglycosides: Use restricted by potential nephrotoxicity. Step-down: Lack of oral options (due to fluoroquinolone/trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole co-resistance) impedes shortening intravenous duration
Carbapenem-resistant EnterobacteralesPyelonephritis: Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, cefiderocol. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producers: Meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam. MBL-producers (e.g., new Delhi metallo-β-lactamase): Ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam or cefiderocol (monotherapy)Pyelonephritis/complicated urinary tract infections: Aminoglycosides. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. Alternative: CefiderocolNephrotoxicity: Polymyxins and aminoglycosides limited by nephrotoxicity. Novel agents (ceftazidime-avibactam, etc.) have low nephrotoxicity risk. Calcineurin inhibitor interactions: Novel agents have limited interaction with tacrolimus, but imipenem-relebactam + cyclosporine increases neurotoxicity risk
DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosaBeta-lactam susceptible (non-carbapenem): Piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, or aztreonam (preferred over carbapenems). Carbapenem-resistant (non-MBL): Ceftolozane-tazobactam (drug of choice if carbapenemase negative), ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam. MBL-producers: CefiderocolMBL-producers: Ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam; polymyxins (poor efficacy/toxicity); cefepime-zidebactam (salvage)Traditional beta-lactams: High-dose extended-infusion suggestedResistance: Pseudomonas aeruginosa can develop resistance during therapy; close monitoring required. Polymyxins: Poor data due to toxicity
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniiCombination therapy: Sulbactam-durlobactam + carbapenem (imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem)Alternative combination: High-dose ampicillin-sulbactam + at least one other agent (polymyxin B, minocycline, tigecycline, or cefiderocol)Ampicillin-sulbactam: High-dose (total daily dose of 9 g sulbactam component)Strategy: Combination therapy suggested due to limited single-agent data
Vancomycin-resistant EnterococciVancomycin-resistant Enterococci faecium urinary tract infection: Daptomycin monotherapy. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci endocarditis: Daptomycin + ampicillinIn-vitro synergy (clinical efficacy to be explored): Fosfomycin + daptomycin or amoxicillinRenal preservation: Daptomycin + ampicillin is an aminoglycoside-sparing therapy to protect renal function
Clostridioides difficilePreferred: Oral vancomycin or fidaxomicinRecurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: Fecal microbiota transplantationOral vancomycin: 125 mg four times dailyFidaxomicin: Lower recurrence rate than vancomycin. Fecal microbiota transplantation: Efficacy/safety in solid organ transplant comparable to immunocompetent individuals
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusPreferred: VancomycinAlternatives: Daptomycin (if intolerance, persistent bacteremia, or minimum inhibitory concentration > 1 μg/mL); teicoplanin; ceftaroline; ceftobiproleVancomycin: Target serum trough 15-20 μg/mL. Continuous infusion preferredVancomycin: Continuous infusion reduces odds of acute kidney injury by 53%. Monitor area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration to reduce nephrotoxicity. Daptomycin: Monitor creatine kinase (myopathy risk). Novels: Ceftaroline/ceftobiprole have minimal interactions with calcineurin inhibitors


Write to the Help Desk