Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Nephrol. Dec 25, 2025; 14(4): 110491
Published online Dec 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.110491
Published online Dec 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.110491
Table 1 Commonly used methods to assess hemodynamic status in nephrology practice
| Method | Strengths | Limitations |
| Physical exam | Standard bedside evaluation: Does not require additional training for physicians; Positive findings are typically clinically meaningful | Very limited sensitivity; may fail to detect a substantial number of patients with volume overload |
| Body weight | Short-term weight changes can indicate fluid accumulation or loss; Can be self-monitored by the patient at home | Inaccurate readings may result from improper calibration, use of different scales, or inconsistent techniques such as wearing varying amounts of clothing during each measurement; Weight changes may not capture congestion related to fluid redistribution |
| Intake-output documentation | Provides an overview of the patient’s fluid balance | Documentation errors are common, especially outside the intensive care setting; Does not capture congestion resulting from fluid redistribution |
| Continuous hematocrit monitoring | Delivers real-time insights into relative changes in intravascular blood volume, enabling adjustment of ultrafiltration rate and volume accordingly | Use is limited to patients receiving hemodialysis; Typically operated by nurses or technicians, requiring dedicated staff training; Does not evaluate tissue congestion, extravascular lung water or cumulative fluid burden |
| Bioimpedance | Offers information on total body, extracellular, and intracellular water, allowing for calculation of both absolute and relative fluid overload | Unable to distinguish between compartmentalized edema (such as ascites, pericardial, or extravascular lung water) and overall increased total body water; Does not provide information on intravascular volume |
| Right heart catheterization | Offers detailed assessment of hemodynamic parameters including right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac output | Invasive modality, generally limited to specialized intensive care settings; Does not assess the presence or absence of extravascular lung water, as elevated pressures do not always correlate with volume overload; Lacks information on the degree of venous congestion; Susceptible to errors from incorrect transducer calibration, leveling, zeroing, or improper balloon inflation; Most nephrologists are not adequately trained to interpret waveforms or recognize measurement errors |
| IVC POCUS | Estimates right atrial pressure; Relatively simple to perform and can be learned with brief training | Estimating right atrial pressure using IVC POCUS is unreliable in mechanically ventilated patients; A plethoric IVC is not specific to volume overload and may be seen in conditions such as cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism, tricuspid regurgitation, or pulmonary hypertension; A small, collapsible IVC cannot distinguish between hypovolemia, euvolemia, or high cardiac output states; IVC may appear small and collapsed despite elevated right atrial pressure in cases of intra-abdominal hypertension; IVC collapsibility is influenced by the strength of respiratory effort, which varies significantly among patients, limiting the real-world applicability of standardized cutoffs from studies |
| Internal jugular vein POCUS | Estimates right atrial pressure; Especially helpful when the IVC is difficult to visualize or yields unreliable information, such as in patients with cirrhosis | Susceptible to errors from improper bed positioning, excessive transducer pressure, and off-axis imaging; The assumption that right atrial depth is consistently 5 cm from the sternal angle has been shown to be inaccurate - often requires concurrent focused cardiac ultrasound to determine this; Scanning protocols vary across the literature, limiting standardization |
| Lung ultrasound | Identifies and quantifies extravascular lung water; More sensitive than chest X-ray for detecting cardiogenic pulmonary edema; Can be performed using basic, lower-cost ultrasound equipment | B-lines are not specific to pulmonary edema and may also appear in conditions such as lung fibrosis, infections, or contusions; In certain cases, distinguishing between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema requires concurrent assessment of left ventricular filling pressures using cardiac Doppler ultrasound (an advanced POCUS skill) |
| Venous Doppler/VExUS (hepatic, portal, intrarenal, and femoral veins) | Detects and quantifies systemic venous congestion; Enables monitoring the response to decongestive therapy through repeat assessments | It is an advanced skill that requires competence in Doppler ultrasound; Lack of simultaneous ECG may limit interpretation, particularly the hepatic vein waveform; Does not differentiate pressure and volume overload; Requires mid- to high-end ultrasound equipment with ECG capability |
| Focused cardiac ultrasound | Offers insights into cardiac function, chamber size, pericardial effusion, and major valvular abnormalities; Experienced users can also estimate stroke volume, pulmonary artery pressure, and left ventricular filling pressures | Considered an advanced skill; nephrologists performing Doppler assessments typically require formal certification in critical care echocardiography; Requires mid- to high-end ultrasound equipment; Accuracy depends on adequate acoustic windows, which are affected by factors such as patient body habitus, positioning, and operator expertise |
- Citation: Gogula NSAR, Koratala A. Lung ultrasound in nephrology: Basics, applications, limitations, and future directions. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(4): 110491
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v14/i4/110491.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.110491
