Published online Nov 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i6.497
Peer-review started: May 26, 2016
First decision: June 17, 2016
Revised: August 8, 2016
Accepted: August 27, 2016
Article in press: August 29, 2016
Published online: November 6, 2016
Processing time: 161 Days and 19 Hours
To evaluate incidence, risk factors and treatment outcome of BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) in a cohort of renal transplant recipients in the Auckland region without a formal BK polyomavirus (BKV) surveillance programme.
A cohort of 226 patients who received their renal transplants from 2006 to 2012 was retrospectively reviewed.
Seventy-six recipients (33.6%) had a BK viral load (BKVL) test and 9 patients (3.9%) developed BKVN. Cold ischaemia time (HR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.04-1.35) was found to be a risk factor for BKVN. Four recipients with BKVN had complete resolution of their BKV infection; 1 recipient had BKVL less than 625 copies/mL; 3 recipients had BKVL more than 1000 copies/mL and 1 had graft failure from BKVN. BKVN has a negative impact on graft function [median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 22.5 (IQR 18.5-53.0) mL/min per 1.73 m2, P = 0.015), but no statistically significant difference (P = 0.374) in renal allograft function was found among negative BK viraemia group [median eGFR 60.0 (IQR 48.5-74.2) mL/min per 1.73 m2), positive BK viraemia without BKVN group [median eGFR 55.0 (IQR 47.0-76.0) mL/min per 1.73 m2] and unknown BKV status group [median eGFR 54.0 (IQR 43.8-71.0) mL/min per 1.73 m2]. The incidence and treatment outcomes of BKVN were similar to some centres with BKV surveillance programmes.
Recipients with BVKN have poorer graft function. Although active surveillance for BKV has been shown to be effective in reducing incidence of BKVN, it should be tailored specifically to that transplant centre based on its epidemiology and outcomes of BKVN, particularly in centres with limited resources.
Core tip: A retrospective analysis of 226 patients from Auckland, New Zealand found BK polyomavirus (BKV) as an uncommon cause of graft loss. Renal units without a formal BKV surveillance programme showed a similar incidence and outcomes for BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) to centres with an active screening programme. When designing a cost effective screening programme for BKV infection, it should be centre specific in relation to the units immunosuppression and monitoring protocol, epidemiology and outcomes of BKVN.
