Previous studies show heterogeneity when applying estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) equations to kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, research on the impact of transplantation-related characteristics on eGFR equations using creatinine (eGFRcr) compared to cystatin C (eGFRcys) is scarce.

We conducted a comprehensive analysis with three eGFRcr equations (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2009, European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) 2021, kidney recipient specific-glomerular filtration rate KRS-GFR) 2023), comparing them to two eGFRcys (CKD-EPI 2012 and EKFC 2023) in 596 KTRs. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated relative differences according to different eGFR-stages. Multivariable logistic regression identified transplantation-related characteristics independently associated with smaller or greater differences between eGFRcr and eGFRcys equations.

94.3% of the cohort were White individuals. Median eGFR differed as much as 9 ml/min/1.73 m2 between equations. The median relative differences (Q2) were greater (more negative) when comparing the eGFRcr equations to eGFRcys CKD-EPI 2012, than when comparing them to eGFRcys EKFC 2023 (P < .001). Better average eGFR was associated with smaller mean relative differences in all comparisons but eGFRcr CKD-EPI 2009 with eGFR EKFC 2023 and eGFRcr EKFC 2021 with eGFRcys EKFC 2023. Living kidney donation and belatacept use were independent factors associated with a smaller difference (≥Q3) between eGFRcr and eGFRcys equations, while prednisone use or higher HbA1c were independently associated with a greater difference (≤Q1) between equations.

Different eGFR-stages, donor, or recipient characteristics, along with immunosuppression such as belatacept or prednisone, contribute to differences between eGFRcr and eGFRcys. These effects need to be considered in the clinical management of KTRs.

To evaluate the prognostic value of blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (BUN/SCr) and cystatin C (Cys C) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after radical nephrectomy.

The study analysed 348 patients with RCC who underwent radical nephrectomy. The optimal cut-off was obtained based on the ROC of specific survival outcomes and the maximum Youden index. The patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 (low BUN/SCr-low Cys C), Group 2 (low BUN/SCr-high Cys C), Group 3 (high BUN/SCr-low Cys C), and Group 4 (high BUN/SCr-high Cys C). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

There is currently no FDA-approved medical therapy for delayed graft function (DGF). Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has multiple reno-protective effects preventing ischemic reperfusion injury, DGF, and acute kidney injury. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reno-protective effects of perioperative DEX during renal transplantation.

A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL until June 8th, 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference for continuous outcomes; both presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022338898.

We included four RCTs with 339 patients. Pooled risk ratio found no difference between DEX and placebo in reducing DGF (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.34, 1.01], p = 0.05) and acute rejection (RR: 0.88 with 95% CI [0.52, 1.49], p = 0.63). However, DEX improved short-term creatinine on day 1 (MD: - 0.76 with 95% CI [- 1.23, - 0.3], p = 0.001) and day 2 (MD: - 0.28 with 95% CI [- 0.5, - 0.07], p = 0.01); and blood urea nitrogen on day 2 (MD: - 10.16 with 95% CI [- 17.21, - 3.10], p = 0.005) and day 3 (MD: - 6.72 with 95% CI [- 12.85, - 0.58], p = 0.03).

Although there is no difference between DEX and placebo regarding reducing DGF and acute rejection after kidney transplantation, there may be some evidence that it has reno-protective benefits because we found statistically significant improvement in the short-term serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels. More trials are required to investigate the long-term reno-protective effects of DEX.

Ischemia-reperfusion injury is inevitable during donor organ harvest and recipient allograft reperfusion in kidney transplantation, and affects graft outcomes. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, has renoprotective effects against ischemia-reperfusion injury. We investigated the effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on renal function and the development of delayed graft function after elective living donor kidney transplantation in a randomized controlled trial.

A total of 104 patients were randomly assigned to receive either an intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg·kg^-1·hr^-1 or 0.9% saline. The primary outcome was the serum creatinine level on postoperative day (POD) 7. Secondary outcomes were renal function and the degree of inflammation and included the following variables: serum creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate up to six months; incidence of delayed graft function; and levels of serum cystatin C, plasma interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-18 during the perioperative period.

The mean (standard deviation) serum creatinine level on POD 7 was comparable between the groups (dexmedetomidine vs control: 1.11 [0.87] mg·dL^-1 vs 1.06 [0.73] mg·dL^-1; mean difference, 0.05; 95% confidence interval, -0.27 to 0.36; P = 0.77). Delayed graft function occurred in one patient in each group (odds ratio, 1.020; P > 0.99). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the groups (all P > 0.05).

Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion did not produce any beneficial effects on renal function or delayed graft function in patients undergoing elective living donor kidney transplantation.

www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03327389); registered 31 October 2017.

Pharmacists are at the forefront of dosing and monitoring medications eliminated by or toxic to the kidney. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these medications, accurate measurement of kidney function is paramount. The mainstay of kidney assessment for drug dosing and monitoring is serum creatinine (SCr)-based estimation equations. Yet, SCr has known limitations including its insensitivity to underlying changes in kidney function and the numerous non-kidney factors that are incompletely accounted for in equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Serum cystatin C (cysC) is a biomarker that can serve as an adjunct or alternative to SCr to evaluate kidney function for drug dosing. Pharmacists must be educated about the strengths and limitations of cysC prior to applying it to medication management. Not all patient populations have been studied and some evaluations demonstrated large variations in the relationship between cysC and GFR. Use of eGFR equations incorporating cysC should be reserved for drug management in scenarios with demonstrated outcomes, including to improve pharmacodynamic target attainment for antibiotics or reduce drug toxicity. This article provides an overview of cysC, discusses evidence around its use in medication dosing and in special populations, and describes practical considerations for application and implementation.

Cystatin C and beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) are filtration markers associated with adverse outcomes in nontransplant populations, sometimes with stronger associations than for creatinine. We evaluated associations of estimated glomerular filtration rate from cystatin C (eGFR_cys ), B2M (eGFR_B2M ), and creatinine (eGFR_cr ) with cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and kidney failure in stable kidney transplant recipients using a case-cohort study nested within the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplantation (FAVORIT) Trial. A random subcohort was selected (N = 508; mean age 51.6 years, median transplant vintage 4 years, 38% women, 23.6% nonwhite race) with enrichment for cardiovascular events (N = 306; 54 within the subcohort), mortality (N = 208; 68 within the subcohort), and kidney failure (N = 208; 52 within the subcohort). Mean eGFR_cr , eGFR_cys , and eGFR_B2M were 46.0, 43.8, and 48.8 mL/min/1.73m² , respectively. After multivariable adjustment, hazard ratios for eGFR_cys and eGFR_B2M <30 versus 60+ were 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-3.76; p = 0.03) and 2.56 (1.35-4.88; p = 0.004) for cardiovascular events; 3.92 (2.11-7.31) and 4.09 (2.21-7.54; both p < 0.001) for mortality; and 9.49 (4.28-21.00) and 15.53 (6.99-34.51; both p < 0.001) for kidney failure. Associations persisted with additional adjustment for baseline eGFR_cr . We conclude that cystatin C and B2M are strongly associated with cardiovascular events, mortality, and kidney failure in stable kidney transplant recipients.

Test the ability of serum uromodulin concentrations 1-3 months after renal transplantation to predict all-cause mortality (ACM) and graft loss (GL) in 91 patients.

uromodulin predicted GL equivalently to the other markers studied: the risk for GL was reduced by 0.21 per one standard deviation (SD) increase (cystatin C: hazard ratio [HR] 4.57, creatinine: HR 4.53, blood-urea-nitrogen [BUN]: HR 2.50, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: HR 0.10). In receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis, uromodulin predicted GL with an area-under-the curve of 0.782 at an optimal cut-off (OCO) of 24.0 ng/ml with a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 70.2%.

Serum uromodulin predicted GL equivalently compared to conventional biomarkers of glomerular filtration.

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. The evaluation of graft function is mandatory in the management of renal transplant recipients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is generally considered the best index of graft function and also a predictor of graft and patient survival. However GFR measurement using inulin clearance, the gold standard for its measurement and exogenous markers such as radiolabeled isotopes ((51)Cr EDTA, (99m)Tc DTPA or (125)I Iothalamate) and non-radioactive contrast agents (Iothalamate or Iohexol), is laborious as well as expensive, being rarely used in clinical practice. Therefore, endogenous markers, such as serum creatinine or cystatin C, are used to estimate kidney function, and equations using these markers adjusted to other variables, mainly demographic, are an attempt to improve accuracy in estimation of GFR (eGFR). Nevertheless, there is some concern about the inability of the available eGFR equations to accurately identify changes in GFR, in kidney transplant recipients. This article will review and discuss the performance and limitations of these endogenous markers and their equations as estimators of GFR in the kidney transplant recipients, and their ability in predicting significant clinical outcomes.