Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Virol. Dec 25, 2024; 13(4): 95986
Published online Dec 25, 2024. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v13.i4.95986
Published online Dec 25, 2024. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v13.i4.95986
Table 1 Characteristics of patients with West Nile virus infection included in the study
Characteristic | Subcategory | n (%)1 |
Sex | Male | 35 (56.4) |
Female | 27 (43.6) | |
Age in median years (IQR) | 68 (58-76) | |
Clinical diagnosis | Febrile headache | 2 (3.2) |
Meningitis | 36 (58.1) | |
Meningoencephalitis | 20 (32.3) | |
Meningoencephalomyelitis | 2 (3.2) | |
Polyradiculoneuritis | 2 (3.2) |
Table 2 Laboratory tests used for the diagnosis of West Nile virus infection
Method | Manufacturer/Protocol | Reference values |
RT-PCR | FP: AAG TTG AGT AGA CGG TGC TG; RP: AGA CGG TTC TGA GGG CTT AC; Probe: FAM-CAA CCC CAG GAG GAC TGG-TAMRA | |
IgM ELISA | Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany | Ratio < 0.8 negative; 0.8-1.1 borderline; > 0.1 positive |
IgG ELISA | Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany | RU/mL < 16 negative, 16-22 borderline; > 22 positive |
IgG avidity | Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany | AI < 40% low; 40%-60% borderline; > 60% high |
VNT | In house | Titer ≥ 10 positive |
Table 3 Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction positive detection rates in cerebrospinal fluid and urine samples, n (%)
Days after symptoms onset | WNV RT-PCR CSF | WNV RT-PCR Urine | ||
Tested | Positive | Tested | Positive | |
≤ 7 | 22 (35.5) | 8 (36.4) | 17 (30.9) | 5 (29.4) |
8–14 | 32 (51.6) | 10 (31.2) | 30 (54.6) | 20 (66.6) |
≥ 15 | 8 (12.9) | 2 (25.0) | 8 (14.5) | 5 (62.5) |
Total | 62 (100) | 20 (32.2) | 55 (100) | 30 (54.4) |
Table 4 Positive detection rate of West Nile virus antibodies in serum samples according to sampling time, n (%)
Days after symptoms onset | Tested | WNV IgM antibodies | WNV IgG antibodies | ||
Positive | Borderline | Positive | Borderline | ||
≤ 7 | 32 (33.7) | 27 (84.3) | 0 (0) | 3 (9.3) | 2 (6.2) |
8 – 14 | 38 (40.0) | 38 (100) | 0 (0) | 27 (71.1) | 5 (13.1) |
≥ 15 | 25 (26.3) | 25 (100) | 0 (0) | 25 (100) | 0 (0) |
Total | 95 (100) | 90 (94.7) | 0 (0) | 55 (57.8) | 7 (7.3) |
Table 5 Positive detection rate of West Nile virus antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid samples according to sampling time, n (%)
WNV IgM antibodies | WNV IgG antibodies | ||||
Days after symptoms onset | Tested | Positive | Borderline | Positive | Borderline |
≤ 7 | 32 (51.6) | 20 (62.5) | 1 (3.1) | 9 (28.1) | 2 (6.2) |
8–14 | 23 (37.1) | 17 (73.9) | 0 (0) | 6 (26.1) | 1 (4.3) |
≥ 15 | 7 (11.3) | 7 (100) | 0 (0) | 4 (57.1) | 0 (0) |
Total | 62 (100) | 44 (70.9) | 1 (1.6) | 19 (30.6) | 3 (4.8) |
Table 6 Immunoglobulin G avidity in asymptomatic West Nile virus seropositive individuals
Serology result | IgG avidity index | ||
Low | Borderline | High | |
IgM/IgG positive, n = 10 | 1 (10.0) | 1 (10.0) | 8 (80.0) |
IgM negative/IgG positive, n = 12 | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0) | 11 (91.7) |
Total, n = 22 | 2 (9.1) | 1 (4.5) | 19 (84.6) |
- Citation: Vilibic-Cavlek T, Bogdanic M, Savic V, Hruskar Z, Barbic L, Stevanovic V, Antolasic L, Milasincic L, Sabadi D, Miletic G, Coric I, Mrzljak A, Listes E, Savini G. Diagnosis of West Nile virus infections: Evaluation of different laboratory methods. World J Virol 2024; 13(4): 95986
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v13/i4/95986.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v13.i4.95986