Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Virol . Feb 12, 2012; 1(1): 31-43
Published online Feb 12, 2012. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v1.i1.31
Published online Feb 12, 2012. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v1.i1.31
Table 1 Types of latency in Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases
| Type 0 latency (EBERs, BARTs) | AIDS-related plasmablastic lymphoma |
| Type I latency (EBNA1, LMP2, EBERs, BARTs) (BamHI A rightward fragments) | Burkitt’s lymphoma |
| Type II latency (EBNA1, LMP1, LMP2, EBERs, BARTs) | Hodgkin’s lymphoma, AIDS-related Burkitt’s lymphoma or primary effusion lymphoma |
| Peripheral T cell lymphoma | |
| NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type | |
| Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (plus BARF1) | |
| Gastric adenocarcinoma (plus BARF1) | |
| Type III latency (EBNA1, -2, -3A, -3B, -3C; LMP1, LMP2, EBERs, BARTs) | Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder |
| AIDS-related immunoblastic or brain lymphoma | |
| Infectious mononucleosis | |
| Chronic active EBV infection | |
| Lymphoblastoid cell lines in vitro | |
| X-linked lymphoproliferative disease |
Table 2 Interpretation of Epstein-Barr virus serological profiles in immunocompetent patients
| Anti-EBV antibodies | Interpretation | ||
| VCA IgM | VCA IgG | EBNA-1 IgG | |
| Negative | Negative | Negative | No immunity |
| Positive | Negative | Negative | Acute infection or non-specificity1 |
| Positive | Positive | Negative | Acute infection |
| Negative | Positive | Positive | Past infection |
| Negative | Positive | Negative | Acute or past infection1 |
| Positive | Positive | Positive | Late primary infection or reactivation1 |
| Negative | Negative | Positive | Past infection or non-specificity1 |
Table 3 Serological profiles in Epstein-Barr virus reactivation and some Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases
| Diseases | VCA IgM | VCA IgG | VCA IgA | EA (D) IgG | EA (R) IgG | EA IgA | EBNA1 IgG |
| Choronic active infection | +/- | ++ | +/- | + | ++ | - | +/- |
| Burkitt’s lymphoma | - | ++ | - | +/- | ++ | - | + |
| Nasopharingeal carcinoma | - | ++ | + | ++ | +/- | + | + |
| Hodgkin’s lymphoma | - | ++ | - | + | - | - | + |
| Reactivation | +/- | ++ | +/- | + | +/- | +/- | +/- |
Table 4 Interpretation of IgG avidity test with immunoblotting
| IgG | IgG avidity | Interpretation |
| Negative | Not observed | No infection |
| Positive BZLF1, p138, p54 | Low-high avidity for BZLF1 and/or p138 and/or p54 | Acute infection |
| Positive p23, BZLF1, p138, p54 | Low avidity for p23 | Acute infection |
| Positive p23, BZLF1, p138, p54 | High avidity for p23 | Recent infection |
| Positive p18, p23, BZLF1, p138, p54 | Low-intermediate avidity for p18 and p23 | Recent infection |
| Positive EBNA-1, p18, p23, BZLF1, p138, p54 | Low-high avidity for EBNA-1 and/or p18, and possible high avidity for p23 | Past infection |
Table 5 Additional tests in the case of an isolated viral capsid antigen IgG pattern
| Tests | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| EBV IgG immunoblotting | Useful in distinguishing acute from past infection | Individual antibody production; expensive |
| IgG avidity | Useful in distinguishing acute from past infection | Individual maturation. Not useful in newborns |
| Molecular biology | Useful in distinguishing acute from past infection | Uncorrected conservation of blood sample, presence of nucleasis; expensive; organisational problems |
| Heterophile antibodies | Useful in distinguishing acute from past infection if positive; inexpensive and simple | Not very sensitive (especially in children) |
| Anti-EA(D) IgG | Of some use in distinguishing acute from past infection; costs the same as a screening test | Not useful in at least 10% of cases |
Table 6 Additional tests in the case of a simultaneous Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 IgG, viral capsid antigen IgG and IgM positive pattern
| Tests | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| EBV IgM immunoblotting | Useful only in verifying the specificity of EBV IgM | Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation; expensive |
| HCMV IgM Parvovirus IgM | Useful in verifying the specificity of EBV IgM | Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation |
| EBV IgG immunoblotting | Only useful in verifying the specificity of EBNA-1 IgG | Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation; expensive |
| IgG avidity | Useful in distinguishing primary infection (transient) from reactivation | Individual maturation |
| Molecular biology | Useful for EBV reactivation follow-up | Difficult to distinguish late primary infection (transient) from reactivation in a single sample; expensive; organisational problems |
| Heterophile antibodies | Useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) reactivation when positive; inexpensive and simple | Not very sensitive (especially in children) |
| Anti-EA(D) IgG | Useful for EBV reactivation follow-up | Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation in a single sample |
| CLIA for EBV antibodies with differential cut-off values | Useful in distinguishing primary infection (transient) from past infection; can be used for screening | Requires further study |
- Citation: De Paschale M, Clerici P. Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions. World J Virol 2012; 1(1): 31-43
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v1/i1/31.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v1.i1.31
