Personal protective equipment is essential to protect healthcare workers when exposed to aerosol-generating procedures in patients with airborne respiratory pathogens.

This study aimed to provide information regarding the level of airborne protection offered to nursing staff and other healthcare workers in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs) 1 year into the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

In this cross-sectional survey, ICUs in Australia and New Zealand were asked to participate in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Point Prevalence Program in June 2021. Sites were asked to contribute to questions regarding airborne protection offered to nursing staff and other healthcare workers.

There were 51 participating sites. Negative-pressure bed space availability within participating ICUs included 24 with more than two, 15 with two, eight with one, and one ICU that did not have any. The median (interquartile range) number of different models and sizes of N95/P2 masks available to ICU staff was 6 (4-7). Of the 1018 nursing staff working that day in the units, 799 (78.5%) had at least one fit-tested N95/P2 mask in the correct size available. A total of 712 patients (461 medical and 251 surgical) were cared for by 700 bedside nurses in these ICUs. Overall, adequate airborne protection preparedness (airborne personal protective equipment training and fit-testing since the pandemic) was present in 548 (78.3%) bedside nurses.

Over a year into the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, airborne protection provided to nursing and other healthcare staff in Australia and New Zealand was often inadequate.

In Italy, influenza viruses typically circulate from October to April, causing seasonal epidemics. The pattern of influenza virus circulation varies each season regarding the timing of the first case notification, period of circulation, and predominant influenza virus types and subtypes.

This analysis used comprehensive data from the national influenza surveillance network for the 2017/2018 to 2023/2024 influenza seasons in the Veneto Region. Influenza A (IAV) and B (IBV) viruses were detected and subtyped using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assays.

Of 21,180 oropharyngeal swabs collected from 2017 to 2024, 4,325 (20.42%) were positive for influenza viruses. IAV accounted for 78.68% of positive cases overall, representing more than 65% of cases in every season except 2017/2018 (26.72%). Both A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) subtypes were detected in all seasons with varying proportions. IBV represented 21.32% of all positive cases, with Victoria and Yamagata lineages detected simultaneously during the 2017/2018 season. No Yamagata lineage was detected after the 2018/2019 season, and no IBV cases were detected in the 2021/2022 season. In almost all seasons, influenza virus circulation was more significant in adults, especially those 65 years and older, than in children.

In the Veneto Region, influenza virus circulation varied considerably from 2017/2018 to 2023/2024. In the 2020/2021 season, no influenza-positive samples were detected due to circulation of SARS-CoV-2 and related countermeasures. IAVs were the predominant type in most seasons, while IBVs made a limited contribution to the overall disease burden.

This study aimed to develop a dynamic prevention and control method for fluctuating respiratory nosocomial infections in outpatients.

Six sets of surveillance data such as influenza-like case counts and their predicted results were used in the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) to forecast the onset and end time points of the epidemic peak. A Delphi process was then used to build consensus on hierarchical infection control measures for epidemic peaks and plateaus. The data, predicted results, and hierarchical infection control measures can assist dynamic prevention and control of respiratory nosocomial infections with changes in the infection risk.

The ARIMA model produced exact estimates. The mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of the data selected to estimate the time range of the high-risk and low-risk periods were 15.8%, 9.2%, 15.4%, 16.8%, 25.6%. The hierarchical infection control measures included three categories and nine key points. A risk-period judgment matrix was also designed to connect the surveillance data and the hierarchical infection control measures.

Through a mathematical model, dynamic prevention and control of respiratory tract infections in outpatients was constructed based on the daily medical service monitoring data of hospitals. It is foreseeable that when applied in medical institutions, this method will provide accurate and low-cost infection prevention and control outcomes.

The optimal use of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients is debated, and considerable uncertainties on the frequency, timing, and outcomes of tracheostomy remain. The objective was to study the frequency and timing of tracheostomy in a real-world population of critically ill COVID-19 patients. The secondary aim was to study whether early tracheostomy was associated with days alive and out of intensive care unit (ICU), days free of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), 60-day mortality, ventilator weaning rate, and ICU discharge rate compared to late tracheostomy.

The study is a retrospective two-center cohort study. All COVID-19 patients admitted to critical care in the Region Östergötland County Council, Sweden, between March 2020 and September 2021 were included. Early (≤10 days from tracheal intubation) and late (>10 days) tracheostomy were compared. Through the Swedish intensive care registry, 249 mechanically ventilated COVID-19-positive patients ≥18 years old with respiratory failure were included. The pre-defined primary outcomes were the frequency and timing of tracheostomy. Secondary outcomes were days free of mechanical ventilation and intensive care, ICU discharge rate, ventilator weaning rate, and 60-day mortality.

Of 319 identified patients (70% men), 249 (78%) underwent endotracheal intubation. Of these, 145 (58%) underwent tracheostomy and 99 (68%) were performed early. Tracheostomy patients (vs. non-tracheostomy) had fewer IMV-free days and ICU-free days (27 [0-43] vs. 52 [43-55], p < .001, and 24 [0-40] vs. 49 [41-52], p < .001). Late (vs. early) tracheostomy patients had fewer IMV- and ICU-free days (16 [0-31] vs. 36 [0-47], p < .001 and 8 [0-28] vs. 32 [0-44], p < .001). Early tracheostomy (vs. late) was associated with a significantly higher ICU discharge rate (adjusted HR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.40-0.86], p = .006), but not with the weaning rate (adjusted HR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.12-3.32], p = .5) or 60-day mortality (adjusted HR = 1.27, 95% CI [0.61-2.67], p = .5).

Tracheostomy is common in critically ill COVID-19 patients. In patients predicted to need a tracheostomy at some point, early, rather than late, tracheostomy might be a means to reduce the time spent in ICU. However, we do not have sufficient evidence to suggest that early tracheostomy reduces mortality or weaning rates, compared with late tracheostomy.

Timely successful liberation from invasive ventilation has the potential to minimise critically ill patients' exposure to invasive ventilation, save costs and improve outcomes; yet no trials have evaluated strategies to better inform extubation decision-making. The Liberation from mechanical ventilation using Extubation Advisor (EA) Decision Support (LEADS) Pilot Trial will assess the feasibility of a trial of a novel extubation decision support tool on feasibility metrics. The primary feasibility outcome will reflect our ability to recruit the desired population. Secondary feasibility outcomes will assess rates of (1) consent, (2) randomisation, (3) intervention adherence, (4) bidirectional crossovers and the (5) completeness of clinical outcomes collected. We will also evaluate physicians' perceptions of the usefulness of the EA tool and measure costs related to EA implementation.

We will include critically ill adults who are invasively ventilated for ≥48 hours and who are ready to undergo a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) with a view to extubation. Patients in the intervention arm will undergo an EA assessment that measures respiratory rate variability to derive an estimate of extubation readiness. Treating clinicians (respiratory therapists, attending physicians and intensive care unit fellows) will receive an EA report for each SBT conducted. The EA report will assist, rather than direct, extubation decision-making. Patients in the control arm will receive standard care. SBTs will be directed by clinicians, using current best evidence, without EA assessments or reports. We aim to recruit 1 to 2 patients/month in approximately 10 centres, and to achieve >75% consent rate, >95% randomisation among consented patients, >80% of EA reports generated and delivered (intervention arm), <10% crossovers (both arms) and >90% of patients with complete clinical outcomes. We will also report physician point-of-care perceptions of the usefulness of the EA tool.

The LEADS Pilot Trial is approved by the Research Ethics Boards of all participating centres and Clinical Trials Ontario (4008). We will disseminate the LEADS trial findings through conference presentations and publication.

NCT05506904.

24 April 2024.

Background Lower respiratory infections remain one of the top global causes of death. The application of molecular diagnostic methods (e.g., reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction {RT-PCR} panels) for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) improves the understanding of respiratory pathogen epidemiology of these diseases and helps in the early detection of causative agents and formulating infection control measures and management. Methods In this study, consecutive nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab, sputum, tracheal aspirate, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples collected from patients having respiratory symptoms were tested using RT-PCR. Results Out of 372 samples, respiratory pathogens were detected in 245 (65.86%) cases. The total number of viral isolates detected in this study was 235, including the viral co-infections and viral and bacterial mixed infections, out of which SARS-CoV-2 was most common (115, 48.94%), followed by influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (82, 34.89%), rhinovirus (17, 7.23%), adenovirus (nine, 3.83%), influenza A (eight, 3.40%), and influenza B (four, 1.70%). Conclusion The rapid detection of respiratory pathogens through molecular methods can help with targeted antiviral treatment, limit the use of antibiotics, and help in knowing the burden of the disease.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Australia resulted in significant additional infection control precautions for consumers and the health workforce. Prior to widespread vaccine availability, substantial changes were made to the operating theatre management of patients presenting for surgery with suspected or diagnosed COVID-19. This study aimed to calculate the actual costs of operating theatre care for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Data were prospectively collected for all patients presenting for surgery with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital. Information collected included patient characteristics, surgical and anaesthesia details, equipment, theatre utilisation, staffing and cleaning. The associated variable costs and usual costs of care were calculated according to the Australian National Efficient Price. We compared estimated usual costs with those estimated for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Twenty-four patients with suspected COVID-19 infection underwent surgery between May 2020 and February 2021. Cost analysis revealed a mean (standard deviation (SD), range) increase in costs of providing perioperative care for COVID-19 suspect patients of A$2252 (A$2570, A$315.85-10,398); that is, a mean of 207.5% more than usual care costs. This was primarily due to the increased number of staff and time required to complete these cases with appropriate infection control.

Healthcare workers are exposed to a high risk of COVID-19 infection due to close contact with infected patients in healthcare centers. This study aimed to investigate the level of exposure and risk of COVID-19 virus infection among healthcare workers working in primary healthcare centers in Khuzestan province, Iran. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 599 healthcare workers working in primary healthcare centers in the northern region of Khuzestan province, Iran, in 2022. Participants were recruited using a multistage and proportional stratified random sampling method. The WHO COVID-19 risk assessment tool was used to collect data. Data were analyzed using STATA V14.2. The prevalence of occupational and community exposure was 95.7% (93.7 to 97.1) and 89.6% (87.0 to 92.1), respectively. Healthcare workers with occupational exposure had a high risk of exposure (92.7%; 95% CI 90.1 to 94.6). There was no significant association between the type of profession, the role of primary health care workers, and the level of occupational exposure risk (P value > 0.05). The strength of the association was very weak (PR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.07). Also, a significant association was observed between the history of contact with biological materials and adherence to infection prevention and control measures with the level of occupational exposure to the virus (P value < 0.001). The strength of the association between contact with biological materials and exposure risk was weak (aPR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.29), but the strength of the association between adherence to infection prevention and control protocols and exposure risk was strong (aPR = 3.85; 95% CI 2.60 to 5.71). Furthermore, infection prevention and control was identified as a strong confounder in this study. The results showed that the prevalence of occupational exposure was high among healthcare workers, regardless of their profession and roles, with the majority of exposures being of high risk. Primary healthcare managers can play a major role in reducing exposure among high-risk healthcare workers by providing continuous personnel training, investing in the supply chain, prioritizing regular testing and vaccination of HCWs, and ensuring dedicated supervision while accurately monitoring compliance with health protocols during pandemics.

Health care systems were subjected to an unprecedented surge of critically ill patients with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which required management by Respiratory Therapists (RTs). Despite the high level of burnout reported in this health care professional group, we have limited knowledge about the lived experience of RTs during the pandemic. This study aims to examine the impact of COVID-19 on RTs in Ontario, Canada. We conducted a qualitative exploratory, descriptive study by conducting virtual semi-structured interviews and focus groups with RTs between March 2023 and June 2023. Two coders analyzed the data using thematic analysis. Twenty-seven RTs participated in the study, with the majority being female (n = 25), averaging 16.4 years of practice (range 4 to 36 years), primarily in acute care settings (n = 23). We identified four themes and lessons learned from the perspective of RTs: (1) Working in the shadow and suffering in silence reflecting varying perceptions of recognition; (2) Flying blind amidst the buzz reflecting the rapid pace of changing policies and practices as COVID-19 gained global attention; (3) Putting out fires in the face of overflowing hospitals reflecting increased workload and staffing issues; and (4) Managing tensions, both external and internal reflecting how RTs coped with distressing workplace situations and their mental well-being. Finally, lessons learned from the RTs include 1) Mobilizing early and consistently during an emergency, which addresses staff concerns; 2) Prioritizing and investing in the mental health and well-being of RTs; 3) Implementing strategies to retain experienced staff in healthcare; and 4) Involving RTs in leadership discussions. The COVID-19 stressors of RTs have illuminated the detrimental impact of the pandemic on this understudied health care profession. With this knowledge, targeted interventions can be developed to address RT recognition and staff retention and provide mental health support.

The importance of aerosols (particles suspended in air) produced during dental procedures became more apparent than ever during the COVID-19 pandemic. Concerns over transmission of infection in these aerosols led to unprecedented disruption to dental services across the world, adversely impacting patients' oral health. This article discusses the evidence related to airborne transmission of infectious diseases and the relevance to dentistry. The production of bioaerosols (aerosols carrying biological material) during dental procedures is explored, as well as how the potential risks posed by these bioaerosols can be controlled. A better understanding of dental bioaerosols is needed to prevent similar disruption to dental services in future outbreaks, and to reduce the risk of infection of dental professionals when treating patients with active infections who require urgent or emergency dental care.

There is a lack of information regarding bronchoscopy practice in adults in Portugal. Our objective was to obtain an overview of the characteristics, resources, techniques and behaviors in national interventional pulmonology (IP) units, before and after SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.

An online survey was developed by an expert panel with a total of 46 questions comprising the specifications of each unit, namely physical space, equipment, staff, procedure planning, monitoring, technical differentiation, and numbers pre- and post-COVID-19. Forty-one interventional pulmonology centers were invited to participate between April and May 2021.

37 units (90.2%) responded to the survey. The majority (64.9%) have a fully dedicated space with a weekly presence of ≥3 chest physicians (82.1%) and support of an anesthesiologist on specific days (48.6%). There is marked heterogeneity in the IP unit's equipment, and 56.8% acquired disposable bronchoscopes after COVID-19 pandemics. Pre-bronchoscopy hemogram, platelet count and coagulation tests are regularly asked by more than 90% of the units, even when deep sedation or biopsies are not planned. In 97.3% of cases, topical anesthesia and midazolam are utilized. Propofol (21.6%) and fentanyl (29.7%) are occasionally employed in some institutions. Most units use ancillary sampling techniques to diagnose central or peripheral lesions, with radial EBUS being used for guidance of distal procedures in 37.8% of centers, linear EBUS and EUS-B-FNA for mediastinal diagnosis and/or staging in 45.9% and 27.0% of units, respectively. Cryobiopsies are used by 21.6% of respondents to diagnose diffuse lung diseases. Rigid bronchoscopy is performed in 37.8% of centers. There was a decrease in the number of flexible (p < 0.001) and rigid (p = 0.005) bronchoscopies and an upscale of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 outbreak.

IP units have variable bronchoscopic practices, but during the COVID-19 pandemic, they complied with most international recommendations, as elective procedures were postponed and PPE levels increased.

The aim of this study was to validate and compare the performance of statistical (Utstein-Based Return of Spontaneous Circulation and Shockable Rhythm-Witness-Age-pH) and machine learning-based (Prehospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation and Swedish Cardiac Arrest Risk Score) models in predicting the outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the models' performance.

This retrospective analysis included adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated at 3 academic hospitals between 2015 and 2023. The primary outcome was neurological outcomes at hospital discharge. Patients were divided into pre- (2015-2019) and post-2020 (2020-2023) subgroups to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome prediction. The models' performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and compared by the DeLong test. The analysis included 2161 patients, 1241 (57.4%) of whom were resuscitated after 2020. The cohort had a median age of 69.2 years, and 1399 patients (64.7%) were men. Overall, 69 patients (3.2%) had neurologically intact survival. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for predicting neurological outcomes were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.87) for the Utstein-Based Return of Spontaneous Circulation score, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.81-0.84) for the Shockable Rhythm-Witness-Age-pH score, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.78-0.81) for the Prehospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation score, and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.77-0.81) for the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Risk Score model. The Utstein-Based Return of Spontaneous Circulation score significantly outperformed both the Prehospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation score (P<0.001) and the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Risk Score model (P=0.007). Subgroup analysis indicated no significant difference in predictive performance for patients resuscitated before versus after 2020.

In this external validation, both statistical and machine learning-based models demonstrated excellent and fair performance, respectively, in predicting neurological outcomes despite different model architectures. The predictive performance of all evaluated clinical scoring systems was not significantly influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tracheostomized patients undergoing liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV) are exposed to the ambient environment through humidified air, potentially heightening aerosol particle dispersion. This study was designed to evaluate the patterns of aerosol dispersion during spontaneous breathing trials in such patients weaning from prolonged MV.

Particle Number Concentrations (PNC) at varying distances from tracheostomized patients in a specialized weaning unit were quantified using low-cost particle sensors, calibrated against a Condensation Particle Counter. Different oxygen delivery methods, including T-piece and collar mask both with the humidifier or with a small volume nebulizer (SVN), and simple collar mask, were employed. The PNC at various distances and across different oxygen devices were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Of nine patients receiving prolonged MV, five underwent major surgery, and eight were successfully weaned from ventilation. PNCs at distances ranging from 30 cm to 300 cm showed no significant disparity (H(4) = 8.993, p = 0.061). However, significant differences in PNC were noted among oxygen delivery methods, with Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons highlighting differences between T-piece or collar mask with SVN and other devices.

Aerosol dispersion within 300 cm of the patient was not significantly different, while the nebulization significantly enhances ambient aerosol dispersion in tracheostomized patients on prolonged MV.

Tracheal intubation is a fundamental facet of airway management, for which the importance of achieving success at the first attempt is well recognized. Failure to do so can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if there is inadequate patient oxygenation by alternate means. The evidence supporting the benefits of a videolaryngoscope in attaining this objective is now overwhelming (in adults). This has led to its increasing recognition in international airway management guidelines and its promotion from an occasional airway rescue tool to the first-choice device during routine airway management. However, usage in clinical practice does not currently reflect the increased worldwide availability that followed the upsurge in videolaryngoscope purchasing during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There are a number of obstacles to widespread adoption, including lack of adequate training, fears over de-skilling at direct laryngoscopy, equipment and cleaning costs, and concerns over the environmental impact, among others. It is now clear that in order for patients to benefit maximally from the technology and for airway managers to fully appreciate its role in everyday practice, proper training and education are necessary. Recent research evidence has addressed some existing barriers to default usage, and the emergence of techniques such as awake videolaryngoscopy and video-assisted flexible (bronchoscopic) intubation has also increased the scope of clinical application. Future studies will likely further confirm the superiority of videolaryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy, therefore, it is incumbent upon all airway managers (and their teams) to gain expertise in videolaryngoscopy and to use it routinely in their everyday practice..

Aerosol-transmitted viruses possess strong infectivity and can spread over long distances, earning the difficult-to-control title. They cause various human diseases and pose serious threats to human health. Mutations can increase the transmissibility and virulence of the strains, reducing the protection provided by vaccines and weakening the efficacy of antiviral drugs. In this study, we established a manually curated database (termed AVM) to store information on aerosol-transmitted viral mutations (VMs). The current version of the AVM contains 42,041 VMs (including 2613 immune escape mutations), 45 clinical information datasets, and 407 drugs/antibodies/vaccines. Additionally, we recorded 88 human diseases associated with viruses and found that the same virus can target multiple organs in the body, leading to diverse diseases. Furthermore, the AVM database offers a straightforward user interface for browsing, retrieving, and downloading information. This database is a comprehensive resource that can provide timely and valuable information on the transmission, treatment, and diseases caused by aerosol-transmitted viruses (http://www.bio-bigdata.center/AVM).

Since 2002, three novel coronavirus outbreaks have occurred: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2. A better understanding of the transmission potential of coronaviruses will result in adequate infection control precautions and an early halt of transmission within the human population. Experiments on the stability of coronaviruses in the environment, as well as transmission models, are thus pertinent.Here, we show that transgenic mice expressing human DPP4 can be infected with MERS-CoV via the aerosol route. Exposure to 5 × 106 TCID50 and 5 × 104 TCID50 MERS-CoV per cage via fomites resulted in transmission in 15 out of 20 and 11 out of 18 animals, respectively. Exposure of sentinel mice to donor mice one day post inoculation with 105 TCID50 MERS-CoV resulted in transmission in 1 out of 38 mice via direct contact and 4 out of 54 mice via airborne contact. Exposure to donor mice inoculated with 104 TCID50 MERS-CoV resulted in transmission in 0 out of 20 pairs via direct contact and 0 out of 5 pairs via the airborne route. Our model shows limited transmission of MERS-CoV via the fomite, direct contact, and airborne routes. The hDPP4 mouse model will allow assessment of the ongoing evolution of MERS-CoV in the context of acquiring enhanced human-to-human transmission kinetics and will inform the development of other transmission models.

Tuberculosis (TB) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality globally. About 3-4% of hospitalized TB patients require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU); the mortality in these patients is around 50-60%. There is limited literature on the evaluation and management of patients with TB who required ICU admission. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) constituted a working group to develop a position paper that provides recommendations on the various aspects of TB in the ICU setting based on available evidence. Seven domains were identified including the categorization of TB in the critically ill, diagnostic workup, drug therapy, TB in the immunocompromised host, organ support, infection control, and post-TB sequelae. Forty-one questions pertaining to these domains were identified and evidence-based position statements were generated, where available, keeping in focus the critical care aspects. Where evidence was not available, the recommendations were based on consensus. This position paper guides the approach to and management of critically ill patients with TB.

Chacko B, Chaudhry D, Peter JV, Khilnani G, Saxena P, Sehgal IS, et al. isccm Position Statement on the Approach to and Management of Critically Ill Patients with Tuberculosis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S67-S91.

Tracheal intubation is the gold standard of airway protection and constitutes a pivotal life-saving technique frequently employed in emergency medical interventions. Hence, in this paper, a system is designed to execute tracheal intubation tasks automatically, offering a safer and more efficient solution, thereby alleviating the burden on physicians.

The system comprises a tracheal tube with a bendable front end, a drive system, and a tip endoscope. The soft actuator provides two degrees of freedom for precise orientation. It is fabricated with varying-hardness silicone and reinforced with fibers and spiral steel wire for flexibility and safety. The hydraulic actuation system and tube feeding mechanism enable controlled bending and delivery. Object detection of key anatomical features guides the robotic arm and soft actuator. The control strategy involves visual servo control for coordinated robotic arm and soft actuator movements, ensuring accurate and safe tracheal intubation.

The kinematics of the soft actuator were established using a constant curvature model, allowing simulation of its workspace. Through experiments, the actuator is capable of 90° bending as well as 20° deflection on the left and right sides. The maximum insertion force of the tube is 2 N. Autonomous tracheal intubation experiments on a training manikin were successful in all 10 trials, with an average insertion time of 45.6 s.

Experimental validation on the manikin demonstrated that the robot tracheal intubation system based on a soft actuator was able to perform safe, stable, and automated tracheal intubation. In summary, this paper proposed a safe and automated robot-assisted tracheal intubation system based on a soft actuator, showing considerable potential for clinical applications.

Conflicting guidance exists regarding the characterization of nebulization as an aerosol-generating procedure and subsequent risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare workers.

This study sought to address whether SARS-CoV-2 viral load distribution was impacted by bronchodilator delivery via nebulizer versus metered-dose inhaler (MDI).

Adults infected with COVID-19 were enrolled and received a single dose of albuterol sulfate nebulized solution (2.5 mg/3 mL via breath-actuated nebulizer with filtered mouthpiece) or albuterol sulfate hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol (90 µg/actuation; two puffs via MDI with spacer) in a randomized crossover sequence. Air and surfaces were sampled at predefined locations within patients' hospital rooms to assess SARS-CoV-2 dispersion over three periods (baseline, MDI, and nebulizer).

Eleven patients received crossover therapy. Six patients had detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA during one treatment period (n = 3 each for MDI and nebulizer) and one during both treatment periods. No viral RNA was found in the rooms of four (36.4%) patients. Overall, few environmental samples (17/397; 4.3%) contained detectable viral RNA, with no meaningful differences in positivity rate across periods; RNA genome copy numbers were low in positive samples. No correlation between dispersion and patient clinical status or environmental parameters was observed.

In this first prospective trial evaluating viral load distribution following use of nebulizer versus MDI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, low environmental contamination was found regardless of administration method. Findings support the use of either device when needed to treat patients with COVID-19.

Owing to the highly contagious nature of SARS-CoV-2, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among the healthcare workers (HCWs) is mandatory. However, PPE associated adverse effects are also there.

To study the adverse effects associated with PPE and their preventive measures amongst the HCWs.

A descriptive study was conducted among 200 HCWs working in a Covid center of a tertiary care center. The participants were sent the questionnaires online. Some of them not having smart phones were interviewed telephonically. Their information profile, the various adverse effects associated with PPE, and the preventive measures being practiced by them were noted. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Total 97% HCWs reported adverse effects with hazmat suit; 96% with N 95 mask; 92% with goggle and 78% with gloves. The adverse effects associated with the prolonged use of the mask were erythema; erosions and scar at the nasal bridge; ear pain; difficulty in breathing; and headache. Sixty-seven percent of the participants had sweating with the use of gloves, which led to cutaneous exfoliation such as dry hands (55%) and skin itching (43%). Moisturizers and natural oils were used to prevent the dryness of hands. For the pressure related injury over the nasal bridge due to N95 mask, participants used to apply Band-Aid (adhesive bandage) and cotton dressing.

Adverse skin reactions related to PPE are common among HCWs. Comprehensive assessment of the skin condition and awareness on adverse skin reactions should be advocated.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on population health and hospital operations. Over 7 million patients have been hospitalized for COVID-19 thus far in the United States alone. Mortality rates for hospitalized patients during the first wave of the pandemic were > 30%, but as we enter the fifth year of the pandemic hospitalizations have fallen and mortality rates for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have plummeted to 5% or less. These gains reflect lessons learned about how to optimize respiratory support for different kinds of patients, targeted use of therapeutics for patients with different manifestations of COVID-19 including immunosuppressants and antivirals as appropriate, and high levels of population immunity acquired through vaccines and natural infections. At the same time, the pandemic has helped highlight some longstanding sources of harm for hospitalized patients including hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated events (VAEs), and hospital-acquired respiratory viral infections. We are, thankfully, on the leeside of the pandemic at present; but the large increases in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), VAEs, bacterial superinfections, and nosocomial respiratory viral infections associated with the pandemic beg the question of how best to prevent these complications moving forward. This paper reviews the burden of hospitalization for COVID-19, the intersection between COVID-19 and both VAP and VAEs, the frequency and impact of hospital-acquired respiratory viral infections, new recommendations on how best to prevent VAP and VAEs, and current insights into effective strategies to prevent nosocomial spread of respiratory viruses.

Accurate molecular diagnostic tests are necessary for confirming a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and for identifying asymptomatic carriage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The number of available SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests continues to increase as does the COVID-19 diagnostic literature. Thus, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed an evidence-based diagnostic guideline to assist clinicians, clinical laboratorians, patients, and policymakers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. In addition, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding molecular diagnostic test performance, discuss nuances of test result interpretation in a variety of practice settings, and highlight important unmet research needs related to COVID-19 diagnostic testing. IDSA convened a multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review to identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. The panel agreed on 12 diagnostic recommendations. Access to accurate SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing is critical for patient care, hospital infection prevention, and the public health response to COVID-19 infection. Information on the clinical performance of available tests continues to grow, but the quality of evidence of the current literature to support this updated molecular diagnostic guideline remains moderate to very low. Recognizing these limitations, the IDSA panel weighed available diagnostic evidence and recommends nucleic acid testing for all symptomatic individuals suspected of having COVID-19. In addition, testing is suggested for asymptomatic individuals with known or suspected contact with a COVID-19 case when the results will impact isolation/quarantine/personal protective equipment (PPE) usage decisions. Evidence in support of rapid testing and testing of upper respiratory specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs, which offer logistical advantages, is sufficient to warrant conditional recommendations in favor of these approaches.

Brazil has high rates of COVID-19 and tuberculosis among healthcare workers (HCWs). Personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential for their protection. We aimed to evaluate PPE use, training, and preparedness among HCWs in the early months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Brazil.

A cross-sectional study was performed using questionnaires available to HCWs through a website created to provide PPE guidelines. χ2 test and robust Poisson regression identified factors associated with HCWs treating COVID-19 patients (TCOVID-19), lack of training on PPE use and N95 respirator reuse. The speech content of open-ended questions was analysed.

We analysed 1410 questionnaires collected from April to July 2020 representing 526 Brazilian cities. HCWs-TCOVID-19 had fewer years of work experience, were more likely to reuse PPE, and reported higher stress levels and lower biosafety at the workplace than HCWs not TCOVID-19 patients. Fearful concerns, limited PPE access and pandemic unpreparedness were common among HCWs. Lack of PPE training was associated with the profession and no N95 respirator fit tests. N95 reuse during the pandemic, common to 78% of the HCWs, was associated with the reuse of PPE during the pandemic and reuse of N95 before the pandemic.

We report the unpreparedness of HCWs and institutions to handle the pandemic, with low rates of training and N95 respirator fit testing and high PPE reuse. N95 reuse was a pre-established practice. This chronic unpreparedness to deal with airborne pathogens may have contributed to one of the highest global rates of tuberculosis and COVID-19 among HCWs.

Airway surgery is performed for COVID-19 patients who require long-term tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Tracheostomy sometimes causes postoperative complications represented by bleeding at a relatively high rate in COVID-19 patients. As an alternative surgical procedure to tracheostomy, cricotracheostomy may reduce these complications, but few studies have examined its safety.

Data were retrospectively collected for sixteen COVID-19 patients (11 underwent tracheostomy, 5 underwent modified cricotracheostomy). In addition to patients' backgrounds and blood test data, the frequency of complications and additional care required for postoperative complications were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted by the univariate analysis of Fischer analysis and Mann-Whitney U test.

Five cases experienced postoperative bleeding, four cases experienced peristomal infection, and one case experienced subcutaneous emphysema in the tracheostomy patients. These complications were not observed in the cricotracheostomy patients. The number of additional cares for postoperative complications was significantly lower in cricotracheostomy than in tracheostomy patients (p < 0.05).

Modified cricotracheostomy could be a safe procedure in airway surgery for patients with COVID-19 from the point of fewer postoperative complications and additional care. It might be necessary to select the cricotracheostomy depending on patients' background to reduce postoperative complications.

Ultrasound performed after extubation has been suggested to be useful for the diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis. However, the use of ultrasound for this purpose before extubation has not been examined. The aim of this study was to examine the versatility (interrater reliability) and usefulness of ultrasound for evaluating the movement of vocal cords before extubation.

The subjects were 30 patients who underwent radical surgery for esophageal cancer from August 2020 to December 2021. An experienced examiner performed an ultrasound examination before and after elective extubation on the day after surgery to evaluate RLN paralysis and record videos. Bronchoscopy was then performed to make a definite diagnosis. Three anesthetists blinded to the diagnosis also evaluated the cases using the videos, and the versatility of the examination was determined using a kappa test.

The diagnostic accuracies of the examiner and three anesthetists were 76.7%, 50.0%, 53.3%, and 46.7%, respectively, and the kappa coefficients for the examiner with the anesthetists were 0.310, 0.502, and 0.169, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for diagnosis of RLN paralysis by the examiner using ultrasound before extubation were 0.57, 0.95, 0.80, and 0.87, respectively.

These results indicate a lack of versatility of the ultrasound examination based on the low kappa coefficients. However, with an experienced examiner, ultrasound can serve as a non-invasive examination that can be performed before extubation with high accuracy and specificity for diagnosis of postoperative RLN paralysis.

Tracheostomy can be performed as an open surgical procedure, percutaneous, or hybrid and forms an important step in the management of patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring weaning from mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this article is to share our experience to performing bedside surgical tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients in a safe and effective manner, whilst minimising the risk of viral transmission, to optimise patient outcomes and reduce risk to healthcare professionals.

As recommended by ENT UK, we prospectively established a COVID Airway Team within the ENT department at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, consisting of four head and neck consultant surgeons to perform either open-bedside, open-theatre or percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. A specific stepwise method for bedside open surgical tracheostomy was based on ENT UK and British Laryngological Society recommendations.

Thirty patients underwent tracheostomy during the study period (14 bedside-open, 5 open-theatre, 11 percutaneous). Mean duration of mechanical intubation prior to bedside-open tracheostomy was 14.5 days. The average time for open-bedside tracheostomy was 9 minutes compared to 31 minutes for open-theatre. There were no significant tracheostomy related complications with bedside-open tracheostomy. No healthcare professional involved reported acute COVID-19 infection.

We describe our effective, safe and swift approach to bedside open tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our experience demonstrated a short mean procedural time, with no tracheostomy-related complications and no reported viral transmission amongst the healthcare members involved.

World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and reliability of voice analysis performed with surgical masks and respirators during the pandemic and to discuss its routine applicability.

This prospective study included 204 patients who applied to our clinic between the ages of 18 and 55, whose preoperative SARS-Cov-2 PCR tests were negative. Voice analyses were performed on each patient without a mask, with a surgical mask and with a valved face-filtering piece-3 (FFP3) respirator respectively. The F0, shimmer, jitter, s/z ratio, maximum phonation time and harmonic/noise ratio (HNR) values obtained from the voice analyses were compared with each other.

No significant difference was found in terms of F0, Jitter, Shimmer, HNR, s/z and maximum phonation time values in the voice analyses performed without a mask and with a surgical mask. With an FFP3, a significant difference was found in only the Shimmer and HNR values compared to the other analysis values. When we look at the data with sex distinction, in the group of female and male patients, when the data of voice analysis obtained in three situations were compared, different results were obtained from the female and male group.

In conclusion, it should be decided by the physician to perform the voice analysis with a surgical mask or with an FFP3, considering the clinically desired parameters.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has affected the worldwide practice of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Here we designed a modified N95 respirator with a channel for endoscope insertion and evaluated its efficacy in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Thirty patients scheduled for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomized into the modified N95 (n=15) or control (n=15) group. The mask was placed on the patient after anesthesia administration and particles were counted every minute before (baseline) and during the procedure by a TSI AeroTrak particle counter (9306-04; TSI Inc.) and categorized by size (0.3, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 10 µm). Differences in particle counts between time points were recorded.

During the procedure, the modified N95 group displayed significantly smaller overall particle sizes than the control group (median [interquartile range], 231 [54-385] vs. 579 [213-1,379]×103/m3; p=0.056). However, the intervention group had a significant decrease in 0.3-µm particles (68 [-25-185] vs. 242 [72-588]×103/m3; p=0.045). No adverse events occurred in either group. The device did not cause any inconvenience to the endoscopists or patients.

This modified N95 respirator reduced the number of particles, especially 0.3-µm particles, generated during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

The role of Vitamin D in immune function is well reported with a growing evidence base linking low levels to poorer outcomes from infectious disease. Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency are prevalent worldwide with healthcare workers identified as a known at-risk group. Here we aim to investigate serum Vitamin D levels in a UK population of front line healthcare workers and to promote the occupational risk.

A cross-sectional study of 639 volunteers was conducted to identify the prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency amongst a population of front-line health care workers in the UK. Participant demographics and co-morbid factors were collected at the time of serum sampling for multivariate analysis.

Only 18.8% of the population had a normal vitamin D level greater than or equal to 75nmol/L. This is compared to Public Health England's (PHE) stipulated normal levels of 60% during winter. 81.2% had a level less than 75nmol/L, with 51.2% less than 50nmol/L and 6.6% less than 25nmol/L. For serum levels less than 25nmol/L, Asian ethnicity was more likely to have a vitamin D deficiency than non-asian (OR (95%CI): 3.81 (1.73-8.39), p = 0.001), whereas white ethnicity was less likely to have a vitamin D deficiency compared to non-white (OR (95%CI: 0.43 (0.20-0.83), p = 0.03). Other factors that contributed to a higher likelihood of lower-than-normal levels within this population included male sex, decreased age and not taking supplementation.

It is concluded that our population of healthcare workers have higher rates of abnormal vitamin D levels in comparison with the general UK population reported prevalence. Furthermore, Asian ethnicity and age 30 years and below are more at risk of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency. This highlights an occupational risk factor for the healthcare community to consider.

Coronavirus adult respiratory distress syndrome, characterized by decreased surfactant due to lysis of type II pneumocytes and hyaline membrane formation, contributes to severe hypoxemia. The administration of surfactant via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) may positively affect lung structure and function in this context. In this study, we report on five clinical cases, encompassing patients aged 40-60 years of both sexes, who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 via real-time polymerase chain reaction and exhibited significant pulmonary compromise with elevated inflammatory biomarkers. These patients were treated with aerosol therapy using surfactant delivered through vibrating-mesh nebulizers alongside HFNC. Of these patients, four demonstrated positive responses to the treatment, suggesting that aerosol therapy with surfactant through vibrating-mesh nebulizers could be a viable rescue therapy in adults receiving HFNC oxygen therapy for hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Unfortunately, one patient had a negative outcome and succumbed. The findings from these cases indicate that the use of aerosol therapy with vibrating-mesh nebulizers as rescue therapy might offer an alternative approach for managing adults with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2, as evidenced by the positive outcomes in four out of the five cases presented.

Advanced airway management of critically ill children is crucial for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) management in the pediatric intensive care unit, whether due to shock and hemodynamic collapse or acute respiratory failure. In this article, intubation is challenging due to the particularities of children's physiology and the underlying disease's pathophysiology, especially when an airborne pathogen, like COVID-19, is present. Unfortunately, published recommendations and guidelines for COVID-19 in pediatrics do not address in-depth endotracheal intubation in acutely ill children. We discussed the caveats and pitfalls of intubation in critically ill children.

Patients with COVID-19 undergoing hip fracture surgeries have a 30-day mortality of up to 34%. We aimed to evaluate the association between anesthesia technique and 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery in patients with COVID-19.

After ethics approval, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set from January to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 19 yr, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 14 days preoperatively, and hip fracture surgery under general anesthesia (GA) or spinal anesthesia (SA). Exclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status V, ventilator dependence, international normalized ratio ≥ 1.5, partial thromboplastin time > 35 sec, and platelet count < 80 × 109 L-1. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. The adjusted association between anesthetic technique and 30-day mortality was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

Of 23,045 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, 331 patients met the study criteria. The median [interquartile range] age was 82 [74-88] yr, and 32.3% were male. The 30-day mortality rate was 10.0% (33/331) for the cohort (10.7%, 29/272 for GA vs 6.8%, 4/59 for SA; P = 0.51; standardized mean difference, 0.138). The use of SA, compared with GA, was not associated with decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 1.8; E-value, 2.49).

Anesthesia technique was not associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 undergoing hip fracture surgery. The findings were limited by a small sample size.

www.

gov (NCT05133648); registered 24 November 2021.

Prevention from disease is presently the cornerstone of the fight against COVID-19. With the rapid emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants, there is an urgent need for novel or repurposed agents to strengthen and fortify the immune system. Existing vaccines induce several systemic and local side-effects that can lead to severe consequences. Moreover, elevated cytokines in COVID-19 patients with cancer as co-morbidity represent a significant bottleneck in disease prognosis and therapy. Withania somnifera (WS) and its phytoconstituent(s) have immense untapped immunomodulatory and therapeutic potential and the anticancer potential of WS is well documented. To this effect, WS methanolic extract (WSME) was characterized using HPLC. Withanolides were identified as the major phytoconstituents. In vitro cytotoxicity of WSME was determined against human breast MDA-MB-231 and normal Vero cells using MTT assay. WSME displayed potent cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-231 cells (IC50: 66 µg/mL) and no effect on Vero cells in the above range. MD simulations of Withanolide A with SARS-CoV-2 main protease and spike receptor-binding domain as well as Withanolide B with SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein and SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease were performed using Schrödinger. Stability of complexes followed the order 6M0J-Withanolide A > 6W9C-Withnaolide B > 5WRG-Withanolide B > 6LU7-Withanolide A. Maximum stable interaction(s) were observed between Withanolides A and B with SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV spike glycoproteins, respectively. Withanolides A and B also displayed potent binding to pro-inflammatory markers viz. serum ferritin and IL-6. Thus, WS phytoconstituents have the potential to be tested further in vitro and in vivo as novel antiviral agents against COVID-19 patients having cancer as a co-morbidity.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40203-023-00184-y.

The contagiousness of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is known to be linked to the emission of bioaerosols. Thus, aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) could increase the risk of infection among healthcare workers (HCWs).

To investigate the impact of an aerosol protection box, the SplashGuard Caregiver (SGGC) with suction system, by direct analysis of the presence of viral particles after an AGP, and by using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation method.

This prospective observational study investigated HCWs caring for patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). Rooms were categorized as: SGCG present and SGCG absent. Virus detection was performed through direct analysis, and using a CFD model to simulate the movement dynamics of airborne particles produced by a patient's respiratory activities.

Of the 67 analyses performed, three samples tested positive on quantitative polymerase chain reaction: one of 33 analyses in the SCCG group (3%) and two of 34 analyses in the non-SGCG group (5.9%). CFD simulations showed that: (1) reduction of the gaps of an SGCG could decrease the number of emitted particles remaining airborne within the room by up to 70%; and (2) positioning HCWs facing the opposite direction to the main air flow would reduce their exposure.

This study documented the presence of SARS-CoV-2 among HCWs in a negative pressure ICU room of an infected patient with or without the use of an SGCG. The simulation will help to improve the design of the SGCG and the positioning of HCWs in the room.

Pneumonia frequently leads to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and is associated with a high mortality risk. This study aimed to assess the impact of early bronchoscopy administered within 3 days of ICU admission on mortality in patients with pneumonia using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database.

A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted using the MIMIC-IV data from 2008 to 2019. Adult ICU-admitted patients diagnosed with pneumonia were included in this study. The patients were stratified into two cohorts based on whether they underwent early bronchoscopy. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. Propensity score matching was used to balance confounding variables.

In total, 8,916 patients with pneumonia were included in the analysis. Among them, 783 patients underwent early bronchoscopy within 3 days of ICU admission, whereas 8,133 patients did not undergo early bronchoscopy. The primary outcome of the 28-day mortality between two groups had no significant difference even after propensity matched cohorts (22.7% vs. 24.0%, P=0.589). Patients undergoing early bronchoscopy had prolonged ICU (P<0.001) and hospital stays (P<0.001) and were less likely to be discharged to home (P<0.001).

Early bronchoscopy in severe pneumonia patients in the ICU did not reduce mortality but was associated with longer hospital stays, suggesting it was used in more severe cases. Therefore, when considering bronchoscopy for these patients, it's important to tailor the decision to each individual case, thoughtfully balancing the possible advantages with the related risks.