Spinal cord injury (SCI) can cause serious respiratory problems. Cervical high-level injuries may result in diaphragm paralysis, necessitating tracheostomy to assist airway protection and facilitate breathing.

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was performed for published studies comparing outcomes between early versus late tracheostomy in acute traumatic SCI patients.

The initial search returned 1837 articles, after the final review, 17 studies with a total of 3853 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mortality rate between early and late tracheostomy was not statistically significant (OR = 0.81, 95 % CI = [0.37, 1.78], P = 0.61). However, early tracheostomy was associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = - 10.58, 95 % CI = [-15.22, -5.95], P < 0.01), hospital length of stay (MD = - 8.50, 95 % CI = [-10.95, -6.05], P < 0.01), and ICU length of stay (MD = - 9.12, 95 % CI = [-12.20, -6.05], P < 0.01). Early tracheostomy was also associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia (OR = 0.68, 95 % CI = [0.51, 0.91], P < 0.01). Patients in the early tracheostomy group also experienced fewer tracheostomy-related complications (OR = 0.50, 95 % CI = [0.33, 0.75], P < 0.01).

In patients with acute traumatic SCI, early tracheostomy within seven days of injury, surgery, or intubation is associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the hospital and ICU. Early tracheostomy is also associated with a lower risk of tracheostomy-related complications.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health burden. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of tracheostomy placement after OHCA and to evaluate trends over time and cost.

Using the National Inpatient Sample data 2016-2021, we examined a weighted sample of adults admitted after OHCA who underwent mechanical ventilation within the first 24 h of arrival and had an admission longer than 24 h. The primary outcome of interest was incidence of tracheostomy placement after cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes of interest included hospitalization costs, days to tracheostomy placement, length of stay and discharge disposition.

A total of 47,550 admissions fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of those, 1,450 (3.0%) patients received a tracheostomy during their hospitalization. There was no change in the incidence of tracheostomy placement over the analyzed years. Median hospitalization costs for patients with OHCA who received a tracheostomy were $96,038 (IQR= $66,415-$148,633). Hospitalization costs steadily increased over the analyzed years, from $83,668 in 2016 to $109,032 in 2021. Median days to tracheostomy placement was 11 days (IQR = 8-15) and median length of stay of patients with OHCA and tracheostomy was 23 days (IQR = 16-36). There was no significant change over the years in days to tracheostomy placement or in length of stay to explain the increase in hospitalization costs. Among patients with tracheostomy, 76.2% were discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility, 13.8% died, 4.8% were discharged to a short-term hospital, and 5.2% were discharged home.

An estimated 3.0% of patients who are admitted to the hospital after OHCA and require mechanical ventilation will receive a tracheostomy. Between 2016-2021 the rates and timing of tracheostomy placement remained stable in patients admitted with OHCA. However, we observed a rise in hospitalization costs associated with patients admitted for OHCA.

To analyze demographics, underlying diseases, and clinical outcomes of adult patients undergoing tracheostomy over 6 years, identifying annual changes and significant trends.

This study is a descriptive analysis of a retrospective cohort. Data were obtained from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database in Japan between January 2016 and December 2021. Adult patients (≥ 20 years) who underwent tracheostomy were included, excluding those from facilities inconsistently included in the database. Trends in demographics, underlying diseases, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, departments performing tracheostomies, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, body mass index at admission, hospital stay duration, timing of mechanical ventilation initiation, and discharge routes were analyzed.

A total of 22,480 patients were included (66.0% men; median age, 73 years). Respiratory diseases (36.6%) were the most common condition, followed by neurological diseases (29.4%), cardiovascular diseases (21.2%), and cancer and benign tumors (19.9%). The median hospital stay was 56 days, which slightly decreased to 53 days in 2021. Transfers to other hospitals increased from 51.0% in 2016 to 55.9% in 2021. Among 10,499 patients requiring ICU ventilatory management, 2756 (26.3%) underwent tracheostomy within 7 days of initiating mechanical ventilation, with no significant increase in early tracheostomy rates over the study period.

The study highlights that respiratory diseases are the leading indication for tracheostomy in adults. The majority of tracheostomies were performed after the initiation of mechanical ventilation, underscoring prolonged ventilation as a primary indication. Further research is warranted to optimize guidelines for tracheostomy timing and indications in adult patients.

This study conducts an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate the outcomes of early vs late tracheostomy, focusing on potential biases and the coherence of the evidence.

Searches were conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, Lilacs and Cochrane Library databases up to November 2024.

Our analysis included studies meeting the following criteria: Population: patients admitted to intensive care units and receiving mechanical ventilation.

early tracheostomy, as defined by the respective study.

late tracheostomy, as defined by the respective study.

mortality and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

systematic reviews and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Two reviewers performed article inclusion, with consensus resolution by a third reviewer in case of disagreement. The quality of studies was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted with an algorithm based on the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) classification DATA SYNTHESIS: Out of 7664 articles identified, 60 articles were considered eligible for full-text reading, and 22 were included in the review. Most studies were rated as critically low quality. Our meta-analysis update with 19 RCTs showed a decrease in VAP (OR 0.65 (0.47 to 0.89), 95% CI; p=0.007) among early tracheostomy patients compared with late tracheostomy patients, but no significant difference in terms of mortality (OR 0.85 (0.70 to 1.03), 95% CI; p=0.09). A trial sequential analysis indicated that the current data are insufficient to reach a definitive conclusion.

In summary, despite extensive research on tracheostomy timing and its outcomes, as well as a correlation in our study between early tracheostomy and reduced VAP incidence, evidence remains weak. Besides that, no clear mortality benefits were observed. Further research using a different approach is crucial to identify the specific population that may derive benefits from early tracheostomy.

The optimal use of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients is debated, and considerable uncertainties on the frequency, timing, and outcomes of tracheostomy remain. The objective was to study the frequency and timing of tracheostomy in a real-world population of critically ill COVID-19 patients. The secondary aim was to study whether early tracheostomy was associated with days alive and out of intensive care unit (ICU), days free of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), 60-day mortality, ventilator weaning rate, and ICU discharge rate compared to late tracheostomy.

The study is a retrospective two-center cohort study. All COVID-19 patients admitted to critical care in the Region Östergötland County Council, Sweden, between March 2020 and September 2021 were included. Early (≤10 days from tracheal intubation) and late (>10 days) tracheostomy were compared. Through the Swedish intensive care registry, 249 mechanically ventilated COVID-19-positive patients ≥18 years old with respiratory failure were included. The pre-defined primary outcomes were the frequency and timing of tracheostomy. Secondary outcomes were days free of mechanical ventilation and intensive care, ICU discharge rate, ventilator weaning rate, and 60-day mortality.

Of 319 identified patients (70% men), 249 (78%) underwent endotracheal intubation. Of these, 145 (58%) underwent tracheostomy and 99 (68%) were performed early. Tracheostomy patients (vs. non-tracheostomy) had fewer IMV-free days and ICU-free days (27 [0-43] vs. 52 [43-55], p < .001, and 24 [0-40] vs. 49 [41-52], p < .001). Late (vs. early) tracheostomy patients had fewer IMV- and ICU-free days (16 [0-31] vs. 36 [0-47], p < .001 and 8 [0-28] vs. 32 [0-44], p < .001). Early tracheostomy (vs. late) was associated with a significantly higher ICU discharge rate (adjusted HR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.40-0.86], p = .006), but not with the weaning rate (adjusted HR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.12-3.32], p = .5) or 60-day mortality (adjusted HR = 1.27, 95% CI [0.61-2.67], p = .5).

Tracheostomy is common in critically ill COVID-19 patients. In patients predicted to need a tracheostomy at some point, early, rather than late, tracheostomy might be a means to reduce the time spent in ICU. However, we do not have sufficient evidence to suggest that early tracheostomy reduces mortality or weaning rates, compared with late tracheostomy.

It is unknown whether a volume-outcome relationship exists for patients who receive tracheostomy in the intensive care unit (ICU) as has been observed in other healthcare settings. This study aimed to determine the average number of tracheostomies performed per intensivist per ICU in Australia and New Zealand and associations with case fatality.

A retrospective cohort study of adult ICU admissions was conducted.

Data from the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database and Critical care resources registry were linked and analysed over the time period extending from 01 January 2018 to 31 March 2023.

The study population included adults (aged ≥18 years) admitted to Australia and New Zealand ICUs who received tracheostomy.

No intervention was reported.

The primary exposure variable was tracheostomies per intensivist (TPIs), which was calculated as (the number of patients who had tracheostomy inserted during their ICU admission)/(the total number of intensivists), for each site for each financial year.

There were 9318 patients from 172 ICUs over a 5-year period, from January 2018 to March 2023, who received tracheostomies and were included in this analysis. The median TPI value was 3.1 (interquartile range: 1.9-4.3). Raw case fatality in the total cohort was 13.7% (1280/9318). The lowest adjusted risk of death (8.5%, 95% confidence interval: 3.63%-13.36%) was observed when the TPI value was equal to 10.3, with higher risk of death observed at lower values of TPI.

A volume-outcome relationship was observed between TPI value and hospital case fatality, with lower case fatality at higher TPI values across the entire range of TPI.

To analyze the utilization and reimbursement for tracheostomy.

Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2013 and 2021) and Part B Medicare Fee-For-Service National Summary Data (2000-2022).

Utilization, payment, and specialty breakdown were analyzed for planned tracheostomy (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 31600, 31601, 31610) and emergency tracheostomy (CPT codes 31603, 31605).

From 2000 to 2022, there was a 48.9% decrease (40,754-20,812) in number of planned tracheostomies and a 75.3% decrease (3277-811) in number of emergency tracheostomies, leading to an overall decrease of 51%. Similarly, there was a 59.3% inflation-adjusted decrease ($13.4-$5.5 million) in total reimbursement for planned tracheostomies and an 82.1% inflation-adjusted decrease ($1.1 million-$205 thousand) in total reimbursement for emergency tracheostomies. There was a 20.3% inflation-adjusted decrease ($329-$262) in reimbursement per planned tracheostomy and a 27.7% inflation-adjusted decrease ($349-$252) in reimbursement per emergency tracheostomy. In our sample of 280 high-volume tracheostomy providers in 2021 (28.2% otolaryngology, 28.2% general surgery, 14.6% thoracic surgery, 14.3% pulmonary disease, 6.4% critical care), the average provider performed 15.8 tracheostomies and was reimbursed $5362.

Despite significant declines in tracheostomy utilization and reimbursement, understanding trends for these lifesaving procedures are critical for otolaryngologists and other providers in delivering high-quality care, and can be used by surgeons, hospital systems, and policymakers to guide future health care legislation.

The optimal timing for exchanging an endotracheal tube for a tracheostomy cannula in patients with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy is controversial.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of early versus late tracheostomy on the prognosis of patients with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy.

The study was an observational retrospective study that followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. We included adults with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy who underwent tracheostomy between January 2012 and September 2020. The patients were classified into early or late tracheostomy groups. To eliminate differences in baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was conducted, and the outcomes between the two groups were compared.

A total of 132 patients were included, and through propensity score matching, 54 pairs of patients were matched. The early tracheostomy group showed a significant reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation (median, 12 days; interquartile range 7-20 vs. median, 28 days; interquartile range, 15.75-58.25, p < .001), intensive care unit length of stay (median, 14.5 days; interquartile range, 6.75-26 vs. median, 35 days; interquartile range, 20-59, p < .001) and hospital length of stay (median, 19.5 days; interquartile range, 10.87-36.5 vs. median, 39.5 days; interquartile range, 22-66, p < .001). Over a 1-year follow-up period, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding inhospital mortality (57.4% vs. 46.3%, p = .248), 30-day mortality (59.3% vs. 46.3%, p = .177) and 1-year mortality (61.1% vs. 48.1%, p = .176).

In patients with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy undergoing mechanical ventilation, early tracheostomy is associated with a reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation and decreased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay.

For patients with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy who are at a high risk of requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, the benefits of early tracheostomy suggest considering it a viable treatment option.

The ideal timing for tracheostomy in patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains controversial. The present study aimed to provide an overview of the timing of percutaneous dilation tracheostomy performed in the ICU over a 5-year period, and the effect of this procedure on 28-day mortality. The study included patients who underwent early (≤14 days) (n = 112) and late (>14 days) (n = 171) tracheostomy during their follow-up in the ICU between 2018 and 2023. It is a single-center retrospective study. The diagnoses, comorbidities, MV duration, tracheostomy timing, tracheostomy indications, tracheostomy complications, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, extubation attempts, mortality, time to decannulation, and ICU discharge location were determined in both tracheostomy groups and compared. The effect of tracheostomy timing on mortality risk was evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analyses. In the early tracheostomy group, MV duration, ICU hospitalization, hospital stay, and extubation attempt were lower. The 28-day intensive care mortality rates were not statistically different between the early and late tracheostomy groups. Multivariate regression analysis showed that mortality risk increased with prolonged MV and tracheostomy complications. In terms of mortality rates in palliative care, mortality in the late tracheostomy group was significantly lower than in the early tracheostomy group. The study demonstrated that the timing of tracheostomy in the ICU had no effect on mortality risk in multivariate analysis. We believe that time is not the only limiting factor when considering tracheostomy and prospective randomized studies are needed.

There is little research on long-term, patient-centered outcomes in critically ill patients undergoing tracheostomy for secretion management or prolonged ventilation. The goal of this study was to determine and compare hospital and long-term mortality, and incidence of new institutionalization amongst patients who underwent an ICU tracheostomy for these two aforementioned indications.

This was a single center historic cohort study of all ICU patients who received a tracheostomy for secretion management or prolonged ventilation from 2011 to 2022. We compared hospital and long-term mortality and incidence of new institutionalization between these two groups.

A cohort of 247 patients (133 secretion management, 114 prolonged ventilation) was established. Overall hospital mortality was 86/247 (35%), mortality at 1 year was 106/207 (51%), and at 3 years was 117/167 (70%), with no significant difference between the two indications. Patients with prolonged ventilation indication had a significantly higher ICU mortality [34/114 (30%) vs. 13/133 (10%), P < 0.001]. Amongst hospital survivors, 49/137 (36%) were unable to return home, with significantly more patients tracheostomized for secretion management requiring new institutionalization [37/78 (47%) vs. 12/59 (20%), P = 0.002].

Tracheostomy indication may be an important determinant of short- and long-term patient-centered outcomes. Patients receiving a tracheostomy for secretion management were twice as likely to be discharged to a new institution compared to prolonged ventilation patients. Patient-centered outcomes should be included in future studies and if confirmed, these outcomes should be incorporated into discussions about tracheostomy decision making.

The aim of this review is to summarize available data, including the most recent ones, to help develop the best possible strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation or who experience loss of airway-protecting mechanisms.

Tracheostomy facilitates the weaning process by reducing the patient's work of breathing and increasing comfort. It thus allows for a reduction in sedation levels. It also helps with secretions clearance, facilitates disconnection from the ventilator, and enables earlier phonation, oral intake, and mobilization. Despite these advantages, tracheostomy does not reduce mortality and is associated with both early and late complications, particularly tracheal stenosis. The timing of tracheostomy remains a subject of debate, and only a personalized approach that considers each patient's specific characteristics can help find the best possible compromise between avoiding unnecessary delays and minimizing the risks of performing a needless invasive procedure. In the absence of contraindications, the percutaneous single dilator technique under fibroscopic guidance should be the first choice, but only if the team is properly trained.

A step-by-step individualized approach based on the available evidence allows identifying the best strategy regarding the use of tracheostomy in ICU patients.

Tracheostomy is performed in patients with trauma who need prolonged ventilation for respiratory failure or airway management. Although it has benefits, such as reduced sedation and easier care, it also has risks. This study explored the unclear timing, technique, and patient selection criteria for tracheostomy in patients with trauma.

We included 220 adult patients with trauma who underwent tracheostomy after endotracheal intubation between January 2019 and December 2022. We compared clinical outcomes between patients who underwent early (within 10 days) and late (after 10 days) tracheostomy and between patients who underwent percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and surgical tracheostomy (ST). Factors associated with hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), ICU-free days, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ventilator-free days (VFDs) were identified using multiple linear regression analysis.

The patients' mean age was 61.5 years; 75.9% were men. Most tracheostomies were performed after 10 days (n = 135, 61.4%), with PDT serving as the more common approach during this period. Contrastingly, early tracheostomies (n = 85, 38.6%) were predominantly performed using ST. Early tracheostomy was significantly associated with reduced hospital (P = 0.038) and ICU LOS (P = 0.047), decreased duration of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.001), and increased VFDs (P < 0.001). However, no significant association was found with ICU-free days (P = 0.072) or in-hospital mortality (P = 0.917).

Early tracheostomy was associated with reduced hospital and ICU LOS, decreased duration of mechanical ventilation, and increased VFDs.

The number of children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) has increased with the advancement of medical care. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of PMV worldwide, document demographic and clinical characteristics of children requiring PMV in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and to understand variation in clinical practice and health-care burden.

This international, multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study screened participating PICUs in 28 countries for children aged >37 postgestational weeks to 17 years who had been receiving mechanical ventilation (MV; invasive or non-invasive) for at least 14 consecutive days. Screening days took place every 90 days for 3 years. Patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis if they had been receiving MV (invasive or non-invasive) for at least 14 consecutive days by their first day of screening. Eligible patients were followed up on the subsequent screening day 90 days later or at time of hospital discharge, whichever came first. Outcome data were recorded in a validated web-based case report file. The primary outcome was the prevalence of PMV. Secondary outcomes were mortality, duration of MV, tracheostomy, and number of complications. All outcomes were assessed at 90 days post-screening. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04112459.

Between Sept 4, 2019 and Dec 7, 2022, 14 595 children were screened on four separate screening days in 158 PICUs, and 2773 patients had been receiving MV for at least 14 days and were included in the analysis. The point prevalence of PMV was 25·8% (IQR 24·1-28·5). Median age was 0·4 years (IQR 0·2-5·3) and median weight was 8·1 kg (IQR 4·7-19·1). 625 (24·0%) of 2610 patients had a history of prematurity (<37 weeks gestational age at birth). 90-day outcome data were collected for 2430 patients. 441 (18·2%) of 2430 patients had died within 90 days. 649 (29·8%) of 2176 patients who initiated ventilation support upon hospital admission had a tracheostomy placed after the first 14 days of MV. The median time to tracheostomy placement after MV initiation was 26 days (IQR 18-52). 462 (21·2%) of 2176 patients had at least one failed extubation between MV initiation and their first screening date. 556 (25·6%) of 2174 patients who started MV upon hospital admission required MV for 21 days or less, whereas 1618 (74·4%) patients required MV for 22 days or more; 90-day mortality did not differ between these groups (18·2% vs 20·30%, p=0·288). Complications were recorded for 810 (38·4%) 2109 patients who initiated MV upon hospital admission; of these 539 (67%) had ventilator-associated pneumonia, and 212 (39%) of 539 patients had multiple episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Timing of tracheostomy was variable, and duration of MV was longer than previously reported. The large variability in patients requiring MV and the associated health-care burden and outcomes across PICUs suggest that further investigation of the factors influencing the care of children with MV is warranted.

Réseau en Santé Respiratoire du Québec (Respiratory Research Network of Quebec), Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec, Women and Children Health Research Institute-Clinical/Community Research Integration and Support Program, Réseau mère-enfant de la francophonie.

For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

It is difficult to predict which mechanically ventilated patients will ultimately require a tracheostomy which further predisposes them to unnecessary spontaneous breathing trials, additional time on the ventilator, increased costs, and further ventilation-related complications such as subglottic stenosis. In this study, we aimed to develop a machine learning tool to predict which patients need a tracheostomy at the onset of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Multicenter Study of 335 Intensive Care Units between 2014 and 2015.

The eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) was utilized to obtain the patient cohort. Inclusion criteria included: (1) Age >18 years and (2) ICU admission requiring mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome of interest included tracheostomy assessed via a binary classification model. Models included logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).

Of 38,508 invasively mechanically ventilated patients, 1605 patients underwent a tracheostomy. The XGBoost, RF, and LR models had fair performances at an AUROC 0.794, 0.780, and 0.775 respectively. Limiting the XGBoost model to 20 features out of 331, a minimal reduction in performance was observed with an AUROC of 0.778. Using Shapley Additive Explanations, the top features were an admission diagnosis of pneumonia or sepsis and comorbidity of chronic respiratory failure.

Our machine learning model accurately predicts the probability that a patient will eventually require a tracheostomy upon ICU admission, and upon prospective validation, we have the potential to institute earlier interventions and reduce the complications of prolonged ventilation.

Tracheotomy has long been performed outside of intensive care medicine. In modern medicine, it has a firm place in the management of critically ill and emergency care patients as well as in cancer surgery of the head and neck, the care of long-term ventilated patients, patients with swallowing disorders, and neurological diseases. The indication, technique, and timing of tracheotomy are very different for the various diseases. This article provides an overview of the different indications, surgical techniques, and timing of tracheotomy in modern intensive care medicine.

The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence concerning communication in critically ill tracheostomy patients dependent on cuff inflation. The aim was to identify the psychological impact on patients awake and alert with tracheostomies but unable to speak; strategies utilised to enable communication and facilitators and barriers for the success of these strategies.

This scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched from 1st January 2000 to 30th September 2023 and supplemented with hand searching of references from included studies.

Studies were eligible if they addressed the psychological impact of voicelessness and/or the structure, process, and outcomes of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, in addition to facilitators and barriers to effectiveness. The population of interest included critically ill tracheostomy patients dependent on cuff inflation, their families, and healthcare workers. Screening and data extraction were undertaken by two reviewers independently. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and content analysis.

A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria: 11 were qualitative, nine were quantitative, and three were mixed-methods studies. Voicelessness elicited negative emotions, predominantly frustration. AAC systems, encompassing unaided and aided (low-tech and high-tech) methods, presented both advantages and drawbacks. High-tech strategies held promise for patients with physical limitations. Patients equally appreciated the support offered through unaided strategies, including eye contact and touch. Facilitating factors included speech therapy involvement and assessment. Patient-related challenges were the most frequent barriers.

Facilitating meaningful communication for critically ill tracheostomy patients dependent on cuff inflation is of paramount psychological significance. Whilst AAC systems are practicable, they are not without limitations, implying the absence of a universally applicable solution. This underscores the importance of continuous evaluation, reinforced by a multidisciplinary team.

27 July 2022.

Open Science Framework Registries: https://osf.io/kbrjn/.

Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation is one of the most crucial processes in critical care, because it is the first step through which a respiratory failure patient begins to transition out of the intensive care unit, and return to normal life. Therefore, when devising appropriate strategies for removing mechanical ventilation, it is essential to consider scientific and systematic approaches, as well as the individual experiences of healthcare professionals. Recently, numerous studies have investigated methods and tools to identify when mechanically ventilated patients are ready to breathe on their own. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine therefore provides these recommendations to clinicians for liberation from the ventilator.

Meta-analyses and comprehensive syntheses were used to thoroughly review, compile, and summarize the complete body of relevant evidence. All studies were meticulously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, and the outcomes were presented succinctly as evidence profiles. These evidence syntheses were discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation, who then developed and approved the recommendations.

Recommendations for nine questions on ventilator liberation about Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) are presented in this document. This guideline presents seven conditional recommendations, one expert consensus recommendation, and one conditional deferred recommendation.

We developed these clinical guidelines for mechanical ventilation liberation to provide meaningful recommendations. These guidelines reflect the best treatment for patients seeking liberation from mechanical ventilation.

Background: The ideal timing for tracheostomy in critically ill patients is still debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether early tracheostomy improves clinical outcomes compared to late tracheostomy or prolonged intubation in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the risk of clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients who underwent early (within 7-10 days of intubation) versus late tracheostomy or prolonged intubation. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2023. The primary outcome evaluated was mortality, while secondary outcomes included the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ICU length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. No language restriction was applied. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing early to late tracheostomy or prolonged intubation in critically ill patients that reported on mortality. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs, and evidence certainty was assessed via the GRADE approach. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 19 RCTs, covering 3586 critically ill patients. Early tracheostomy modestly decreased mortality compared to the control (RR -0.1511 [95% CI: -0.2951 to -0.0070], p = 0.0398). It also reduced ICU length of stay (SMD -0.6237 [95% CI: -0.9526 to -0.2948], p = 0.0002) and the duration of mechanical ventilation compared to late tracheostomy (SMD -0.3887 [95% CI: -0.7726 to -0.0048], p = 0.0472). However, early tracheostomy did not significantly reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation compared to prolonged intubation (SMD -0.1192 [95% CI: -0.2986 to 0.0601], p = 0.1927) or affect VAP incidence (RR -0.0986 [95% CI: -0.2272 to 0.0299], p = 0.1327). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) for each outcome indicated that additional trials are needed for conclusive evidence. Conclusions: Early tracheostomy appears to offer some benefits across all considered clinical outcomes when compared to late tracheostomy and prolonged intubation.

Suitable tracheostomy timing after cardiac operation remains controversial; hence, this study compared the effectiveness of early and late tracheostomy after cardiac operation.

By using the nationwide administrative claims database in Japan, patients who underwent cardiac operation between April 2010 and March 2020 were identified and included in this study. In-hospital mortality, incidence of deep sternal wound infection, and ventilator-free days were analyzed and compared by dividing patients into 2 groups: an early group (patients who underwent tracheostomy 1-14 days postoperatively) and a late group (patients who underwent tracheostomy 15-30 days postoperatively). Baseline characteristics were adjusted by propensity score weighting.

Of 1240 patients who underwent cardiac operation and postoperative tracheostomy, 784 were included in the main analysis cohort. As the number of days between the operation and tracheostomy increased, in-hospital mortality increased, whereas ventilator-free days decreased. The early and late groups comprised 284 and 326 patients, respectively. After adjustment of baseline characteristics, the in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91; P = .01) was lower in the early group than in the late group, the incidence of deep sternal wound infection (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.23-1.52; P = .27) was not significantly different between the 2 groups, and the early group had more ventilator-free days compared with the late group (mean difference, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.6-6.5; P < .001).

Early tracheostomy may be considered in patients expected to require prolonged ventilation.

Respiratory distress and failure is a complication of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and tracheostomy may be necessary in cases of prolonged intubation in order to reduce mechanical ventilation duration. However, according to the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines, which our institution applies, patients should not undergo tracheostomy unless cleared of the virus to reduce its spread among healthcare workers because tracheostomy is an aerosolized procedure. This study aimed to identify the outcomes of prolonged intubation in patients with and without COVID-19 who underwent tracheostomy and to determine the morbidity and mortality rates in both groups.

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit of King Fahad Hospital of the University, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia, between March 1 and October 31, 2020. This study compared and analyzed the outcomes of delayed tracheostomy in patients with and without COVID-19 in terms of complication, morbidity, and mortality rates.

Of the 228 study participants, 111 (48.68%) had COVID-19. The mean age of the study participants was 58.67 years (SD = 17.36, max.=93, min.=20), and the majority were males (n = 149, 65.35%). Regarding tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19, 11 (9.91%) patients underwent tracheostomy; however, four (36.36%) of them had prolonged intubation. The mean intensive care unit admission length of stay for tracheostomy patients was 37.17 days, while it was 12.09 days for patients without tracheostomy (t(226)=-9.32, p < 0.001). Regarding prolonged intubation among patients with COVID-19 (n = 7, 6.31%), the complications were as follows: six people (85.71%) had dysphonia, one (14.29%) had vocal cord granuloma, and two (28.57%) had subglottic tracheal stenosis. The mortality rate among our study participants was 51.32%, and the risk was significantly higher in older people (Odds ratio = 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.02-1.06) and in delayed tracheostomy cases (OR = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.31-6.63). However, COVID-19 status was not significantly related to the risk of mortality.

Delaying tracheostomy increases the risk of mortality. Therefore, we recommend weighing the risks and benefits for each patient to benefit both healthcare workers and patients with COVID-19.

Optimal timing of tracheostomy in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown due to lack of clinical trials. We emulated a target trial to estimate the effect of early vs. delayed tracheostomy strategy on functional outcome of patients with severe TBI.

Target trial emulation using 1:1 balanced risk-set matching.

North American hospitals participating in the TBI Hypertonic Saline randomized controlled trial of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.

The prematching population consisted of patients with TBI and admission Glasgow Coma Scale less than or equal to 8, who were alive and on mechanical ventilation on the fourth day following trial enrollment, and stayed in the ICU for at least 5 days. Patients with absolute indication for tracheostomy and patients who died during the first 28 days with a decision to withdraw care were excluded.

We matched patients who received tracheostomy at a certain timepoint (early group) with patients who had not received tracheostomy at the same timepoint but were at-risk of tracheostomy in the future (delayed group). The primary outcome was a poor 6-month functional outcome, defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended less than or equal to 4.

Out of 1282 patients available for analysis, 275 comprised the prematching population, with 75 pairs being created postmatching. Median time of tracheostomy differed significantly in the early vs. the delayed group (7.0 d [6.0-10.0 d] vs. 12.0 d [9.8-18.3 d]; p < 0.001). Only 40% of patients in the delayed group received tracheostomy. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding poor 6-month functional outcome (early: 68.0% vs. delayed: 72.0%; p = 0.593).

In a target trial emulation, early as opposed to delayed tracheostomy strategy was not associated with differences in 6-month functional outcome following severe TBI. Considering the limitations of target trial emulations, delaying tracheostomy through a "watchful waiting" approach may be appropriate.

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear most of the global burden of critical illness. Managing this burden requires improved understanding of epidemiology and outcomes in LMIC intensive care units (ICUs), including LMIC-specific mortality prediction scores. This study was a retrospective observational study at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, examining all consecutive medical ICU admissions from June 2014 to April 2015. The primary outcome was ICU mortality; secondary outcomes were prolonged ICU stay and prolonged mechanical ventilation. ICU mortality prediction models were created using multivariable logistic regression and compared with the Mortality Probability Model-II (MPM-II). Associations with secondary outcomes were examined with multivariable logistic regression. There were 198 admissions during the study period; mortality was 35%. Age, shock on admission, mechanical ventilation, human immunodeficiency virus, and Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 were associated with ICU mortality. The receiver operating characteristic curve for this 5-factor model had an AUC of 0.8205 versus 0.7468 for MPM-II, favoring the simplified new model. Mechanical ventilation and lack of shock were associated with prolonged ICU stays. Mortality in an LMIC medical ICU was high. This study examines an LMIC medical ICU population, showing a simplified prediction model may predict mortality as well as complex models.

Tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients with severe stroke can be performed surgically or dilationally. Prospective data comparing both methods in patients with stroke are scarce. The randomized Stroke-Related Early Tracheostomy vs Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial2 (SETPOINT2) assigned 382 mechanically ventilated patients with stroke to early tracheostomy versus extubation or standard tracheostomy. Surgical tracheostomy (ST) was performed in 41 of 307 SETPOINT2 patients, and the majority received dilational tracheostomy (DT). We aimed to compare ST and DT in these patients with patients.

All SETPOINT2 patients with ST were compared with a control group of patients with stroke undergoing DT (1:2), selected by propensity score matching that included the factors stroke type, SETPOINT2 randomization group, Stroke Early Tracheostomy score, patient age, and premorbid functional status. Successful decannulation was the primary outcome, and secondary outcome parameters included functional outcome at 6 months and adverse events attributable to tracheostomy. Potential predictors of decannulation were evaluated by regression analysis.

Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups of patients with stroke undergoing ST (n = 41) and matched patients with stroke undergoing DT (n = 82). Tracheostomy was performed significantly later in the ST group than in the DT group (median 9 [interquartile range {IQR} 5-12] vs. 9 [IQR 4-11] days after intubation, p = 0.025). Patients with ST were mechanically ventilated longer (median 19 [IQR 17-24] vs.14 [IQR 11-19] days, p = 0.008) and stayed in the intensive care unit longer (median 23 [IQR 16-27] vs. 17 [IQR 13-24] days, p = 0.047), compared with patients with DT. The intrahospital infection rate was significantly higher in the ST group compared to the DT group (14.6% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002). At 6 months, decannulation rates (56% vs. 61%), functional outcomes, and mortality were not different. However, decannulation was performed later in the ST group compared to the DT group (median 81 [IQR 66-149] vs. 58 [IQR 32-77] days, p = 0.004). Higher baseline Stroke Early Tracheostomy score negatively predicted decannulation.

In ventilated patients with severe stroke in need of tracheostomy, surgical and dilational methods are associated with comparable decannulation rate and functional outcome at 6 months. However, ST was associated with longer time to decannulation and higher rates of early infections, supporting the dilational approach to tracheostomy in ventilated patients with stroke.

This study was a retrospective study to investigate factors related to difficult tracheostomy decannulation, and to evaluate outcomes of tracheostomized neurosurgical patients.

All consecutive tracheostomized neurosurgical patients in the Prince of Wales Hospital between 1st September 2016 and 31st August 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into easy decannulation and difficult decannulation groups using 3 months as cut-off time. Risk factors were analysed and outcomes were compared.

One hundred thirty-one patients were included. In univariate analyses, male gender, GCS less than or equal to 8 on admission, the presence of vocal cord palsy at 3 months, and pneumonia within 1-month post-tracheostomy were associated with difficult decannulation. In multivariable logistic regression for difficult decannulation, GCS on admission, the presence of vocal cord palsy at 3 months, and the presence of pneumonia within 1-month post-tracheostomy remained statistically significant. The easy decannulation group had a shorter length of in-patient stay, higher survival rate, and more favourable neurological outcome (GOS 4-5) than the difficult decannulation group at both 6 months and 1 year. The majority of easy decannulation group patients (54%) were discharged to home, while the majority of the difficult decannulation group (42%) of patients were discharged to the infirmary.

GCS less than or equal to 8 on admission, the presence of vocal cord palsy, and the presence of pneumonia were associated with difficult tracheostomy decannulation in neurosurgical patients. Difficult decannulation is associated with a longer length of in-patient stay and poor neurological outcomes.

We assessed the effects of tracheostomy timing (early vs. late) on outcomes among adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant RCTs of tracheotomy timing on patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data. Outcomes in patients with early tracheostomy and late tracheostomy groups were compared and analyzed. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata14.0 and RevMan 5.4 software. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022360319).

Twenty-one RCTs were included in this Meta-analysis. The Meta-analysis indicated that early tracheotomy could significantly shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD: -2.77; 95% CI -5.10~ -0.44; P = 0.02) and the length of ICU stay (MD: -6.36; 95% CI -9.84~ -2.88; P = 0.0003), but it did not significantly alter the all-cause mortality (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.73~1.00; P = 0.06), the incidence of pneumonia (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74~1.01; P = 0.06), and length of hospital stay (MD: -3.24; 95% CI -7.99~ 1.52; P = 0.18).

In patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the tracheostomy performed at an earlier stage may shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of ICU stay but cannot significantly decrease the all-cause mortality and incidence of pneumonia.

Background Tracheostomy is a common intervention for intensive care unit (ICU) patients for various reasons. The superiority of early versus late tracheostomy is still unfounded for non-COVID-19 cases. The COVID-19 pandemic complicated the matter, as little literature was available on the ideal timing of tracheostomy for patients with COVID-19. Research question This study aimed to establish the superiority of early or late tracheostomy for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases by comparing outcomes, including ICU mortality, ventilation days after tracheostomy, and ICU length of stay (LOS). Study design and methods A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on ventilated ICU patients both with and without COVID-19 at a university hospital between January 2020 and December 2021. During the study period, 1,393 ventilated patients were scanned, and 156 were found to be tracheostomized. Tracheostomy was considered to be early when performed within 10 days of intubation, after which it was considered to be late. Results Tracheostomy was performed early for 84/156 (53.8%) of tracheostomized patients and late for 72/156 (46.2%) of patients. The overall mortality was 42.9% (36/84) versus 69.4% (50/72) (P=0.001, OR=3.03, 95% CI=1.563-5.874), 31.4% versus 65.5% in the non-COVID-19 group and 60.6% versus 72.1% (P=0.005, OR=2.640, 95% CI=1.345-5.181) in the COVID-19 group for the early and late tracheostomy groups, respectively. Ventilation days were higher for the late tracheostomy group than for the early tracheostomy group in the non-COVID-19 group (17.10 versus 9.18 days, P<0.001). However, it was almost the same for the early and late tracheostomy groups in the COVID-19 group (14.15 versus 13.86 days, P=0.821). The ICU LOS was greater for the late tracheostomy group for both the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that ICU mortality is significantly associated with age, ventilation days, and ICU LOS. Interpretation The results of this study indicate that early tracheostomy was associated with lower mortality, fewer ventilation days, and shorter LOS in both the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a frequent cause of hypoxemic respiratory failure with a mortality rate of approximately 30%. Identifying ARDS subphenotypes based on "focal" or "non-focal" lung morphology has the potential to better target mechanical ventilation strategies of individual patients. However, classifying morphology through chest radiography or computed tomography is either inaccurate or impractical. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a non-invasive bedside tool that can accurately distinguish "focal" from "non-focal" lung morphology. We hypothesize that LUS-guided personalized mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients leads to a reduction in 90-day mortality compared to conventional mechanical ventilation.

The Personalized Mechanical Ventilation Guided by UltraSound in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PEGASUS) study is an investigator-initiated, international, randomized clinical trial (RCT) that plans to enroll 538 invasively ventilated adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Eligible patients will receive a LUS exam to classify lung morphology as "focal" or "non-focal". Thereafter, patients will be randomized within 12 h after ARDS diagnosis to receive standard care or personalized ventilation where the ventilation strategy is adjusted to the morphology subphenotype, i.e., higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers for "non-focal" ARDS and lower PEEP and prone positioning for "focal" ARDS. The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality at day 90. Secondary outcomes are mortality at day 28, ventilator-free days at day 28, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality, hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, and number of complications (ventilator-associated pneumonia, pneumothorax, and need for rescue therapy). After a pilot phase of 80 patients, the correct interpretation of LUS images and correct application of the intervention within the safe limits of mechanical ventilation will be evaluated.

PEGASUS is the first RCT that compares LUS-guided personalized mechanical ventilation with conventional ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with moderate and severe ARDS. If this study demonstrates that personalized ventilation guided by LUS can improve the outcomes of ARDS patients, it has the potential to shift the existing one-size-fits-all ventilation strategy towards a more individualized approach.

The PEGASUS trial was registered before the inclusion of the first patient, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (ID: NCT05492344).

Background: Traumatic brain injury manifests itself in various forms, ranging from mild impairment of consciousness to severe coma and death. Traumatic brain injury remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is no therapy to reverse the effects associated with traumatic brain injury. New neuroprotective treatments for severe traumatic brain injury have not achieved significant clinical success. Methods: A literature review was performed to summarize the recent interdisciplinary findings on management of traumatic brain injury from both clinical and experimental perspective. Results: In the present review, we discuss the concepts of traditional and new approaches to treatment of traumatic brain injury. The recent development of different drug delivery approaches to the central nervous system is also discussed. Conclusions: The management of traumatic brain injury could be aimed either at the pathological mechanisms initiating the secondary brain injury or alleviating the symptoms accompanying the injury. In many cases, however, the treatment should be complex and include a variety of medical interventions and combination therapy.

Advanced respiratory failure with tracheostomy requirement is common in heart recipients. The aim of the study is to assess the tracheostomy rate after orthotopic heart transplantation and identify the subgroups of patients with the highest need for tracheostomy and these groups' association with mortality at a single centre through a retrospective analysis of 140 consecutive patients transplanted between December 2012 and July 2018. As many as 28.6% heart recipients suffered from advanced respiratory failure with a need for tracheostomy that was performed after a median time of 11.5 days post-transplant. Tracheostomy was associated with a history of stroke (OR 3.4; 95% CI) 1.32-8.86; p = 0.012), previous sternotomy (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.18-5.32; p = 0.017), longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.01; p = 0.007) as well as primary graft failure (OR 6.79; 95% CI2.93-15.71; p < 0.001), need of renal replacement therapy (OR 19.2; 95% 2.53-146; p = 0.004) and daily mean SOFA score up to 72 h (OR 1.50; 95% 1.23-1.71; p < 0.01). One-year mortality was significantly higher in patients requiring a tracheostomy vs. those not requiring one during their hospital stay (50% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). The need for tracheostomy in heart transplant recipients was 30% in our study. Advanced respiratory failure was associated with over 3-fold greater 1-year mortality. Thus, tracheostomy placement may be regarded as a marker of unfavourable prognosis.

Significant inconsistencies in respiratory care provision for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are reported across different specialist neuromuscular centres in the UK. The absence of robust clinical evidence and expert consensus is a barrier to the implementation of care recommendations in public healthcare systems as is the need to increase awareness of key aspects of care for those living with DMD. Here, we provide evidenced-based and/or consensus-based best practice for the respiratory care of children and adults living with DMD in the UK, both as part of routine care and in an emergency.

Initiated by an expert working group of UK-based respiratory physicians (including British Thoracic Society (BTS) representatives), neuromuscular clinicians, physiotherapist and patient representatives, draft guidelines were created based on published evidence, current practice and expert opinion. After wider consultation with UK respiratory teams and neuromuscular services, consensus was achieved on these best practice recommendations for respiratory care in DMD.

The resulting recommendations are presented in the form of a flow chart for assessment and monitoring, with additional guidance and a separate chart setting out key considerations for emergency management. The recommendations have been endorsed by the BTS.

These guidelines provide practical, reasoned recommendations for all those managing day-to-day and acute respiratory care in children and adults with DMD. The hope is that this will support patients and healthcare professionals in accessing high standards of care across the UK.

Background: New York City was the epicenter of the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Tracheostomy is a critical procedure in the care of patients with COVID-19. We hypothesized that early tracheostomy would decrease the length of time on sedation, time on mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, and mortality. Methods: A retrospective analysis of outcomes for all patients with COVID-19 who underwent tracheostomy during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic at the Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, New York. All adult intensive care units at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York. Patients/subjects: 888 patients admitted to intensive care with COVID-19. Results: All patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 (888) from 1 March 2020 to 1 March 2021 were analyzed and separated further into those intubated (544) and those requiring tracheostomy (177). Of those receiving tracheostomy, outcomes were analyzed for early (≤12 days) or late (>12 days) tracheostomy. Demographics, medical history, laboratory values, type of oxygen and ventilatory support, and clinical outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Conclusions: Early tracheostomy resulted in reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced hospital length of stay, and reduced intensive care unit length of stay in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19. There was no effect on overall mortality.

Traumatic brain injury is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and is one of the major public healthcare burdens in the US, with millions of patients suffering from the traumatic brain injury itself (approximately 1.6 million/year) or its repercussions (2-6 million patients with disabilities). The severity of traumatic brain injury can range from mild transient neurological dysfunction or impairment to severe profound disability that leaves patients completely non-functional. Indications for treatment differ based on the injury's severity, but one of the goals of early treatment is to prevent secondary brain injury. Hemodynamic stability, monitoring and treatment of intracranial pressure, maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressure, support of adequate oxygenation and ventilation, administration of hyperosmolar agents and/or sedatives, nutritional support, and seizure prophylaxis are the mainstays of medical treatment for severe traumatic brain injury. Surgical management options include decompressive craniectomy or cerebrospinal fluid drainage via the insertion of an external ventricular drain. Several emerging treatment modalities are being investigated, such as anti-excitotoxic agents, anti-ischemic and cerebral dysregulation agents, S100B protein, erythropoietin, endogenous neuroprotectors, anti-inflammatory agents, and stem cell and neuronal restoration agents, among others.

One of the most critical issues in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) is protecting the airway and attempting to keep a secure airway. It is evident that tracheostomy in patients with TBI after 7-14 days can have favorable outcomes if the patient cannot be extubated; however, some clinicians have recommended early tracheostomy before 7 days.

A retrospective cohort of inpatient study participants was queried from the National Inpatient Sample to include patients with TBI between 2016 and 2020 undergoing tracheostomy and outcomes between the two groups of early tracheostomy (ET) (< 7 days from admission) and late tracheostomy (LT) (≥ 7 days from admission) were compared.

We reviewed 219,005 patients with TBI, out of whom 3.04% had a tracheostomy. Patients in the ET group were younger than those in the LT group (45.02 ± 19.38 years old vs. 48.68 ± 20.50 years old, respectively, p < 0.001), mainly men (76.64% vs. 73.73%, respectively, p = 0.01), and mainly White race (59.88% vs. 57.53%, respectively, p = 0.33). The patients in the ET group had a significantly shorter length of stay as compared with those in the LT group (27.78 ± 25.96 days vs. 36.32 ± 29.30 days, respectively, p < 0.001) and had a significantly lower hospital charge ($502,502.436 ± 427,060.81 vs. $642,739.302 ± 516,078.94 per patient, respectively, p < 0.001). The whole TBI cohort mortality was reported at 7.04%, which was higher within the ET group compared with the LT group (8.69% vs. 6.07%, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients in the LT had higher odds of developing any infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [1.22-1.68], p < 0.001), emerging sepsis (OR 1.61 [1.39-1.87], p < 0.001), pneumonia (OR 1.52 [1.36-1.69], p < 0.001), and respiratory failure (OR 1.30 [1.09-1.55], p = 0.004).

This study shows that ET can provide notable and significant benefits for patients with TBI. Future high-quality prospective studies should be performed to investigate and shed more light on the ideal timing of tracheostomy in patients with TBI.

Depending on the definitional criteria used, approximately 5% to 10% of critical adults will require prolonged mechanical ventilation with longer-term outcomes that are worse than those ventilated for a shorter duration. Outcomes are affected by patient characteristics before critical illness and its severity but also by organizational characteristics and care models. Definitive trials of interventions to inform care activities, such as ventilator weaning, upper airway management, rehabilitation, and nutrition specific to the prolonged mechanical ventilation patient population, are lacking. A structured and individualized approach developed by the multiprofessional team in discussion with the patient and their family is warranted.

Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to the more common use of venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). While tracheostomy is generally understood to decrease the risks of prolonged endotracheal intubation, there is conflicting data regarding the benefit of tracheostomy in patients on ECMO. The purpose of this study is to determine whether ECMO cannulation before tracheostomy impacted patient outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent tracheostomy for COVID-19-related ARDS at a tertiary academic center from March 2020 through March 2022. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether they were cannulated for ECMO prior to tracheostomy. Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the two groups. Results A total of 24 patients were included in the study, with 13 in the ECMO group and 11 in the non-ECMO group. There was no significant difference in age, comorbidities, race, or gender between the groups. Patients on ECMO had a longer time from admission to intubation (seven days vs. three days, p=.002), were more likely to have multiple intubations (54% vs 9%, p= .033), had increased rates of postoperative bleeding (62% vs. 18%, p = .047), and had a higher mortality rate (39% vs. 0%, p= .041). Conclusions ECMO cannulation prior to tracheostomy for COVID-19-related ARDS is associated with poorer outcomes. It is unclear whether this is related to a more severe disease burden in these patients. Further study is needed to evaluate this and guide future management.

Laryngeal and airway surgery continues to see innovation and advances, similar to other specialties of modern medicine. Research in this field has led to a greater understanding of conditions resulting in new terminology, diagnoses and change in management. This article looks at advances in laryngeal and upper airway surgery and discusses their ongoing impact on clinical practice.

Successful liberation from mechanical ventilation is one of the most crucial processes in critical care because it is the first step by which a respiratory failure patient begins to transition out of the intensive care unit and return to their own life. Therefore, when devising appropriate strategies for removing mechanical ventilation, it is essential to consider not only the individual experiences of healthcare professionals, but also scientific and systematic approaches. Recently, numerous studies have investigated methods and tools for identifying when mechanically ventilated patients are ready to breathe on their own. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine therefore provides these recommendations to clinicians about liberation from the ventilator.

Meta-analyses and comprehensive syntheses were used to thoroughly review, compile, and summarize the complete body of relevant evidence. All studies were meticulously assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method, and the outcomes were presented succinctly as evidence profiles. Those evidence syntheses were discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation, who then developed and approved recommendations.

Recommendations for nine PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) questions about ventilator liberation are presented in this document. This guideline includes seven conditional recommendations, one expert consensus recommendation, and one conditional deferred recommendation.

We developed these clinical guidelines for mechanical ventilation liberation to provide meaningful recommendations. These guidelines reflect the best treatment for patients seeking liberation from mechanical ventilation.

The effects of tracheostomy on outcome as well as on intra or post-operative complications is yet to be defined. Admission of patients with tracheostomy to rehabilitation facility is at higher risk of suboptimal care and increased mortality. The aim of the study was to investigate ICU mortality, clinical outcome and quality of life up to 12 months after ICU discharge in tracheostomized critically ill patients. This is a prospective, multi-center, cohort study endorsed by Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Reanimation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI Prot. n° 643/13) registered in Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT01899352). Patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and requiring elective tracheostomy according to physician in charge decision were included in the study. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for ICU mortality, prevalence of mortality at follow-up, rate of discharge from the hospital and rehabilitation, quality of life, performance status, and management of tracheostomy cannula at 3-, 6, 12-months from the day of tracheostomy. 694 critically ill patients who were tracheostomized in the ICU were included. ICU mortality was 15.8%. Age, SOFA score at the day of the tracheostomy, and days of endotracheal intubation before tracheostomy were risk factors for ICU mortality. The regression tree analysis showed that SOFA score at the day of tracheostomy and age had a preeminent role for the choice to perform the tracheostomy. Of the 694 ICU patients with tracheostomy, 469 completed the 12-months follow-up. Mortality was 33.51% at 3-months, 45.30% at 6-months, and 55.86% at 12-months. Patients with tracheostomy were less likely discharged at home but at hospital facilities or rehabilitative structures; and quality of life of patients with tracheostomy was severely compromised at 3-6 and 12 months when compared with patients without tracheostomy. In patients admitted to ICU, tracheostomy is associated with high mortality, difficult rehabilitation, and decreased quality of life. The choice to perform a tracheostomy should be carefully weighed on family burden and health-related quality of life.Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT01899352).

The timing of tracheostomy for critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) is a topic of controversy. Our objective was to determine the most suitable timing for tracheostomy in patients undergoing MV.

Retrospective cohort study.

One thousand eight hundred eighty-four hospitalisations received tracheostomy from January 2011 to December 2020 in a Chinese tertiary hospital.

Tracheostomy timing was divided into three groups: early tracheostomy (ET), intermediate tracheostomy (IMT), and late tracheostomy (LT), based on the duration from tracheal intubation to tracheostomy. We established two criteria to classify the timing of tracheostomy for data analysis: Criteria I (ET ≤ 5 days, 5 days < IMT ≤ 10 days, LT > 10 days) and Criteria II (ET ≤ 7 days, 7 days < IMT ≤ 14 days, LT > 14 days). Parameters such as length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and duration of MV were used to evaluate outcomes. Additionally, the outcomes were categorized as good prognosis, poor prognosis, and death based on the manner of hospital discharge. Student's t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were employed as appropriate to assess differences in demographic data and individual characteristics among the ET, IMT, and LT groups. Univariate Cox regression model and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model were utilized to determine whether delaying tracheostomy would increase the risk of death.

In both of two criterion, patients with delayed tracheostomies had longer hospital stays (p < 0.001), ICU stays (p < 0.001), total time receiving MV (p < 0.001), time receiving MV before tracheostomy (p < 0.001), time receiving MV after tracheostomy (p < 0.001), and sedation durations. Similar results were also found in sub-population diagnosed as trauma, neurogenic or digestive disorders. Multinomial Logistic regression identified LT was independently associated with poor prognosis, whereas ET conferred no clinical benefits compared with IMT.

In a mixed ICU population, delayed tracheostomy prolonged ICU and hospital stays, sedation durations, and time receiving MV. Multinomial logistic regression analysis identified delayed tracheostomies as independently correlated with worse outcomes.

ChiCTR2100043905. Registered 05 March 2021. http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx.