Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2015; 5(4): 300-309
Published online Dec 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.300
Published online Dec 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.300
Table 1 Recipient characteristics
Parameters | n (%) |
Age | 56 (19-72) |
Gender | |
Male | 135 (67.5) |
Female | 65 (32.5) |
Indication for LT | |
Alcoholic cirrhosis | 64 (32) |
HCC | 40 (20) |
Acute liver failure | 23 (11.5) |
Cryptogenic cirrhosis | 22 (11) |
HBV/HCV cirrhosis | 13 (6.5) |
PSC | 13 (6.5) |
Others | 25 (12.5) |
Table 2 Donor characteristics
Parameters | |
Age, yr | 56 (12-89) |
Gender, n (%) | |
Male | 98 (49) |
Female | 102 (51) |
ICU, d | 3 (0-60) |
BW, kg | 84.5 (30-190) |
Table 3 Transplantation data
Parameters | |
WIT, min | 44 (20-78) |
CIT, min | 480 (100-994) |
Rescue allocation | 93 (46.5) |
Anastomotic technique | |
SS | 164 (82) |
EE | 18 (9) |
Hepaticojejunostomy | 18 (9) |
External biliary drain | |
T-tube | 179 (89.5) |
Roeder-drain | 15 (7.5) |
No drain | 6 (3) |
Table 4 Biliary complications in relation to the type of biliary reconstruction technique n (%)
SS n = 164 | P-vaule (vs not SS) | EE n = 18 | P-vaule (vs not EE) | HJ n = 18 | P-vaule (vs not HJ) | |
Anastomotic strictures | 34 (20.75) | 0.183 | 4 (22.2) | 0.715 | 0 | 0.031 |
< 3 mo | 29 (17.7) | 2 (11.1) | ||||
> 3 mo | 5 (3.05) | 2 (11.1) | ||||
Bile leaks | 10 (6.1) | 0.901 | 0 | 0.261 | 2 (11.1) | 0.338 |
Biliary drain complications | 10 (6.1) | 0.091 | 0 | 0.261 | 2 (11.1) | 0.338 |
Papillary stenosis | 7 (4.3) | 0.207 | 0 | 0.397 | - | |
ITBL | 6 (3.6) | 0.244 | 0 | 0.434 | 0 | 0.434 |
≤ 1st yr | 4 (2.4) | |||||
> 1st yr | 2 (1.2) | |||||
Total | 67 (40.9) | 4 (22.2) | 4 (22.2) |
Table 5 Biliary complications in relation to ischemic times, initial postoperative lab-values and specific donor data n (%)
BC yes | BC no | P-value (χ2) | |
WIT > 45 min | 29 (38.7) | 43 (34.4) | 0.543 |
CIT > 10 h | 10 (13.3) | 28 (22.4) | 0.114 |
ALT init | 9 (12) | 18 (14.4) | 0.631 |
> 1500 U/L | |||
Bilirubin init | 19 (25.3) | 36 (28.8) | 0.595 |
> 5 mg/dL | |||
Donor Age | 23 (30.7) | 29 (23.2) | 0.244 |
> 65 yr | |||
Donor sex | |||
Male | 43 (57.3) | 55 (44) | 0.068 |
Female | 32 (42.7) | 70 (56) | |
Donor ICU stay > 6 d | 22 (29.3) | 17 (13.6) | 0.007 |
Rescue organ | 35 (46.7) | 58 (46.4) | 0.971 |
Table 6 Type and frequency of therapeutic interventions in relation to the biliary complications n (%)
Percental incidence(Of total n = 200) | Therapy 0(No consequence) | Therapy 1(lab control) | Therapy 2(ERCP/PTCD) | Therapy 3(OP) | |
Anastomotic-stenosis grades | 38 (19) | ||||
1 | 23 (60.5) | 0 | 21 (91.3) | 2 (8.7) | 0 |
2 | 3 (7.9) | 0 | 0 | 3 (100) | 0 |
3 | 7 (18.4) | 0 | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | 0 |
4 | 5 (13.2) | 0 | 0 | 5 (100) | 0 |
Bile leakage | 12 (6) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (16.7) | 3 (25) | 6 (50) |
Biliary drain complication | 12 (6) | 7 (58.3) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (16.7) | 2 (16.7) |
Papillary stenosis | 7 (3.5) | 2 (28.57) | 1 (14.29) | 4 (57.14) | 0 |
ITBL | 6 (3) | 0 | 0 | 6 (100) | 0 |
Table 7 Short and long term outcome in relation to reconstruction technique, ischemic times and patient groups n (%)
Cholangitis | ITBL | Rehospitalisation | Re-LT | Death | |
Rates in total | 15 (7.5 ) | 6 (3 ) | 21 (10.5) | 5 (2.5) | 21 (10.5) |
Type of reconstruction | |||||
SS | 14 (93.3) | 6 (100) | 19 (95) | 5 (100) | 1 (4.8) |
EE | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0) | 2 (5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
HJ | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Ischemic times | |||||
CIT > 10 h | 2 (13.3) | 1 (16.6) | 4 (19) | 1 (20) | 1 (4.8) |
WIT > 45 min | 6 (40) | 1 (16.6) | 9 (42.8) | 3 (60) | 0 (0) |
Without complications | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) |
Anastomotic stenosis | 6 (40) | 0 (0) | 11 (52.4) | 2 (40) | 1 (4.8) |
Bile leakage | 1 (6.6) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.8) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) |
Biliary drain complication | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Papillary stenosis | 3 (20) | 0 (0) | 3 (14.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
ITBL | 5 (33.4) | 6 (100) | 5 (23.7) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) |
- Citation: Kienlein S, Schoening W, Andert A, Kroy D, Neumann UP, Schmeding M. Biliary complications in liver transplantation: Impact of anastomotic technique and ischemic time on short- and long-term outcome. World J Transplant 2015; 5(4): 300-309
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v5/i4/300.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.300