Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Transplant. Apr 29, 2020; 10(4): 79-89
Published online Apr 29, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i4.79
Published online Apr 29, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i4.79
Table 1 Demographical and clinical characteristics
| Control group | Study group | P value | |
| Age (yr) | 57.1 ± 16.9 | 56.6 ± 14.1 | 0.930 |
| Gender | > 0.999 | ||
| Male | 13 (65.0%) | 13 (61.9%) | |
| Female | 7 (35.0%) | 8 (38.1%) | |
| Education level | 0.670 | ||
| Illiterate | 4 (20.0%) | 4 (19.1%) | |
| Literate | 4 (20.0%) | 4 (19.1%) | |
| Primary | 4 (20.0%) | 7 (33.3%) | |
| Secondary | 1 (5.0%) | 2 (9.5%) | |
| High | 4 (20.0%) | 2 (9.5%) | |
| University | 3 (15.0%) | 2 (9.5%) | |
| Marital status | 0.651 | ||
| Married | 10 (50.0%) | 13 (61.9%) | |
| Others | 10 (50.0%) | 8 (38.1%) | |
| Weight (kg) | 76.4 ± 12.4 | 79.8 ± 14.4 | 0.423 |
| Height (cm) | 163.6 ± 7.7 | 164.7 ± 9.1 | 0.689 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 28.6 ± 4.6 | 29.6 ± 5.7 | 0.554 |
| Presence of a dialysis catheter | 14 (70.0%) | 14 (66.7%) | > 0.999 |
| Received hemodialysis prior | 15 (75.0%) | 14 (66.7%) | 0.808 |
| Any family members with ESRD | 4 (20.0%) | 3 (14.3%) | 0.697 |
| Duration of diagnosis | 19.5 (2.0-70.0) | 17.0 (1.5-60.0) | 0.403 |
Table 2 Frequency distributions for the reasons of end-stage kidney disease diagnosis
| Control group | Study group | |||
| n | % | n | % | |
| Diabetes and HTN | 7 | 35.0 | 5 | 23.8 |
| Type II DM | 2 | 10.0 | 3 | 14.3 |
| Glomerulonephritis | 2 | 10.0 | 2 | 9.5 |
| Acute kidney failure | 1 | 5.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| HTN | 1 | 5.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Obstructive uropathy | 1 | 5.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Type 1 DM | 1 | 5.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Alport’s diesese | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Alport’s disease | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Amyloidosis | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Drug toxicity | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Dysplastic kidney, HTN | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| FSGS | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Kidney stones | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| MPGN | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Polycystic kidney disease | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Prostate Tm, HTN, DM | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Renal cell Ca+ dysplastic kidney | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Urethral stricture | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 20 | 100.0 | 21 | 100.0 |
Table 3 Frequency distributions for any other surgical intervention history
| Control group | Study group | |||
| n | % | n | % | |
| None | 7 | 35.0 | 7 | 33.3 |
| TAH-BSO | 1 | 5.0 | 3 | 14.3 |
| Inguinal hernia repair | 1 | 5.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| TUR-P | 1 | 5.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Appendectomy | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Cholecystectomy | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Cystoscopy | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Glaucoma surgery | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Hip replacement | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Kidney biopsy | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Appendectomy | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Kidney biopsy | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Kidney transplantation | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Knee arthroplasty, chronic infection | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Motor vehicle accident | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Motor vehicle accident, prostate op. | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Nephrectomy | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Prostate cancer removal | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Stone removal | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Total prosthetic knee replacement | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| TUR-P, pleural excision | 1 | 5.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Varicocele | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Vitrectomy under local anaesthesia | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.8 |
| Total | 20 | 100.0 | 21 | 100.0 |
Table 4 Other clinical findings
| Control group | Study group | P value | |
| Duration of procedure | 44.0 ± 11.0 | 44.9 ± 9.8 | 0.783 |
| Location of fistula creation | - | ||
| Dominant | 1 (5.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Non-dominant | 19 (95.0%) | 21 (100.0%) | |
| Fistula location | |||
| Brachiocephalic | 12 (60.0%) | 13 (61.9%) | > 0.999 |
| Snuff-box | 4 (20.0%) | 4 (19.0%) | > 0.999 |
| Radiocephalic | 3 (15.0%) | 4 (19.0%) | > 0.999 |
| Brachiobasilic | 1 (5.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | - |
| Incision length | 3.0 (2.0-5.0) | 3.0 (2.0-5.0) | 0.979 |
| Estimated blood loss | 42.5 (20.0-120.0) | 50.0 (10.0-120.0) | 0.530 |
| VAS | 4.5 (2.0-10.0) | 2.0 (1.0-8.0) | < 0.001 |
| Willingness to repeat the procedure | 3.0 (1.0-9.0) | 8.0 (5.0-10.0) | < 0.001 |
| Demand of analgesic | 9 (45.0%) | 3 (14.3%) | 0.069 |
| Amount of local analgesic | 22.5 (15.0-38.0) | 20.0 (15.0-40.0) | 0.607 |
| Anticoagulant | 14 (70.0%) | 12 (57.1%) | 0.596 |
| Beta blocker | 2 (10.0%) | 4 (19.0%) | 0.663 |
| Antihypertensive | 10 (50.0%) | 12 (57.1%) | 0.885 |
Table 5 Hemodynamic measurements regarding for follow-up times
| Pre-op | Post-op | P value | Difference | |
| SBP | ||||
| Control group | 154.00 ± 22.34 | 159.80 ± 22.65 | < 0.001 | 5.80 ± 6.20 |
| Study group | 154.10 ± 17.74 | 144.52 ± 15.87 | < 0.001 | -9.58 ± 6.04 |
| P value | 0.988 | 0.016 | < 0.001 | |
| DBP | ||||
| Control group | 84.95 ± 10.08 | 89.15 ± 8.08 | < 0.001 | 4.20 ± 4.63 |
| Study group | 87.90 ± 10.89 | 81.86 ± 7.20 | < 0.001 | -6.04 ± 7.41 |
| P value | 0.373 | 0.004 | < 0.001 | |
| HR | ||||
| Control group | 77.45 ± 7.07 | 84.45 ± 10.25 | < 0.001 | 7.00 ± 6.08 |
| Study group | 81.71 ± 8.78 | 75.52 ± 8.12 | < 0.001 | -6.19 ± 6.79 |
| P value | 0.096 | 0.004 | < 0.001 | |
| SAT | ||||
| Control group | 98.75 ± 1.25 | 98.30 ± 1.66 | 0.095 | -0.45 ± 1.15 |
| Study group | 99.19 ± 1.08 | 99.52 ± 0.87 | 0.049 | 0.33 ± 0.73 |
| P value | 0.234 | 0.007 | 0.012 | |
| RR | ||||
| Control group | 19.00 ± 1.38 | 20.35 ± 1.46 | < 0.001 | 1.35 ± 1.42 |
| Study group | 19.67 ± 1.46 | 18.95 ± 1.07 | 0.025 | -0.72 ± 1.35 |
| P value | 0.141 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
Table 6 Anxiety measurements regarding for follow-up times
| Pre-op | Post-op | P value | Difference | |
| STAI-T | ||||
| Control group | 41.5 (24.0-61.0) | 47.0 (25.0-77.0) | 0.070 | 5.0 (-16.0–19.0) |
| Study group | 53.0 (24.0-72.0) | 40.0 (16.0-56.0) | < 0.001 | -12.0 (-32.0– -2.0) |
| P value | 0.196 | 0.025 | < 0.001 | |
| STAI-S | ||||
| Control group | 49.0 (31.0-78.0) | - | - | - |
| Study group | 48.0 (31.0-78.0) | - | - | - |
| P value | 0.845 | - | - | |
- Citation: Cimen SG, Oğuz E, Gundogmus AG, Cimen S, Sandikci F, Ayli MD. Listening to music during arteriovenous fistula surgery alleviates anxiety: A randomized single-blind clinical trial. World J Transplant 2020; 10(4): 79-89
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v10/i4/79.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v10.i4.79
