Machine perfusion in abdominal organ transplantation: Current use in the Netherlands

doi:10.5500/wjt.v10.i1.15

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 10, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8195)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

643

WORD

166

HTML

4587

Figures (1-3)

358

Tables (1-5)

447

Sum=6201

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

836

Download

1158

Sum=1994

Jan 18, 2020 (publication date) through Nov 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (18)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Transplantation

ISSN

2220-3230

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Transplant. Jan 18, 2020; 10(1): 15-28
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i1.15

Table 1 Outcomes from meta-analyses or large studies comparing donation after circulatory death to donation after brain death outcomes in abdominal organ transplantation

	DCD	DBD	P value
Kidney[56]
PNF (%)	3.2	2.6	0.06
DGF (%)	48.5	24.9	< 0.001^a
1-yr eGFR¹	47.4 (35.6-61.2)	48.7 (37.3-61.1)	0.69
5-yr graft survival (%)	76.8	78.1	0.60
5-yr patient survival (%)	86.5	89.4	< 0.001^a
Liver[57]
Biliary complications (%)	26	16	< 0.001^a
Ischemic cholangiopathy (%)	16	3	< 0.001^a
3-yr graft survival (%)	73	74	0.01^a
3-yr patient survival (%)	82	88	0.04^a
Pancreas[7]
Graft survival	HR 0.98 (0.74-1.31)	Reference value	0.92
Patient survival	HR 1.31 (0.62-2.78)	Reference value	0.47
Graft thrombosis	OR 1.67 (1.04-2.67)	Reference value	0.006^a

¹Data is presented as median and interquartile range.

^aStatistically significant. DBD: Donation after brain death; DCD: Donation after circulatory death; DGF: Delayed graft function; eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR: Hazard ratio; OR: Odds ratio; PNF: Primary non function.

Table 2 Clinical studies published about kidney transplant outcomes after abdominal regional perfusion

						Graft survival, %			Patient survival, %
Study	n	DCD type	Rejection, %	DGF, %	PNF, %	1	3	5	1	3	5
HRP
Valero et al[35], 2000	8	II	-	75	0	-	-	-	-	-	-
Koyama et al[58], 2002	46	III/IV	-	87	6.5	88.3	-	-	-	-	-
Lee et al[34], 2005	31	II/III/IV	35.5	41.9	0	100	-	88.4	100	-	100
Sánchez-Fructuoso et al[59], 2006	320	I/II	4.4	60.9	4.4	87.4	-	82.1	95	-	90
Farney et al[33], 2011	25	III	16	21	0	88	88	-	-	-	-
NRP
Valero et al[35], 2000	8	II	-	12.5	0	-	-	-	-	-	-
Magliocca et al[37], 2005	24	III	0	8.3	0	-	-	-	-	-	-
Reznik et al[60], 2011	20	II	10	70	10	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hessheimer et al[61], 2015	158	II	-	65	9	88	-	-	-	-	-
Oniscu et al[42], 2014	32	III	-	40	6	87.5	-	-	96.8	-	-
Butler et al[43], 2014	14¹	III	-	18.2	9.1	-	-	-	-	-	-
Rojas-Peña et al[62], 2014	29²	III	-	31	3.5	-	-	-	-	-	-
Demiselle et al[63], 2016	19	II	-	53	5.3	94	-	-	100	-	-
Miñambres et al[36], 2017	37	III	-	27	5	91.8	-	-	-	-	-

¹Fourteen kidneys were transplanted in 11 recipients. Therefore, clinical outcomes are calculated in the 11 recipients;

²Outcomes were only mentioned from their own center. DCD: Donation after circulatory death; DGF: Delayed graft function; HRP: Hypothermic regional perfusion; NRP: Normothermic regional perfusion; PNF: Primary non function.

Table 3 Clinical studies published about liver transplant outcomes after normothermic regional perfusion

							Graft survival, %			Patient survival, %
Study	n	DCD type	Rejection, %	BC, %	IC, %	PNF, %	1	3	5	1	3	5
Otero et al[64], 2004	14	II	22	-	28	28	43	-	-	71	-	-
Fondevila et al[41], 2007	10	II	-	10	-	10	50	-	-	70	-	-
Jiménez-Galanes et al[65], 2009	20	II	-	-	5	10	80	-	-	85	-	-
Fondevila et al[66], 2012	34	II	-	12	8	4.3	-	-	-	-	-	-
Oniscu et al[42], 2014	11	III	-	18.2	0	9.1	87.5	-	-	96.8	-	-
Butler et al[43], 2014	3	III	-	-	0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Rojas-Peña et al[62], 2014	13	III	-	-	14.3	14.3	85.7	-	-	-	-	-
Hessheimer et al[61], 2015	42	II	-	-		10	73	-	-	-	-	-
De Carlis et al[67], 2016	7	II/III	14.3	14.3	0	0	-	-	-	-	-	-
Miñambres et al[36], 2017	11	III	-	0	0	9.1	90.9	-	-	-	-	-
Hessheimer et al[40], 2019	95	III	-	8	2	2	88	88	-	93	93	-

BC: Biliary complications; DCD: Donation after circulatory death; IC: Ischemic cholangiopathy; NRP: Normothermic regional perfusion; PNF: Primary non function.

Table 4 Currently ongoing clinical trials concerning ex vivo machine perfusion in kidney transplantation

Name of study	Registration number	Design	PI	n	Primary outcome	Intervention	Included donors	Results
Unknown	ISRCTN91315246	Non-randomized	Cambridge	90	Graft function	1 h NMP	Discarded kidneys	November 2019
COPE-POMP	ISRCTN63852508	RCT	COPE Essen	262	Graft survival 1y	Short period HMP vs SCS only	ECD-DBD	July 2019
COPE-COMPARE	ISRCTN32967929	RCT	COPE Leuven	162	Kidney graft function 1 y	HMP with oxygen vs HMP without oxygen	DCD III	↓ risk BPAR ↑ 1-y eGFR[44]
PIO	NCT03031067	Case control	Bologna	20	Graft function	2 h HMP vs SCS	ECD -DBD	February 2018
PREDICTION	NCT02055950	Case control	Bergamo	60	Kidney function	HMP vs SCS	ECD-DBD	Augustus 2018
Unknown	NCT03837197	RCT	Bologna	260	DGF	2 h oxygenated HMP vs SCS	ECD-DBD	December 2021
IMPULSION	NCT01170910	RCT	Lyon	162	DGF	6-8 h HMP vs SCS	ECD	August 2016
Machine perfusion trial	ISRCTN83876362	RCT	COPE Groningen	654	DGF	Non-oxygenated HMP vs SCS	DCD III and DBD	↓ risk of DGF (OR 0.57) ↓ risk of graft failure (HR 0.52) ↑ allograft survival (94 vs 90%, P = 0.04)[27]
Unknown	ISRCTN15821205	RCT	Cambridge	400	DGF	1 h pre-transplant NMP vs SCS	DCD III and IV	January 2021

BPAR: Biopsy proven acute rejection; COPE: Consortium for Organ Preservation in Europe; DBD: Donation after brain death; DCD: Donation after circulatory death; DGF: Delayed graft function; ECD: Expanded criteria donor; eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; HMP: Hypothermic machine perfusion; HR: Hazard ratio; NMP: Normothermic machine perfusion; OR: Odds ratio; PI: Principal investigator; RCT: Randomized controlled trial; SCS: Static cold storage.

Table 5 Currently ongoing clinical trials concerning ex vivo machine perfusion in liver transplantation

Name of study		Design	PI	n	Primary outcome	Intervention	Included donors	Results
DHOPE DCD	NCT02584283	RCT	Groningen	156	% NAS	2 h end-ischemic DHOPE	DCD III	October 2019
HOPE	NCT01317342	RCT	Zürich	170	Postoperative complications	1-2 h HOPE	DBD	July 2019
HOPE ECD-DBD	NCT03124641	RCT	Aachen	46	Peak ALT	1-2 h HOPE	ECD-DBD	June 2019
DHOPE-COR-NMP	NTR5972	Non-randomized	Groningen	16	Graft survival	DHOPE, gradually rewarming, NMP	Discarded livers (DCD and DBD)	11 livers transplanted 100% patient/graft survival, 9.1% ischemic cholangiopathy[48]
PIO	NCT03031067	Case control	Bologna	20	Graft function	2 h HOPE	ECD livers	February 2018
VITTAL	NCT02740608	Non-randomized	Birmingham	22	Patient survival	4 h NMP	Discarded livers (DCD and DBD)	March 2020
Liver WP2	ISRCTN39731134	RCT	Oxford COPE	220	Peak AST	Minimally 4 h NMP	All deceased donors	49.4% ↓ peak AST[47]
CORNET	ISRCTN94691167	RCT	Essen	40	Peak AST	1,5 h COR until 20 degrees (dual perfusion)	ECD	February 2021
DHOPE	NTR4493	Case control	Groningen	10	Graft survival 6 mo	At least 2 h of DHOPE	DCD III	↑ graft survival (P = 0.052) ↓peak ALT (P = 0.006) ↓bilirubin (P = 0.044)[46]
Unknown	NCT03837197	RCT	Bologna	260	Early allograft dysfunction	Minimally 1 hour of HOPE	ECD-DBD	December 2021

ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate transaminase; COR: Controlled oxygenated rewarming; COPE: Consortium for Organ Preservation in Europe; DBD: Donation after brain death; DCD: Donation after circulatory death; DHOPE: Dual hypothermic oxygenated perfusion; DCD: Donation after circulatory death; ECD: Expanded criteria donor; HOPE: Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion; NAS: Non-anastomotic strictures; NMP: Normothermic machine perfusion; PI: Principal investigator; RCT: Randomized controlled trial

Citation: Rijkse E, IJzermans JN, Minnee RC. Machine perfusion in abdominal organ transplantation: Current use in the Netherlands. World J Transplant 2020; 10(1): 15-28
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v10/i1/15.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v10.i1.15