Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.10
Peer-review started: August 5, 2015
First decision: September 21, 2015
Revised: November 4, 2015
Accepted: December 3, 2015
Article in press: December 4, 2015
Published online: March 24, 2016
Processing time: 227 Days and 17.3 Hours
Corneal transplantation is the most common surgical procedure amongst solid organ transplants with a high survival rate of 86% at 1-year post-grafting. This high success rate has been attributed to the immune privilege of the eye. However, mechanisms originally thought to promote immune privilege, such as the lack of antigen presenting cells and vessels in the cornea, are challenged by recent studies. Nevertheless, the immunological and physiological features of the cornea promoting a relatively weak alloimmune response is likely responsible for the high survival rate in “low-risk” settings. Furthermore, although corneal graft survival in “low-risk” recipients is favourable, the prognosis in “high-risk” recipients for corneal graft is poor. In “high-risk” grafts, the process of indirect allorecognition is accelerated by the enhanced innate and adaptive immune responses due to pre-existing inflammation and neovascularization of the host bed. This leads to the irreversible rejection of the allograft and ultimately graft failure. Many therapeutic measures are being tested in pre-clinical and clinical studies to counter the immunological challenge of “high-risk” recipients. Despite the prevailing dogma, recent data suggest that tissue matching together with use of systemic immunosuppression may increase the likelihood of graft acceptance in “high-risk” recipients. However, immunosuppressive drugs are accompanied with intolerance/side effects and toxicity, and therefore, novel cell-based therapies are in development which target host immune cells and restore immune homeostasis without significant side effect of treatment. In addition, developments in regenerative medicine may be able to solve both important short comings of allotransplantation: (1) graft rejection and ultimate graft failure; and (2) the lack of suitable donor corneas. The advances in technology and research indicate that wider therapeutic choices for patients may be available to address the worldwide problem of corneal blindness in both “low-risk” and “high-risk” hosts.
Core tip: Corneal grafts enjoy a high acceptance rate when performed in “low-risk” host graft beds. This is associated with a relatively weak alloimmune response. However, in “high-risk” hosts where the immunologically quiescent homeostatic environment of the cornea is compromised prior to graft procedure, heightened immune responses significantly increase the risk of graft rejection. Clinical approaches such as tissue matching and long-term immunosuppression could be beneficial in preventing graft rejection especially in “high-risk” settings. In addition, promotion of transplant tolerance by cell-based therapies and use of corneal “substitutes” such as collagen-based hydrogels are promising alternatives for “high-risk” recipients.