BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Transplant. Jun 18, 2026; 16(2): 118288
Published online Jun 18, 2026. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v16.i2.118288
Immunosuppression and vascular remodeling after liver transplantation: Mechanisms, surrogate markers, and modifiable pathways
Sarah Jahangir, Mohammed Zohery, Clarimar Diaz Lopez, Jenna Carter Hamed, Shiza Sarfraz, Hafsa Ashraf, Taha Rafiq, Hadeera Ali, Muhammad Raza, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Mohamed Khalaf, Hassam Ali
Sarah Jahangir, Jenna Carter Hamed, Department of Medicine, East Carolina University - Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, United States
Mohammed Zohery, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia 20052, United States
Clarimar Diaz Lopez, Department of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, United States
Shiza Sarfraz, Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University - Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, United States
Hafsa Ashraf, Department of Internal Medicine, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA 01201, United States
Taha Rafiq, Department of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway TK33, Ireland
Hadeera Ali, Department of Medicine, Combined Military Hospital, Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan
Muhammad Raza, Department of Medicine, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan
Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States
Mohamed Khalaf, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29401, United States
Hassam Ali, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, East Carolina University - Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, United States
Co-first authors: Sarah Jahangir and Mohammed Zohery.
Author contributions: Jahangir S, Zohery M, Diaz Lopez C, Hamed JC, Sarfraz S, Ashraf H, Rafiq T, Ali H, Raza M, Dahiya DS, and Khalaf M contributed to literature review, data synthesis, and drafting of the manuscript, including figures preparation; Dahiya DS, Khalaf M, and Ali H critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; Ali H conceived the review topic, supervised manuscript development, and coordinated revisions; Jahangir S and Zohery M contributed equally to this manuscript and are co-first authors. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
AI contribution statement: Grammarly was used during the preparation of this manuscript for grammar checking and language refinement, which may have included AI-assisted suggestions for sentence restructuring and rephrasing.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Corresponding author: Hassam Ali, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, East Carolina University - Brody School of Medicine, 2100 Statonsburg Road, Greenville, NC 27834, United States. hassamali155@gmail.com
Received: December 29, 2025
Revised: February 2, 2026
Accepted: March 11, 2026
Published online: June 18, 2026
Processing time: 152 Days and 4.6 Hours
Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) has achieved excellent short-term outcomes; however, long-term survival remains limited by cardiovascular disease, now a leading cause of late mortality in transplant recipients. Immunosuppressive therapy is a major contributor to this risk through both direct vascular toxicity and indirect metabolic effects. This review examines the clinical impact of immunosuppression-associated vascular remodeling and strategies to reduce cardiovascular complications after LT. Calcineurin inhibitors remain central to post-transplant immunosuppression but are strongly associated with hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, nephrotoxicity, and progressive vascular injury. Corticosteroids further increase cardiovascular risk by promoting insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, weight gain, and blood pressure elevation, supporting widespread adoption of steroid-sparing protocols. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may limit vascular smooth muscle proliferation and intimal hyperplasia and are frequently used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor minimization, though careful patient selection is required due to metabolic and thrombotic concerns. Antimetabolites are generally vascularly well tolerated and play a key role in combination regimens. Subclinical vascular injury can be detected using noninvasive measures such as pulse wave velocity, carotid intima-media thickness, and flow-mediated dilation, enabling earlier identification of patients at increased cardiovascular risk. Host factors including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and pre-existing cardiovascular disease further modify outcomes and should guide individualized immunosuppressive planning. Prospective studies incorporating vascular endpoints are needed to refine immunosuppressive strategies and improve long-term outcomes after LT.

Keywords: Liver transplantation; Immunosuppression; Vascular remodeling; Endothelial dysfunction; Cardiovascular disease; Calcineurin inhibitors; Metabolic complications; Arterial stiffness; Graft survival

Core Tip: Long-term survival after liver transplantation is increasingly limited by cardiovascular disease driven by immunosuppression-associated vascular remodeling. This review highlights how commonly used immunosuppressive agents, particularly calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids, promote endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffening, and metabolic injury, while alternative strategies such as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based regimens and antimetabolites may reduce vascular harm. We emphasize noninvasive vascular markers and individualized immunosuppression as emerging tools to balance graft protection with long-term cardiovascular health in liver transplant recipients.

Write to the Help Desk