Memory B cells (MBCs) are responsible for maintaining long-lasting functional B-cell immune responses. Little is known about the kinetics of peripheral blood (PB) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced MBCs in end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing replacement therapies. We investigated this issue in this prospective, observational cohort study including 27 patients (9 females and 18 males; median age, 68.4 years, range 48-82) comprising 20 hemodialysis patients and 7 Kidney transplant recipients. SARS-CoV-2-Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD)-targeted PB-MBCs were enumerated by flow cytometry using a tetramer-binding assay after the second COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose (Post-2D), before (Pre-3D), and after the first mRNA vaccine booster dose (Post-3D). Commercially available electrochemiluminescent immunoassays were used to measure total anti-RBD antibodies targeting an IgG against the S trimeric protein. Overall, 18/27 patients (66.6%) exhibited detectable RBD-MBC responses at Post-2D, 12/27 (44.4%) at Pre-3D, and 16/27 (59.2%) at Post-3D. RBD-MBC levels dropped non-significantly between post-2D and Pre-3D (p = 0.38). A nonsignificant increase in RBD-MBCs was noticed post-3D (p = 0.65). Overall, both antibody specificities displayed the same dynamics but the drop in anti-trimeric spike antibody levels between Post-2D and Pre-3D and increases post-3D were statistically significant (p < 0.001). No correlation (rho = 0.05; p = 0.64) was observed between total antibodies against RBD and RBD-MBC counts. The correlation between IgG antibodies against the trimeric S protein and SARS-CoV-2 RBD-MBC counts was very weak (rho, 0.18; p = 0.11). In summary, waning RBD-MBC counts Pre-3D and increases post-3D are less marked than that of anti-RBD and anti-S trimeric antibodies.

We aimed to address existing knowledge gaps regarding risk stratification, best use of diagnostic resources, optimal treatment, and general management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. As high-quality evidence specific to this fragile population is lacking, our final aim was to provide an expert consensus evidence-informed guidance that can aid clinicians in their daily practice.

This study was conducted within the Working Package 4 (fragile population cohorts) of the H2020-funded ORCHESTRA study (https://orchestra-cohort.eu). Eight infectious disease and one clinical pharmacology specialists conducted a comprehensive scoping literature review which covered five key areas: the role of SOT as a risk factor for evolution to severe disease; the optimal use of diagnostic resources, considering cost-benefit ratios and appropriateness of active screening; population-specific therapeutic management, including antiviral use and drug-drug interactions and appropriate duration of treatment; the potential need for withdrawal of immunosuppressive agents and management of potential donors and recipients with recent and/or ongoing SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of transplantation. On the basis of this review, a 28-item questionnaire was developed and administered to a panel of experts through two rounds, following the Delphi methodology.

The panel consisted of 21 experts, 13 females and 8 males, from Italy (n = 11), Spain (n = 5), Switzerland (n = 2), Brazil (n = 1), United States (n = 1), and United Kingdom (n = 1). Consensus was achieved for 18 out of 28 items after the first round and for 9 out of 13 items after the second round, according to agreement/disagreement levels obtained for each question and round, ten statements were finally produced.

The consensus statements derived from this study offer a framework for standardizing care and improving outcomes in SOT recipients affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection in a field where high-quality evidence specific to this high-risk population is currently lacking.

Recent studies have identified Torquetenovirus (TTV) as a promising biomarker of immune competence, particularly in assessing the vaccine response of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, given the individual variability of viral load, it is not yet possible to define "normal levels". Nevertheless, TTV is just one component of the broader Anelloviridae family, which also includes Torquetenominivirus (TTMV) and Torquetenomidivirus (TTMDV). This study explores whether the viremia of TTMV and TTMDV offers a stronger predictive marker for vaccine efficacy in SOT recipients. A cohort of 168 SOT patients (142 kidney and 26 lung transplant recipients) who received the BNT162B2 mRNA vaccine was examined, with viral loads quantified through virus-specific real-time PCR. While TTV remains a potentially useful biomarker for evaluating immune response, the combined analysis of all anelloviruses viremia provides deeper insights, particularly in cases where TTV is undetectable. Notably, only TTMV exhibited a pattern similar to TTV, suggesting its potential as an alternative biomarker when TTV is absent from the patient's virome.

Immunocompromised adults may experience severe COVID-19 outcomes, necessitating a multifaceted treatment approach. Studies from the Delta period showed benefit from monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy that was most pronounced among anti-spike IgG seronegative individuals. With widespread vaccination and shifting SARS-CoV-2 variants in the Omicron period, clinical predictors of anti-spike IgG seronegativity, and impacts on clinical outcomes, remain incompletely characterized.

We describe outcomes from a cohort of immunocompromised adults with COVID-19 stratified by anti-spike IgG serostatus and receipt of mAb therapy during the Omicron period to evaluate clinical impact.

This was a retrospective study of immunocompromised adults with mild-moderate COVID-19 presenting between December 2021 and October 2022.

Charts were reviewed to assess anti-spike IgG serostatus, receipt of mAb therapy, and 28-day outcomes including conventional oxygen use, high-flow oxygen use, mechanical ventilation, and death.

A total of 276 individuals were included, of whom 252 (91%) were partially or fully vaccinated, 190 (69%) were anti-spike IgG seropositive, and 225 (82%) received mAb therapy. A majority were solid organ transplant recipients (169, 61%), with anti-spike IgG seronegatively significantly associated with mycophenolate-based immunosuppression or comorbid chronic kidney disease. Conventional oxygen use among seropositive patients receiving mAb, seronegative patients receiving mAb, seropositive patients not receiving mAb, and seronegative patients not receiving mAb were 2/154 (1%), 5/71 (7%), 6/36 (17%), and 4/15 (27%), respectively. Across the cohort, high-flow oxygen use, mechanical ventilation, and death occurred in 6 (2%), 4 (3%), and 3 (1%) individuals, respectively.

Clinical outcomes in a predominantly vaccinated, immunocompromised cohort with mild-moderate COVID-19 during the Omicron period appeared to vary with anti-spike IgG serostatus and receipt of mAb therapy. Observed trends would benefit from prospective studies during future iterations of COVID-19 therapeutics to inform treatment decisions for immunocompromised adults.

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are considered a high-risk group for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The adaptive immune responses generated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination include humoral and cellular immune responses. Most studies on the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine have focused primarily on humoral immunity, but cellular immunity is vital for effectively controlling progression to severe COVID-19. In SOTRs, the vaccine-induced adaptive immune response is significantly attenuated compared to the response in healthy individuals. Nevertheless, vaccinated SOTRs exhibit a reduced rate and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This review aims to provide a concise overview of the current understanding of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immune responses in SOTRs.

Solid organ transplant recipients face unique challenges in managing their immunosuppressed status, making vaccination a critical consideration. This review aimed to comprehensively analyze current recommendations, evaluate the efficacy of vaccinations in this population, and assess safety concerns. We explored the latest evidence on vaccine types, timing, and potential benefits for transplant patients, highlighting the importance of individualized approaches for routinely used vaccines as well as coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines. By synthesizing available data, this review underscored the pressing need to optimize vaccination strategies, ensuring that transplant recipients can obtain the full protection against many pathogens while minimizing risks associated with their post-transplant immunosuppression.

SARS-CoV-2 has caused global waves of infection since December 2019 and continues to persist today. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with strong immune evasion capabilities has compromised the effectiveness of existing vaccines against breakthrough infections. Therefore, it is important to determine the best utilization strategies for different demographic groups given the variety of vaccine options available. In this review, we will discuss the protective efficacy of vaccines during different stages of the epidemic and emphasize the importance of timely updates to target prevalent variants, which can significantly improve immune protection. While it is recognized that vaccine effectiveness may be lower in certain populations such as the elderly, individuals with chronic comorbidities (e.g., diabetes with poor blood glucose control, those on maintenance dialysis), or those who are immunocompromised compared to the general population, administering multiple doses can result in a strong protective immune response that outweighs potential risks. However, caution should be exercised when considering vaccines that might trigger an intense immune response in populations prone to inflammatory flare or other complications. In conclusion, individuals with special conditions require enhanced and more effective immunization strategies to prevent infection or reinfection, as well as to avoid the potential development of long COVID.

Despite vaccination strategies, people with chronic kidney disease, particularly kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), remained at high risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes. We assessed serological responses to the three-dose COVID-19 vaccine schedule in KTRs and people on dialysis, as well as seroresponse predictors and the relationship between responses and breakthrough infection.

Plasma from 30 KTRs and 17 people receiving dialysis was tested for anti-Spike receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG and neutralising antibodies (NAb) to the ancestral and Omicron BA.2 variant after Doses 2 and 3 of vaccination.

After three doses, KTRs achieved lower anti-Spike RBD IgG levels (P < 0.001) and NAb titres than people receiving dialysis (P = 0.002). Seropositive cross-reactive Omicron neutralisation levels were achieved in 11/27 (40.7%) KTRs and 11/14 (78.6%) dialysis recipients. ChAdOx1/viral-vector vaccine type, higher mycophenolate dose (> 1 g per day) and lower absolute B-cell counts predicted poor serological responses in KTRs. ChAdOx-1 vaccine type and higher monocyte counts were negative predictors in dialysis recipients. Among ancestral NAb seroresponders, higher NAb levels positively correlated with higher Omicron neutralisation (R = 0.9, P < 0.001). More KTRs contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection (14/30; 47%) than dialysis recipients (5/17; 29%) and had more severe disease. Those with breakthrough infections had significantly lower median interdose incremental change in anti-Spike RBD IgG and ancestral NAb titres.

Serological responses to COVID-19 vaccines in KTRs lag behind their dialysis counterparts. KTRs remained at high risk of breakthrough infection after their primary vaccination schedule underlining their need for booster doses, strict infection prevention measures and close surveillance.

Epidemiological data on seasonal coronaviruses (sCoVs) may provide insight on transmission patterns and demographic factors that favor coronaviruses (CoVs) with greater disease severity. This study describes the incidence of CoVs in several high-risk groups in Ottawa, Canada, from October 2020 to March 2022.

Serological assays quantified IgG and IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-229E. Incident infections were compared between four population groups: individuals exposed to children, transit users, immunocompromised, and controls. Associations between antibody prevalence indicative of natural infection and demographic variables were assessed using regression analyses.

Transit users and those exposed to children were at no greater risk of infection compared to the control group. Fewer infections were detected in the immunocompromised group (p = .03). SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was greater in individuals with low income and within ethnic minorities.

Our findings suggest that nonpharmaceutical interventions intended to reduce SAR-CoV-2 transmission protected populations at high risk of exposure. The re-emergence of sCoVs and other common respiratory viruses alongside SARS-CoV-2 may alter infection patterns and increase the risk in vulnerable populations.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) generate lower antibody responses to messenger RNA (mRNA)-based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, yet precise mechanisms for this poor response remain uncertain. One potential contributor is suboptimal spike antigen (sAg) translation and expression owing to transplant immunosuppression, which might lead to insufficient exposure to develop humoral and/or cellular immune responses.

Within a single-arm clinical trial, 65 KTRs underwent ultrasensitive plasma sAg testing before, and 3 and 14 days after, the third mRNA vaccine doses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (anti-receptor binding domain [anti-RBD]) were serially measured at 14 and 30 days post-vaccination. Associations between sAg detection and clinical factors were assessed. Day 30 anti-RBD titer was compared among those with versus without sAg expression using Wilcoxon rank sum testing.

Overall, 16 (25%) KTRs were sAg positive (sAg+) after vaccination, peaking at day 3. Clinical and laboratory factors were broadly similar in sAg(+) versus sAg(-) KTRs. sAg(+) status was significantly negatively associated with day 30 anti-RBD response, with median (interquartile range) 10.8 (<0.4-338.3) U/mL if sAg(+) versus 709 (10.5-2309.5) U/mL if sAg(-) (i.e., 66-fold lower; p = .01).

Inadequate plasma sAg does not likely drive poor antibody responses in KTRs, rather sAg detection implies insufficient immune response to rapidly clear vaccine antigen from blood. Other downstream mechanisms such as sAg trafficking and presentation should be explored.

Immunocompromised individuals, primarily attributable to using immunosuppressants, face heightened COVID-19 risks. Despite the proven efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, their impact on patients with immune-mediated dermatological diseases remains unclear. This study aims to thoroughly examine vaccine immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety in immune-mediated dermatological disease patients. Clinical studies in adults that compared vaccinated immune-mediated dermatological disease patients with vaccinated healthy controls or unvaccinated immune-mediated dermatological disease patients in terms of vaccine immunogenicity, COVID-19 infection, adverse events, or exacerbation of immune-mediated dermatological diseases were searched via electronic databases. Seventeen studies (1,348,690 participants) were included. Seroconversion rates between immune-mediated dermatological disease patients and healthy controls were not different. However, among individuals aged ≤55 years, immune-mediated dermatological disease patients had lower mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels. Immunosuppressed immune-mediated dermatological disease patients also had lower titres and were less likely to achieve T-cell response. In terms of safety, the risk of adverse events was higher in atopic dermatitis patients, but those with psoriasis had a reduced risk. Additionally, immunosuppressed patients had fewer adverse events. Vaccinated immune-mediated dermatological disease patients had a lower risk of COVID-19 infection than unvaccinated patients but a higher risk than healthy controls; however, disease exacerbation may be induced. In conclusion, immune-mediated dermatological diseases showed a reduced vaccine response in our meta-analysis, yet vaccination remained effective against COVID-19 infection and well tolerated.

Heart transplant recipients (HTr) have a higher probability of suffer from severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in comparison to general population, but their risk has changed over the course of the pandemic in relation to various factors. We conducted a prospective study including all HTr at risk of COVID-19 in a tertiary center between February 2020 and October 2022. The aim was to analyze how the prognosis (incidence of pneumonia and mortality) of COVID-19 in HTr has evolved over time, contextualizing variants, vaccination, and other treatments.

Of 308 HTr included, 124 got the infection (39.2%). COVID and non-COVID HTr had similar baseline characteristics. COVID-19 patients with pneumonia had a poorer prognosis than those with less severe presentations, with a higher rate of hospitalization (93.3 vs. 14.1%, p < .001) and death (41.0 vs. 1.2%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥60 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-11.49, p = .027), and chronic kidney disease ≥3a (OR 4.95, 95% CI 1.39-17.54, p = .014) as predictors of pneumonia. Two-dose vaccination (OR 0.20, CI 95% 0.05-0.72, p = .02) and early remdesivir administration (OR 0.17, CI 0.03-0.90, p = .037) were protective factors. Over the course of the pandemic considering three periods in the follow-up (prevaccination February-December 2020, postvaccination January-December 2021, and post early remdesivir indication January-October 2022), we observed a reduction in pneumonia incidence from 62% to 19% (p < .001); and mortality (from 23% to 4%, p < .001).

The prognosis of COVID-19 in HTr has improved over time, likely due to vaccination and early administration of remdesivir.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in rapid research and vaccine development to help curtail unchecked transmission. However, these studies cannot be applied as easily among every population, such as immunocompromised individuals. In this study, we observed the humoral response of 70 total heart and renal transplant patients to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations to help further understand the effectiveness of vaccination in post-transplant patients following second or booster vaccinations. Antibodies were measured by bead technology to detect IgG, as well as IgG/IgM Rapid Cassette tests for confirmation. Immunocompromised patients had a noticeably lower humoral response than non-immunocompromised populations, with an even lower response among Black patients. Our findings also show for the first time various antibody responses to different motifs of the virus, with the lowest being against the S2 motif. A potential link between the duration of immunosuppression and vaccine response was also observed, where patients on immunosuppressants for longer had a stronger response to vaccination compared to recent transplant patients in our study. In addition, younger transplant recipients had a better humoral response to vaccination, and vaccine effectiveness was disproportionate between races. This finding reinforces the continuation of the guidelines for accelerated vaccination schedules for immunocompromised patients.

Torque Teno Virus (TTV), first discovered in 1997, is a non-pathogenic, highly prevalent virus with a notable presence in the human virome. TTV has garnered attention as a potential indicator of immunocompetence in recipients of solid organ transplants. In this review, we discuss the role of TTV as a potential marker for immunosuppression optimization, prediction of graft rejection, and as an indicator of opportunistic infections. We discuss TTV's behavior over the course of time after transplantation, TTV's implications in different immunosuppressive regimens, and potential utility in vaccinations. The review synthetizes findings from various studies depicting its potential clinical utility for future personalized patient care.

(1) Background: Vulnerable populations including transplant recipients are jeopardised by COVID-19. Herein, we report on B and T cell responses among liver and kidney organ recipients at our centre. (2) Methods: 23 liver and 45 kidney (14 thereof combined kidney/pancreas) transplanted patients were vaccinated with two doses of BNT162b2 followed by a booster dose of mRNA-1273 in 28 non-responders 4 months thereafter. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Ig was measured by specific ELISA and virus neutralisation assay; T cell responses were measured by a spike protein-specific IFN-γ release assay. (3) Results: Compared to controls, B and T cell responses were weak in transplant recipients, particularly in those without prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Within this group, only 15% after the first and 58.3% after the second vaccination achieved seroconversion. A total of 14 out of 28 vaccination non-responders achieved a seroconversion after a third dose. Vaccination side effects were more frequent in healthy controls. The use of mycophenolate was associated with reduced anti-SARS-CoV-2-Ig production. (4) Conclusions: Our data confirm that vaccination responses are insufficient after standard vaccination in liver and kidney transplant recipients and are affected to a variable degree by specific immunosuppressants, particularly mycophenolate. Monitoring vaccination success and re-vaccinating those who are unresponsive seems prudent to achieve sufficient titres. Overall, prospective large-scale, multinational, multicentre studies or high-quality meta-analyses will be needed to generate personalised vaccination strategies in order to achieve protective immunity in high-risk, hard-to-immunize populations.

In solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, the humoral response following COVID-19 vaccination is reduced, as a result of their immunosuppressed treatment. In this study, we investigated antibody concentrations after booster vaccinations until the fifth dose, the latter by monovalent or bivalent BA1 or BA4/5 vaccines. In addition, we evaluated the efficacy of vaccination by recording breakthrough infections, hospitalizations, and deaths.

This prospective cohort study included 438 SOT recipients (>18 years) vaccinated with mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 from January 2021 until March 2023. Blood samples were drawn before and after each vaccination and tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD IgG antibodies with the lowest and highest cut-off at 7.1 and 5,680 BAU/mL, respectively. Vaccine information, breakthrough infections, and hospitalizations were collected from the medical records.

Most participants received BNT162b2 and 61.4% received five vaccine doses. The response proportion in SOT recipients increased from 86.7% after the fourth dose to 93.0% following the fifth dose. Antibody concentration decreased with 142.7 BAU/mL between the third and fourth dose (median 132 days, Quartile 1: 123, Quartile 3: 148) and 234.3 BAU/mL between the fourth and fifth (median 250 days, Quartile 1: 241, Quartile 3: 262) dose among those without breakthrough infection (p=0.34). When comparing the Omicron BA.1 or Omicron BA.4/BA.5 adapted vaccines, no significant differences in antibody concentration were found, but 20.0% of SOT recipients receiving a monovalent fifth vaccine dose had a breakthrough infection compared to 4.0% and 7.9% among those who received BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 adapted vaccines, respectively (p=0.04). Since January 2021, 240 (54.8%) participants had a breakthrough infection, and 22 were hospitalized, but no deaths were observed.

The fifth COVID-19 vaccine dose raised antibody response to 93.0% of the study population. Additional booster doses, as well as bivalent vaccines, led to higher levels of antibody concentration in SOT recipients. We found a lower incidence of breakthrough infections among SOT recipients after receiving a bivalent vaccine as a fifth dose compared to those receiving a monovalent dose. Antibody concentrations did not wane when the time between doses was prolonged from four to eight months.

Purpose of review: To review the data on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines, administered by different strategies, in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Recent findings: COVID-19 booster vaccines were given to SOTRs as a widespread practice in many transplant centers, mostly as the third and/or fourth dose in an extended vaccine series, with a significantly improved humoral response compared with the initial two-dose scheme. However, one-third of SOTRs remained unresponsive, despite these boosters. Next steps: Vaccination with standard dosing remains the most feasible strategy for attaining protection against COVID-19. Additional booster doses and temporarily holding or reducing mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid may provide immunogenicity to vaccines, according to recent studies demonstrating some efficacy with these measures. Preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies showed benefit in immunocompromised patients but is no longer recommended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) due to diminished efficacy against Omicron and recent variants. Screening for the presence and titers of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in SOTRs is not recommended in most clinical settings. T cell-based techniques are needed to evaluate vaccine efficacy and risk of infection. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, new vaccines based on conservative protein component/complexes of the COVID virus, in addition to its spike protein, are warranted to offer prolonged protection.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has negatively impacted on patients of the whole CKD spectrum, causing high rates of morbi-mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines opened a new era, but patients with CKD (including kidney transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) were systematically excluded from pivotal clinical trials. The Spanish Society of Nephrology promoted the multicentric national SENCOVAC study aimed at assessing immunological responses after vaccination in patients with CKD. During the first year after vaccination, patients with non-dialysis CKD and those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis presented good anti-Spike antibody responses to vaccination, especially after receiving the third and fourth doses. However, kidney transplant recipients presented suboptimal responses after any vaccination schedule (initial, third and fourth dose). Especially worrisome is the situation of a patients with a persistently negative humoral response that do not seroconvert after boosters. In this regard, monoclonal antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for high-risk patients, although they may become obsolete as the viral genome evolves. The present report reviews the current status of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum with emphasis on lessons learned from the SENCOVAC study. Predictors of humoral response, including vaccination schedules and types of vaccines, as well as the integration of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents are discussed.

After basic immunization with 2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses, only a small proportion of patients who are severely immunocompromised generate a sufficient antibody response. Hence, we assessed the additional benefit of a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with different levels of immunosuppression.

In this observational extension of the COVERALL trial (Corona Vaccine Trial Platform), we recruited patients from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (ie, lung and kidney transplant recipients). We collected blood samples before and 8 weeks after the third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with either mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants showing an antibody response (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S test; threshold ≥100 U/mL) 8 weeks after the third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We also compared the proportion of patients who reached the primary outcome from basic immunization (the first and second vaccines) to the third vaccination.

Nearly all participants (97.2% [95% CI, 95.9%-98.6%], 564/580) had an antibody response. This response was comparable between mRNA-1273 (96.1% [95% CI, 93.7%-98.6%], 245/255) and BNT162b2 (98.2% [95% CI, 96.7%-99.6%], 319/325). Stratification by cohort showed that 99.8% (502/503) of people living with HIV and 80.5% (62/77) of recipients of solid organ transplants achieved the primary endpoint. The proportion of patients with an antibody response in solid organ transplant recipients improved from the second vaccination (22.7%, 15/66) to the third (80.5%, 62/77).

People living with HIV had a high antibody response. The third vaccine increased the proportion of solid organ transplant recipients with an antibody response. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04805125 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Although mRNA vaccines have overall efficacy preventing morbidity/mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection, immunocompromised persons remain at risk. Antibodies mostly prevent early symptomatic infection, but cellular immunity, particularly the virus-specific CD8+ T cell response, is protective against disease. Defects in T cell responses to vaccination have not been well characterized in immunocompromised hosts; persons with lung transplantation are particularly vulnerable to vaccine failure with severe illness.

Comparison groups included persons with lung transplantation and no history of COVID-19 (21 and 19 persons after initial mRNA vaccination and a third booster vaccination respectively), 8 lung transplantation participants recovered from COVID-19, and 22 non-immunocompromised healthy control individuals after initial mRNA vaccination (without history of COVID-19). Anti-spike T cell responses were assayed by stimulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with pooled small overlapping peptides spanning the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, followed by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and flow cytometry for release of cytokines in response to stimulation, including negative controls (no peptide stimulation) and positive controls (phorbol myristate acetate [PMA] and ionomycin stimulation). To evaluate for low frequency memory responses, PBMCs were cultured in the presence of the mRNA-1273 vaccine for 14 days before this evaluation.

Ionophore stimulation of PBMCs revealed a less inflammatory milieu in terms of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, and IL-10 profiling in lung transplantation individuals, reflecting the effect of immunosuppressive treatments. Similar to what we previously reported in healthy vaccinees, spike-specific responses in lung transplantation recipients were undetectable (< 0.01%) when tested 2 weeks after vaccination or later, but were detectable after in vitro culture of PBMCs with mRNA-1273 vaccine to enrich memory T cell responses. This was also seen in COVID-19-recovered lung transplantation recipients. Comparison of their enriched memory responses to controls revealed relatively similar CD4+ T cell memory, but markedly reduced CD8+ T cell memory both after primary vaccination or a booster dose. These responses were not correlated to age or time after transplantation. The vaccine-induced CD4+ and CD8+ responses correlated well in the healthy control group, but poorly in the transplantation groups.

These results reveal a specific defect in CD8+ T cells, which have key roles both in transplanted organ rejection but also antiviral effector responses. Overcoming this defect will require strategies to enhance vaccine immunogenicity in immunocompromised persons.

Background and Objectives: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have a higher risk of suffering from severe Coronavirus (COVID-19) compared to the general population. Studies have shown impaired immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines in this high-risk population; thus, SOT recipients have been prioritized globally for primary and booster doses. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 144 SOT recipients who had previously received two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA1273 vaccine, and who were subsequently vaccinated with a booster dose of the mRNA1273 vaccine. Humoral and cellular immune responses were measured 1 and 3 months after the second dose, and 1 month after the third dose. Results: One month after the second dose, 33.6% (45/134) of patients displayed a positive antibody response with a median (25th, 75th) antibody titer of 9 (7, 161) AU/mL. Three months after the second dose, 41.8% (56/134) tested positive with a median (25th, 75th) antibody titer of 18 (7, 251) AU/mL. After the booster dose, the seropositivity rate increased to 69.4% (93/134), with a median (25th, 75th) titer of 966 (10, 8027) AU/mL. The specific SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was assessed in 44 randomly selected recipients 3 months after the second dose, and 11.4% (5/44) of them had a positive response. Following the third dose, 42% (21/50) tested positive. Side effects after the third dose were mild, with pain at the injection site being the most frequent adverse effect, reported by 73.4% of the recipients. Conclusion: Our study shows a mild delayed increase in antibody titer, three months after primary vaccination compared to one month after. It also shows a robust augmentation of humoral and specific T-cell responses after the booster dose, as well as the safety and tolerability of the mRNA vaccines in SOT recipients.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) experienced reduced SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response and were at increased risk of severe COVID-19. It is unknown if level of vaccine induced anti-receptor binding domain IgG (anti-RBD IgG) correlates with protection from and survival following COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the effect of vaccine response on risk of breakthrough infections (BTI) and COVID-19 death in KTRs.

We performed a nationwide study, examining the competing risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related/unrelated death, and vaccine efficacy as assessed by level of anti-RBD IgG response 4-10 weeks after each vaccination. The study included all KTR in Norway alive and with a functioning graft on February 20th, 2020, and events after November 11th, 2022 were right-censored. A pre-pandemic reference-cohort from January 1st 2019 to January 1st 2020 was included to evaluate excess mortality. The study was conducted at Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway.

The study included 3607 KTRs (59 [48-70] years) with a functioning graft at February 20th, 2020, who received (median [IQR]) 4 [3-4] vaccines (range 2-6, 99% mRNA). Anti-RBD IgG was measured in 12 701 serum samples provided by 3213 KTRs. Vaccine response was assessed 41 [31-57] days after vaccination. A total of 1090 KTRs were infected with SARS-CoV-2, 1005 (92%) were BTI, and vaccine response did not protect against BTI. The hazard ratio for COVID-19 related death 40 days post-infection was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.14, 2.56) comparing vaccine response levels (≥5 vs. ≥5000 BAU/mL). No excess non-COVID-19 mortality was registered in KTRs surviving SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to a 2019 pre-pandemic reference.

Our findings suggested that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine response did not predict protection against infection, but prevention of fatal disease progression in KTRs and greater vaccine response further reduced the risk of COVID-19 death. No excess non-COVID-19 mortality was seen during the pandemic.

CEPI and internal funds.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab-cilgavimab (tix-cil) may be associated with cardiovascular adverse events. Also, in vitro studies have reported a reduced activity of tix-cil against emerging SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants. Our study aimed to report the real-world outcomes of tix-cil prophylaxis in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients METHODS: We retrospectively studied all OHT recipients who received one dose of tix-cil (150-150 mg or 300-300 mg) at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota, between February 5, 2022 and September 8, 2022. We collected data on cardiovascular adverse events and breakthrough COVID-19 following tix-cil administration.

One hundred sixty-three OHT recipients were included. The majority were male (65.6%), and the median age was 61 years (IQR 48, 69). During the median follow-up of 164 days (IQR 123, 190), one patient presented an episode of asymptomatic hypertensive urgency that was managed with outpatient antihypertensive treatment optimization. Twenty-four patients (14.7%) experienced breakthrough COVID-19 at the median of 63.5 days (IQR 28.3, 101.3) after tix-cil administration. The majority (70.8%) completed the primary vaccine series and received at least one booster dose (70.8%). Only one patient with breakthrough COVID-19 required hospitalization. All patients survived.

In this cohort of OHT recipients, no patients developed severe cardiovascular events related to tix-cil. The high incidence of breakthrough COVID-19 could be due to the reduced activity of tix-cil against current circulating SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants. These results emphasize the need for a multimodal prevention strategy against SARS-CoV-2 in these high-risk patients.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (Sars-CoV-2) infection has significantly affected immunocompromised individuals and subsequently, liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Early in the course of pandemic, this vulnerable population was prioritized for vaccination, after obtaining encouraging data about the vaccination benefits on disease severity and mortality. As the published knowledge was mainly supported from studies which were limited to the healthy population, the present review summarizes the data from the literature on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in LTRs and the available vaccination guidelines of international societies. The COVID-19 vaccination of LTRs is strongly recommended as a safe and effective measure in order to prevent severe disease and mortality.

Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), including administration of booster doses, continues to be the most effective method for controlling COVID-19-related complications including progression to severe illness and death.However, there is mounting evidence that more needs to be done to protect individuals with compromised immune function.

Here, we review the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised patients, including those with primary immunodeficiencies, HIV, cancer (including hematological malignancies), solid organ transplant recipients and chronic kidney disease, as reported in systematic reviews/meta-analyses published over a 12-month period in PubMed. Given the varied responses to vaccination patients with compromised immune function, a major goal of this analysis was to try to identify specific risk-factors related to vaccine failure.

COVID-19 remains a global problem, with new variants of concern emerging at regular intervals. There is an ongoing need for optimal vaccine strategies to combat the pandemic. In addition, alternative treatment approaches are needed for immunocompromised patients who may not mount an adequate immune response to current COVID-19 vaccines. Identification of high-risk patients, and the introduction of newer antiviral approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, will offer physicians therapeutic options for such vulnerable individuals.

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are at increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated complications.

We aimed to describe the outcomes of polymerase chain reaction-documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in LTRs followed at our institution from March 2020 to July 2022. The primary outcome investigated was hospitalization or death from COVID-19-related symptoms within 28 days from diagnosis.

Overall, 60 cases were included, of which 18 (30%) reached the primary outcome. Only one patient (2%) died. Anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were administered as early treatment in 36 patients (casirivimab/imdevimab = 2, sotrovimab = 31, and tixagevimab/cilgavimab = 3). Multivariate analysis revealed that age >60 years (p = .003; odds ratio [OR] 9.41; confidence interval [CI] 2.52-41.05) was associated with a higher risk for the primary outcome, while administration of mAbs as early treatment (p = .030; OR 0.23; CI 0.06-0.87) was associated with a lower risk. No effect of vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 variant was observed. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity values did not decrease among 37 patients who had spirometry performed 1 month after COVID-19.

We observed a relatively low morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 in LTR. mAb administration was associated with a better outcome.

Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants along with vaccinations are fundamental for severe COVID-19 disease prevention. A study was performed that focused on 43 patients with the SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted to the Emergency Department. RT-PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples were sequenced using the MiSeq II system for variant detection. The main reason for Emergency Department admission was COVID-19 (67%), followed by other causes (33%); 51% patients were unvaccinated or vaccinated with a single dose and 49% had completed the vaccination course with two or three doses. Among the vaccinated group, 38% were admitted for COVID-19, versus 94.5% of the unvaccinated group. After admission, 50% of the vaccinated group and 36% of the unvaccinated group were discharged and allowed to go home, and 80% of the unvaccinated had no major comorbidities; 63% needed hospital admission and 5% required a stay in the Intensive Care Unit. Of these, 37% were vaccinated with 3 doses, 11% with two doses, 4% with a single dose, and 48% were unvaccinated. The 70% of the vaccinated patients who were admitted to hospital presented major comorbidities versus 38% of the unvaccinated group. Two unvaccinated patients that needed intensive care had relevant comorbidities and died. Genome sequencing showed the circulation of three omicron and two pure sub-lineages of omicron, including 22 BA.1, 12 BA.1.1, and 7 BA.2. Data showed the SARS-CoV-2 national and international migration patterns and how vaccination was useful for severe COVID-19 disease prevention.