Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among renal transplant (RTx) recipients, with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) representing a disproportionately high burden. However, the optimal revascularization strategy for NSTE-ACS in RTx recipients remains unclear. This retrospective study analyzed the 2016 to 2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database. RTx recipients (≥18 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for NSTE-ACS were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while perioperative complications, unplanned 30- and 90-day readmissions, repeat revascularization, and renal allograft failure were also considered. Multivariable logistic regression and Royston-Parmar models were used to identify the risk-adjusted association of revascularization modality, timing, and outcomes. Of an estimated 3,323 patients, 20.5% underwent CABG and 79.5% PCI. Following adjustment, CABG was associated with higher perioperative complications (AOR 3.46, 95% CI 2.31 to 5.19) and demonstrated a trend toward increased mortality risk (AOR 1.79, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.18). Royston-Parmar analysis demonstrated no difference in freedom from readmission or renal allograft failure within 90 days of discharge, but CABG was associated with a lower hazard of repeat revascularization (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76). Timing analysis revealed stable mortality rates across intervals for both modalities. While PCI complications increased with longer delays to revascularization, CABG demonstrated a more stable pattern. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCI appears to be associated with lower risks of mortality and complications compared to CABG in RTx recipients with NSTE-ACS. However, CABG may offer benefits of reduced risk of repeat revascularization and greater flexibility in timing without compromising renal allograft function.

Adult patients with a prior renal transplantation are at increased risk of accelerated cardiovascular disease. This study aims to identify key clinical and biochemical predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in this population. Understanding these predictors may improve risk stratification and enhance long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients. A systematic literature search of medical databases was performed using PRISMA principles to identify all relevant studies assessing clinical and biochemical parameters in adult patients with a prior renal transplantation (2000-2024; English only; PROSPERO registration CRD42024596207). Data for a range of clinical and biochemical parameters were individually extracted, and those with low heterogeneity were then meta-analysed using a random-effects model for overall effect size and assessed through standardised mean difference (SMD) and odds ratios (ORs). The primary outcomes assessed were fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events occurring after renal transplantation during hospitalisation and up to 10 years post discharge. Of 506 screened studies, 17 peer-reviewed articles met inclusion criteria and included a total of 181,938 renal transplant patients. The key novel predictors of MACE included pre-transplant haemodialysis (OR 2.562, 95% CI = 1.585-4.139, p < 0.001) and delayed graft function (OR 2.113, 95% CI = 1.397-3.198, p < 0.001). Importantly, transplant from a living donor (OR 0.463, 95% CI = 0.393-0.546, p < 0.001) was a protective factor. Traditional cardiovascular risk factor profiles were all predictors of MACE events (p < 0.05). This study identified several traditional and novel predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with pre-existing renal transplantation. Early recognition of these high-risk clinical predictors should prompt more aggressive monitoring and treatment.

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risks of cardiovascular events, but contemporary risk estimates are sparse. Using the Danish nationwide administrative databases, we quantified 1- and 5-year risks of cardiovascular disease and kidney failure among all first-time kidney transplant recipients (2005-2018) and age- and sex-matched controls (1:10 ratio).

Cumulative 1- and 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure), kidney failure (re-transplantation or need for dialysis >30 days post-transplant), and mortality following transplantation were calculated until maximally Dec 31, 2018.

A total of 2,565 kidney transplant recipients (median age 50.5 [25-75th percentile 40.2-60.7] years, 37 % females) and 25,650 controls were included. 1-year cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure was 2.6 % (95 % confidence interval 1.9 %-3.2 %) among kidney transplant recipients versus 0.5 % (0.4 %-0.5 %) in controls. Cumulative 5-year risk estimates for the same endpoints were 8.3 % (7.1 %-9.5 %) for the transplant patients, and 2.6 % (2.3 %-2.8 %) among controls, respectively. For the kidney transplant cohort, cumulative mortality was 2.2 % (1.7 %-2.8 %) and 10.3 % (9.0 %-11.6 %) at 1- and 5 years, respectively, versus 0.5 % (0.4 %-0.6 %) and 3.0 % (2.7 %-3.2 %) for controls. The cumulative incidence of dialysis and re-transplantation was 6.1 % (5.2 %-7.1 %) at 1 year and 16.3 % (14.7 %-17.9 %) at 5 years, respectively.

Despite the benefits of transplantation, kidney transplant recipients continue to have significant long-term cardiovascular disease, end-stage kidney disease, and mortality risks even with contemporary medical management. Better cardiovascular preventive strategies are warranted to improve prognosis in this segment of patients.

Individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) face higher cerebrovascular risk. Yet, the impact of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and kidney transplantation (KTx) on hospitalization rates for cerebral infarction and hemorrhage remains underexplored. Analyzing 2,713,194 ESKD hospitalizations (2005-2019) using the National Inpatient Sample, we investigated hospitalization rates for ischemic and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular diseases concerning ESKD, PVD, KTx, or their combinations. Patients hospitalized with cerebral infarction due to thrombosis/embolism/occlusion (CITO) or artery occlusion resulting in cerebral ischemia (AOSI) had higher rates of comorbid ESKD and PVD (4.17% and 7.29%, respectively) versus non-CITO or AOSI hospitalizations (2.34%, p < 0.001; 2.29%, p < 0.001). Conversely, patients hospitalized with nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (NIH) had significantly lower rates of ESKD and PVD (1.64%) compared to non-NIH hospitalizations (2.34%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, hospitalizations for CITO or AOSI exhibited higher rates of KTx and PVD (0.17%, 0.09%, respectively) compared to non-CITO or AOSI hospitalizations (0.05%, p = 0.033; 0.05%, p = 0.002). Patients hospitalized with NIH showed similar rates of KTx and PVD (0.04%) versus non-NIH hospitalizations (0.05%, p = 0.34). This nationwide analysis reveals that PVD in ESKD patients is associated with increased hospitalization rates with cerebral ischemic events and reduced NIH events. Among KTx recipients, PVD correlated with increased hospitalizations for ischemic events, without affecting NIH. This highlights management concerns for patients with KTx and PVD.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant (KT) patients. The perceived risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may create a reluctance to perform coronary angiography in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database was used to sample individuals presenting with NSTEMI. Patients were stratified into KT and Non-KT cohorts. Outcomes included left heart catheterization rates, mortality, arrhythmias, acute kidney injury/acute renal failure (AKI/ARF), and extended length of hospital stay (ELOS) (>72 h). Propensity matching (1:1 ratio) and regression analyses were performed.

Out of 336,354 patients with NSTEMI, 742 patients were in the KT group. KT patients were less likely to have LHC relative to non-KT patients (22.0 % vs 18.3 %); a difference that persisted on post-match analysis (27.1 % vs 19.4 %). On pre-match analysis, KT transplant patients that underwent LHC had lower mortality (10.3 % vs 0.7 %), AKI/ARF (44.6 % vs 27.9 %), arrhythmias (30.4 % vs 20.6 %) and lower ELOS (58.6 % vs 41.9 %). Post-match, KT cohort patient that underwent LHC had lower arrhythmias (OR:0.60[0.38-0.96]), AKI/ARF (OR = 0.51[0.34-0.77]), ELOS (OR:0.49[0.34-0.73]).

KT patients underwent LHC much less frequently than their non-KT counterparts for NSTEMI. Coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization were associated with a significant decrease in morbidity and mortality. This theorized risk of CIN should not outweigh the benefit of LHC in KT patients.

Kidney transplantation is considered the treatment of choice for end-stage kidney disease patients. However, the residual cardiovascular risk remains significantly higher in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) than in the general population. Hypertension is highly prevalent in KTRs and represents a major modifiable risk factor associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and reduced patient and graft survival. Proper definition of hypertension and recognition of special phenotypes and abnormal diurnal blood pressure (BP) patterns is crucial for adequate BP control. Misclassification by office BP is commonly encountered in these patients, and a high proportion of masked and uncontrolled hypertension, as well as of white-coat hypertension, has been revealed in these patients with the use of ambulatory BP monitoring. The pathophysiology of hypertension in KTRs is multifactorial, involving traditional risk factors, factors related to chronic kidney disease and factors related to the transplantation procedure. In the absence of evidence from large-scale randomized controlled trials in this population, BP targets for hypertension management in KTR have been extrapolated from chronic kidney disease populations. The most recent Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2021 guidelines recommend lowering BP to less than 130/80 mmHg using standardized BP office measurements. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-II receptor blockers have been established as the preferred first-line agents, on the basis of emphasis placed on their favorable outcomes on graft survival. The aim of this review is to provide previous and recent evidence on prevalence, accurate diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment of hypertension in KTRs.

The 4S-AF scheme [Stroke risk, Symptom severity, Severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, Substrate severity] was recently proposed to characterize AF patients. In this post hoc analysis we evaluated the agreement between the therapeutic strategy (rate or rhythm control, respectively), as suggested by the 4S-AF scheme, and the actual strategy followed in a patients cohort. Outcomes of interest were as follows: all-cause death, a composite of all-cause death/any thromboembolism/acute coronary syndrome, and a composite of all-cause death, any thrombotic/ischemic event, and major bleeding (net clinical outcome). We enrolled 615 patients: 60.5% male, median age 74 [interquartile range (IQR) 67-80] years; median CHA₂DS₂VASc 4 and median HAS-BLED 2. The 4S-AF score would have suggested a rhythm-control strategy in 351 (57.1%) patients while a rate control in 264 (42.9%). The strategy adopted was concordant with the 4S-AF suggestions in 342 (55.6%) cases, and non-concordant in 273 (44.4%). After a median follow-up of 941 days (IQR 365-1282), 113 (18.4%) patients died, 158 (25.7%) had an event of the composite endpoint. On adjusted Cox regression analysis, when 4S-AF score suggested rate control, disagreement with that suggestion was not associated with a worse outcome. When 4S-AF indicated rhythm control, disagreement was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 7.59; 95% CI 1.65-35.01), and of the composite outcome (HR 2.69; 95% CI 1.19-6.06). The 4S-AF scheme is a useful tool to comprehensively evaluate AF patients and aid the decision-making process. Disagreement with the rhythm control suggestion of the 4S-AF scheme was associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

The literature on the mortality and 30-day readmissions for acute heart failure and for acute myocardial infarction among renal-transplant recipients is limited.

To study the in-hospital mortality, cardiovascular complications, and 30-day readmissions among renal transplant recipients (RTRs).

Data from the national readmissions database sample, which constitutes 49.1% of all hospitals in the United States and represents more than 95% of the stratified national population, was analyzed for the years 2012-2018 using billing codes.

A total of 588,668 hospitalizations in renal transplant recipients (mean age 57.7 ± 14.2 years; 44.5% female) were recorded in the study years. A total of 15,788 (2.7%) patients had a diagnosis of acute heart failure; 11,320 (71.7%) had acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and 4468 (28.3%) had acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; 17,256 (3%) patients had myocardial infarction, 3496 (20%) had ST-Elevation myocardial infarction while 13,969 (80%) had non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Overall, 11,675 (2%) renal-transplant patients died, of whom 757 (6.5%) had acute heart failure, 330 (2.8%) had acute reduced and 427 (3.7%) had acute preserved ejection fraction failure. Among 1652 (14.1%) patient deaths with myocardial infarction, 465 (4%) were ST-elevation- and 1187 (10.1%) were non-ST-Elevation-related. The absolute yearly mortality rate due to acute heart failure increased over the years 2012-2018 (p-trend 0.0002, 0.001, 0.002, 0.05, respectively), while the mortality rate due to myocardial infarction with ST-elevation decreased (p-trend 0.002).

Cardiovascular complications are significantly associated with hospitalizations among RTRs. The absolute yearly mortality, and rate of heart failure (with reduced or preserved ejection fraction) increased over the study years, suggesting that more research is needed to improve the management of these patients.

The literature on outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) amongst kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is limited.

To study the outcomes of STEMI among KTR.

Data from the national readmissions database (NRD) sample that constitutes 49.1% of the stratified sample of all hospitals in the USA were analyzed for hospitalizations with STEMI among KTR for the years 2012-2018. Complications associated with STEMI were extracted using International Classification of Diseases codes.

A total of 588,668 index KTR hospitalizations (mean age 57.67±14.22 years; female 44.5%) of which 3,496 (0.59%) had STEMI were recorded in the NRD for the years 2012-2018. A total of 11,676 (1.98%) patients died during the hospitalization. In-hospital mortality among STEMI was higher, 465 (13.3%), than without-STEMI 11,211 (1.92%). Among the complications, mechanical complications occurred among 1.0% vs 0.02%, cardiogenic shock 10.6 vs 0.3%, ventricular arrythmias 8.3% vs 0.8%, conduction block 6.9% vs 2%, stroke 4.1% vs 1.9%, and acute kidney injury 31.6% vs 28.3% among STEMI and without-STEMI respectively. Among coronary procedures, coronary angiography was performed among 1,999 (57.2%) of which 1,777 (50.8%) had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). On coarsened exact matching of baseline characteristics, PCI was less likely associated with mortality, odds ratio 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.24-0.64; p=0.0002). The trends of mortality among STEMI were steady (p-trend 0.11). PCI trend increased (p-trend 0.008) and incidence of STEMI decreased over the study years 2012 (0.66%)-2018(0.474%). A total of 84,810 (14.4%) patients were readmitted in 30 days of which 696 (20%) patients were among the STEMI subgroup.

STEMI is not an uncommon complication among KTR and is associated with significant mechanical complications. Improvement in cardiovascular risk factors might improve the STEMI rates among KTR.

Hypertension is common in kidney transplantation recipients and may be difficult to treat. Factors present before kidney transplantation, related to the transplantation procedure itself and factors developing after transplantation may contribute to blood pressure (BP) elevation in kidney transplant recipients. The present consensus is based on the results of three recent systematic reviews, the latest guidelines and the current literature. The current transplant guidelines, which recommend only office BP assessments for risk stratification in kidney transplant patients should be reconsidered, given the presence of white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension in this population and the better prediction of adverse outcomes by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring as indicated in recent systematic reviews. Hypertension is associated with adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes and decreased survival in kidney transplant recipients. Current evidence suggests calcium channel blockers could be the preferred first-step antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant patients, as they improve graft function and reduce graft loss, whereas no clear benefit is documented for renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use over conventional treatment in the current literature. Randomized control trials demonstrating the clinical benefits of BP lowering on kidney and major cardiovascular events and recording patient-related outcomes are still needed. These trials should define optimal BP targets for kidney transplant recipients. In the absence of kidney transplant-specific evidence, BP targets in kidney transplant recipients should be similar to those in the wider chronic kidney disease population.