1
|
Mueller KT, Saavedra AA, O'Keeffe LA, Sparks JA. Patient-Centric Approach for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in Older People. Drugs Aging 2025; 42:81-94. [PMID: 39800810 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01175-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to outline considerations for treating older adults with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) as it relates to infection, comorbidities, cancer, and quality of life. RECENT FINDINGS The recent 2023 American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians guideline conditionally recommended specific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), antifibrotics, and short-term glucocorticoids to treat RA-ILD. Since RA-ILD often affects older adults, we contextualize these pharmacologic options related to infection, gastrointestinal (GI) effects, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and quality of life. Nearly all DMARDs and glucocorticoids are immunosuppressive and increase infection risk. Rituximab, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, and glucocorticoids may have particularly high infection risk. Many therapies recommended for treating RA-ILD have potential GI side effects. Antifibrotics have a high rate of nausea and diarrhea. Janus kinase inhibitors may increase risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease in older people. In older individuals, decisions must weigh the risks and benefits of drug options while considering clinical and social factors such as polypharmacy, adherence, cost, convenience, and social support. Management of RA-ILD in older individuals is complex and should consider risks and benefits, while optimizing quality and quantity of life through a shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin T Mueller
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, no. 6016U, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Alene A Saavedra
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, no. 6016U, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Lauren A O'Keeffe
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, no. 6016U, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Sparks
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, no. 6016U, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rizzi M, Tonello S, Brinno C, Zecca E, Matino E, Cittone M, Rizzi E, Casciaro GF, D’Onghia D, Colangelo D, Minisini R, Bellan M, Castello LM, Chiocchetti A, Pirisi M, Rigamonti C, Lilleri D, Zavaglio F, Bergami F, Sola D, Sainaghi PP. SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is higher in vaccinated patients with inflammatory autoimmune diseases or liver transplantation treated with mycophenolate due to an impaired antiviral immune response: results of the extended follow up of the RIVALSA prospective cohort. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1185278. [PMID: 37545528 PMCID: PMC10398576 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1185278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A relevant proportion of immunocompromised patients did not reach a detectable seroconversion after a full primary vaccination cycle against SARS-CoV-2. The effect of different immunosuppressants and the potential risks for SARS-CoV-2 infection in these subjects is largely unknown. Methods Patients from the Rivalsa prospective, observational cohort study with planned anti SARS-CoV-2 third dose mRNA vaccination between October and December 2021 were asked to participate to this follow-up study. Patients were asked about eventual confirmed positivity to SARS-CoV-2 infection within 6 months from the third dose and to undergo a blood draw to evaluate seroconversion status after the additional vaccine shot. Results 19 out of 114 patients taking part in the survey developed a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; we identified mycophenolate treatment as an independent predictor of an increased risk of infection even after the third vaccine dose (OR: 5.20, 95% CI: 1.70-20.00, p=0.0053). This result is in agreement with the in vitro evidence that MMF impairs both B and T lymphocytes driven immune responses (reduction both in memory B cells producing anti-spike antibodies and in proliferating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells). Conclusions Immunocompromised patients need an additional vaccine administration to reach a detectable seroconversion, thus fostering a more personalized approach to their clinical management. Moreover, patients undergoing mycophenolate treatment show a specific increased infection risk, with respect to other immunosuppressants thus supporting a closer monitoring of their health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Rizzi
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Stelvio Tonello
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- CAAD, Center for Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases, and IRCAD (Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases), Università del Piemonte Orientale (UPO), Novara, Italy
| | - Cristiana Brinno
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Erika Zecca
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and COVID-19 Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Division of Emergency Medicine and COVID-19 sub-intensive unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Erica Matino
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and COVID-19 Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Division of Emergency Medicine and COVID-19 sub-intensive unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Micol Cittone
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Eleonora Rizzi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and COVID-19 Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Division of Emergency Medicine and COVID-19 sub-intensive unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Francesco Casciaro
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and COVID-19 Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Division of Emergency Medicine and COVID-19 sub-intensive unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Davide D’Onghia
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Donato Colangelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Rosalba Minisini
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Mattia Bellan
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- CAAD, Center for Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases, and IRCAD (Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases), Università del Piemonte Orientale (UPO), Novara, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and COVID-19 Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Division of Emergency Medicine and COVID-19 sub-intensive unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Luigi Mario Castello
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Division of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera “SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo”, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Annalisa Chiocchetti
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- CAAD, Center for Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases, and IRCAD (Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases), Università del Piemonte Orientale (UPO), Novara, Italy
| | - Mario Pirisi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- CAAD, Center for Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases, and IRCAD (Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases), Università del Piemonte Orientale (UPO), Novara, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and COVID-19 Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Division of Emergency Medicine and COVID-19 sub-intensive unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Cristina Rigamonti
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Daniele Lilleri
- Unit of Microbiology and Virology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federica Zavaglio
- Unit of Microbiology and Virology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federica Bergami
- Unit of Microbiology and Virology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Daniele Sola
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Pier Paolo Sainaghi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- CAAD, Center for Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases, and IRCAD (Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases), Università del Piemonte Orientale (UPO), Novara, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and COVID-19 Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Division of Emergency Medicine and COVID-19 sub-intensive unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arora H, Boothby-Shoemaker W, Braunberger T, Lim HW, Veenstra J. Safety of conventional immunosuppressive therapies for patients with dermatological conditions and coronavirus disease 2019: A review of current evidence. J Dermatol 2021; 49:317-329. [PMID: 34962304 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on patients receiving conventional immunosuppressive (IS) therapy has yet to be fully determined; however, research on using IS therapy for treating COVID-19 in acutely ill patients is increasing. While some believe that IS therapy may be protective, others argue that these agents may make patients more susceptible to COVID-19 infection and morbidity and advocate for a more cautious, individualized approach to determining continuation, reduction, or discontinuation of therapy. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of COVID-19 risk in dermatological patients who are receiving conventional IS therapies, including mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, apremilast, JAK inhibitors, and systemic steroids. Additionally, we provide recommendations for management of these medications for dermatological patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Treatment of dermatological disease during the COVID-19 pandemic should involve shared decision-making between the patient and provider, with consideration of each patient's comorbidities and the severity of the patient's dermatological disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harleen Arora
- Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Wyatt Boothby-Shoemaker
- Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Henry W Lim
- Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Jesse Veenstra
- Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohapatra A, Valson AT, Annapandian VM, David VG, Alexander S, Jacob S, Kakde S, Kumar S, Devasia A, Vijayakumar TS, Tamilarasi V, Jacob CK, Basu G, John GT, Varughese S. Post-transplant complications, patient, and graft survival in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients at a tropical tertiary care center across two immunosuppression eras. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e13973. [PMID: 33463876 PMCID: PMC7615901 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report pediatric PAKT patient and graft outcomes at a large tropical tertiary center spanning two transplant eras. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, all children ≤18 years who underwent kidney transplantation at our center between 1991 and 2016 were included. Data pertaining to their baseline characteristics, post-transplant events, and outcome were retrieved from transplant records and compared between transplant eras (1991-2005 and 2006-2016). RESULTS A total of 139 children (mean age 15.2 ± 2.9 years) underwent PAKT during this period. The incidence of UTIs, CMV disease, BKVN, invasive fungal infections, new-onset diabetes after transplant, leucopenia, and recurrent NKD was higher in the 2006-2016 era (P < .001 for all), while 1-year cumulative BPAR was comparable (P = .100). Five-year graft and patient survival in the two eras were 89.9% and 94.2% (P = .365) and 92.1% and 95.3% (P = .739), respectively. Incidence of CMV disease, BKVN, graft loss, and death was lower in the calcineurin withdrawal group. Non-adherence accounted for 36% of graft loss; infections caused 43.7% of deaths. On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, independent predictors for graft loss were UTIs and blood transfusion naïve status and for death were serious infections and glomerular NKD. CONCLUSIONS PAKT in India has excellent long-term graft outcomes, though patient outcomes remain suboptimal owing to a high burden of infections. Current immunosuppression protocols need to be re-examined to balance infection risk, graft, and patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Mohapatra
- Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Anna T. Valson
- Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | | | | | - Shibu Jacob
- Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Shailesh Kakde
- Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Santosh Kumar
- Department of Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Antony Devasia
- Department of Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | | | | | - Gopal Basu
- Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dendle C, Polkinghorne KR, Mulley WR, Gan PY, Kanellis J, Stuart RL, Thursky K, Holdsworth SR. A simple score can identify kidney transplant recipients at high risk of severe infection over the following 2 years. Transpl Infect Dis 2019; 21:e13076. [PMID: 30875147 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine whether a composite score of simple immune biomarkers and clinical characteristics could predict severe infections in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS We conducted a prospective study of 168 stable kidney transplant recipients who underwent measurement of lymphocyte subsets, immunoglobulins, and renal function at baseline and were followed up for 2 years for the development of any severe infections, defined as infection requiring hospitalization. A point score was developed to predict severe infection based on logistic regression analysis of factors in baseline testing. RESULTS Fifty-nine (35%) patients developed severe infection, 36 (21%) had two or more severe infections, and 3 (2%) died of infection. A group of 19 (11%) patients had the highest predicted infectious risk (>60%), as predicted by the score. Predictive variables were mycophenolate use, graft function, CD4+, and natural killer cell number. The level of immunosuppression score had an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.83). CONCLUSION Our level of immunosuppression score for predicting the development of severe infection over 2 years has sufficient prognostic accuracy for identification of high-risk patients. This data can inform research that examines strategies to reduce the risks of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Dendle
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kevan R Polkinghorne
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia
| | - William R Mulley
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Poh-Yi Gan
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Kanellis
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rhonda L Stuart
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karin Thursky
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen R Holdsworth
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Updates on urinary tract infections in kidney transplantation. J Nephrol 2019; 32:751-761. [PMID: 30689126 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-019-00585-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) represents the most common infection after kidney transplantation; it is associated with an increased risk for acute kidney rejection and impaired graft function in the early post-transplant period. Kidney transplant recipients with UTIs are often clinically asymptomatic due to the immunosuppressive therapy; however, asymptomatic bacteriuria may progress to acute pyelonephritis, bacteremia and urosepsis, particularly in the early post-transplant period, that are independent risk factors for short and long-term graft and patient survival. This article reviews the definitions, incidence, risk factors and the management of UTI in kidney transplant recipients; furthermore, the main controversial and still unanswered questions, regarding the causes of recurrent UTIs, adequate use of antibiotics to avoid antibiotic resistance, dosing and timing for prophylaxis and treatment of symptomatic infections, are also discussed. The emerging definition of urinary microbiota introduces new concepts in understanding the complexity of the disease and might represent the future target for therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mathis AS, Egloff G, Ghin HL. Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies. World J Transplant 2014; 4:57-80. [PMID: 25032096 PMCID: PMC4094953 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i2.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2014] [Revised: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 05/14/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and reduces the risk of mortality. A majority of the success of kidney transplantation is attributable to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and their ability to reduce acute rejection rates. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and although controversial, evidence does suggest a role of chronic CNI toxicity in this failure to improve outcomes. Consequently, there is interest in reducing or removing CNIs from immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to improve outcomes. Several strategies exist to spare calcineurin inhibitors, including use of agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), sirolimus, everolimus or belatacept to facilitate late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal, beyond 6 mo post-transplant; or using these agents to plan early withdrawal within 6 mo; or to avoid the CNIs all together using CNI-free regimens. Although numerous reviews have been written on this topic, practice varies significantly between centers. This review organizes the data based on patient characteristics (i.e., the baseline immunosuppressive regimen) as a means to aid the practicing clinician in caring for their patients, by matching up their situation with the relevant literature. The current review, the first in a series of two, examines the potential of immunosuppressive agents to facilitate late CNI withdrawal beyond 6 mo post-transplant, and has demonstrated that the strongest evidence resides with MMF/MPS. MMF or MPS can be successfully introduced/maintained to facilitate late CNI withdrawal and improve renal function in the setting of graft deterioration, albeit with an increased risk of acute rejection and infection. Additional benefits may include improved blood pressure, lipid profile and serum glucose. Sirolimus has less data directly comparing CNI withdrawal to an active CNI-containing regimen, but modest improvement in short-term renal function is possible, with an increased risk of proteinuria, especially in the setting of baseline renal dysfunction and/or proteinuria. Renal outcomes may be improved when sirolimus is used in combination with MMF. Although data with everolimus is less robust, results appear similar to those observed with sirolimus.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in organ transplant recipients: an update. Arch Toxicol 2014; 88:1351-89. [PMID: 24792322 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-014-1247-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 04/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This review aims to provide an update of the literature on the pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Mycophenolate is now the antimetabolite of choice in immunosuppressant regimens in transplant recipients. The active drug moiety mycophenolic acid (MPA) is available as an ester pro-drug and an enteric-coated sodium salt. MPA is a competitive, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), an important rate-limiting enzyme in purine synthesis. MPA suppresses T and B lymphocyte proliferation; it also decreases expression of glycoproteins and adhesion molecules responsible for recruiting monocytes and lymphocytes to sites of inflammation and graft rejection; and may destroy activated lymphocytes by induction of a necrotic signal. Improved long-term allograft survival has been demonstrated for MPA and may be due to inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 or fibroblast proliferation. Recent research also suggested a differential effect of mycophenolate on the regulatory T cell/helper T cell balance which could potentially encourage immune tolerance. Lower exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (renal sparing) appears to be possible with concomitant use of MPA in renal transplant recipients without undue risk of rejection. MPA displays large between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. At least three studies have now reported that MPA exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with bioavailability decreasing significantly with increasing doses, perhaps due to saturable absorption processes or saturable enterohepatic recirculation. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is still controversial and the ability of routine MPA TDM to improve long-term graft survival and patient outcomes is largely unknown. MPA monitoring may be more important in high-immunological recipients, those on calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens and in whom unexpected rejection or infections have occurred. The majority of pharmacodynamic data on MPA has been obtained in patients receiving MMF therapy in the first year after kidney transplantation. Low MPA area under the concentration time from 0 to 12 h post-dose (AUC0-12) is associated with increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection although AUC0-12 optimal cut-off values vary across study populations. IMPDH monitoring to identify individuals at increased risk of rejection shows some promise but is still in the experimental stage. A relationship between MPA exposure and adverse events was identified in some but not all studies. Genetic variants within genes involved in MPA metabolism (UGT1A9, UGT1A8, UGT2B7), cellular transportation (SLCOB1, SLCO1B3, ABCC2) and targets (IMPDH) have been reported to effect MPA pharmacokinetics and/or response in some studies; however, larger studies across different ethnic groups that take into account genetic linkage and drug interactions that can alter a patient's phenotype are needed before any clinical recommendations based on patient genotype can be formulated. There is little data on the pharmacology and toxicology of MPA in older and paediatric transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus From Southern Taiwan. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19:252-8. [DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0b013e31829d5017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
10
|
Ebrahimi F, Koch M, Pieroh P, Ghadban C, Hobusch C, Bechmann I, Dehghani F. Time dependent neuroprotection of mycophenolate mofetil: effects on temporal dynamics in glial proliferation, apoptosis, and scar formation. J Neuroinflammation 2012; 9:89. [PMID: 22569136 PMCID: PMC3430572 DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-89] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2012] [Accepted: 05/08/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immunosuppressants such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have the capacity to inhibit microglial and astrocytic activation and to reduce the extent of cell death after neuronal injury. This study was designed to determine the effective neuroprotective time frame in which MMF elicits its beneficial effects, by analyzing glial cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis. Methods Using organotypic hippocampal slice cultures (OHSCs), temporal dynamics of proliferation and apoptosis after N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-mediated excitotoxicity were analyzed by quantitative morphometry of Ki-67 or cleaved caspase-3 immunoreactive glial cells. Treatment on NMDA-lesioned OHSCs with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)100 μg/mL was started at different time points after injury or performed within specific time frames, and the numbers of propidium iodide (PI)+ degenerating neurons and isolectin (I)B4+ microglial cells were determined. Pre-treatment with guanosine 100 μmol/l was performed to counteract MMF-induced effects. The effects of MMF on reactive astrocytic scar formation were investigated in the scratch-wound model of astrocyte monolayers. Results Excitotoxic lesion induction led to significant increases in glial proliferation rates between 12 and 36 hours after injury and to increased levels of apoptotic cells between 24 and 72 hours after injury. MMF treatment significantly reduced glial proliferation rates without affecting apoptosis. Continuous MMF treatment potently reduced the extent of neuronal cell demise when started within the first 12 hours after injury. A crucial time-frame of significant neuroprotection was identified between 12 and 36 hours after injury. Pre-treatment with the neuroprotective nucleoside guanosine reversed MMF-induced antiproliferative effects on glial cells. In the scratch-wound model, gap closure was reached within 48 hours in controls, and was potently inhibited by MMF. Conclusions Our data indicate that immunosuppression by MMF significantly attenuates the extent of neuronal cell death when administered within a crucial time frame after injury. Moreover, long-lasting immunosuppression, as required after solid-organ transplantation, does not seem to be necessary. Targeting inosine 5-monophosphate dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme of purine synthesis, is an effective strategy to modulate the temporal dynamics of proliferation and migration of microglia and astrocytes, and thus to reduce the extent of secondary neuronal damage and scar formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahim Ebrahimi
- Institute of Anatomy, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Raheem OA, Daly PJ, O'Kelly P, Shields WP, Zimmerman AJ, Mohan P, Power R, Little DM, Conlon PJ, Hickey DP. Mycophenolate mofetil in low-risk renal transplantation in patients receiving no cyclosporine: a single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 27:840-4. [PMID: 21622991 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assess our long-term experience with regards the safety and efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in our low risk renal transplant population and compared it retrospectively to Azathioprine (AZA) immunosuppressive regimen. Patients and methods. Between January 1999 and December 2005, 240 renal transplants received MMF as part of their immunosuppressive protocol (MMF group). AZA group of 135 renal transplants was included for comparative analysis (AZA group). Patients received Cyclosporine was excluded from this study. RESULTS The incidence of biopsy proven 3-month acute rejections was 30 (12.5%) in MMF group and 22 (16%) in AZA group respectively (P = 0.307). Patient survival rates at 1 and 5 years for the MMF group were 97 and 94%, respectively, compared to 100% and 91% at 1 and 5 years respectively for the AZA group (P = 0.61). Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years for the MMF group were 95 and 83%, respectively, compared to 97 and 84% at 1 and 5 years, respectively for the AZA group (P = 0.62). CONCLUSION There was no difference in acute rejection episodes between MMF and AZA based immunotherapy. Additionally, we observed no significant difference concerning graft survival in the MMF group when compared to AZA group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer A Raheem
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Raheem OA, Kamel MH, Daly PJ, Mohan P, Little DM, Awan A, Hickey DP. Mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplantation: a single center experience. Pediatr Transplant 2011; 15:240-4. [PMID: 21492350 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2009.01179.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We assessed our long-term experience with regards to the safety and efficacy of MMF in our pediatric renal transplant population and compared it retrospectively to our previous non-MMF immunosuppressive regimen. Forty-seven pediatric renal transplants received MMF as part of their immunosuppressive protocol in the period from January 1997 till October 2006 (MMF group). A previously reported non-MMF group of 59 pediatric renal transplants was included for comparative analysis (non-MMF group). The MMF group comprised 29 boys and 18 girls, whereas the non-MMF group comprised 34 boys and 25 girls. Mean age was 11.7 and 12 yr in the MMF and non-MMF groups, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection episodes was 11 (23.4%) and 14 (24%) in the MMF and non-MMF group, respectively. Two (3.3%) grafts were lost in the non-MMF group compared with one (2.1%) in the MMF group. Twenty-one (44.68%) patients in the MMF group developed post-transplant infections compared with 12 (20.33%) in the non-MMF group (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the use of MMF in pediatric renal transplantation was not associated with a lower rejection rate or immunological graft loss. It did, however, result in a significantly higher rate of viral infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer A Raheem
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu GC, Wu H, Fan LY, Pan HF. Saikosaponins: a potential treatment option for systemic lupus erythematosus. Ir J Med Sci 2010; 180:259-61. [PMID: 21110136 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-010-0646-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2010] [Accepted: 11/14/2010] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
While the exact cause of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still unknown, modern medicine has a number of effective treatments for this complex disorder. Corticosteroid hormones help reduce inflammation, antimalarial treatments address flare-ups and immunosuppressive medications work to keep the immune system in check. All these therapies are well tolerated, but accompany an increased risk of infection and nephrotoxicity. Recently, several studies showed that a number of natural and herbal products may also help some SLE patients deal with the debilitating symptoms. In this brief report, we proposed a traditional Chinese medicinal herb--Saikosaponins, and discussed its potential as a treatment option for SLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G-C Wu
- Department of Pharmacology, The First People's Hospital, Lakeshore New District, Hefei, 230001, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Min SI, Park YJ, Ra W, Kim SY, Min SK, Oh MD, Kim YS, Ahn C, Kim SJ, Ha J. Infectious Complications in Renal Transplant Recipients: Changing Epidemiology under Modern Immunosuppression. KOREAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2010. [DOI: 10.4285/jkstn.2010.24.3.187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Il Min
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yang Jin Park
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Whando Ra
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Yup Kim
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Kee Min
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myoung Don Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yon Su Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Transplantation Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Curie Ahn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Transplantation Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Joon Kim
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Transplantation Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jongwon Ha
- Departments of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Transplantation Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ritter ML, Pirofski L. Mycophenolate mofetil: effects on cellular immune subsets, infectious complications, and antimicrobial activity. Transpl Infect Dis 2009; 11:290-7. [PMID: 19497072 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00407.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is one of the most frequently used immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplant recipients. MMF is an inhibitor of inosine-5'-monophosphate, and is able to preferentially inhibit B-cell and T-cell function. The immunosuppressive abilities of MMF have made it one of the most successful anti-rejection drugs in transplant patients, but patients also appear to have increased susceptibility to infections, specifically cytomegalovirus and BK virus. Despite its association with an increased risk of infection, MMF has also exhibited antimicrobial activity against pathogens including hepatitis C, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and human immunodeficiency virus. A thorough understanding of the functions of MMF on the immune system and interaction with infectious pathogens could be helpful in implementing preventative strategies against opportunistic infections in transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Ritter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10461, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009. [DOI: 10.1002/pds.1648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|