Over the past six decades, liver transplantation (LT) has evolved from an experimental procedure into a standardized and life-saving intervention, reshaping the landscape of organ transplantation. Driven by pioneering breakthroughs, technological advancements, and a deepened understanding of immunology, LT has seen remarkable progress. Some of the most notable breakthroughs in the field include advances in immunosuppression, a revised model for end-stage liver disease, and artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated imaging modalities serving diagnostic and therapeutic roles in LT, paired with ever-evolving technological advances. Additionally, the refinement of transplantation procedures, resulting in the introduction of alternative transplantation methods, such as living donor LT, split LT, and the use of marginal grafts, has addressed the challenge of organ shortage. Moreover, precision medicine, guiding personalized immunosuppressive strategies, has significantly improved patient and graft survival rates while addressing emergent issues, such as short-term complications and early allograft dysfunction, leading to a more refined strategy and enhanced post-operative recovery. Looking ahead, ongoing research explores regenerative medicine, diagnostic tools, and AI to optimize organ allocation and post-transplantation car. In summary, the past six decades have marked a transformative journey in LT with a commitment to advancing science, medicine, and patient-centered care, offering hope and extending life to individuals worldwide.

Liver transplantation is a life-saving therapy for end-stage liver disease patients, but acute cellular rejection (ACR) and graft complications remain significant postoperative challenges. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes, but their diagnosis rely currently on invasive biopsy sampling, thus prompting the search for non-invasive Biomarkers. MicroRNA (miRNA) have emerged as promising biomarkers in various pathological conditions, and their potential utility in diagnosing acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation has gained significant interest.

This systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry analyzes studies exploring miRNA as biomarkers for ACR and graft dysfunction in liver transplantation (PROSPERO ID CRD42023465278). The Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias was employed. Population data, identified miRNA and their dynamic regulation, as well as event prediction were compared. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers.

Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review. Various investigated miRNAs were upregulated in association with acute cellular rejection, like miR-122, miR-155, miR-181, miR-483-3p, and miR-885-5p, demonstrating great biomarker potential. Additionally, several studies conducted target gene analysis, revealing insights into cellular mechanisms linked to ACR. Moreover, various miRNA were also capable of predicting different organ complications following transplantation, expanding their versatility. Remaining challenges include the standardization of miRNA profiling, the need for functional validation, and the necessity for long-term studies.

The results highlight the potential of miRNA as specific, non-invasive biomarkers for ACR and graft dysfunction following liver transplantation. However, further research is needed to validate these findings and establish standardized diagnostic panels to incorporate them into clinical practice and explore miRNA-based therapies in the future.

Other than rejection, hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis are the most common complications in the immediate postoperative period with hepatic arterial thrombosis more common and more devastating. Hepatic artery stenosis is more common 1 month after transplantation, whereas portal and hepatic vein stenosis is more often seen as a late complication. Ultrasound is the first-line imaging examination to diagnose vascular complications with contrast-enhanced CT useful if ultrasound findings are equivocal. MR cholangiography is often most helpful in diagnosing bile leaks, biliary strictures, and biliary stones.

Immunosuppression is a critical aspect of post-transplant management, yet practices at intermediate and late time points after liver transplantation (LT) are poorly characterized.

A retrospective cohort of 11 326 adult first LT alone recipients between 2007 and 2016 was identified by linking United Network for Organ Sharing transplant data to Medicare administrative claims. The immunosuppression regimen was obtained from Medicare billing claims. Factors associated with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) monotherapy at 1-, 3-, and 5-y post-LT were investigated using mixed-effects logistic regression. Center practice heterogeneity was evaluated. The association of immunosuppression regimen (time-updating) with patient and graft survival was studied.

CNI monotherapy was used in 51.9% at 1-y post-LT and 68.6% at 5-y post-LT. Center-specific rates ranged from 20.0%-79.9% to 15.4%-95.2%, respectively. CNI monotherapy at 1- and 3-y post-LT was less likely among Black recipients ( P = 0.027 and P = 0.015 versus White, respectively). CNI plus antimetabolite was associated with improved adjusted patient (hazard ratio, 0.59; P < 0.001) and graft (hazard ratio, 0.62; P < 0.001) survival versus CNI monotherapy. The benefit of CNI plus antimetabolite on patient and graft survival increased with older age.

In this first longitudinal analysis of LT immunosuppression practices among Medicare beneficiaries, a CNI plus antimetabolite approach led to improved outcomes. Significant center heterogeneity in practice was observed.

Early acute rejection (EAR) is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of EAR in donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation recipients.

We retrospectively analysed the data of 461 DCD liver transplants performed during the period from January 2010 to June 2016 to study the relationship between EAR and various clinical factors. EAR was defined as histologically proven acute cellular rejection occurring less than 90 days after transplantation.

The median follow-up time for this study was 33.1 months (range: 0.03-92.8 months). Thirty-two (6.9%) patients developed EAR with a median period of 20.5 days (5-88 days) after transplantation. A multivariate analysis revealed that female recipient (hazard ratio: 2.801; P=0.024) and high recipient body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio: 1.005; P=0.049) were two independent risk factors for early acute rejection.

In DCD liver transplantation, recipient female gender and high BMI were associated with a higher incidence of EAR, while the use of CD25-Ab and/or MMF had a protective effect.

Immunosuppression handling plays a key role in the early and long-term results of transplantation. The development of multiple immunosuppressive drugs led to numerous clincial trials searching to reach the ideal regimen. Due to heterogeneity of the studied patient cohorts and flaws in many, even randomized controlled, study designs, the answer still stands out. Nowadays triple-drug immunosuppression containing a calcineurin inhibitor (preferentially tacrolimus), an antimetabolite (using mycophenolate moffettil or Azathioprine) and short-term steroids with or without induction therapy (using anti-IL2 receptor blocker or anti-lymphocytic serum) is the preferred option in both liver and intestinal transplantation. This chapter aims, based on a critical review of the definitions of rejection, corticoresistant rejection and standard immunosuppression to give some reflections on how to reach an optimal immunosuppressive status and to conduct trials allowing to draw solid conclusions. Endpoints of future trials should not anymore focus on biopsy proven, acute and chronic, rejection but also on graft and patient survival. Correlation between early- and long-term biologic, immunologic and histopathologic findings will be fundamental to reach in much more patients the status of operational tolerance.

Liver transplantation has become a definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and those meeting Milan criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. The morbidity and mortality associated with liver transplantation continues to decrease thanks to refinements in surgical technique, immunosuppression, and imaging. In particular, imaging plays a vital role by facilitating early detection of post-operative complications and enabling prompt treatment. Post-operative complications that lead to graft failure and patient morbidity/mortality can be generally categorized as vascular, biliary, parenchymal, and malignant. Vascular complications include stenosis and thrombosis of the hepatic artery, portal vein, and inferior vena cava; hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm; arteriovenous fistula; and celiac stenosis. Biliary abnormalities include strictures, bile leak, obstruction, recurrent disease, and infection. While imaging is not primarily utilized to diagnose allograft rejection, it plays an important role in excluding mechanical causes of graft dysfunction that can mimic rejection. Ultrasound is routinely performed as the first-line imaging evaluation for the detection and follow-up of early and delayed complications. Cholangiography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are useful in detecting and characterizing biliary complications. Computed tomography is often used to further evaluate abnormal findings on ultrasound or for the characterization of post-operative fluid collections. The aim of this review is to discuss and illustrate the imaging findings of complications associated with liver transplantation and their role in facilitating treatment.

T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is common after liver transplantation (LT), and it is often thought to have a minimum impact on outcomes. Because alloimmune response changes over time, we investigated the role of the timing of TCMR on patient and allograft survival and examined the risk factors for early and late TCMR. We reviewed protocol liver biopsies for 787 consecutive LT recipients with an 8.6-year follow-up. The incidence of early TCMR (≤6 weeks after LT) was 33.5% with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients having the lowest incidence. Younger recipient age (P < 0.01), number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches (P < 0.01), and use of deceased donor allografts (P = 0.01) were associated with increased risk of early TCMR, which had no impact on allograft (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79-1.32; P = 0.89) or overall survival (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.34; P = 0.86). Late TCMR (>6 weeks after LT) was less common (17.7%) and was associated with different risk factors. The majority of late TCMR (56.2%) episodes had no antecedent early TCMR, although moderate-to-severe early TCMR (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.55-5.23; P < 0.01) and steroid resistance (HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.87-6.99; P < 0.01) were associated with late TCMR. Late TCMR increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.35-2.65; P = 0.001) and graft loss (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.23-2.37; P = 0.001). Thus, these data suggest that the timing and histologic grade of TCMR determine its impact on patient and allograft survival. Early mild TCMR episodes after LT do not adversely impact patient or allograft survival provided that they are adequately treated. The occurrence of late TCMR carries deleterious effects with increased longterm risk of graft loss and decreased survival. Patients with moderate-to-severe early TCMR are at an increased risk for late TCMR and warrant closer clinical follow-up.

Recurrence of the original disease following liver transplantation is not uncommon and can lead to graft failure. There are limited data on recurrent fatty liver disease following liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of recurrent fatty liver disease in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, its effect on survival, and whether there are any predictive factors for recurrence. We analyzed patients undergoing liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis from 1997 to 2008 at a single center. Patients undergoing transplantation for cholestatic disease, alcohol, hepatitis C, or cryptogenic cirrhosis were controls. Ninety-eight patients underwent transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis. Recurrent fatty liver disease was seen in 70%, 25% had recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and 18% had stage II/IV or greater fibrosis at a mean of 18 months. No patients with recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis developed graft failure or required retransplantation at a follow-up of 3 years. No recipient or donor factors were associated with disease recurrence, although patients with recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis had a higher incidence of diabetes, weight gain, and dyslipidemia at the time of diagnosis of recurrence. One-third of patients with recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis had normal liver enzymes at the time of diagnosis post-transplantation. In conclusion, recurrent fatty liver disease is common following liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis but does not lead to early allograft failure. Recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis can occur despite normal liver enzymes, and features of metabolic syndrome are associated with disease recurrence.

The aim is to review available data regarding the risks and benefits of indefinite immunosuppression against attempted immunosuppression withdrawal for children who have undergone liver transplantation.

Emerging data suggest that conventional immunosuppression practices may well be responsible for a substantial proportion of the long-term mortality and morbidity burden borne by pediatric liver transplant recipients. The cumulative risk of chronic kidney disease, infection, malignancy, and cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia appear to threaten the health and well being of children more than that of acute or chronic allograft rejection. In parallel, single-center experiences have suggested that gradual immunosuppression withdrawal can be done safely with higher success rates in pediatric compared with adult liver transplant recipients. The coalescence of these two data streams has engendered substantial interest in systematic exploration of the safety and efficacy of immunosuppression withdrawal in conjunction with a vigorous scientific effort to elucidate an immunologic signature predictive of successful withdrawal.

There is a concerted effort within the transplant community to identify biomarkers that can accurately predict the success of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation. Freedom from lifelong immunosuppression is likely to yield considerable benefit, particularly for children who face the longest lifetime horizons.

In transplant recipients transplanted for hepatitis C, presentation of abnormal transaminases can herald the presentation of recurrent hepatitis C, cellular rejection, or both. Given the sometimes ambiguous histology with these 2 entities, the ability to distinguish them is of great importance because misinterpretation can potentially affect graft survival. We used an immune functional assay to help assess the etiology of abnormal liver function test results in liver transplant recipients. Blood samples for the immune functional assay were taken from 42 recipients prospectively at various times post-transplant and compared with clinical and histologic findings. In patients whose liver biopsy showed evidence of cellular rejection, the immune response was noted to be very high, whereas in those with active recurrence of hepatitis C, the immune response was found to be very low. This finding was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.0001). In those patients in whom there was no predominant histologic features suggesting 1 entity over the other, the immune response was higher than in those with aggressive hepatitis C but lower than in those with cellular rejection. In conclusion, these data show the potential utility of the ImmuKnow assay as a means of distinguishing hepatitis C from cellular rejection and its potential usefulness as a marker for outlining the progression of hepatitis C.

Minimal immunosuppression (IS) is desirable in organ transplantation to reduce side effects and to promote the process of tolerance induction.

Between February 2000 and September 2004, 156 adults (>15 years old) receiving a primary liver graft were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, investigator-driven single-center study comparing tacrolimus (TAC)-placebo (PL) and TAC-low-dose, short-term (64 days) steroid (ST) IS. There were no exclusion criteria at moment of randomization. All patients had a 12-month follow-up (range, 12-84).

Three- and 12-month patient survival rates were 93.6% and 87.2% in the TAC-PL group and 98.7% and 94.7% in TAC-ST group (P = 0.096 and P = 0.093, respectively). Three- and 12-month graft survival rates were 92.3% and 85.9% versus 97.4% and 92.3% (P = 0.14 and 0.13, respectively). By 3 and 12 months, rejection treatment had been given in 20.5% (16 pts) and 23% (18 pts) of TAC-PL patients and in 12.7% (10 pts) and 20.5% (16 pts) of TAC-ST patients (P = 0.20 and 0.54). Corticosteroid-resistant rejection (CRR) at 3 and 12 months was recorded in 12.8% (10 pts) of TAC-PL patients and 3.8% (3 pts) of TAC-ST patients (P = 0.04). When considering the 145 patients transplanted without artificial organ support (n = 145), CRR at 3 and 12 months was recorded in 8.8% (6/68 pts) of TAC-PL patients and in 3.9% (3/77 pts) of TAC-ST patients (P = 0.22). Vanishing bile duct syndrome was diagnosed in 1 (1.2%) TAC-PL patient and 4 (5.1%) TAC-ST patients (P = 0.17). By 1 year, 78.2% (61/78) of TAC-PL patients and 82% (64/78) of TAC-ST patients were on TAC monotherapy (P = 0.54). When considering 67 TAC-PL and 74 TAC-ST survivors, rates of monotherapy were 91% (61 pts) and 86.5% (64 pts) (P = 0.39). At 1 year, 62.5% (42 pts) of TAC-PL survivors and 64.9% (48 pts) of TAC-ST survivors were on low-dosage (<6 ng/mL) TAC monotherapy (P 0.79).

TAC monotherapy can be achieved safely without compromising graft nor patient survival in a primary, even unselected, adult liver transplant population. The higher incidence of early CRR in the TAC-PL group related to the significantly higher number of patients transplanted while being on artificial organ support. In such condition, this monodrug immunosuppressive strategy needs to be adapted. TAC monotherapy strategy should lay the basis for further large scale minimization studies in liver transplantation.

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is a known entity in various solid organ transplants but not in intestinal transplantation.

The purpose of this study is to characterize the presence and effect of SCR in small intestinal transplantation (Itx). A total of 151 patients who underwent Itx and maintained a functioning graft for at least 3 months after Itx were investigated. The clinicopathological characteristics associated with a SCR episode within 3 months after Itx were analyzed. Cox regression with the landmark method (the landmark time being 3 months after Itx) was used for the analyses of overall graft survival and cause-specific hazard rate of SCR.

A total of 2744 small intestinal transplant biopsies within 3 months after Itx were available for retrospective evaluation; 171 cases (6.2%) were determined as SCR and 78 patients (51.7%) experienced SCR episode within 3 months after Itx. Adult patients were associated with a significantly higher occurrence of a SCR episode (P=0.001). Overall graft survival at 5 years posttransplant for patients experiencing SCR within 3 months posttransplant and for patients without SCR was 37.2% and 60.2%, respectively (P=0.009). Cause-specific hazard rate analysis showed that a SCR episode was associated with a significantly higher hazard rate of death due to infection (P=0.005).

A SCR episode in the initial postoperative period of Itx is a significant factor for unfavorable graft prognosis, likely representing alloimmune injury ultimately resulting in patient morbidity due to infection.

1. In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients, treatment of acute rejection is associated with worse outcomes (increased risk of allograft cirrhosis and mortality). 2. Whether patients with HCV are at higher risk for rejection remains controversial. 3. The mechanisms mediating acute rejection and recurrence of HCV are distinct, and as such, it should be possible to develop techniques based on these molecular differences that are diagnostically useful. 4. Liver biopsy is considered the gold-standard for diagnosing acute rejection and recurrent HCV; however, given histopathological similarities between the two conditions, discrimination can be extremely difficult. 5. At the present time, there are no reliable, noninvasive tools available to distinguish between HCV recurrence alone and acute rejection plus HCV recurrence. 6. Mild rejection per se is not associated with graft loss and treatment of rejection with steroids and OKT3 is associated with worse outcome in HCV; thus, it seems logical that we should no longer treat mild rejection.

The Banff schema incorporates a semiquantitative scoring system for grading of acute cellular rejection (ACR) of the liver allograft. The Banff rejection activity index (RAI) comprises 3 components scored from 0 to 3: venous endothelial inflammation (E); bile duct damage (B); and portal inflammation (P); the scores are combined to an overall score (the RAI). The purpose of this research was to determine the prognostic value of the Banff RAI score in predicting the response to increased immunosuppression and the long-term outcome of the graft. A retrospective study was done of patients undergoing primary liver transplantation between January 2000 and October 2004 with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression; 495 patients were included, 231 had histologically-confirmed ACR, 193 responded to 1 cycle of high-dose steroids. There was no correlation between the total RAI score and response to steroids, resistant rejection, development of chronic rejection, or graft survival. The E score was related to patient survival, a lower score being associated with a worse outcome (P = 0.048). In multivariable analysis, serum bilirubin, serum aspartate aminotransferase, and E score were significant predictors of death (P = 0.012). In univariable analysis, B score and bilirubin were significantly related to "resistant rejection" (P = 0.018 and 0.002, respectively), but only bilirubin was significant in multivariable analysis (logistic regression). In conclusion, although the Banff RAI score is a useful marker of the severity of rejection, neither the total RAI score nor any of the individual components correlated with response to steroids or graft survival.

Clinical transplantation tolerance has remained an elusive goal in the 50 yr since it was first described in experimental animals. Greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for allorecognition have allowed for the development of promising immunosuppressive strategies that may bring us closer to reproducible induction of tolerance; consideration of past successes and failures from both clinical and basic science is required to define future challenges facing this field. This article reviews mechanisms of self and transplantation tolerance, translation of basic science research to clinical protocols in animals and human beings, the changing role of immunosuppression, complications following tolerance induction and controversies surrounding the choice of patients for tolerance trials with a focus on issues relevant to pediatric patients. The role of the Immune Tolerance Network is discussed along with realistic goals for tolerance induction in human beings over the next decade.

Over the last two decades there has been a significant increase in the number and types of immunosuppressive agents that have been available to clinicians. The protocols for immunosuppression used in liver transplantation have been derived historically from those in renal transplantation. During the last decade there has been a shift in the use of immunosuppression, with the introduction of interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antagonists in place of anti-lymphocyte preparations, substitution of tacrolimus for cyclosporin and mycophenolate for azathioprine. The use of corticosteroids has been reduced. For a variety of reasons, these changes have not always been made on the basis of properly randomized studies. The place of newer agents, such as sirolimus and leflunomide derivatives and of the microbiological agents, is unclear. In this review, we outline briefly the mechanism of action of drugs and suggest possible approaches to the management of the liver allograft recipient, suggesting how treatment could be adjusted according to the indication for transplantation as well as the individual's comorbidities.

Liver transplantation is the accepted treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease or intractable symptoms secondary to primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and has proven survival benefit. Indications for transplantation are an unacceptable quality of life or anticipated death in less than 1 year. Although there are a number of prognostic models, serum bilirubin provides the simplest guide to transplantation timing. Those grafted for PBC are at greater risk of developing chronic rejection, and are less likely to be successfully weaned from immunosuppression than those grafted for other indications. Following transplantation, antimitochondrial antibodies persist and histological features of recurrent PBC may be seen in the allograft in up to 50% by 10 years; however, at least in the medium-term, this rarely causes clinical problems.

The search for tolerance therapies that would thwart the alloimmune response following organ transplantation while preserving a patient's protective immune response has been a formidable goal for clinical immunologists. Over the past few decades, a more detailed understanding of the molecular events associated with T-cell recognition and activation has demonstrated the feasibility of various tolerance approaches, such as costimulation blockade, in numerous animal models of both autoimmunity and transplantation. Yet, only a few promising new therapies have reached the early stages of human clinical development. In contrast, the use of T-cell depleting induction therapy has become widespread, and new trials have been designed with immunosuppressive drug withdrawal in mind. Furthermore, nonmyeloablative mixed chimeric approaches have allowed complete immunosuppressive withdrawal in some limited cases. In the course of these investigations, however, what has become increasingly clear is that the distinctions between immunosuppression and tolerance have been blurred as the success and durability of the therapies rely as much on the state of the organ and organism as they do the mechanism of action of the drug. In this review, we provide a summary of the progress and lessons in promoting clinical transplant tolerance and an overview of promising agents.

After orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), allograft rejection remains an important problem and is the major reason that immunosuppressive therapy must be administered. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a proinflammatory mediator that is central to the immune response, and intragraft expression of this cytokine is increased during acute cellular rejection (ACR). Polymorphisms within the TNF promoter have been identified and correlated with alterations in production. The aims of this study were to determine if an individual patient's propensity to develop ACR is related to the presence of these genetic polymorphisms (either alone or in combination) within donor and recipient tissue and to determine if these polymorphisms affect patient survival after OLT. The study group consisted of 210 patients who underwent OLT between 1989 and 1999 with at least 6 months survival, including 42 cases who had evidence of acute cellular rejection (biopsy-proven, elevated enzymes, and response to increased immunosuppression) and were matched 4:1 to controls (n = 168) with similar age, gender, underlying liver disease, date of transplant, and baseline immunosuppression. The underlying liver diseases were hepatisis C virus (HCV)/alcohol (70), HCV alone (50), alcohol (30), primary biliary cirrhosis (15), primary sclerosing cholangitis (15), autoimmune hepatitis/cirrhosis (10), cryptogenic (15), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) (5). DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded donor and recipient liver tissue (total 420 samples), amplified, and sequenced for TNF single-nucleotide polymorphisms (TNFA-308 A/G and TNFA-238 A/G). We found no differences between the TNF allelic distributions among donors without liver disease (presumably representative of a normal control population) and patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing OLT. Multivariate analysis revealed no association with TNF polymorphisms (within donor or recipient tissue) and rejection risk or patient survival after transplantation. In this large case control analysis of patients undergoing liver transplantation for diverse etiologies, TNF promoter polymorphisms were not independently associated with rejection or survival.

Advances in liver transplantation continue to evolve but are hampered by continued increasing shortages in donor organs. This has resulted in a high incidence of patients dying while on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. Indeed, we continue to assess ways of expanding the donor pool by using marginal donors, living donor liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, domino transplantation, and hepatic support systems to prolong survival long enough for the patient to undergo liver transplantation. Changes in the liver allocation policy to reduce the number of people dying while waiting for an organ are discussed. Implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system should help alleviate the problem of increasing deaths of patients while on the waiting list. Recurrent disease, particularly recurrent hepatitis C, continues to be a major problem, and effective therapy is needed to prevent both progression of hepatitis C and recurrence in the graft and avoid retransplantation. The use of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin holds promise for improving the success in overcoming recurrent hepatitis C. Finally, advances in immunosuppression have reduced the incidence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection. However, these therapies have been fraught with metabolic complications that are now affecting quality of life and long-term survival. Tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient is discussed.

Liver transplantation is now the accepted treatment for patients with end-stage disease or intractable symptoms. The success rate is high. Those grafted for PBC are at greater risk of developing acute and chronic rejection and are less likely to be weaned from immunosuppression. Following transplantation, AMA persist and histological features of PBC may be seen in the allograft, in up to 50% by 10 years.

Acute allograft rejection continues to be a major cause of morbidity following organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the local expression of a range of immunomodulatory molecules which may be mediating rejection of, or tolerance to, liver allografts.

RNA was extracted from 31 protocol liver biopsies taken 7-10 days post-transplantation, reverse transcribed and screened by a sensitive RT-PCR for a wide range of cytokines and other immunomodulatory molecules. The mRNA profile of each biopsy was subsequently related to the histological and clinical status of the graft. Samples of RNA isolated from activated leukocytes and T cell clones, and from normal liver, were used as controls to compare to the 'immunological snapshot' obtained from the biopsies.

Presence of tumour necrosis factor-alpha, fas ligand, granzyme B and perforin mRNA in most of the liver biopsies reflected the occurrence of cell-mediated immune reactions. However, the expression of only one cytokine, interleukin-15 (IL-15), was significantly more frequent in allografts that showed no histological or biochemical signs of rejection during the early post-transplant period. Using an in vitro model it was demonstrated that recombinant IL-15 expands tenfold the number of CD3(+)CD56(+) (natural T; NT) cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultures. Conditioning with IL-15 also increased cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes against leukaemic target cells.

Although considerable evidence for cell-mediated immunity was shown for all liver allografts, the only clinical association was for IL-15 mRNA expression and graft acceptance. An in vitro model suggested that IL-15 may be enhancing the numbers and the activity of local regulatory cells, in particular resident NT cells in the liver, which may have a role in killing activated lymphocytes such as graft-reactive host T cells.

Protocol biopsy results in the first few weeks after liver transplantation sometimes display histologic features of acute cellular rejection (ACR), even in the absence of significant clinical or biochemical dysfunction. At present there is no clear consensus about the need to treat such cases with adjuvant immunosuppression. This systematic review describes, from the available evidence, the natural history of untreated histologic ACR in the absence of biochemical graft dysfunction. An electronic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to select studies that reported protocol liver biopsies in the early posttransplant period from 1983 to 2000. Studies that identified patients with ACR on protocol biopsy who were not treated with adjuvant immunosuppression formed the basis of the study group. Data from individual studies were extracted using standardized pro forma and pooled for descriptive analysis. The search identified 3431 studies, of which 516 were cited in full. Of these, 15 studies met all of the inclusion criteria. These 15 studies reported on 1566 patients who had protocol biopsies performed in the early posttransplant period, of which 1048 (67%) had histologic evidence of ACR. Three hundred and thirty one (32%) patients with histologic ACR on protocol biopsy had no associated biochemical graft dysfunction. Without treatment, only 14% of these patients subsequently developed biochemical graft dysfunction requiring adjuvant immunosuppression. Steroid-resistant rejection and chronic rejection both had a prevalence of 4% in patients with untreated histologic ACR and no biochemical graft dysfunction. Withholding adjuvant immunosuppression from patients with histologic ACR and no biochemical graft dysfunction seems to be safe, as long as graft function is carefully monitored. The rationale for performing protocol biopsies in the absence of biochemical graft dysfunction is questionable.

Intravenous methylprednisolone is used in most liver transplant centers as first-line therapy of acute hepatic cellular rejection in patients who undergo liver transplant. However, no controlled study has been performed to date to define the optimal dose and duration of the steroid regimen. The schedules that actually are used in most transplant centers are drawn from those that were developed empirically for the treatment of acute renal graft rejection. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare two schedules of steroid treatment of acute hepatic cellular rejection among those most widely used. Thirty-eight eligible patients with grade II or III acute hepatic cellular rejection were randomized to receive two different high-dose methylprednisolone schedules. Eighteen patients were randomized in group A (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d). Twenty patients were randomized in group B (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days). The response to treatment was evaluated by means of a second liver biopsy. The treatment of group A proved to be more effective than treatment of group B. The resolution of acute hepatic cellular rejection was observed in 83.3% of cases in group A and 50.0% of cases in group B (P <.05). The treatment of group A proved to be safer also than treatment of group B. Patients randomized in group B showed a higher prevalence of infections (90.0% of cases versus 55.5% of cases; P <.01) mainly because of bacterial (80.0% versus 50.0%; P <.05) and viral (50.0% versus 16.6%; P <.05) agents. In conclusion, the study shows that intravenous administration of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d is more effective and safer than intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days in the treatment of acute cellular rejection in patients with liver transplantation.

With the continued improvements in outcome following liver transplantation, the drawbacks associated with conventional immunosuppression regimens become increasingly apparent. Although up to 70% of patients develop a histological infiltrate of the graft (acute rejection), many of these will resolve spontaneously, and chronic rejection is rare. If a robust form of allograft acceptance or tolerance can be established, then immunosuppression can be withdrawn along with all the accompanying risks. The liver is already known to be associated with downregulated immune responses; the mechanism for this is unclear, but may be related to a number of mechanisms known to be involved in peripheral tolerance. There are many strategies being studied for achieving allograft tolerance, including the use of modern immunosuppressants, antibodies that target key molecules in the immune response, and recruitment of leukocytes to allografts. In the interim, it is necessary to look for safe protocols that allow trials of tolerance strategies without putting patients at increased risk.

Hepatic graft rejection is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT), with a maximum incidence within the first weeks. The identification of high-risk patients for early acute rejection (EAR) might be useful for clinicians. A series of 133 liver graft recipients treated with calcineurin inhibitors was retrospectively assessed to identify predisposing factors for EAR and develop a mathematical model to predict the individual risk of each patient. The incidence of EAR (< or =45 days after LT) was 35.3%. Multivariate analysis showed that recipient age, underlying liver disease, and Child's class before LT were independently associated with the development of EAR. Combining these 3 variables, the following risk score for the development of EAR was obtained: EAR score [F(x)] = 2.44 + (1.14 x hepatitis C virus cirrhosis) + (2.78 x immunologic cirrhosis) + (2.51 x metabolic cirrhosis)--(0.08 x recipient age in years) + (1.65 x Child's class A) [corrected]. Risk for rejection = e(F(x))/1 + e(F(x)). The combination of age, cause of liver disease, and Child's class may allow us to predict the risk for EAR.

Although immunosuppressive regimens are effective, rejection occurs in up to 50% of patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), and there is concern about side effects from long-term therapy. Knowledge of clinical and immunogenetic variables may allow tailoring of immunosuppressive therapy to patients according to their potential risks. We studied the association between transforming growth factor-beta, interleukin-10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) gene polymorphisms and graft rejection and renal impairment in 121 white liver transplant recipients. Clinical variables were collected retrospectively, and creatinine clearance was estimated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault. Biallelic polymorphisms were detected using polymerase chain reaction-based methods. Thirty-seven of 121 patients (30.6%) developed at least 1 episode of rejection. Multivariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh score (P =.001), immune-mediated liver disease (P =.018), normal pre-OLT creatinine clearance (P =.037), and fewer HLA class 1 mismatches (P =.038) were independently associated with rejection. Renal impairment occurred in 80% of patients and was moderate or severe in 39%. Clinical variables independently associated with renal impairment were female sex (P =.001), pre-OLT renal dysfunction (P =.0001), and a diagnosis of viral hepatitis (P =.0008). There was a significant difference in the frequency of TNF-alpha-308 alleles among the primary liver diseases. After adjustment for potential confounders and a Bonferroni correction, the association between the TNF-alpha-308 polymorphism and graft rejection approached significance (P =.06). Recipient cytokine genotypes do not have a major independent role in graft rejection or renal impairment after OLT. Additional studies of immunogenetic factors require analysis of large numbers of patients with appropriate phenotypic information to avoid population stratification, which may lead to inappropriate conclusions.

Spontaneous tolerance to liver allograft has been reported previously in outbred pig models, but the lack of genetic background did not allow to analyze the impact of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on tolerance induction. A model of semi-identical liver allograft was therefore developed in inbred miniature swine in order to mimic the clinical situation of living related liver transplant (parent into infant) and to study a protocol for inducing tolerance to liver allograft.

SLAdd (class Id/d, class IId/d) pigs received orthotopic liver allograft from heterozygous SLAcd (class Ic/d, class IIc/d) miniature swine. Eight animals did not receive immunosuppression. Fourteen SLAdd animals had a 12-day course of FK506 and were divided in two subgroups. In subgroup FK-1, six pigs received a daily intramuscular injection of FK506 at 0.1-0.4 mg/kg, in order to reach daily trough levels between 7 and 20 ng/ml; in subgroup FK-2, eight additional animals received two daily injections of FK506 at 0.05 mg/kg regardless of the daily trough levels. Graft survival, liver biological tests, histology, cellular and humoral immune responses, as well as detection of microchimerism were assessed in all groups.

All untreated animals rejected their allograft and died within 28.1 +/- 9.5 days. These rejector animals developed a significant anti-donor cellular and humoral immune response. No peripheral or lymphoid tissue microchimerism was detected in this group. In contrast, long-term survival was obtained in five FK-treated animals (112, 154, 406, 413, and 440 days), whereas several pigs died with a normal allograft function from either overimmunosuppression or intercurrent causes. All FK-treated pigs developed a specific anti-donor unresponsiveness in both cell mediated lymphocytotoxicity and mixed lymphocyte reaction and did not develop anti-donor alloantibodies. The study of the anti-donor immune response by mixed lymphocyte reaction, during the first postoperative week, demonstrated a specific anti-donor unresponsiveness in the peripheral blood from the first posttransplant day. Although microchimerism was detectable in the peripheral blood for several postoperative weeks (maximum 10 weeks) in FK-treated animals, donor cells or DNA were not detected during the long-term follow-up in peripheral blood or lymphoid tissues.

Spontaneous tolerance to semi-identical orthotopic liver allograft did not occur, whereas a 12-day course of FK506 allowed long-term graft acceptance. All FK-treated animals developed in vitro signs of specific immune unresponsiveness and transient peripheral microchimerism. The specific anti-donor cellular unresponsiveness occurred on the first postoperative day after surgery and was of long-term duration. The study of the early immunological events in this model could be of major importance regarding clinical living related liver transplantation.

Since the first human liver transplant done in 1963, the procedure has become a routine procedure with an excellent outcome in terms both of quality and of length of survival. The development and introduction into clinical practice of a variety of immunosuppressive agents has given the clinician a bewildering array of therapeutic options but with a lack of evidence on which to select for optimal immunosuppression. Tolerance can be reliably achieved in some animal transplants but remains to be achieved in humans. One of the major challenges facing the transplant community is the shortage of donor organs: imaginative approaches to overcome this problem include more effective use of marginal donor livers, splitting livers and development of living related transplants. While advances have been made in the field of xenotransplantation, there remain many hurdles to be overcome before this approach can be introduced into human transplantation. In the meanwhile, there are difficulties in determining the optimal criteria for listing patients for transplantation and for treating some of the complications arising after transplantation such as recurrence of disease and complications of immunosuppression, e.g. renal failure, malignancy and vascular disease.

Intrahepatic cholestasis following liver transplantation commonly occurs after liver transplantation and may be caused by infections, drugs such as cyclosporine and sulfonamides, and acute or chronic rejection. Less common causes such as fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis or recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis may also be encountered. Biliary strictures may also be present. Although some disorders may be managed medically, others often require repeat liver transplantation. Prompt recognition and specific treatment can improve the outcome for liver transplant recipients.

We propose that a novel mechanism of hepatocyte apoptosis, involving a cooperative interaction between CD40 and Fas, is involved in the hepatocyte loss of chronic liver allograft rejection. We detected increased hepatocyte expression of Fas, Fas ligand (FasL), and CD40 associated with dropout of centrilobular (acinar zone 3) hepatocytes in chronic allograft rejection. Expression of CD40 ligand (CD40L) was also increased but was largely restricted to CD68(+) macrophages. A functional role for CD40 and Fas in hepatocyte apoptosis was demonstrated in vitro using primary human hepatocytes and the HepG2 cell line in both of which apoptosis was induced, not only by cross-linking Fas directly but also via CD40 activation. Our data suggest that CD40 activation induces apoptosis via Fas because (a) ligation of CD40 upregulated hepatocyte FasL expression, and (b) apoptosis induced via activation of CD40 was prevented by a neutralizing monoclonal antibody to FasL. Thus, CD40 engagement triggers apoptosis of human hepatocytes and might amplify Fas-dependent hepatocyte apoptosis in chronic rejection and other inflammatory liver diseases in which Fas-mediated apoptosis is involved.