Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) have a high risk of death. New types of mechanical devices have limited availability in Brazil. The use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), although new guidelines downgraded its recommendation, is the most widely used mechanical support strategy. However, little is known about the clinical predictors of its effectiveness in reducing mortality in this group of patients.

To assess the predictors of IABP effectiveness in reducing in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI and CS.

This observational, retrospective, descriptive, single-center study involved 98 patients with STEMI and CS treated with IABP, in an intensive care unit. We compared patients who survived (42 men and 13 women) and those did not (30 men and 13 women) using clinical predictors of IABP effectiveness in reducing in-hospital death, considering a statistical significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).

The use of IABP in patients less than 1 day after infarction (odds ratio [OR]: 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02 to 0.85; p = 0.034) was a factor that increased the risk of in-hospital death. Younger age (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.16; p = 0.010) and dyslipidemia (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.81; p = 0.024) were predictors of reduced in-hospital mortality. For each additional year of age, the risk of death increased 1.07-fold.

In patients with STEMI and CS, the use of IABP reduced in-hospital mortality when it was used for 2 or more days, as well as in younger patients and those with dyslipidemia. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) may be applied to optimize advanced heart failure (AHF) patients and improve right ventricular (RV) function before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of this intervention and define RV response predictors. Decompensated AHF patients, not eligible for LVAD because of poor RV function, who required IABP for stabilization were enrolled. Echocardiography and invasive hemodynamics were serially applied to determine fulfillment of prespecified "LVAD eligibility RV function" criteria (right atrium pressure [RA] <12 mm Hg, pulmonary artery pulsatility index [PAPi] >2.00, RA/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] <0.67, RV strain <-14.0%). Right ventricular-free wall tissue was harvested to assess interstitial fibrosis. Eighteen patients (12 male), aged 38 ± 14 years were supported with IABP for 55 ± 51 (3-180) days. In 11 (61.1%), RV improved and fulfilled the prespecified criteria, while seven (38.9%) showed no substantial improvement. Histopathology revealed an inverse correlation between RV interstitial fibrosis and functional benefit following IABP: interstitial fibrosis correlated with post-IABP RA ( r = 0.63, p = 0.037), RA/PCWP ( r = 0.87, p = 0.001), PAPi ( r = -0.83, p = 0.003). Conclusively, IABP improves RV function in certain AHF patients facilitating successful LVAD implantation. Right ventricular interstitial fibrosis quantification may be applied to predict response and guide preoperative patient selection and optimization. http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A995.

The incidence of cardiogenic shock and the utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices are increasing in the US. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock through basic hemodynamic and myocardial energetic principles. We also explore the commonly used platforms for temporary mechanical circulatory support, their advantages, disadvantages and practical considerations relating to implementation and management. It is through the translation of underlying physiological principles that we can attempt to maximize the clinical utility of circulatory support devices and improve outcomes in cardiogenic shock.

Sepsis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SCM) has been recognized as a relevant complication. In this article, the pathophysiology of SCM and the literature regarding the clinical care with a focus on the use of mechanical circulatory support for the rescue of patients with severe SCM are reviewed. Lastly, a pragmatic approach to the care of this complex patient population is provided using a representative case example.

What is the central question of this study? Visceral ischaemia is one of the most feared complications during use of an intra-aortic balloon pump. Using an animal model, we measured the flows at the abdominal level directly and examined flow patterns to enable investigation of flow patterns during the use of the intra-aortic balloon pump. What is the main finding and its importance? We show that there is a significant balloon-related reduction in superior mesenteric flow in both early and mid-diastole.

A number of previous studies have shown that blood flow in the visceral arteries is altered during intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) treatment. We used a porcine model to analyse the pattern of blood flow into the visceral arteries during IABP use. For this purpose, we measured the superior mesenteric, right renal and left renal flows before and during IABP support, using surgically placed flowmeters surrounding these visceral arteries. The superior mesenteric flow significantly decreased in early diastole (P < 0.001) and in mid-diastole (P = 0.003 versus early diastole), whereas in late diastole it increased again (P < 0.001 versus mid-diastole). During systole, the flow was not significantly increased compared with late diastole (P = 0.51), but it was significantly lower than at baseline (both P < 0.001). Flows did not differ between right and left kidneys. Perfusion of either kidney did not change significantly in early diastole (P > 0.05), whereas it decreased significantly in mid-diastole (P < 0.001), rising dramatically in late diastole (P < 0.001) and with an additional slight increase in systole (P = 0.054). This study provides important insights into abdominal flows during intra-aortic pump counterpulsation. Furthermore, it supports the need to rethink the balloon design to avoid visceral ischaemia during circulatory assistance.

Treatment with the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most common form of mechanical support for the failing heart. Augmentation of diastolic pressure during balloon inflation contributes to the coronary circulation and the presystolic deflation of the balloon reduces the resistance to systolic output. Consequently, the myocardial work is reduced. The overall effect of the IABP therapy is an increase in the myocardial oxygen supply/demand ratio and thus in endocardial viability.This is an overall synopsis of what we need to know regarding IABP. Furthermore, this review article attempts to systematically delineate the pathophysiology linked with the hemodynamic consequences of IABP therapy. The authors also look at the future of the use of the balloon pump and conclude that the positive multi-systemic hemodynamic regulation during IABP treatment should further justify its use.

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been used in clinical treatment as a mechanical circulatory support device for patients with heart failure. A computer model is used to study the effect on coronary blood flow (CBF) with different balloon cycles under both normal and pathological conditions. The model of cardiovascular and IABP is developed by using MATLAB SIMULINK. The effect on coronary blood flow has been studied under both normal and pathological conditions using different balloon cycles (balloon off; 1:4; 1:2; 1:1). A pathological heart is implemented by reducing the left ventricular contractility. The result of this study shows that the rate of balloon cycles is related to the level of coronary blood flow.

An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most commonly used circulatory assist device in cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that prophylactic application of an IABP improves early clinical outcome of high-risk patients undergoing scheduled off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).

From January 2010 to December 2013, hemodynamically stable, high-risk patients undergoing scheduled OPCABG with preincision use of an IABP were recruited to the IABP group. Using the propensity score-matching method, every patient in the IABP group was matched with another patient (the control group) with a similar propensity score who received an IABP on an as-needed basis during or after OPCABG. Surgical mortality and major morbidity rates were compared between groups.

A total of 116 patient pairs were included in this study. In patients in the IABP group, postoperative low cardiac output and respiratory as well as renal failure were less frequent, intensive care unit stay was shorter, and surgical mortality was lower compared to patients in the control group. In multivariate logistic regression, timing of IABP implantation, as an independent risk factor, was associated with postoperative low cardiac output (OR=2.02, 95% CI 1.28-5.76), respiratory failure (OR=1.86, 95% CI 1.19-4.27), renal failure (OR=2.96, 95% CI 1.51-6.63) and surgical mortality (OR=2.45, 95% CI 1.42-6.07).

Prophylactic application of an IABP improves postoperative cardiac performance, reduces respiratory and renal complications, and consequently lowers surgical mortality in high-risk patients undergoing scheduled OPCABG.

This study evaluated the effect of early application of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Patients who had experienced STEMI for 12-72 h received (IABP group) or did not receive (control group) IABP counterpulsation for 3-5 days before PCI.

One hundred patients were included. Frequencies of infarct-related artery thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow rate classes 0, I and II in the IABP group (11.5, 1.9 and 7.7%, respectively) were significantly lower than in the control group (29.1, 14.6 and 22.9%, respectively) before PCI. After PCI, the frequency of TIMI class III flow rate in the IABP group (96.2%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.3%). Four weeks after PCI, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly higher, and the incidence of major cardiac events was significantly lower, in the IABP group compared with the control group.

Early use of IABP counterpulsation in STEMI patients scheduled for PCI was effective, with a favourable safety profile. IABP counterpulsation reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiac events and improved LVEF. However, IABP devices must be used at an early stage, to obtain optimal results.

NOS inhibitors are a potential treatment for patients with cardiogenic shock during acute myocardial infarction. Despite hemodynamic efficacy, their effects on the extent of myocardial infarction (MI) and the no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) have not been clarified.

Sixteen pigs underwent occlusion of the mid left anterior descending coronary artery for 1h followed by reperfusion for 2h. Coronary blood flow (CBF), distal to the occlusion site, was measured. In eight experiments, L-NAME (non selective NO synthetase inhibitor) administration began 10 min before the onset of reperfusion and continued for 2h (loading dose 1mg/kg, perfusion rate: 1mg/kg/h) (L-NAME group). Eight pigs received similarly normal saline (controls). At the end of each experiment, the myocardial area at risk (MAR) and extent of MI and NRP were measured.

Hemodynamics at baseline and during ischemia were similar in both groups. During reperfusion, the mean aortic blood pressure was significantly higher in the l-NAME group. In both groups, CBF reached a peak at 5 min of reperfusion, (no difference between groups). CBF gradually returned to baseline levels within 60 min of reperfusion in both groups. No statistically significant differences in the extent of the NRP (51.8 ± 19.7 vs 60.9 ± 11.4 p=0.35) and MI (77.9 ± 13.9 vs 77.1 ± 8.8 p=0.92), both expressed as a percentage of MAR, were observed between the L-NAME group and the control group.

L-NAME administration started immediately before and maintained throughout reperfusion has no effect on NRP and MI size. L-NAME might stabilize patients with post-MI cardiogenic shock without adverse effects on infarct size.