Pregnancy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) puts the mother, child, and transplanted organ at risk. Little is known about long-term outcomes. We performed a nationwide retrospective cohort study to evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes of post-OLT pregnancies. The secondary aim was to assess predictors for adverse pregnancy outcomes. A composite outcome of preeclampsia, preterm birth, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission was made. Survival of women who received a transplant at <50 years of age with and without pregnancy after OLT were compared (Dutch Organ Transplantation Registry data). Descriptive statistics, regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis, and generalized estimating equation analysis were used. Among the included 70 women with 113 pregnancies >20 weeks of gestation, hypertension occurred in 20% and preeclampsia in 12%. The live birth rate was 87%; 33% were preterm, and 23% had low birth weight. Long-term follow-up (median 10 y [IQR: = 4-14]) showed small changes in serum creatinine and bilirubin ( p < 0.001). Sixteen mothers (23%) died during follow-up (median 8 y [IQR: = 4-12]), with all their children aged <18 years. No difference in survival was found when comparing women with and without pregnancy after OLT. The composite outcome occurred in 43/98 of pregnancies. Higher body mass index (BMI) and maternal age at conception increased the composite outcome risk (OR: 1.24, p < 0.01, and OR: 1.25, p = 0.01, respectively). To conclude, pregnancy after OLT does not seem to influence long-term outcomes of graft, kidney function, or patient survival in most cases. However, although pregnancy does not seem to impact survival after OLT, we do show that a substantial number of children will lose their mothers early in life. We believe this is important for pregnancy couseling of patients with an OLT and their partners.

Since the first successful liver transplant in 1967, immunosuppression has allowed liver transplantation to become the standard treatment of end-stage liver disease. Over the decades, the rates of rejection have decreased, and patient survival outcomes have significantly improved in large part due to the introduction and advancements of immunosuppression medications. However, the adverse effects associated with long-term immunosuppression have created new challenges facing liver transplantation and added significantly to posttransplantation morbidity. This review presents the data and rationale for immunosuppression approaches, addresses the main controversies related to immunosuppression in liver transplantation, and explores some of the newer advancements in immunosuppressive drug therapy.

Liver transplant (LT) has become increasingly common among reproductive-aged women. The effect of the type of liver donor, either a living donor LT (LDLT) or a deceased donor LT, on pregnancy outcomes is unknown. As such, we aim to review the available literature and assess obstetric, pregnancy, or delivery outcomes in LDLT. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Random-effect meta-regression assessed the association between the percentage of women who underwent LDLT (independent variable) and the proportion of outcomes. Meta-regression results were expressed as a regression coefficient, which transforms the proportion of outcomes of interest associated with a 1% increase in the percentage of LDLT patients. A value of 0 denotes no relationship between the outcomes and LDLT. A total of 6 articles (438 patients) were included, with a total of 806 pregnancies. Eighty-eight (20.09%) patients underwent LDLT. None of the studies segregated the data based on the type of donor LT. The median time from LT to pregnancy was 4.86 (4.62-5.03) years. Twelve (1.5%) stillbirths were reported. LDLT was statistically significantly associated with a higher rate of stillbirths (coefficient 0.002, p < 0.001; I 2 0%). The type of donor LT was not associated with an increased risk of other obstetric, pregnancy, or delivery complications. This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of the type of donor LT on pregnancy outcomes. This study highlights the lack of robust literature addressing this important topic. The results suggest that pregnancy outcomes after LDLT and deceased donor LT are comparable. Despite LDLT being statistically significantly associated with a higher rate of stillbirths, the association is weak and is unlikely to be clinically significant.

There is a need for evidence-based counseling for women with chronic liver disease (LD) who may experience impaired fertility. Currently, the literature on assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment in women with LD has been limited to a single European case series. We evaluated ART treatment outcomes in patients with LD and compared with controls.

The retrospective study evaluated women with and without LD who had normal ovarian reserve and underwent ART treatment in a high-volume fertility practice from 2002 to 2021.

We identified 295 women with LD (mean age 37.8 ± 5.2 years) who underwent 1,033 ART treatment cycles; of these women, 115 underwent 186 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Six women (2.0%) had cirrhosis, 8 (2.7%) were postliver transplantation, and 281 (95.3%) had chronic LD, with viral hepatitis (B and C) being the most prevalent. In the subgroup who underwent IVF and embryo biopsy, the median fibrosis-4 score was 0.81 (0.58-1.03), and there were no statistically significant differences in response to controlled ovarian stimulation, embryo fertilization rate, or ploidy outcome in patients with LD compared with controls. In those who subsequently underwent a single thawed euploid embryo transfer to achieve pregnancy, there were no statistically significant differences in rates of clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, or live birth in patients with LD compared with controls.

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest to date to evaluate IVF efficacy in women with LD. Our study demonstrates that patients with LD have similar ART treatment outcomes compared with those without LD.

Liver failure during pregnancy is a rare and highly fatal condition frequently resulting from the patient's pre-existing chronic liver disease. There is no established protocol for managing this condition, and physicians tend to adopt a conservative approach due to concerns about the impact of liver transplantation on fetal development. However, conservative treatment may exacerbate the condition, increasing the risk of fetal and miscarriage deaths. In this study, we present a case of acute-on-chronic liver failure resulting from chronic hepatitis during the 19th week of gestation. Despite undergoing conservative treatment, the fetus tragically died, but the patient achieved an excellent clinical outcome after emergency liver transplantation. We also conducted a systematic review of the literature on liver transplantation during pregnancy from the last decade, examining the causes of liver failure and transplantation during pregnancy. Our research complied with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Istanbul Declaration.

Liver diseases in pregnancy comprise both gestational liver disorders and acute and chronic hepatic disorders occurring coincidentally in pregnancy. Whether related to pregnancy or pre-existing, liver diseases in pregnancy are associated with a significant risk of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Thus, the European Association for the Study of Liver Disease invited a panel of experts to develop clinical practice guidelines aimed at providing recommendations, based on the best available evidence, for the management of liver disease in pregnancy for hepatologists, gastroenterologists, obstetric physicians, general physicians, obstetricians, specialists in training and other healthcare professionals who provide care for this patient population.

More than 90% of pregnant women take at least one drug during pregnancy. Drug dose adjustments during pregnancy are sometimes necessary due to various pregnancy-induced physiological alterations frequently associated with lower plasma concentrations. However, the clinical relevance or benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in pregnant women have not been specifically studied. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies in pregnant women are incredibly challenging for many reasons. Despite this, regulatory agencies have made efforts to encourage the inclusion of this population in clinical trials to achieve more information on the pharmacotherapy of pregnant women. This review aims to provide support for TDM recommendations and dose adjustments in pregnant women.

The search was conducted after a predetermined strategy on PubMed and Scopus databases using the MeSH term "pregnancy" alongside other terms such as "Pregnancy and dose adjustment," "Pregnancy and therapeutic drug monitoring," "Pregnancy and PBPK," "Pregnancy and pharmacokinetics," and "Pregnancy and physiological changes."

The main information on TDM in pregnant women is available for antiepileptics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, antibiotics, antimalarials, and oncologic and immunosuppressive drugs.

More data are needed to support informed benefit-risk decision making for the administration of drugs to pregnant women. TDM and/or pharmacokinetic studies could ensure that pregnant women receive an adequate dosage of an active drug. Mechanistic modeling approaches potentially could increase our knowledge about the pharmacotherapy of this special population, and they could be used to better design dosage regimens.

Pregnancy after thoracic organ transplantation is feasible for select individuals but requires multidisciplinary subspecialty care. Key components for a successful pregnancy after lung or heart transplantation include preconception and contraceptive planning, thorough risk stratification, optimization of maternal comorbidities and fetal health through careful monitoring, and open communication with shared decision-making. The goal of this consensus statement is to summarize the current evidence and provide guidance surrounding preconception counseling, patient risk assessment, medical management, maternal and fetal outcomes, obstetric management, and pharmacologic considerations.

There have been multiple systemic drugs approved for the therapy of psoriasis vulgaris and psoriasis arthritis (PsA) in the last decade. However, treatment decisions are difficult to make in women planning a pregnancy and in pregnant and lactating women due to the paucity of data for such cases. The strongest evidence for psoriasis therapy during pregnancy exists for topical corticosteroids. Medically controlled use of UVB-therapy is also considered safe. The best evidence regarding systemic therapy during pregnancy and lactation is available for the group of TNF-alpha inhibitors, which is also reflected in the respective medical product information. This is especially important in cases of psoriatic arthritis. Among traditional systemic therapeutics, the largest clinical experience exists for ciclosporin, which, if medically necessary, may be continued during gestation. However, TNF-alpha inhibitors, especially the pegylated form, should be preferred in case of pregnancy. Furthermore, an elective pregnancy termination is not necessary due to systemic therapy of psoriasis with many further substances during the first pregnancy weeks. The current work provides a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on treatment of psoriasis during pregnancy and lactation. Based on the available scientific information, severity of psoriasis and patient's comorbidities, the best possible therapeutic approach can be found in consensus with the patient.

To systematically review the social outcomes of patients with biliary atresia (BA), including educational, employment and family outcomes.

We conducted a systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, Global Health, Maternity and Infant Care Database, supplemented by reference searching. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute scoring was conducted for quality assessment. The PROSPERO registration ID was CRD42020178846.

Fifty-one studies were included (41 cohort, 10 cross-sectional), including 4631 participants across 16 countries. Cohorts were BA post-liver transplant (LT) (18 studies), native liver survivors (NLS) (16 studies), mixed (13 studies) and four other cohorts. Outcomes covered; education (n = 35), employment (n = 16), family outcomes (n = 22), and social functioning (n = 22). BA patients had lower school functioning scores than controls, with no difference between NLS versus post-LT. Between 2% and 48% of children required additional educational support. Between 60% and 100% of adult patients with BA were employed. Pregnancies were described in 17 studies, with small samples, and some noted complications. Social functioning scores were similar to healthy controls in 8 of 11 comparisons.

Despite BA being the primary indication for liver transplantation in childhood, social outcomes for children and adolescents are predominantly reported in non-controlled, single-centre survey-based studies. School functioning is lower compared to peer groups, with no evidence of a difference for those having a liver transplant. We recommend routine psychosocial assessment of these patients during follow-up, alongside multi-centre collaborations, to maximise the quality of evidence for future patients.

Conception, pregnancy, and lactation following solid organ transplantation require appropriate management. The most frequently used immunosuppressive drug combination after solid organ transplantation consists of tacrolimus (Tac) plus mycophenolic acid (MPA). Here, the effects of Tac and MPA on fertility, pregnancy, and lactation are systematically reviewed, and their implications for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are discussed.

A systematic literature search was performed (August 19, 2019) using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, and 102 studies were included. Another 60 were included from the reference list of the published articles.

As MPA is teratogenic, women who are trying to conceive are strongly recommended to switch from MPA to azathioprine. MPA treatment in men during conception seems to have no adverse effect on pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, in 2015, the drug label was updated with additional risk minimization measures in a pregnancy prevention program. Data on MPA pharmacokinetics during pregnancy and lactation are limited. Tac treatment during conception, pregnancy, and lactation seems to be safe in terms of the health of the mother, (unborn) child, and allograft. However, Tac may increase the risk of hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and low birth weight. Infants will ingest very small amounts of Tac via breast milk from mothers treated with Tac. However, no adverse outcomes have been reported in children exposed to Tac during lactation. During pregnancy, changes in Tac pharmacokinetics result in increased unbound to whole-blood Tac concentration ratio. To maintain Tac concentrations within the target range, increased Tac dose and intensified TDM may be required. However, it is unclear if dose adjustments during pregnancy are necessary, considering the higher concentration of (active) unbound Tac.

Tac treatment during conception, pregnancy and lactation seems to be relatively safe. Due to pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy, a higher Tac dose might be indicated to maintain target concentrations. However, more evidence is needed to make recommendations on both Tac dose adjustments and alternative matrices than whole-blood for TDM of Tac during pregnancy. MPA treatment in men during conception seems to have no adverse effect on pregnancy outcomes, whereas MPA use in women during conception and pregnancy is strongly discouraged.

Pregnancy after transplantation is a challenge owing to the high risk of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes, and immunosuppressants may further impact these outcomes. There are no head-to-head randomized controlled trials comparing influences of cyclosporin and tacrolimus on pregnancy outcomes. Thus, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed observational studies assessing the comparative influences of these two drugs on pregnancy outcomes in liver/kidney transplant recipients.

Relevant studies comparing pregnancy outcomes with tacrolimus and cyclosporin head-to-head were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science (from 1 January 2000 to 20 March 2020). The weighted mean difference and odds ratio (OR) were calculated to compare continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was estimated using funnel plots. The study quality was assessed according to the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Overall, 10 observational studies of low quality, including a total of 1080 post-liver or kidney transplant pregnancies, were identified. Tacrolimus-treated recipients experienced a lower risk of gestational hypertension (28.0%; OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.27-2.39; p < 0.01). Cyclosporin-treated recipients showed a lower incidence of caesarean section (40.3%; OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.82; p < 0.01). Additionally, cyclosporin performed better in terms of the live birth rate (78.0%; OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.02-1.88; p = 0.04). No significant differences in the incidences of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm delivery and birth weight were observed.

Tacrolimus performed better in patients with gestational hypertension, while cyclosporin was associated with a lower incidence of caesarean section and a higher incidence of live birth. The findings are based on relatively low-quality evidence, but may provide a reference for clinicians in their clinical monitoring and obstetric care for post-transplant pregnancies.

Liver transplantation (LT) remains the gold standard for treatment of end-stage liver disease. Given the increasing number of liver transplantation in females of reproductive age, our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating pregnancy outcomes after LT.

MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Estimates of pregnancy-related outcomes in LT recipients were generated and pooled across studies using the random-effects model.

A comprehensive search identified 1,430 potential studies. Thirty-eight studies with 1,131 pregnancies among 838 LT recipients were included in the analysis. Mean maternal age at pregnancy was 27.8 years, with a mean interval from LT to pregnancy of 59.7 months. The live birth rate was 80.4%, with a mean gestational age of 36.5 weeks. The rate of miscarriages (16.7%) was similar to the general population (10%-20%). The rates of preterm birth, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery (32.1%, 12.5%, and 42.2%, respectively) among LT recipients were all higher than the rates for the general US population (9.9%, 4%, and 32%, respectively). Most analyses were associated with substantial heterogeneity.

Pregnancy outcomes after LT are favorable, but the risk of maternal and fetal complications is increased. Large studies along with consistent reporting to national registries are necessary for appropriate patient counseling and to guide clinical management of LT recipients during pregnancy.

An increasing number of childbearing agewomen undergo liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. Transplantation in this patient subgroup poses a significant challenge regarding the plans for future fertility, particularly in terms of immunosuppression and optimal timing of conception. Intrapartum LT is only rarely performed as the outcome is commonly dismal for the mother or more commonly the fetus. On the other hand, the outcomes of pregnancy in LT recipients are favorable, and children born to LT recipients are relatively healthy. Counseling on pregnancy should start before LT and continue after LT up until pregnancy, while all pregnant LT recipients must be managed by amultidisciplinary team, including both an obstetrician and a transplant hepatologist. Additionally, an interval of at least 1-2 years after successful LT is recommended before considering pregnancy. Pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus are reported more commonly during the pregnancies of LT recipients than in the pregnancies of non-transplant patients. As adverse fetal outcomes, such asmiscarriage, abortion, stillbirth, or ectopic pregnancy, may occur more often than in the non-transplant population, early planning or delivery either through a planned induction of labor or cesarean section is critical to minimize the risk of complications. No significant long-term physical or phycological abnormalities have been reported in children born to LT recipients.

Fertility is often impaired in adolescents and women with cirrhosis, but it is rapidly restored after liver transplantation (LT). Early and unplanned pregnancies confer increased risks to maternal, fetal, and graft health, underscoring the need for reproductive counseling. However, data on reproductive practices or counseling in the LT setting are limited. An anonymous online Qualtrics (Provo, UT) survey was sent to transplant patients and providers to gauge knowledge and practices surrounding contraception and pregnancy. Eligible participants included transplant patients aged 14-45 years and their transplant providers. Patient response was 50.0% (74/148), 14 of whom were pre-LT patients and 60 of whom were post-LT patients. Counseling occurred in 37% of patients prior to transplant and 82% after transplant. Most patients (86%) considered family planning a high priority in their transplant care. Contraception- and pregnancy-specific counseling was provided by LT providers in 60% and 44% of patients, respectively. The most desired mode of counseling by patients was in-person discussion with an LT provider (89%). Despite most post-LT patients receiving counseling, only 41% used contraception during the first year after LT, of whom 32% relied on high failure methods. Of the 31/43 (72.1%) provider responses, 96% voiced interest in additional reproductive education. Most providers (90%) correctly advised that patients delay pregnancy during the first year after LT, although misconceptions about safety of estrogen and intrauterine devices were selected by 53% and 42%, respectively. Some favored resources by providers were educational pamphlets in clinic (88%) and automated note templates to prompt family planning inquiry (72%). Transplant patients and providers have key deficiencies in their knowledge of contraception and corresponding practices. Most post-LT patients receive counseling, yet contraception practices are inadequate for preventing unplanned pregnancy. Discussion with transplant providers was the most favored counseling modality by patients, underscoring our critical role in optimizing post-LT reproductive care.

BACKGROUND Gestational weight gain (GWG) is an important index influencing perinatal outcomes. Inappropriate weight gain during pregnancy is strongly associated with multiple pregnancy complications. In pregnant liver transplant recipients whose risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes is already high, this aspect may be even more significant. The present study analyzed the gestational weight gain in female liver transplant recipients and its effect on neonatal complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cohort study of retrospective data was performed in the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw. There were 23 patients who fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The gestational weight gain was analyzed in the context of pre-pregnancy BMI, immunosuppression, and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS The preterm delivery rate was 39.13% and GWG increased according to the duration of pregnancy. The model adjusted to week of delivery revealed no association between weight gain and the length of pregnancy (p=0.82). GWG in liver transplant recipients did not affect hypotrophy incidence, adverse perinatal outcomes, or caesarian delivery rate. A positive correlation between GWG and neonatal birth weight was observed (p=0.06). One patient, with coexisting PIH, had a stillbirth at 23 weeks. In all other cases, the 5-min Apgar score was 10 points. CONCLUSIONS Current obstetrical recommendations do not consider patients with chronic diseases undergoing immunosuppressive treatment. Proper counselling and preparing liver transplant recipients for pregnancy, especially optimizing maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, may be an important element in improving perinatal outcomes by lowering the risk of maternal complications. GWG itself is not relevant as a predictor of term gestation, but it might be important in achieving eutrophic fetus growth.

Despite increasing reports of pregnancy in liver transplant recipients, questions remain about the impact of transplantation in pregnancy.

This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 26th December 2019 for studies reporting pregnancy with liver transplant. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modelling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database.

Of 1239 unique studies, 28 met inclusion criteria, representing 1496 pregnancies in 1073 liver transplant recipients. The live-birth rate was 85.6% (CI95%: 80.5%-90.7%). The rate of other pregnancy outcomes was as follows: induced abortions (5.7%), miscarriages (7.8%) and stillbirths (3.3%). Pooled rates of obstetric complications were hypertension (18.2%), pre-eclampsia (12.8%) and gestational diabetes (7.0%). Pooled rates of delivery outcomes for caesarean section (C-section) and pre-term birth were 42.2% and 27.8%, respectively.

In conclusion, live birth outcomes are good among liver transplant recipients and this favourable trend is consistent at an international level. However, special attention should be given to obstetric complications such as hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and preterm delivery. The high incidence of these complications supports the high-risk classification of post-liver transplant pregnancies and it is necessary for a multidisciplinary team to be involved in the monitoring and counselling of liver transplant recipients both before and during pregnancy. Whilst majority data originate from institutions from high-income countries, data from low-middle income countries (LMIC) are needed owing to rising rates of liver transplantation in LMIC.

Pregnancy after liver transplantation (LT) is increasingly common and is a frequent scenario that transplant physicians, obstetricians, and midwives encounter. This review summarizes the key issues surrounding preconception, pregnancy-related outcomes, immunosuppression, and breastfeeding in female LT recipients. Prepregnancy counseling in these patients should include recommendations to delay conception for at least 1-2 years after LT and discussions about effective methods of contraception. Female LT recipients are generally recommended to continue immunosuppression during pregnancy to prevent allograft rejection; however, individual regimens may need to be altered. Although pregnancy outcomes are overall favorable, there is an increased risk of maternal and fetal complications. Pregnancy in this cohort remains high risk and should be managed vigilantly in a multidisciplinary setting. We aim to review the available evidence from national registries, population-based studies, and case series and to provide recommendations for attending clinicians.

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is a demanding surgical procedure, thus explaining its slow expansion and limited popularity amongst Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary (HPB) surgeons. However, three main advantages of robotic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) including improved dexterity, 3D vision less surgical fatigue, may overcome some of the hurdles and ultimately lead to a wider adoption. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the current literature on open and MIPD.

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for PD. Network meta-analysis of intraoperative (operating time, blood loss, transfusion rate), postoperative (overall and major complications, pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, length of hospital stay) and oncological outcomes (R0 resection, lymphadenectomy) were performed.

Sixty-one studies including 62,529 patients were included in the network meta-analysis, of which 3% (n = 2131) were totally robotic (TR) and 10% (n = 6514) were totally laparoscopic (TL). There were no significant differences between surgical techniques for major complications, overall and grade B/C fistula, biliary leak, mortality and R0 resections. Transfusion rates were significantly lower in TR compared to TL and open. Operative time for TR was longer compared with open and TL. Both TL and TR were associated with significantly lower rates of wound infections, pulmonary complications, shorter length of stay and higher lymph nodes examined when compared to open. TR was associated with significantly lower conversion rates than TL.

In summary, this network meta-analysis highlights the variability in techniques within MIPD and compares other variations to the conventional open PD. Current evidence appears to demonstrate MIPD, both laparoscopic and robotic techniques are associated with improved rates of surgical site infections, pulmonary complications, and a shorter hospital stay, with no compromise in oncological outcomes for cancer resections.

Although much has been learnt regarding pregnancy after liver transplantation, data from India are scant. Hence, we evaluated the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies after liver transplantation at our center.

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent liver transplantation and later conceived at our center between 2006 and 2019.

Of the 750 liver transplantations performed at our center, 129 were female and 62 of them were in the childbearing age group (15-44 years). A total of seven conceptions occurred in seven patients during the study period. All the pregnancies occurred spontaneously. The median age of the patients at the time of liver transplantation and conception was 25 years (range, 24-33 years) and 29 years (range, 26-36 years), respectively. The median interval between transplantation and conception was 40 months (range, 7-48 months). All patients were on tacrolimus monotherapy. None of the patients had rejection during pregnancy despite a low median tacrolimus trough level of 2.7 ng/mL. Live birth (five cesarean and one normal) occurred in six of seven pregnancies at a median gestation age of 37.5 weeks. Mean birth weight was 3055.8 g (range, 2470-3635 g). Antenatal rubella infection and grade III intrauterine growth restriction resulting in still birth at 29 weeks occurred in one patient. The median postnatal follow-up was 25 months (range, 2-81 months). All babies and mothers were healthy.

Pregnancy after liver transplantation has a favorable outcome with a multidisciplinary team approach. There is a physiological reduction of tacrolimus trough levels during pregnancy for which dose augmentation is not usually required.

Thrombocytopenia during pregnancy presents unique challenges for the hematologist. Obstetricians generally manage many of the pregnancy-specific etiologies, ranging from the benign (gestational thrombocytopenia) to the life-threatening (preeclampsia; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets syndrome; and acute fatty liver of pregnancy). However, hematologists may be consulted for atypical and severe presentations and to help manage non-pregnancy specific etiologies, including immune thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, hemolytic uremic syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome, among others, in which maternal and fetal risks must be considered. This review provides a general approach to the diagnosis and management of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy for the consulting hematologist.

Routine use of water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE) to assess anastomotic integrity is debated. This study aimed to evaluate the role of WSCE to assess anastomotic integrity following anterior resections (AR) with defunctioning stoma prior to reversal and identify factors to limit its selective use.

This retrospective study evaluated all WSCE performed over a 7-year period at a high-volume colorectal unit. Risk factors for radiological abnormality/leak, including malignancy, chemoradiotherapy, and immediate postoperative complications, were recorded. A gastrointestinal specialist radiologist and surgeon validated all WSCEs reported as abnormal.

Of the 486 WSCE studies identified, 92 were excluded (repeat studies (n = 51), pediatric cases [n = 2], no AR [n = 39]). A total of 394 WSCE studies were evaluated (260 cancer; 134 noncancer patients); 14% (37/260) of cancer patients and 8% (10/134) of noncancer patients had abnormal studies (P = 0.072). Of the 37 abnormal studies in cancer patients, 73% (27/37) radiological leaks were found, and 41% (n = 11/27) of these patients had postoperative complications. Of the 10 abnormal studies in noncancer patients, 20% (2/10) radiological leaks were found, but none of these patients had postoperative complications. Overall leak rates were 7% (29/394), and rates were significantly higher in cancer patients than noncancer patients (10 vs 2%, P = 0.005).

Routine use of WSCE may not be necessary prior to reversal. WSCE should be selectively used in event of postoperative leak or complications. Noncancer resections are less likely demonstrate a leak.