Background: Artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing within the domains of medicine and transplantology. In this comprehensive review, we provide an in-depth exploration of current AI methodologies, with a particular emphasis on machine learning and deep learning techniques, and their diverse subtypes. These technologies are revolutionizing how data are processed, analyzed, and applied in clinical decision making. Methods: A meticulous literature review was conducted with a focus on the application of artificial intelligence in kidney transplantation. Four research questions were formulated to establish the aim of the review. Results: We thoroughly examined the general applications of AI in the medical field, such as feature selection, dimensionality reduction, and clustering, which serve as foundational tools for complex data analysis. This includes the development of predictive models for transplant rejection, the optimization of personalized immunosuppressive therapies, the algorithmic matching of donors and recipients based on multidimensional criteria, and the sophisticated analysis of histopathological images to improve the diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, we present a detailed comparison of existing AI-based algorithms designed to predict kidney graft survival in transplant recipients. In this context, we focus on the variables incorporated into these predictive models, providing a critical analysis of their relative importance and contribution to model performance. Conclusions: This review highlights the significant advancements made possible through AI and underscores its potential to enhance both clinical outcomes and the precision of medical interventions in the field of transplantology.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has a wide and increasing range of applications across various sectors. In medicine, AI has already made an impact in numerous fields, rapidly transforming healthcare delivery through its growing applications in diagnosis, treatment and overall patient care. Equally, AI is swiftly and essentially transforming the landscape of kidney transplantation (KT), offering innovative solutions for longstanding problems that have eluded resolution through traditional approaches outside its spectrum. The purpose of this review is to explore the present and future applications of artificial intelligence in KT, with a focus on pre-transplant evaluation, surgical assistance, outcomes and post-transplant care. We discuss its great potential and the inevitable limitations that accompany these technologies. We conclude that by fostering collaboration between AI technologies and medical practitioners, we can pave the way for a future where advanced, personalised care becomes the standard in KT and beyond.

The field of kidney transplantation is being revolutionized by the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques. AI equips machines with human-like cognitive abilities, while ML enables computers to learn from data. Challenges in transplantation, such as organ allocation and prediction of allograft function or rejection, can be addressed through AI-powered algorithms. These algorithms can optimize immunosuppression protocols and improve patient care. This comprehensive literature review provides an overview of all the recent studies on the utilization of AI and ML techniques in the optimization of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. By developing personalized and data-driven immunosuppression protocols, clinicians can make informed decisions and enhance patient care. However, there are limitations, such as data quality, small sample sizes, validation, computational complexity, and interpretability of ML models. Future research should validate and refine AI models for different populations and treatment durations. AI and ML have the potential to revolutionize kidney transplantation by optimizing immunosuppression and improving outcomes. AI-powered algorithms enable personalized and data-driven immunosuppression protocols, enhancing patient care and decision-making. Limitations include data quality, small sample sizes, validation, computational complexity, and interpretability of ML models. Further research is needed to validate and enhance AI models for different populations and longer-term dosing decisions.

The optimal use and monitoring of cyclosporine A (CyA) have remained unclear and the current strategy of CyA treatment requires frequent dose adjustment following an empirical initial dosage adjusted for total body weight (TBW). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate age and anthropometric parameters as predictors for dose adjustment of CyA; and the secondary aim was to compare the usefulness of the concentration at predose (C0) and 2-hour postdose (C2) monitoring. An open-label, non-randomized, retrospective study was performed in 81 renal transplant patients in Japan during 2001-2010. The relationships between the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC0-9) of CyA and its C0 or C2 level were assessed with a linear regression analysis model. In addition to age, 7 anthropometric parameters were tested as predictors for AUC0-9 of CyA: TBW, height (HT), body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), ideal body weight (IBW), lean body weight (LBW), and fat free mass (FFM). Correlations between AUC0-9 of CyA and these parameters were also analyzed with a linear regression model. The rank order of the correlation coefficient was C0 > C2 (C0; r=0.6273, C2; r=0.5562). The linear regression analyses between AUC0-9 of CyA and candidate parameters indicated their potential usefulness from the following rank order: IBW > FFM > HT > BSA > LBW > TBW > BMI > Age. In conclusion, after oral administration, C2 monitoring has a large variation and could be at high risk for overdosing. Therefore, after oral dosing of CyA, it was not considered to be a useful approach for single monitoring, but should rather be used with C0 monitoring. The regression analyses between AUC0-9 of CyA and anthropometric parameters indicated that IBW was potentially the superior predictor for dose adjustment of CyA in an empiric strategy using TBW (IBW; r=0.5181, TBW; r=0.3192); however, this finding seems to lack the pharmacokinetic rationale and thus warrants further basic and clinical investigations.