Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of infection between liver transplant patients with and without simultaneous splenectomy.

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 211 patients who underwent liver transplantation in the Tri-Service General Hospital from 2012 to 2017. The frequency of blood cultures obtained after liver transplantation; incidence of bacteremia, pathogens, and complications; and overall survival rates were compared between the groups.

One hundred thirty-three of 211 patients underwent liver transplantation without simultaneous splenectomy. There were no significant differences in the frequency of blood cultures obtained after liver transplantation (non-splenectomy group and splenectomy group: 63% and 62%, respectively); incidences of bacteremia after liver transplantation (21% and 21%, respectively), repeat bacteremia (39% and 35%, respectively), cytomegalovirus infection (4% and 3%, respectively), herpes infection (6% and 7%, respectively), and fungal infection (3% and 3%, respectively); and overall survival rate between the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in infection-related deaths between the groups. Simultaneous splenectomy and episodes of antibody-related rejection were significant risk factors associated with infection-related death in multivariate analyses.

Although simultaneous splenectomy does not increase the incidence of infection, simultaneous splenectomy definitely carries risks of infection-related mortality in liver transplantation.

To investigate the relationship between post-liver transplantation (LT) glycemic control and LT outcomes.

A qualitative systematic review on relevant prospective interventions designed to control glucose levels including insulin protocols. Studies investigating an association between glycemic control and post-LT outcomes such as mortality, graft rejection, and infection rate were reviewed. PubMed, EMBASE, and other databases were searched through October 2016.

Three thousands, six hundreds and ninety-two patients from 14 studies were included. Higher mortality rate was seen when blood glucose (BG) ≥ 150 mg/dL (P = 0.05). BG ≥ 150 mg/dL also led to higher rates of infection. Higher rates of graft rejection were seen at BG > 200 mg/dL (P < 0.001). Mean BG ≥ 200 mg/dL was associated with more infections (P = 0.002). Nurse-initiated protocols and early screening strategies have shown a reduction in negative post-LT outcomes.

Hyperglycemia in the perioperative period is associated with poor post-LT outcomes. Only a few prospective studies have designed interventions aimed at managing post-LT hyperglycemia, post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and their impact on post-LT outcomes.

The effects of diabetic status and acute rejection (AR) on liver transplant outcomes are largely unknown. We studied 13,736 liver recipients from the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement Transplant Network database who underwent transplantation between 2004 and 2007 with a functioning graft for greater than 1 year. The association of pretransplant diabetes mellitus (PDM), new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT), and AR rates on allograft failure, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality were determined. To determine the differential and joint effects of diabetic status and AR on transplant outcomes, recipients were further stratified into 6 groups: neither (reference, n = 6600); NODAT alone (n = 2054); PDM alone (n = 2414); AR alone (n = 1448); NODAT and AR (n = 707); and PDM and AR (n = 513). An analysis with hepatitis C virus (HCV) serostatus was also performed (HCV recipients, n = 6384; and non-HCV recipient, n = 5934). The median follow-up was 2537 days. The prevalence of PDM was 21.3%. At 1 year after transplant, the rates of NODAT and AR were 25.5% and 19.4%, respectively. Overall, PDM, NODAT, and AR were associated with increased risks for graft failure (PDM, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31, P < 0.01; NODAT, HR = 1.11, P = 0.02; AR, HR = 1.28, P < 0.01). A multivariate Cox regression analysis of the 6 recipient groups demonstrated that NODAT alone was not significantly associated with any study outcomes. The presence of PDM, AR, NODAT and AR, and PDM and AR were associated with higher overall graft failure risk and mortality risk. The presence of PDM was associated with higher cardiovascular mortality risk. The analyses in both HCV-positive and HCV-negative cohorts showed a similar trend as in the overall cohort. In conclusion, PDM and AR, but not NODAT, is associated with increased mortality and liver allograft failure. Liver Transplantation 22 796-804 2016 AASLD.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent consequence of solid organ transplantation. PTDM has been associated with greater mortality and increased infections in different transplant groups using different diagnostic criteria. An international consensus panel recommended a consistent set of guidelines in 2003 based on American Diabetes Association glucose criteria but did not exclude the immediate post-transplant hospitalization when many patients receive large doses of corticosteroids. Greater glucose monitoring during all hospitalizations has revealed significant glucose intolerance in the majority of recipients immediately after transplant. As a result, the international consensus panel reviewed its earlier guidelines and recommended delaying screening and diagnosis of PTDM until the recipient is on stable doses of immunosuppression after discharge from initial transplant hospitalization. The group cautioned that whereas hemoglobin A1C has been adopted as a diagnostic criterion by many, it is not reliable as the sole diabetes screening method during the first year after transplant. Risk factors for PTDM include many of the immunosuppressant medications themselves as well as those for type 2 diabetes. The provider managing diabetes and associated dyslipidemia and hypertension after transplant must be careful of the greater risk for drug-drug interactions and infections with immunosuppressant medications. Treatment goals and therapies must consider the greater risk for fluctuating and reduced kidney function, which can cause hypoglycemia. Research is actively focused on strategies to prevent PTDM, but until strategies are found, it is imperative that immunosuppression regimens are chosen based on their evidence to prolong graft survival, not to avoid PTDM.

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of intraoperative hyperglycemia on postoperative outcomes in orthotopic liver transplant recipients.

After ethics committee approval was obtained, we retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplant from January 2000 to December 2013. A total 389 orthotopic liver transplants were performed in our center, but patients aged < 15 years (179 patients) were not included in the analyses. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their maximum intraoperative blood glucose level: group 1 (patients with intraoperative blood glucose level < 200 mg/dL) and group 2 (patients with intraoperative blood glucose level > 200 mg/dL). Postoperative complications between the 2 groups were compared.

There were 58 patients (37.6%; group 1, blood glucose < 200 mg/dL) who had controlled blood glucose and 96 patients (62.3%; group 2, blood glucose > 200 mg/dL) who had uncontrolled blood glucose. The mean age and weight for groups 1 and 2 were similar. There were no differences between the 2 groups regarding the duration of anhepatic phase (P = .20), operation time (P = .41), frequency of immediate intraoperative extubation (P = .14), and postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .06). There were no significant differences in frequency of patients who had postoperative infectious complications, acute kidney injury, or need for hemodialysis. Mortality rates after liver transplant were similar between the 2 groups (P = .81).

Intraoperative hyperglycemia during orthotopic liver transplant was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection, acute renal failure, or mortality.

The influence of NODAT on survival of liver transplant recipients has not been clarified. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of NODAT on survival in LT recipients.

Data from 352 LT patients were totally analyzed. 97 patients with pretransplant diabetes mellitus were excluded, and 255 patients without diabetes mellitus at time of transplantation were included.

NODAT was diagnosed in 41 patients (16.1%). There was no difference in frequency of NODAT according to the etiology of liver cirrhosis. NODAT was associated with a higher body weight (p=0.004) and BMI (p=0.002) 5years after LT, but not with weight gain (p=0.201) or increase in BMI (p=0.335) 5years after LT. HbA1c 5years after LT was significantly higher in patients with NODAT (p=0.001), but mean HbA1c still remained lower than 6.5% (6.4(±1.2) %). Patients with NODAT showed better survival rates (log rank: p=0.002) compared to LT recipients without diabetes. According to all existing knowledge of diabetes mellitus (DM) better survival cannot be a direct effect of this disease. Our results are rather influenced by an not known confounding factor (possibly recovery from cachexia) associated with better survival and NODAT, while complications of NODAT will not appear during the relatively short postoperative time and observation period (mean follow up 6.08 (±2.67) years).

NODAT is frequently diagnosed in LT recipients and is associated with an improved 5year survival after LT due to a not exactly known confounding factor.

Hyperglycemia is a frequent phenomenon in hospitalized patients that is associated with negative outcomes. It is common in liver transplant patients as a result of stress and is related to immunosuppressant drugs. Although studies are few, a history of diabetes and the presentation of hyperglycemia during liver transplantation have been associated with a higher risk for rejection.

To analyze whether hyperglycemia during the first 48hours after liver transplantation was associated with a higher risk for infection, rejection, or longer hospital stay.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients above the age of 15years that received a liver transplant. Hyperglycemia was defined as a value above 140mg/dl and it was measured in three different manners (as an isolated value, as a mean value, and as a weighted value over time). The relation of hyperglycemia to a risk for acute rejection, infection, or longer hospital stay was evaluated.

Some form of hyperglycemia was present in 94% of the patients during the first 48 post-transplantation hours, regardless of its definition. There was no increased risk for rejection (OR: 1.49; 95%CI: 0.55-4.05), infection (OR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.16-2.25), or longer hospital stay between the patients that presented with hyperglycemia and those that did not.

Hyperglycemia during the first 48hours after transplantation appeared to be an expected phenomenon in the majority of patients and was not associated with a greater risk for rejection or infection and it had no impact on the duration of hospital stay.

Tacrolimus is an important immunosuppressant administered to patients following liver transplantation (LT), with a recommended trough concentration of 8 to 11 ng/mL to prevent allograft rejection. We retrospectively examined our data to identify the tacrolimus trough concentration that combined efficacy with minimal adverse effects.

The case records of LT recipients, who were nondiabetic, nonhypertensive, and with normal renal parameters prior to LT were retrospectively examined for acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes and three major adverse effects of tacrolimus, i.e. neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM).

Thirty-two LT recipients fulfilled the criteria for the study. The mean (±SD) tacrolimus level for the 290 troughs (after 10 days) was 8.5 ± 3.8 ng/mL. At 10 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, the trough values were 7.3 ± 2.9, 9.7 ± 3.4, 7.9 ± 3.3, and 7.6 ± 2.6 ng/mL, respectively. The mean time taken for stabilization of the blood pressure and biochemical parameters was 7 ± 2 days. Overall, a trough window with the least adverse effect was 7 to 7.9 ng/mL. Neurotoxicity was least in the trough range 5 to <8 ng/mL. Symptoms included headache in four, tremors in three, seizure in one, confusion and psychosis in two, and combination in three. Nephrotoxicity was least in trough 8 to <11 ng/mL. One patient progressed to chronic kidney disease at 6 months. NODM was present in 11 % to 18 % across the various trough range, including the extremes (mean trough level, 8.4 ± 4.4 ng/dL). At 6 months, five recipients were on treatment for NODM. Three recipients developed ACR, two within the first month and one at 7 weeks. The trough levels were 8.5, 9, 15.2 ng/mL, respectively. All recovered with three pulse doses of methylprednisolone.

Tacrolimus concentration of 5 to <8 ng/mL was associated with least overall toxicity, neurotoxicity, and ACR.

Despite the success of liver transplantation, long-term complications remain, including de novo malignancies, metabolic syndrome, and the recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current mainstay of treatment, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), can also worsen posttransplant renal dysfunction, neurotoxicity, and diabetes. Clearly there is a need for better immunosuppressive agents that maintain similar rates of efficacy and renal function whilst minimizing adverse effects. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors with a mechanism of action that is different from other immunosuppressive agents has the potential to address some of these issues. In this review we surveyed the literature for reports of the use of mTOR inhibitors in adult liver transplantation with respect to renal function, efficacy, safety, neurological symptoms, de novo tumors, and the recurrence of HCC and HCV. The results of our review indicate that mTOR inhibitors are associated with efficacy comparable to CNIs while having benefits on renal function in liver transplantation. We also consider newer dosing schedules that may limit side effects. Finally, we discuss evidence that mTOR inhibitors may have benefits in the oncology setting and in relation to HCV-related allograft fibrosis, metabolic syndrome, and neurotoxicity.

Liver regulates lipid metabolism in health and disease states. Nevertheless, the entity of cardiovascular risk (CVR) resulting from dysregulation of lipid metabolism secondary to liver disease is poorly characterized.

To review, based on a PubMed literature search, the features and the determinants of serum lipid phenotype and its correlation with hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance (IR) and CVR across the wide spectrum of the most common chronic liver diseases due to different etiologies.

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is associated with steatosis, IR and a typical lipid profile. The relationship between alcohol intake, incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CVR describes a J-shaped curve. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and probably nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in particular, is associated with IR, atherogenic dyslipidemia and increased CVR independent of traditional risk factors. Moreover, NASH-cirrhosis and T2D contribute to increasing CVR in liver transplant recipients. HBV infection is generally free from IR, steatosis and CVR. HCV-associated dysmetabolic syndrome, featuring steatosis, hypocholesterolemia and IR, appears to be associated with substantially increased CVR. Hyperlipidemia is an almost universal finding in primary biliary cirrhosis, a condition typically spared from steatosis and associated with neither subclinical atherosclerosis nor excess CVR. Finally, little is known on CVR in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

CVR is increased in ALD, NAFLD and chronic HCV infection, all conditions featuring IR and steatosis. Therefore, irrespective of serum lipid phenotype, hepatic steatosis and IR may be major shared determinants in amplifying CVR in common liver disease due to varying etiology.

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a cluster of metabolic derangements associated with insulin resistance and an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. MS has become a major health concern worldwide and is considered to be the etiology of the current epidemic of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In addition to cardiovascular disease, the presence of MS is also closely associated with other comorbidities including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The prevalence of MS in patients with cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease is not well established and difficult to ascertain. Following liver transplant, the prevalence of MS is estimated to be 44-58%. The main factors associated with posttransplant MS are posttransplant diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. In addition to developing NAFLD, posttransplant MS is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality that is 2.5 times that of the age- and sex-matched individuals. Additionally, the presence of posttransplant MS has been associated with rapid progression to fibrosis in individuals transplanted for HCV cirrhosis. There is an urgent need for well-designed prospective studies to fully delineate the natural history and risk factors associated with posttransplant MS. Until then, early recognition, prevention, and treatment of its components are vital in improving outcomes in liver transplant recipients.

We conducted a multicenter randomized study in liver transplantation to compare standard-dose tacrolimus to reduced-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil to reduce the occurrence of tacrolimus side effects. Two primary outcomes (censored criteria) were monitored during 48 weeks post-transplantation: occurrence of renal dysfunction or arterial hypertension or diabetes (evaluating benefit) and occurrence of acute graft rejection (evaluating risk). Interim analyses were performed every 40 patients to stop the study in the case of increased risk of graft rejection. One hundred and ninety-five patients (control: 100; experimental: 95) had been included when the study was stopped. Acute graft rejection occurred in 46 (46%) and 28 (30%) patients in control and experimental groups, respectively (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: [0.37-0.94]; p = 0.024). Renal dysfunction or arterial hypertension or diabetes occurred in 80 (80%) and 61 (64%) patients in control and experimental groups, respectively (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: [0.49-0.95]; p = 0.021). Renal dysfunction occurred in 42 (42%) and 23 (24%) patients in control and experimental groups, respectively (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: [0.29-0.81]; p = 0.004). Leucopoenia (p = 0.001), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.017) and diarrhea (p = 0.002) occurred more frequently in the experimental group. Reduced-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil reduces the occurrence of renal dysfunction and the risk of graft rejection. This immunosuppressive regimen could replace full-dose tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation is the standard of care for acute and chronic causes of end-stage liver disease. Advances in medical therapy and surgical techniques have led to improvement of patient and graft survival rates following orthotopic liver transplantation. However, the prevalence of post-transplant cardiovascular complications has been rising with increased life expectancy after liver transplantation.

To determine the incidences, risk factors, and treatment for hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, and obesity in the post-liver transplantation population.

We performed a review of relevant studies available on the PubMed database that provided information on the incidence, risk factors and treatment for cardiovascular complications that develop in the post-liver transplantation population.

Current immunosuppressive agents have improved patient and graft survival rates. However, long-term exposure to these agents has been associated with development of systemic and metabolic complications including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Cardiovascular disease remains one of the most common causes of death in liver transplant patients with functional grafts.

Liver transplant recipients have a higher risk of cardiovascular complications compared with the nontransplant population. Post-transplant cardiac risk stratification and aggressive treatment of cardiovascular complications, including modification of risk factors and tailoring of immunosuppressive regimen, is imperative to prevent serious complications.

New-onset diabetes is a common complication after liver transplantation.

We aimed to analyze the incidence and rate of known risk factors and the impact of new-onset diabetes mellitus on postoperative outcome.

We retrospectively evaluated the files of 310 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 1995 and 2009. Definition of new-onset diabetes included: repeated fasting serum glucose >6.8 mmol/l and/or sustained antidiabetic therapy that was present 3 months after transplantation.

New-onset diabetes occurred in 63 patients (20%). Differences between the new-onset and the control group were the donor body mass index (24+/-3 vs. 22.4+/-3.6 kg/m 2 , p = 0.003), donor male gender (58% vs. 33%, p = 0.002), and recipient age (47.6+/-7.2 vs. 38.3+/-14.6 year, p<0.001), body mass index (26.7+/-3.8 vs. 23.3+/-5.6 kg/m 2 , p<0.001), male gender (60% vs. 44%, p = 0.031). The 66% of patients with new-onset diabetes were transplanted with cirrhosis caused by hepatitis C virus infection, while in the control group the rate was 23% (p<0.001). Cumulative patient survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 8 year were 95%, 90.6%, 88% and 88% in the control group, and 87%, 79%, 79% and 64% in the de novo group, respectively (p = 0.011). Cumulative graft survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 8 year in the control group were 92%, 87%, 86% and 79%, in the de novo diabetes group the rates were 87%, 79%, 79%, 65%, respectively (p = NS). In case of early recurrence (in 6 months), majority of patients developed new-onset diabetes (74% vs. control 26%, p = 0.03). More patients had more than 10 times higher increase of the postoperative virus titer correlate to the preoperative titer in the de novo diabetes group (53% vs. 20%, p = 0.028). Mean fibrosis score was higher in new-onset group one year after the beginning of antiviral therapy (2.05+/-1.53 vs. 1.00+/-1.08, p = 0.039).

Risk factors for new-onset diabetes after transplantation are older age, obesity, male gender and cirrhosis due to hepatitis C infection. The early recurrence, viremia and more severe fibrosis after antiviral therapy have an impact on the occurrence of new-onset diabetes in hepatitis C positive patients.

OBJECTIVE.: To analyze the risk factors for new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) in liver transplant recipients using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. METHODS.: Among 20,172 primary liver recipients (age > or =18 years) transplanted between July 2004 and December 2008 in Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing databases, 15,463 recipients without pretransplant diabetes were identified. Risk factors for NODM were examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS.: NODM was reported in 26.4% of recipients (median follow-up, 685 days). Independent predictors of NODM development included recipient age (> or = 50 vs. <50 years, hazard ratio [HR]=1.241), African American race (HR=1.147), body mass index (> or = 25 vs. <25, HR=1.186), hepatitis C (HR=1.155), recipient cirrhosis history (HR=1.107), donor age (> or = 60 vs. <60 year, HR=1.152), diabetic donor (HR=1.151), tacrolimus (tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine, HR=1.236), and steroid at discharge (HR=1.594). Living donor transplant (HR=0.628) and induction therapy (HR=0.816) were associated with a decreased risk of NODM. CONCLUSION.: The incidence of NODM was 26.4% in liver recipients with a median follow-up time of 685 days. Identified risk factors for NODM in liver transplantation were similar to that in kidney transplantation. Some of the identified factors are potentially modifiable, including obesity and the choice of immunosuppressive regimens.

With increasing survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), metabolic syndrome and its individual components, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity, are increasingly being identified and contributing to cardiovascular complications and late morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of posttransplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS) and its individual components has been found to be higher post-OLT versus a comparable population without OLT. The development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after liver transplantation for non-NAFLD cirrhosis is also being increasingly recognized. A number of predictors have been identified as potential risk factors related to these complications. The pretransplant risk factors include immunosuppression, a higher age at transplant, male gender, a history of smoking, the pretransplant body mass index, pre-OLT diabetes, the etiology of the underlying liver disease that resulted in OLT (hepatitis C, cryptogenic cirrhosis, or alcohol), an increased donor body mass index, and marital status. Although there is an increased risk of cardiovascular events, rejection, and infection among patients with PTMS, the overall impact on long-term survival and mortality remains inconclusive. Strategies to reduce the development of metabolic syndrome after transplantation should include lifestyle modifications involving alterations in diet and increased physical activity. Additional measures that may be potentially beneficial include the use of lipid-lowering agents, the optimal control of blood glucose, and the use of tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine.

OGTT was performed in 28 liver transplants maintained with tacrolimus to investigate carbohydrate metabolism and assess risk factors for development of PTDM. None had PTDM that was detected by OGTT. Early PTDM in four cases (14.3%) resolved in follow-up. Five new cases (17.9%) demonstrated DCM (DCM = IGT +/- hyperinsulinemia). Fasting measurements were normal in two hyperinsulinemic cases. With one (20%, p > 0.05) exception none of the children with DCM were overweight or had a family history of diabetes. All five (100%) children with DCM had been given high cumulative dosage of steroids 18 (78.3%)--without DCM (p > 0.05). The median age of children with DCM was greater [4.3 (12.7-18.0) vs. 7.0 (2.3-18.0) yr, p < 0.01] and duration of follow-up longer [5.3 (2.3-7.0) vs. 2.5 (0.7-7.3) yr, p < 0.05]. Four children (80%) with DCM were pubertal (p < 0.05). However, neither age nor duration of follow-up or pubertal stage had significant effect on DCM development. Early PTDM is a transient phenomenon and is not predictive for future development of diabetes. DCM is frequently observed in liver transplanted children. Albeit the children with DCM were given high cumulative dose of steroids, were older, mostly were pubertal, and had longer duration of follow-up, we cannot draw firm conclusions on effects of the risk factors on carbohydrate metabolism because of the small sample size and relatively short duration of follow-up. Unlike fasting measurements, OGTT can detect all children with DCM.

New onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) postliver transplantation (LT) is very common and may negatively affect patient and graft survival, but its causative mechanism is still unclear. This study was to analyze the connection between Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and NODM after LT by systematically reviewing published medical literature. We electronically searched databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from January 1980 to January 2008. Only retrospective studies could be identified. Seven of them were subjected to the meta-analysis. Analysis was performed by using revman 4.2 software. We found that HCV increased the prevalence of NODM [OR 2.46; 95%CI (1.44, 4.19)]. Then, we further analyzed the association between HCV and persistent-NODM (P-NODM) after LT. The result showed that prevalence of P-NODM was higher in HCV-positive group than in HCV-negative group with marginally statistical significance [OR = 1.39; 95%CI (1.06, 1.83)]. The present meta-analysis based on retrospective studies suggested a significant relationship between HCV and NODM after LT, and it seems that HCV infection might also increase the prevalence of P-NODM. Multicenter, large sized prospective studies are still needed to further confirm these results.

The development of diabetes after solid organ transplantation is a known complication, and many published studies have examined prevalence rates and risk factors for specific categories of transplant recipients. However, fewer articles have compared rates of posttransplant diabetes and risk factors among different types of transplant recipients. This article provides an overview of the literature on this subject and compares similarities and differences related to posttransplant diabetes for different categories of organ transplant recipients. Awareness of the various risk factors for different organ transplant recipients will enhance transplant clinicians' knowledge related to this complication so that appropriate monitoring can be started.

Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation (LT) is desirable in order to reduce steroid side effects. Between February 2000 and August 2004, 110 patients after LT were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Randomization was performed before LT. In all patients, tacrolimus was used without induction therapy. All patients received methylprednisolon for 14 days, thereafter a double-blinded medication containing either placebo (n = 56) or methylprednisolon (n = 54) for 6 months, which was completely stopped thereafter. End points were patient and graft survival, acute and chronic rejection, and incidence of steroid side effects during the first year after LT. One-year patient survival was 85.7% (placebo) and 88.8% (steroid) (p = 0.572). Twenty-seven (48.2%) and 19 (35.2%) patients experienced acute rejection (placebo versus steroid, respectively; p = 0.116). Two patients in the placebo group but none in the steroid group experienced chronic rejection (p = 0.257). The rates of side effects were (placebo versus steroid, respectively): CMV infection 25% versus 33% (p = 0.336), post-transplant diabetes 30% versus 53% (p = 0.024), hypertension 39% versus 52% (p = 0.248), hypercholesterolemia 10% versus 41% (p = 0.002) and hypertriglyceridemia 32% versus 54% (p = 0.046). In conclusion, early steroid withdrawal after LT is feasible under tacrolimus monotherapy without increased rejection rates and with a lower rate of side effects.

As survival increases after liver transplantation, common issues that arise involve immunosuppression-related complications and primary health care. Proper emphasis on the prevention and treatment of post-liver transplant complications, such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, renal dysfunction, osteoporosis, and obesity, requires careful screening and long-term surveillance to minimize the progression of these complications. Active involvement by internists and subspecialists is necessary and a multidisciplinary approach should be undertaken. Liver transplantation should be viewed as a lifelong commitment by both patient and physician.

The clinical impact of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is frequently underestimated by clinicians. NODM occurs in approximately 15-20% of renal transplant patients and 15% of liver transplant recipients. Diabetes after transplantation is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular events, with a higher prognostic value than in the non-transplant population. NODM also appears to have a negative influence on graft function, and graft survival rates after renal transplantation are significantly lower in patients who develop diabetes than in controls. Patient mortality following renal transplantation is generally found to be higher in patients with NODM, due to increased cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease, accelerated graft deterioration and diabetes-related complications, notably infection. A renal registry analysis has reported an increase of 87% in risk of death following onset of NODM. There is also limited evidence that NODM is associated with increased risk of death in liver transplant patients. The relative incidence and severity of diabetic complications in transplant recipients have not been assessed rigorously in a clinical trial but registry data indicate that 20% of renal transplant patients with NODM experience at least one clinically significant diabetic complication within three years. Financially, the additional healthcare costs incurred over the first two years following onset of NODM amount to 21,500 dollars. Routine pre-transplant assessment of diabetic risk, with requisite modification of lifestyle, glycaemic monitoring and immunosuppressive regimens, and coupled with standardized, aggressive hypoglycaemic management as necessary, offers an important opportunity to alleviate the burden of NODM for transplant patients.

Approximately 20% of liver transplant recipients develop posttransplant diabetes mellitus. Hepatitis C, a leading indication for liver transplantation, has been identified as a risk factor for posttransplant diabetes mellitus and is an observation that is not well described.

To evaluate the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus and risk factors associated with this condition.

A retrospective chart review.

A large urban transplant center.

One hundred fifteen liver transplant recipients who received a transplant between January 1, 1998, and August 31, 2001.

The rate of posttransplant diabetes mellitus, calculated at 3-month intervals in the first year after liver transplantation, ranged from 19.4% to 24.6%, which is similar to the averages reported in most published studies. The cumulative rate of posttransplant diabetes mellitus, which includes all patients who developed this condition during the time studied, was 31.3%. Clinical and demographic factors, including immunosuppression regimens, were similar between patients with and without posttransplant diabetes mellitus. Two risk factors for posttransplant diabetes mellitus were identified: hepatitis C, which was the leading indication for transplantation in this group (54.8%), and cytomegalovirus infection during the first year after transplantation. Other clinical and demographic variables, such as gender, age, ethnicity, rejection episodes, body mass index, and immunosuppression, were not identified as risk factors for posttransplant diabetes mellitus in liver transplant recipients.

The prevalence and risk factors for diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation are not well understood. Thus, we sought to identify independent risk factors for the development of diabetes after liver transplantation using currently accepted medical criteria. We studied the prevalence and risk factors in 253 adult recipients transplanted at UCLA between January 1998 and December 2002. Analysis of the retrospective data was performed using demographic, immunosuppression and liver disease variables. Factors found to be significant on a univariate analysis were further studied in a multivariate analysis. There were 158 men and 95 women in our study. The mean age was 51.4 +/- 11.0 years. The mean [+/- standard deviation (SD) pretransplant body mass index was 26.7 (+/-5.1). Most patients were transplanted for hepatitis C (HCV). The prevalence of diabetes after transplantation was 17.8%. In a multivariate analysis only gender [odds ratio (OR) = 0.37; p = 0.02] was independently predictive of the development of diabetes. This study in a large liver transplant recipient population identifies male gender as an independent risk factor for the development of diabetes. Follow-up studies are needed to assess the impact of diabetes, and its intervention on post-transplant morbidity and mortality.

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) develops in approximately 15% of liver transplant recipients, and a similar proportion of patients have diabetes prior to transplantation. Preexisting diabetes and probably NODM are associated with increased mortality and risk of infection. NODM occurs more frequently among patients with hepatitis C infection; additional risk factors include family history, male gender, increasing weight, and alcoholic cirrhosis. Corticosteroid therapy, particularly bolus injections, increases likelihood of NODM, and randomized clinical trials and retrospective studies have shown NODM to occur more frequently with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine. Patients undergoing liver transplantation should be screened for diabetes risk factors, and fasting plasma glucose should be monitored regularly in all transplant recipients. Management of NODM is essentially similar to that of diabetes in the nontransplant population, and includes dietary and lifestyle modifications. In choosing oral agents and/or insulin, the individual medical profile of the patient must be considered carefully. Corticosteroid exposure should be limited as much as possible, and reduction of calcineurin inhibitor dose is prudent. Switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine may be required in some cases to achieve improvement or resolution. In conclusion, prospective trials are necessary to properly define antidiabetic therapy and immunosuppressive strategies in this population.

Liver disease alters the glucose metabolism and may cause diabetes, but this condition is potentially reversible with liver transplantation (LTx). Type 1 diabetes mellitus may be coincidentally present in a LTx candidate and immunosuppressive drugs will aggravate diabetes and make its management more difficult for posttransplant. In addition, diabetes negatively influences outcome after LTx. Therefore, the question arises as to why not transplanting the pancreas in addition to the liver in selected patients suffering from both liver disease and Type 1 diabetes. We report two cases of en bloc combined liver and pancreatic transplantation, a technique originally described a decade ago in the treatment of upper abdominal malignancies but rarely used for the treatment of combined liver disease and Type 1 diabetes. Both recipients are currently liver disease-free and insulin-free more than 2 and 4 years posttransplant, respectively. Surgical, medical and immunological aspects of combined liver-pancreas transplantation are discussed in the light of the existing relevant literature.

Epidemiological studies suggest diabetes mellitus (DM) may be an extrahepatic manifestation of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Since diabetes and HCV are common in liver transplant recipients, we sought to examine the unique contribution of HCV infection to risk of de novo diabetes posttransplantation. Using a cohort of 555 liver transplant recipients (median age 49 years, 54% males, 82% Caucasian) without preexisting diabetes from 3 U.S. centers enrolled between 1990 and 1994 and followed for a median duration of 5 years, we determined the incidence of de novo diabetes and the independent predictors of the development of diabetes. De novo diabetes was defined by the use of antidiabetic medications. De novo diabetes developed in 209/555 (37.7%) patients of whom 157 (28.3%) had transient-DM (T-DM) and 52 (9.4%) had persistent-DM (P-DM). Among HCV-infected transplant recipients, de novo T-DM and P-DM developed in 26% and 14%, respectively. HCV was predictive of P-DM (P =.02) but not T-DM. Older age (P =.03) and tacrolimus use (P =.02) were also independent predictors of P-DM. In conclusion, de novo diabetes is common in transplant recipients, but is typically transient in nature. However, among those developing de novo persistent diabetes, HCV is one of the most important risk factors. This adds further support to the epidemiological data linking HCV and diabetes.

In liver transplant recipients, new onset of diabetes mellitus (posttransplant diabetes mellitus or PTDM) is estimated to occur in 9% to 21% of recipients. The limited published data on survival and posttransplant complications in liver transplant recipients who develop PTDM show conflicting results. The objective of our study was to compare the morbidity and mortality of 46 patients who developed PTDM with 92 age- and sex-matched patients without pretransplant or posttransplant diabetes mellitus (DM). The demographics of both groups were similar except that there were more blacks with PTDM. The incidence of following complications was higher in the PTDM group compared with the control group: cardiac (48% v 24%; P =.005), major infections (41% v 25%; P =.07), minor infections (28% v 5%; P =.001), neurologic (22% v 9%; P =.05), and neuropsychiatric (22% v 6%; P =.009). Acute rejection was seen more commonly in the PTDM group (50% v 30%; P =.03). The duration of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, retransplantation rate, and graft survival were similar in both groups. Patient survival also was similar in the PTDM and control groups at 1 year (93.5% v 83.5%), two years (88.1% v 77.9%), and 5 years (75% v 77.2%); Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also did not show survival difference. In conclusion, PTDM was associated with significant morbidity, and our findings suggest that patients with PTDM should be monitored very closely to improve long-term outcome.

To systematically review the incidence of posttransplantation diabetes (PTD), risk factors for its development, prognostic implications, and optimal management.

We searched databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and others) from inception to September 2000, reviewed bibliographies in reports retrieved, contacted transplantation experts, and reviewed specialty journals. Two reviewers independently determined report inclusion (original studies, in all languages, of PTD in adults with no history of diabetes before transplantation), assessed study methods, and extracted data using a standardized form. Meta-regression was used to explain between-study differences in incidence.

Nineteen studies with 3,611 patients were included. The 12-month cumulative incidence of PTD is lower (<10% in most studies) than it was 3 decades ago. The type of immunosuppression explained 74% of the variability in incidence (P = 0.0004). Risk factors were patient age, nonwhite ethnicity, glucocorticoid treatment for rejection, and immunosuppression with high-dose cyclosporine and tacrolimus. PTD was associated with decreased graft and patient survival in earlier studies; later studies showed improved outcomes. Randomized trials of treatment regimens have not been conducted.

Physicians should consider modification of immunosuppressive regimens to decrease the risk of PTD in high-risk transplant recipients. Randomized trials are needed to evaluate the use of oral glucose-lowering agents in transplant recipients, paying particular attention to interactions with immunosuppressive drugs.

1. As long-term survival improves after liver transplantation, cardiovascular complications are emerging as a major cause of late morbidity and mortality. It seems reasonable to correct the potentially reversible cardiovascular risk factors of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and obesity, in addition to hypertension. 2. The results of liver transplantation in diabetics are acceptable in terms of morbidity, mortality, and prevalence of posttransplant diabetes, but the poor outcomes described in some series suggest that more extensive testing for macro- and microvascular disease may become necessary. 3. The management of diabetes in liver transplant recipients is not substantially different from its management in non-transplant patients, except that steroid reduction or withdrawal and minimizing doses of calcineurin inhibitors are beneficial. 4. Hyperlipidemia occurs in all solid-organ transplantation, with prevalence rates the lowest for liver transplant recipients. Following liver transplantation, between 15% and 40% of recipients on average have increased plasma cholesterol levels and about 40% have hypertriglyceridemia. Dietary changes, weight reduction, exercise and statins are the mainstays of therapy. 5. Retrospective studies suggest that long-term survival of obese recipients after liver transplantation does not differ from nonobese recipients. Posttransplant weight gain occurs in most recipients, and approximately two thirds become overweight. The management of posttransplant obesity is similar to that in non-transplant settings.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has recently been suggested to be a risk factor for the development of diabetes mellitus. The aim of our study was to investigate whether the prevalence of diabetes is increased among liver transplant recipients infected with HCV. We compared the prevalence of diabetes among 278 liver transplant recipients whose original cause of liver failure was HCV infection (110 patients), hepatitis B virus infection (HBV; 53 patients), and cholestatic liver disease (CLD; 115 patients). The pretransplantation prevalence of diabetes was higher in the HCV group (29%) compared with the HBV (6%) and CLD (4%) groups (P <.001). The prevalence of diabetes remained higher in the HCV group 1 year after transplantation: 37%, 10%, and 5% in the HCV, HBV, and CLD groups, respectively (P <.001). The cumulative steroid dose during the first year of transplantation was significantly lower in the HCV group compared with the CLD group. Multivariate analysis revealed that HCV-related liver failure (P =.002), pretransplantation diabetes (P <.0001), and male sex (P =.019) were independent predictors of the presence of diabetes 1 year after transplantation. The high prevalence of diabetes persisted in the HCV group, with 41% diabetic at 5 years. The majority of patients with diabetes mellitus (89%) required insulin therapy after transplantation. Patient and graft survival rates were similar among patients with and without diabetes. In conclusion, our study shows that there is a high prevalence of diabetes among liver transplant recipients infected with HCV both before and after transplantation.