BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2026; 16(9): 119271
Published online Sep 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.119271
Table 1 Comparison of general data between two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD/median (interquartile range)
Variable
PSD group (n = 112)
Non-PSD group (n = 233)
t/χ2/Z value
P value
Sex3.720.054
Male54 (48.21)138 (59.23)
Female58 (51.79)95 (40.77)
Age (years)65.73 ± 10.2462.18 ± 11.352.8160.005
Years of education (years)8.42 ± 3.678.89 ± 3.821.0870.278
Marital status1.030.598
Married89 (79.46)195 (83.69)
Divorced/widowed18 (16.07)31 (13.30)
Single5 (4.46)7 (3.00)
Cerebral infarction location2.150.341
Anterior circulation52 (46.43)124 (53.22)
Posterior circulation38 (33.93)76 (32.62)
Multiple22 (19.64)33 (14.16)
NIHSS score (points)6 (3, 9)4 (2, 7)-3.624< 0.001
BI (points)65 (45, 80)80 (60, 95)-4.518< 0.001
Assessment time (days)42 (21, 78)38 (18, 72)-1.2360.216
Comorbidities
Hypertension71 (63.39)134 (57.51)1.1030.294
Diabetes mellitus48 (42.86)72 (30.90)4.7620.029
Coronary heart disease29 (25.89)51 (21.89)0.6890.407
Table 2 Comparison of scale scores between two groups, median (interquartile range)
Scale
PSD group (n = 112)
Non-PSD group (n = 233)
Z value
P value
HAMD-1714 (10, 19)4 (2, 6)-12.347< 0.001
PHQ-912 (8, 16)3 (1, 5)-11.862< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of two scales at different cutoff values
Scale and cutoff value
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
+LR
-LR
Youden Index
Kappa value
HAMD-17 ≥ 7 points88.3979.8367.8193.474.380.150.6820.632
PHQ-9 ≥ 5 points91.0768.6758.2994.122.910.130.5970.521
PHQ-9 ≥ 7 points83.0481.1267.8890.874.40.210.6420.606
PHQ-9 ≥ 10 points73.2189.2776.6487.396.830.30.6250.632
Table 4 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis results of two scales
Scale
AUC
95%CI
Optimal cutoff (points)
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
+LR
-LR
Youden Index
HAMD-170.8910.854-0.928788.3979.8367.8193.474.380.150.682
PHQ-90.8670.826-0.908783.0481.1267.8890.874.40.210.642
Table 5 Agreement analysis between two scales and gold standard diagnosis
Scale and cutoff value
Positive cases
True positive
False positive
True negative
False negative
Kappa value
P value
HAMD-17 ≥ 7 points (optimal cutoff value)1469947186130.632< 0.001
PHQ-9 ≥ 5 points17510273160100.521< 0.001
PHQ-9 ≥ 7 points (optimal cutoff value)1379344189190.606< 0.001
PHQ-9 ≥ 10 points1078225208300.632< 0.001


Write to the Help Desk