Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Aug 19, 2026; 16(8): 118680
Published online Aug 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i8.118680
Published online Aug 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i8.118680
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data before and after propensity score matching between the two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Items | Before matching | χ2/t | After matching | χ2/t | ||||
| Intervention group | Control group | Intervention group | Control group | |||||
| Sex | 0.028 | 0.867 | 0.035 | 0.852 | ||||
| Male | 51 (61.45) | 56 (60.22) | 39 (62.90) | 40 (64.52) | ||||
| Female | 32 (38.55) | 37 (39.78) | 23 (37.10) | 22 (35.48) | ||||
| Age (years) | 61.04 ± 7.31 | 60.99 ± 7.47 | 0.042 | 0.967 | 61.15 ± 7.37 | 62.11 ± 7.13 | 0.743 | 0.459 |
| Course of disease (years) | 2.65 ± 0.66 | 2.28 ± 0.68 | 0.604 | < 0.001 | 2.49 ± 0.60 | 2.46 ± 0.64 | 0.231 | 0.817 |
| Rutherford grade | 7.996 | 0.018 | 0.254 | 0.881 | ||||
| I-II | 42 (50.60) | 65 (69.89) | 38 (61.29) | 36 (38.71) | ||||
| III | 30 (48.39) | 17 (18.28) | 15 (18.07) | 15 (16.13) | ||||
| IV | 11 (13.25) | 11 (11.83) | 9 (10.84) | 11 (11.83) | ||||
| Hypertension | 0.189 | 0.664 | 0.576 | 0.448 | ||||
| Yes | 26 (31.33) | 32 (34.41) | 23 (27.71) | 19 (30.65) | ||||
| No | 57 (91.94) | 61 (65.59) | 39 (46.99) | 43 (69.35) | ||||
| Diabetes | 0.330 | 0.565 | 0.827 | 0.363 | ||||
| Yes | 29 (34.94) | 18 (19.35) | 14 (22.58) | 10 (16.13) | ||||
| No | 64 (77.11) | 75 (80.65) | 48 (77.42) | 52 (83.87) | ||||
| Coronary heart disease | 0.090 | 0.764 | 0.000 | 1.000 | ||||
| Yes | 12 (14.46) | 12 (12.90) | 8 (12.90) | 8 (12.90) | ||||
| No | 71 (85.54) | 81 (87.10) | 54 (87.10) | 54 (87.10) | ||||
Table 2 Comparison of Chinese Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale scores between the two groups before and after intervention, mean ± SD
| Group | Before intervention | After 8 weeks of intervention | At 1 month follow-up |
| Intervention group (n = 62) | 51.55 ± 2.03 | 74.45 ± 7.54 | 79.82 ± 4.51 |
| Control group (n = 62) | 51.76 ± 1.96 | 67.55 ± 8.20 | 71.95 ± 5.20 |
| t | 0.584 | 4.877 | 8.998 |
| P value | 0.560 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of quality-of-life scores between the two groups before and after the intervention, mean ± SD
| Dimensions | Intervention group (n = 62) | Control group (n = 62) | t | P value | |
| Life function | Before intervention | 56.15 ± 5.33 | 55.45 ± 5.61 | 0.705 | 0.482 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 70.65 ± 6.35 | 66.71 ± 6.14 | 3.508 | < 0.001 | |
| At 1 month follow-up | 80.11 ± 6.53 | 74.15 ± 6.87 | 4.957 | < 0.001 | |
| Physiological functions | Before intervention | 56.24 ± 5.24 | 56.44 ± 5.12 | 0.208 | 0.835 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 69.85 ± 5.74 | 63.88 ± 4.95 | 6.214 | < 0.001 | |
| At 1 month follow-up | 81.21 ± 5.63 | 74.85 ± 5.94 | 6.109 | < 0.001 | |
| Body pain | Before intervention | 47.53 ± 5.66 | 48.32 ± 5.15 | 0.813 | 0.418 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 65.19 ± 5.43 | 59.03 ± 5.27 | 6.409 | < 0.001 | |
| At 1 month follow-up | 75.16 ± 6.11 | 67.34 ± 5.65 | 7.402 | < 0.001 | |
| Overall health | Before intervention | 51.84 ± 5.56 | 52.06 ± 5.33 | 0.231 | 0.818 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 68.85 ± 5.52 | 62.93 ± 6.11 | 5.657 | < 0.001 | |
| At 1 month follow-up | 82.32 ± 6.13 | 74.82 ± 6.32 | 6.703 | < 0.001 | |
| Vitality | Before intervention | 52.79 ± 5.60 | 53.71 ± 5.18 | 0.949 | 0.345 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 67.74 ± 4.72 | 62.77 ± 4.89 | 5.758 | < 0.001 | |
| At 1 month follow-up | 76.85 ± 5.01 | 70.11 ± 4.95 | 7.540 | < 0.001 | |
| Social functions | Before intervention | 55.11 ± 5.27 | 54.21 ± 5.17 | 0.963 | 0.337 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 68.44 ± 4.85 | 62.02 ± 5.76 | 4.618 | < 0.001 | |
| At 1 month follow-up | 79.68 ± 6.26 | 72.32 ± 6.09 | 6.634 | < 0.001 | |
| Emotional function | Before intervention | 51.10 ± 4.82 | 51.71 ± 4.46 | 0.736 | 0.463 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 67.37 ± 5.61 | 61.37 ± 6.65 | 5.432 | < 0.001 | |
| At 1 month follow-up | 78.65 ± 6.13 | 71.87 ± 6.51 | 5.964 | < 0.001 | |
| Mental health | Before intervention | 56.37 ± 4.65 | 56.82 ± 4.79 | 0.533 | 0.595 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 69.11 ± 6.33 | 62.54 ± 5.71 | 6.066 | < 0.001 | |
| At 1 month follow-up | 78.53 ± 6.81 | 70.63 ± 6.13 | 6.791 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of complications between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | Vascular restenosis | Skin infection | Delayed healing of incision | Skin ulcer | Total complications (%) |
| Intervention group (n = 62) | 1 (1.61) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.61) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (3.23) |
| Control group (n = 62) | 3 (4.84) | 2 (3.23) | 3 (4.84) | 1 (1.61) | 9 (14.52) |
| χ2 | 4.888 | ||||
| P value | 0.027 |
- Citation: Shi YX, Qin B, Wang XX, Sun YX, Wang XY, Kou J. Impact of mindfulness training on depression and walking ability in patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans and depression. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(8): 118680
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i8/118680.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i8.118680