Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Jul 19, 2026; 16(7): 118740
Published online Jul 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.118740
Published online Jul 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.118740
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Item | Control group (n = 60) | Observation group (n = 60) | t/χ² | P value |
| Age (years) | 43.69 ± 11.18 | 43.02 ± 8.39 | 0.369 | 0.713 |
| Gender | 0.135 | 0.714 | ||
| Male | 32 (53.33) | 34 (56.67) | ||
| Female | 28 (46.67) | 26 (43.33) | ||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.17 ± 2.05 | 22.22 ± 2.13 | -0.115 | 0.909 |
| Disease duration (years) | 3.62 ± 1.55 | 3.49 ± 1.46 | 0.477 | 0.634 |
| Educational level | 6.000 | 0.306 | ||
| Middle school | 10 (16.67) | 11 (18.33) | ||
| Secondary or high school | 23 (38.33) | 25 (41.67) | ||
| College and beyond | 27 (45.00) | 24 (40.00) | ||
| Drug type | 0.100 | 0.752 | ||
| Atypical antipsychotics | 55 (91.67) | 56 (93.33) | ||
| Typical antipsychotic drugs | 5 (8.33) | 4 (6.67) |
Table 2 Comparison of treatment compliance between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Item | Medication Adherence Rating Scale score | |
| Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Control group (n = 60) | 4.56 ± 0.93 | 7.20 ± 0.85 |
| Observation group (n = 60) | 4.66 ± 0.89 | 8.54 ± 0.83 |
| t value | -0.390 | -8.680 |
| P value | 0.697 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of psychological state indicators before and after intervention in the two groups, mean ± SD
| Item | Hamilton anxiety scale score | Hamilton depression scale score | ||
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Control group (n = 60) | 18.53 ± 2.88 | 10.23 ± 1.67 | 22.77 ± 3.47 | 12.38 ± 2.23 |
| Observation group (n = 60) | 19.41 ± 3.05 | 8.34 ± 1.74 | 21.90 ± 2.49 | 10.85 ± 1.87 |
| t value | -1.629 | 6.067 | 1.566 | 4.054 |
| P value | 0.106 | < 0.001 | 0.120 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of the severity of mental symptoms between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Item | Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score | |
| Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Control group (n = 60) | 42.12 ± 3.67 | 32.32 ± 2.07 |
| Observation group (n = 60) | 42.58 ± 3.60 | 26.44 ± 1.35 |
| t value | -0.689 | 18.427 |
| P value | 0.492 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of quality of life scores before and after intervention between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Item | Psychosocial score | Motivation and energy (scores) | Symptoms/side effects (scores) | |||
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |
| Control group (n = 60) | 30.78 ± 1.93 | 24.71 ± 2.50 | 39.42 ± 3.03 | 33.22 ± 2.17 | 23.12 ± 1.51 | 19.50 ± 1.07 |
| Observation group (n = 60) | 31.15 ± 1.87 | 23.58 ± 3.57 | 39.58 ± 3.15 | 30.04 ± 2.97 | 23.45 ± 1.36 | 18.73 ± 0.97 |
| t value | -1.201 | 15.374 | -0.246 | 6.702 | -1.275 | 4.177 |
| P value | 0.232 | < 0.001 | 0.806 | < 0.001 | 0.205 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Tong J, Cheng J, Gao SM, Chen Y, Liu SH, Li M, Lu YT. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction combined with narrative nursing on treatment adherence and negative emotions with schizophrenia. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(7): 118740
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i7/118740.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.118740