©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Mar 19, 2026; 16(3): 113572
Published online Mar 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i3.113572
Published online Mar 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i3.113572
Table 1 Search phrases and terms utilised across the assessed databases
| Database | Search string |
| PubMed | [("Hyperbaric Oxygenation"(MeSH Terms) OR "hyperbaric oxygen therapy"(All Fields) OR HBOT (All Fields)] AND ["Depressive Disorder"(MeSH Terms) OR "depression"(All Fields)] |
| EMBASE | ('Hyperbaric oxygen therapy'/exp OR HBOT) AND ('depression'/exp OR 'depressive disorder'/exp) |
| PsycINFO | (DE "Hyperbaric Treatment" OR "hyperbaric oxygen therapy" OR HBOT) AND (DE "Depression" OR DE "Major Depressive Disorder") |
| Cochrane Library | (Hyperbaric NEAR/5 oxygen NEAR/5 therapy OR HBOT) AND (depression OR depressive disorder) |
| Scopus | ((TITLE-ABS-KEY ("hyperbaric oxygen therapy") OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (HBOT)) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY (depression OR depressive disorder))) |
| Web of Science | ("Hyperbaric oxygen therapy" OR HBOT) AND (depression OR "depressive disorder") AND Language: (English) |
Table 2 Demographic variables assessed across the selected trials
| Ref. | Country | Protocol | Sample size (n) | Age range (years) | Male: Female ratio |
| Feng and Li[23], 2017 | China | RCT | 60 | 18-50 | 42:18 |
| Guo et al[24], 2023 | China | RCT | 180 | 22-60 | 104:86 |
| Harch et al[25], 2020 | United States | RCT | 62 | 18-65 | 28:34 |
| Koźmin-Burzyńska et al[26], 2016 | Poland | RCT | 50 | 28-80 | 41:9 |
| Mi et al[27], 2021 | China | RCT | 64 | 18-65 | Unspecified |
| Zilberman-Itskovich et al[28], 2022 | Israel | RCT | 73 | 48.4 ± 10.6 (mean) | 29:34 |
Table 3 Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on depression as observed across the included trials
| Ref. | Treatment duration | Outcome measures | Baseline scores | Post-treatment scores | Statistical significance | Inference drawn |
| Feng and Li[23] | 8 weeks | HAM-D, HAMA, ASIA, FIM | No significant difference in HAM-D, HAM-A, ASIA, FIM scores (P > 0.05) | Significant reduction in HAM-D and HAM-A scores in HBOT group compared to control (P < 0.05); significant increase in ASIA and FIM scores in HBOT group (P < 0.05) | P < 0.05 for HBOT vs control in HAM-D, HAM-A, ASIA, FIM | HBOT significantly improves both depression and functional outcomes in SCI patients |
| Guo et al[24] | 8 weeks | MADRS, NIHSS | No significant difference in MADRS, NIHSS scores (P > 0.05) | Greater reduction in MADRS scores in HBOT group (14.3 ± 5.2) vs control (18.1 ± 3.5), P < 0.001; greater improvement in NIHSS scores in HBOT group (12.2 ± 4.0) vs control (16.1 ± 3.4), P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 for HBOT vs control in MADRS, NIHSS | HBOT effectively reduces depression severity and improves neurological function |
| Harch et al[25] | 8 weeks | NSI, cognitive tests (Memory Index, ANAM 4), HAM-D, HAM-A, PSQI, QOLIBRI, PCL | No significant difference in baseline scores reported | Significant 26.3-point decrease in NSI scores in HBOT group vs 2.5-point decrease in control (P < 0.0001); Improved Memory Index, ANAM 4, HAM-D, HAM-A, PSQI, QOLIBRI, PCL in HBOT group | P < 0.0001 for NSI; significant improvements in other measures | HBOT provides substantial relief from post-concussion symptoms and enhances cognitive and emotional well-being |
| Koźmin-Burzyńska et al[26] | 6 weeks | HbA1c, PHQ-9, BHS, HADS A, HADS D, Hamilton Depression Scale | No significant correlations for duration of diabetes and DFS | Higher HbA1c levels correlated with increased depressive symptoms (HADS D, r = 0.20, P < 0.05) | Significant correlation for HbA1c and depressive symptoms (P < 0.05) | HBOT may reduce depressive symptoms, particularly in patients with higher HbA1c levels and severe tissue damage |
| Mi et al[27] | 6 weeks | HAM-D, MoCA | Control: 23.56 ± 4.26; observation: 23.98 ± 4.52 (HAM-D); no significant difference (P > 0.05) | Significant reduction in HAM-D scores at 2 weeks in observation group vs control (P < 0.05); no significant difference at 4 weeks and 6 weeks (P > 0.05) | Significant difference at 2 weeks (P < 0.05) | HBOT combined with escitalopram showed rapid improvement in depression scores at 2 weeks; significant improvement in cognitive function at 4 weeks and 6 weeks |
| Zilberman-Itskovich et al[28] | 8 weeks | Cognitive function, SF-36, PSQI, BSI-18, brain imaging | No significant differences in baseline scores reported | Significant improvement in cognitive function (d = 0.495, P = 0.038); improvements in SF-36, PSQI, and BSI-18 scores; increased gray-matter cerebral blood flow | Significant improvements in multiple measures (P < 0.05) | HBOT significantly improved cognitive function, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, and brain perfusion |
Table 4 Vote-count summary of hyperbaric oxygen therapy efficacy across outcome domains (n = 6 randomized controlled trials)
| Domain | Significant benefit (HBOT > control) | No significant difference | Significant harm |
| Mood/depression scales | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Cognition/neuropsychology tests | 3 | 11 | 0 |
| Functional/QoL indices | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Perfusion/imaging metrics | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Table 5 GRADE assessment of the selected trials
| Study design | Number of studies | Common finding | Bias risk | Variability | Indirect evidence | Precision | Other factors | Certainty |
| RCT | 6 | HBOT improves depression, cognitive function, and functional outcomes | Low to moderate | Low | Low | Moderate | None | Moderate |
- Citation: Ahsan M, Ahmed S, Shaik RA, Ahmad MS, Nurani KM, A P. Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of depression. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(3): 113572
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i3/113572.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i3.113572
