BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 125256
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.125256
Table 1 Represents the summarization of the evidence of psychological and neurocognitive outcomes
Treatment modality
Psychological neuropsychiatric outcomes
Key findings
Quantitative estimates
Ref.
Active surveillanceAnxiety, depressionMost men show stable, low levels of psychological distress over time, although a minority experience clinically relevant symptomAnxiety prevalence: Up to 23%-24%; depression prevalence: Approximately 12.5%Watts et al[28], Alvisi et al[29], van den Bergh et al[30]
Radical prostatectomyMental distress, depression, anxietyPersistent psychological distress may occur after surgery and is associated with urinary and sexual dysfunction and reduced quality of lifeApproximately 8%-20% may require psychological supportKöhler et al[31], Ilie et al[32], Meissner et al[33], Mehnert et al[41]
Radiation therapyDepression, anxietyPsychological morbidity may be lower than with watchful waiting or ADT, although depression and anxiety remain clinically relevantNot consistently reported across the cited studiesRavi et al[34], Crump et al[35]
ADT Depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment, reduced quality of lifeADT is associated with increased psychiatric and cognitive morbidity and reduced physical, social, and functional well-beingDepression: RR = 1.51; anxiety: HR = 2.08; cognitive impairment: RR = 1.45Saini et al[36], Siebert et al[37], Galvão et al[38], Crump et al[39]
PCa- depression associated – healthcare burden Depression-associated healthcare utilizationComorbid depression is associated with substantially greater emergency care, hospitalization and mortality among men with PCaER visits: OR = 4.45; hospitalization: OR = 3.22; mortality: HR = 2.82 Jayadevappa et al[40]
Table 2 Risk factors and predictors of psychological morbidity in prostate cancer
Risk factor
Psychological outcomes
Effect size/association
Statistical significance
Ref.
Divorced relationship statusAnxietyHigher prevalence of clinically relevant anxiety among divorced men (56.3%) compared with the overall cohort (23.1%)P = 0.011Watts et al[28]
High-risk PCaDepression, anxietyMajor depression: AHR = 1.82 (95%CI: 1.75-1.89); anxiety disorders: AHR = 1.96 (95%CI: 1.87-2.05)P < 0.001Crump et al[35], Crump et al[39]
ADTDepression, anxiety, cognitive impairmentDepression: RR = 1.51; anxiety: AHR = 2.08 (95%CI: 1.93-2.25); cognitive impairment/dementia: RR = 1.45Depression: P = 0.0002; anxiety: P < 0.001; cognitive impairment: P = 0.024Siebert et al[37], Crump et al[39]
Younger age (per 10-year decrease)DepressionOR = 1.38 (95%CI: 1.16-1.60)P = 0.001Fervaha et al[48]
Poor social support/absence of caregiverAnxiety, depressionAbsence of caregiver: OR = 5.02; emotional support: OR = 0.81; instrumental support: OR = 0.67P < 0.05Mehnert et al[41], Morris et al[49]
Moderate-to-severe urinary dysfunctionMental distressOR = 4.79 (95%CI: 1.04-22.03)P < 0.05Ilie et al[32]
Poor relationship satisfaction/sexual difficultiesPsychological distressLower relationship satisfaction associated with greater distress; OR = 0.14 (95%CI: 0.03-0.77)P < 0.05Köhler et al[31], Ilie et al[32]
Pre-existing depression or anxietyDepressionOR = 3.64 (95%CI: 2.42-5.48)P < 0.0001Fervaha et al[48]
High-risk disease classificationDepressionOR = 1.49 (95%CI: 1.05-2.12)P = 0.027Fervaha et al[48]
Poor performance status (ECOG > 1)DepressionOR = 5.01 (95%CI: 3.49-7.20)P < 0.0001Fervaha et al[48]
Cancer-related/treatment-related fatiguePsychological burden, Reduced quality of lifeFatigue prevalence: 42% with ADT, 21% after radical prostatectomy, 40% after radiotherapyReported with 95%CIsLuo et al[50]


Write to the Help Desk