BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2026; 16(10): 121582
Published online Oct 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.121582
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants, mean ± SD/n (%)
Variable
Observation group (n = 60)
Control group (n = 60)
P value
Male32 (53.33)33 (55.00)0.857
Age (years)8.62 ± 1.358.58 ± 1.410.872
Disease duration (weeks)4.31 ± 1.244.27 ± 1.290.859
Pre-intervention pVHI score62.35 ± 8.4261.98 ± 8.530.813
Table 2 Comparison of pediatric voice handicap index scores and vocal fatigue visual analogue scale scores of two groups of children before and after intervention (points), mean ± SD
Group
Time node
pVHI score (points)
Vocal fatigue VAS score (points)
Observation group (n = 60) Before intervention62.35 ± 8.427.21 ± 1.35
After intervention28.46 ± 6.15a, b2.35 ± 0.82a, b
Control group (n = 60) Before intervention61.98 ± 8.537.18 ± 1.42
After intervention42.63 ± 7.28a4.52 ± 1.05a
Table 3 Comparison of vocal cord vibration symmetry and mucosal wave integrity scores between the two groups of children before and after intervention (points), mean ± SD
Group
Time node
Vocal fold vibration symmetry score (points)
Mucosal wave integrity score (points)
Observation group (n = 60) Before intervention1.23 ± 0.351.18 ± 0.32
After intervention2.76 ± 0.42a, b2.81 ± 0.38a, b
Control group (n = 60) Before intervention1.21 ± 0.381.15 ± 0.34
After intervention2.15 ± 0.45a2.08 ± 0.41a
Table 4 Comparison of Scale for Children’s Anxiety Disorders scores between the two groups of children before and after intervention (points), mean ± SD
Group
Time node
Vocal fold vibration symmetry score (points)
Mucosal wave integrity score (points)
Observation group (n = 60) Before intervention1.23 ± 0.351.18 ± 0.32
After intervention2.76 ± 0.42a, b2.81 ± 0.38a, b
Control group (n = 60) Before intervention1.21 ± 0.381.15 ± 0.34
After intervention2.15 ± 0.45a2.08 ± 0.41a


Write to the Help Desk