Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2026; 16(10): 120085
Published online Oct 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.120085
Published online Oct 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.120085
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the study participants, mean ± SD/n (%)
| Groups | Age | BMI (kg/m2) | HAMD-17 | Course of the disease (months) | History of substance abuse, yes/no | Years of education, high school/≥ high school |
| Control group (n = 30) | 39.30 ± 10.90 | 22.08 ± 2.78 | 3.03 ± 1.67 | - | 5 (16.67)/25 (83.33) | 17 (56.67)/13 (43.33) |
| Depression group (n = 90) | 38.07 ± 9.83 | 21.19 ± 2.85 | 27.00 ± 4.85 | 19.01 ± 8.44 | 25 (27.78)/65 (72.22) | 61 (67.78)/29 (32.22) |
| t | 0.579 | 1.479 | 26.504 | - | 1.481 | 1.221 |
| P value | 0.564 | 0.142 | < 0.001 | - | 0.224 | 0.269 |
Table 2 Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between male and female patients with depression, mean ± SD/n (%)
| Subgroup | Age | BMI (kg/m2) | HAMD-17 | Course of the disease (months) | History of substance abuse, yes/no | Years of education, high school/≥ high school |
| Men (n = 45) | 37.22 ± 9.31 | 21.94 ± 2.95 | 25.89 ± 4.51 | 19.71 ± 8.69 | 17 (37.78)/28 (62.22) | 32 (71.11)/13 (28.89) |
| Women (n = 45) | 38.91 ± 10.36 | 20.44 ± 2.57 | 28.11 ± 4.96 | 18.31 ± 8.22 | 8 (17.78)/37 (82.22) | 29 (64.44)/16 (35.56) |
| t | 0.813 | 2.564 | 2.223 | 0.785 | 4.486 | 0.458 |
| P value | 0.418 | 0.012 | 0.029 | 0.435 | 0.034 | 0.499 |
Table 3 Comparison of global network topology properties, mean ± SD
| Groups | GE | LE | CC | σ |
| Control group (n = 30) | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 2.08 ± 0.12 |
| Depression group (n = 90) | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.35 ± 0.05 | 1.86 ± 0.16 |
| t | 7.078 | 4.712 | 3.493 | 7.006 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Differences in global network topology properties between male and female patients with depression, mean ± SD
| Subgroup | GE | LE | CC | σ |
| Men (n = 45) | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 1.78 ± 0.10 |
| Women (n = 45) | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 1.94 ± 0.16 |
| t | 3.448 | 1.624 | 1.046 | 5.374 |
| P value | < 0.001 | 0.108 | 0.299 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of network modularity characteristics, mean ± SD
| Groups | N_mod | CV_size | W_in | W_out |
| Control group (n = 30) | 5.86 ± 0.83 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.03 |
| Depression group (n = 90) | 5.18 ± 1.23 | 0.45 ± 0.10 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 0.12 ± 0.03 |
| t | 2.816 | 6.860 | 7.115 | 8.576 |
| P value | 0.006 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Differences in network modularity characteristics between male and female patients with depression, mean ± SD
| Subgroup | N_mod | CV_size | W_in | W_out |
| Men (n = 45) | 5.23 ± 1.31 | 0.45 ± 0.10 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.02 |
| Women (n = 45) | 5.13 ± 1.15 | 0.44 ± 0.10 | 0.25 ± 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
| t | 0.417 | 0.718 | 5.314 | 7.095 |
| P value | 0.678 | 0.475 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 7 Comparison of dynamic functional connectivity variability, mean ± SD
| Groups | dFCV | State transition frequency (times/minute) | State residence time (second) |
| Control group (n = 30) | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 2.40 ± 0.67 | 34.87 ± 7.67 |
| Depression group (n = 90) | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 1.96 ± 0.39 | 25.06 ± 6.11 |
| t | 5.014 | 4.405 | 7.128 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 8 Differences in dynamic functional connectivity variability between male and female patients with depression, mean ± SD
| Subgroup | dFCV | State transition frequency (times/minute) | State residence time (second) |
| Men (n = 45) | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 2.11 ± 0.32 | 24.76 ± 6.41 |
| Women (n = 45) | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 1.80 ± 0.40 | 25.36 ± 5.86 |
| t | 7.692 | 4.057 | 0.464 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.644 |
Table 9 Comparison of key network dynamic connectivity, mean ± SD
| Groups | DMN internal connectivity | SN-limbic system connectivity | ECN hub nodes |
| Control group (n = 30) | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.42 ± 0.06 |
| Depression group (n = 90) | 0.35 ± 0.07 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 0.62 ± 0.06 |
| t | 9.319 | 10.431 | 15.213 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 10 Differences in key network dynamic connectivity between male and female patients with depression, mean ± SD
| Subgroup | DMN internal connectivity | SN-limbic system connectivity | ECN hub nodes |
| Men (n = 45) | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.61 ± 0.06 |
| Women (n = 45) | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.63 ± 0.07 |
| t | 7.200 | 5.198 | 1.701 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.093 |
Table 11 Influencing factors of dynamic brain network indicators
| Factors | Non-standardized coefficient | Standardized coefficient | t | P value | Collinearity statistic | ||
| B | SE | β | Tolerance | VIF | |||
| HAMD-17 | 0.017 | 0.002 | 0.438 | 9.117 | < 0.001 | 0.221 | 4.528 |
| GE | -0.472 | 0.216 | -0.06 | -2.185 | 0.031 | 0.677 | 1.477 |
| LE | -0.053 | 0.231 | -0.006 | -0.23 | 0.818 | 0.712 | 1.405 |
| CC | -0.252 | 0.222 | -0.028 | -1.133 | 0.260 | 0.817 | 1.224 |
| σ | -0.284 | 0.074 | -0.115 | -3.832 | < 0.001 | 0.571 | 1.752 |
| N_mod | -0.007 | 0.009 | -0.019 | -0.801 | 0.425 | 0.864 | 1.157 |
| CV_size | 0.258 | 0.114 | 0.064 | 2.256 | 0.026 | 0.640 | 1.562 |
| W_in | -0.477 | 0.196 | -0.072 | -2.432 | 0.017 | 0.588 | 1.701 |
| W_out | -1.298 | 0.354 | -0.116 | -3.664 | < 0.001 | 0.506 | 1.978 |
| dFCV | 0.308 | 0.239 | 0.036 | 1.288 | 0.201 | 0.65 | 1.538 |
| State transition frequency | -0.064 | 0.022 | -0.076 | -2.949 | 0.004 | 0.766 | 1.306 |
| State residence time | -0.001 | 0.002 | -0.013 | -0.457 | 0.648 | 0.624 | 1.603 |
| DMN internal connectivity | -0.309 | 0.166 | -0.063 | -1.861 | 0.066 | 0.452 | 2.214 |
| SN-limbic system connectivity | -0.514 | 0.177 | -0.1 | -2.905 | 0.004 | 0.428 | 2.335 |
| ECN hub nodes | 0.611 | 0.156 | 0.152 | 3.925 | < 0.001 | 0.338 | 2.958 |
- Citation: Wang JX, Zhang HS, Liu M, Zhao J, Wang YF, Shen LJ, Zhang M. Observations on dynamic brain network properties of emotional information processing in patients with depression and sex differences. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(10): 120085
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i10/120085.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.120085