Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Aug 19, 2025; 15(8): 107860
Published online Aug 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107860
Published online Aug 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107860
Table 1 Comparison of general demographic information between groups
| mean ± SD | OCD (n = 33) | HC (n = 26) | t/χ2 | P value |
| Sex (male) | 16 | 11 | 0.15 | 0.78 |
| Age | 32.24 ± 7.38 | 28.23 ± 7.36 | 1.98 | 0.06 |
| Education | 15.18 ± 2.07 | 15.45 ± 1.76 | -0.93 | 0.61 |
| Age at onset | 24.56 ± 9.15 | / | / | / |
| Duration (months) | 84.12 ± 79.15 | / | / | / |
| Y-BOCS total | 25.81 ± 4.78 | / | / | / |
| Y-BOCS obsession | 13.03 ± 2.91 | / | / | / |
| Y-BOCS compulsion | 12.88 ± 3.48 | / | / | / |
| HAMD | 12.94 ± 5.80 | 1.09 ± 1.44 | 11.06 | 0.000b |
| HAMA | 9.42 ± 3.80 | 0.77 ± 1.11 | 11.34 | 0.000b |
Table 2 Seed points of the default mode, dorsal attention, frontoparietal, and salience networks
| Abbreviation | X (L/R) | Y (L/R) | Z (L/R) | |
| DMN | ||||
| Dorsal medial prefrontal cortex | dmPFC | -8 | 50 | 34 |
| Ventral medial prefrontal cortex | vmPFC | -2 | 44 | -12 |
| Posterior cingulate cortex | PCC | -2 | -48 | 28 |
| Precuneus | Pcu | -2 | -60 | 50 |
| Superior frontal gyrus | SFG | -8/12 | 20/18 | 62/62 |
| Inferior frontal gyrus | IFG | -42/50 | 26/30 | -14/-6 |
| DAN | ||||
| Frontal eye fields | FEF | -24/24 | 2/-2 | 62/56 |
| Superior occipital gyrus | SOG | -18/26 | -66/-64 | 50/54 |
| FPN | ||||
| Anterior inferior parietal lobule | aIPL | -54/50 | -48/-44 | 48/46 |
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | DLPFC | -38/44 | 32/42 | 30/26 |
| SAN | ||||
| Anterior insula | aINS | -30/32 | 20/20 | -2/-4 |
| Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex | dACC | 6 | 30 | 40 |
Table 3 Comparison of demographic information before and after group cognitive-behavioral therapy treatment
| Before (n = 33) | After (n = 21) | t | P value | |
| Sex (male) | 16 | 11 | / | / |
| Age | 32.24 ± 7.38 | 32.50 ± 7.22 | -0.315 | 0.75 |
| Education | 15.18 ± 2.07 | 16.04 ± 1.85 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Age at onset | 24.56 ± 9.15 | 24.32 ± 9.07 | -0.37 | 0.72 |
| Y-BOCS total | 25.81 ± 4.78 | 16.41 ± 6.70 | 6.65 | 0.000b |
| Y-BOCS obsession | 13.03 ± 2.91 | 8.59 ± 3.11 | 5.40 | 0.000b |
| Y-BOCS compulsion | 12.88 ± 3.48 | 7.82 ± 4.47 | 5.37 | 0.000b |
| HAMD | 12.94 ± 5.80 | 6.83 ± 4.50 | 2.91 | 0.005a |
| HAMA | 9.42 ± 3.80 | 5.11 ± 3.25 | 3.41 | 0.001a |
Table 4 Comparison of neuropsychological assessment results between groups
| OCD (n = 33) | HC (n = 26) | t | P value | ||
| MoCA-B | MoCA-B | 27.79 ± 1.59 | 29.00 ± 0.87 | -3.25 | 0.002a |
| Visuospatial ability | Rey-O emulation time (second) | 160 ± 80.67 | 128.63 ± 48.44 | 1.67 | 0.100 |
| Rey-O recall time (second) | 79.57 ± 40.10 | 87.63 ± 25.01 | -0.84 | 0.404 | |
| Rey-O recall score | 15.26 ± 7.97 | 21.27 ± 6.18 | -2.99 | 0.004a | |
| Rey-O recall organization score | 4.53 ± 1.77 | 5.41 ± 1.10 | -2.27 | 0.027a | |
| Memory | AVLT-N1 | 4.12 ± 1.60 | 4.36 ± 1.22 | -0.60 | 0.548 |
| AVLT-N2 | 5.94 ± 2.01 | 7.18 ± 1.26 | -2.81 | 0.007a | |
| AVLT-N3 | 7.00 ± 2.19 | 8.55 ± 1.99 | -2.65 | 0.011a | |
| AVLT-N4 short-delayed recall | 5.73 ± 2.18 | 7.36 ± 2.01 | -2.81 | 0.007a | |
| AVLT-N5 long-delayed recall | 5.30 ± 2.42 | 7.05 ± 2.06 | -2.77 | 0.008a | |
| AVLT-N6 | 5.45 ± 2.47 | 7.36 ± 1.89 | -3.07 | 0.008a | |
| AVLT-reaccreditation | 9.82 ± 2.11 | 10.91 ± 1.07 | -2.52 | 0.015a | |
| Attention | SDMT-correct count | 53.03 ± 12.47 | 61.18 ± 7.71 | -2.99 | 0.004a |
| SDMT-error count | 0.30 ± 0.63 | 0.72 ± 1.24 | -1.47 | 0.150 | |
| PASAT-correct count | 32.79 ± 4.13 | 35.77 ± 2.93 | -2.93 | 0.005a | |
| DST-recite along | 9.61 ± 1.32 | 9.59 ± 1.01 | 0.05 | 0.964 | |
| DST-recite backwards | 5.94 ± 1.69 | 7.05 ± 1.79 | -2.32 | 0.024a | |
| DST total score | 15.54 ± 2.67 | 16.64 ± 2.42 | -1.54 | 0.129 | |
| Executive function | SCWT-A (second) | 21.27 ± 4.83 | 19.96 ± 3.43 | 1.18 | 0.24 |
| SCWT-B (second) | 34.27 ± 10.86 | 28.32 ± 3.75 | 2.90 | 0.006a | |
| SCWT-C (second) | 63.76 ± 22.39 | 56.45 ± 9.93 | 1.44 | 0.157 | |
| SCWT-C error count | 0.46 ± 1.30 | 0.73 ± 2.33 | -0.56 | 0.581 | |
| STT-A practice (second) | 7.33 ± 3.27 | 7.09 ± 3.54 | 0.26 | 0.791 | |
| STT-A test (second) | 39.30 ± 12.59 | 32.18 ± 8.80 | 2.30 | 0.025a | |
| STT-B practice (second) | 13.18 ± 5.04 | 10.59 ± 1.99 | 2.67 | 0.011a | |
| STT-B test (second) | 85.21 ± 22.79 | 70.96 ± 13.62 | 2.90 | 0.005a | |
| CCST spontaneous classification | 4.36 ± 1.24 | 6.22 ± 1.02 | -5.83 | 0.000b | |
| CCST classification of leads | 8.79 ± 1.53 | 7.86 ± 1.81 | 1.97 | 0.056 | |
| CCST total classification | 13.15 ± 2.09 | 14.09 ± 2.07 | -1.63 | 0.107 | |
| Tower of Hanoi: Three discs moving steps | 12.31 ± 4.46 | 8.82 ± 2.38 | 3.72 | 0.001a | |
| Time (second) | 40.50 ± 20.35 | 23.36 ± 17.39 | 3.22 | 0.002a | |
| Tower of Hanoi: Four discs moving steps | 23.97 ± 5.99 | 22.09 ± 6.93 | 1.06 | 0.293 | |
| Time (second) | 82.03 ± 33.93 | 62.04 ± 32.24 | 2.17 | 0.035a | |
| Tower of Hanoi: Five discs moving steps | 52.42 ± 9.67 | 42.23 ± 6.29 | 4.32 | 0.000b | |
| Time (second) | 171.16 ± 58.92 | 111.91 ± 29.40 | 4.81 | 0.000b | |
| Speech | Surname and city alternate correct number | 26.81 ± 5.85 | 34.18 ± 5.79 | -4.56 | 0.000b |
| Surname correct number | 13.22 ± 3.47 | 17.77 ± 4.43 | -4.23 | 0.000b | |
| City correct number | 13.59 ± 3.91 | 16.41 ± 4.46 | -2.46 | 0.017a | |
| Number of errors | 1.22 ± 2.15 | 0.91 ± 1.63 | 0.57 | 0.570 | |
| Repetition number | 2.91 ± 4.60 | 1.36 ± 2.17 | 1.65 | 0.106 | |
| Animal and fruit alternate correct number | 15.97 ± 3.40 | 18.14 ± 3.06 | -2.41 | 0.020a | |
| Number of errors | 0.21 ± 0.48 | 0.55 ± 0.91 | -1.57 | 0.127 | |
| Repetition number | 0.09 ± 0.29 | 0.41 ± 1.10 | -1.32 | 0.197 | |
Table 5 Changes in neuropsychological assessments before and after treatment
| Cognitive function | Test | Before GCBT | After GCBT | t | P value |
| Visuospatial ability | Rey-O emulation time (second) | 160.73 ± 80.67 | 87.56 ± 21.48 | 2.67 | 0.000b |
| Rey-O recall score | 15.26 ± 7.97 | 21.00 ± 5.45 | -2.03 | 0.049 | |
| Memory | ALVT-N1 | 4.12 ± 1.60 | 6.11 ± 1.62 | -3.31 | 0.002 |
| ALVT-N2 | 5.94 ± 2.01 | 7.56 ± 1.94 | -2.15 | 0.038 | |
| ALVT-N3 | 7.00 ± 2.19 | 9.22 ± 1.64 | -2.82 | 0.007 | |
| ALVT-N4 | 5.73 ± 2.18 | 8.56 ± 1.67 | -3.60 | 0.001 | |
| ALVT-N5 | 5.30 ± 2.42 | 8.11 ± 1.69 | -3.26 | 0.002 | |
| ALVT-N6 | 5.45 ± 2.48 | 8.33 ± 1.73 | -3.26 | 0.002 | |
| Attention | SDMT correct number | 53.03 ± 12.47 | 63.33 ± 12.07 | -2.21 | 0.033 |
| Executive function | STT-A time (second) | 39.30 ± 12.59 | 29.89 ± 10.00 | 2.07 | 0.045 |
| CCST total score | 13.15 ± 2.09 | 15.22 ± 1.30 | -2.81 | 0.008 | |
| Time taken to move four discs (second) | 82.03 ± 33.93 | 33.44 ± 11.29 | 6.86 | 0.000b |
Table 6 Comparison of default mode network, dorsal attention network, frontoparietal network, and salience network intra- and inter-network functional connectivity before and after group cognitive-behavioral therapy
| Before-GCBT | After-GCBT | t | P value | |
| Intra-network | ||||
| DMN | ||||
| dmPFC-vmPFC | 0.38 ± 0.24 | 0.22 ± 0.23 | 2.37 | 0.022 |
| vmPFC-LSFG | 0.22 ± 0.20 | 0.09 ± 0.20 | 2.18 | 0.035 |
| vmPFC-LIFG | 0.33 ± 0.24 | 0.13 ± 0.26 | 2.68 | 0.010 |
| Pcu-RIFG | 0.23 ± 0.22 | 0.06 ± 0.20 | 2.70 | 0.010 |
| LIFG-RIFG | 0.62 ± 0.25 | 0.43 ± 0.18 | 3.00 | 0.004 |
| DAN | ||||
| LFEF-LSOG | 0.50 ± 0.28 | 0.35 ± 0.24 | 2.04 | 0.047 |
| LFEF-RSOG | 0.37 ± 0.26 | 0.15 ± 0.25 | 3.01 | 0.003a |
| Inter-network | ||||
| DMN-DAN | ||||
| vmPFC-RFEF | 0.13 ± 0.22 | -0.04 ± 0.16 | 2.99 | 0.004a |
| vmPFC-RSOG | 0.16 ± 0.22 | 0.04 ± 0.15 | 2.17 | 0.035 |
| RIFG-LFEF | 0.20 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.24 | 2.03 | 0.048 |
| RIFG-RFEF | 0.25 ± 0.27 | 0.10 ± 0.19 | 2.17 | 0.035 |
| RIFG-RSOG | 0.22 ± 0.21 | 0.08 ± 0.21 | 2.26 | 0.028 |
| DMN-FPN | ||||
| LSFG-LDLPFC | 0.03 ± 0.24 | -0.13 ± 0.23 | 2.26 | 0.029 |
| RIFG-RaIPL | 0.20 ± 0.26 | -0.01 ± 0.26 | 2.62 | 0.012 |
| RIFG-LDLPFC | 0.24 ± 0.28 | -0.00 ± 0.26 | 3.02 | 0.004 |
| RIFG-RDLPFC | 0.04 ± 0.21 | -0.19 ± 0.21 | 3.85 | 0.000b |
| RIFG-RDLPFC | 0.04 ± 0.21 | -0.19 ± 0.21 | 3.85 | 0.000b |
| DMN-SAN | ||||
| LSFG-dACC | 0.20 ± 0.25 | 0.03 ± 0.21 | 2.47 | 0.017 |
| LIFG-LaINS | 0.24 ± 0.24 | 0.11 ± 0.19 | 2.11 | 0.040 |
| RIFG-LaINS | 0.07 ± 0.17 | 0.34 ± 0.28 | 5.13 | 0.000b |
| RIFG-RaINS | 0.34 ± 0.28 | 0.09 ± 0.19 | 3.53 | 0.001a |
| RIFG-dACC | 0.34 ± 0.29 | 0.09 ± 0.26 | 3.13 | 0.003a |
| DAN-SAN | ||||
| RFEF-RaINS | 0.34 ± 0.20 | 0.20 ± 0.13 | 2.91 | 0.005a |
| LSOG-LaINS | 0.29 ± 0.23 | 0.12 ± 0.26 | 2.38 | 0.022 |
| LSOG-RaINS | 0.24 ± 0.20 | 0.11 ± 0.23 | 2.09 | 0.043 |
Table 7 Correlations between functional connectivity and neuropsychological assessments after group cognitive-behavioral therapy
| dmPFC-vmPFC | VmPFC-RSOG | LIFG-LaINS | RIFG-LDLPFC | vmPFC-LIFG | LFEF-LSOG | LSOG-LaINS | LIFG-RIFG | |||||||||
| DMN | DMN-DAN | DMN-SAN | DMN-FPN | DMN | DAN | DAN-SAN | DMN | |||||||||
| r | P value | r | P value | r | P value | r | P value | r | P value | r | P value | r | P value | r | P value | |
| Rey-O emulation time | -0.84 | 0.010 | -0.87 | 0.005a | ||||||||||||
| Rey-O recall score | -0.73 | 0.042a | -0.86 | 0.006a | ||||||||||||
| AVLT-N1 | -0.87 | 0.005a | ||||||||||||||
| AVLT-N4 | -0.79 | 0.019a | ||||||||||||||
| SDMT correct number | -0.76 | 0.028a | -0.77 | 0.025a | ||||||||||||
| STT-A test | 0.70 | 0.050 | 0.78 | 0.022a | 0.77 | 0.024a | ||||||||||
| CCST score | -0.80 | 0.016a | -0.76 | 0.024a | ||||||||||||
| Tower of Hanoi: Three discs moving steps | -0.73 | 0.040a | -0.89 | 0.003a | 0.74 | 0.036a | ||||||||||
| Time taken to move the three discs (second) | 0.86 | 0.006a | ||||||||||||||
| Tower of Hanoi: Four discs moving steps | 0.77 | 0.024a | ||||||||||||||
| Time taken to move the four discs (second) | 0.85 | 0.007a | ||||||||||||||
- Citation: Zhang ZF, He Y, Su YQ, Liu JM. Decreased inter- and intra-network connectivity after group cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with unmedicated obsessive-compulsive disorder. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(8): 107860
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i8/107860.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107860
