Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Jul 19, 2025; 15(7): 107416
Published online Jul 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i7.107416
Table 1 Participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics (n = 615)
Characteristics
Variable
Frequency
Percent (%)
GenderMale81.3
Female60798.7
Age20-3017127.8
31-4038161.9
≥ 416310.3
Educational levelJunior college and below8714.2
Bachelor’s degree50381.8
Master’s degree and above254.0
Hospital levelTertiary hospitals48679.1
Secondary hospitals8413.6
Primary hospitals457.3
Years of working experience in oncology care≤ 1 year6210.1
2-5 years22035.8
5-10 years24039.1
≥ 10 years9315.0
ReligionNo57693.7
Yes396.3
Bereavement experienceNo34455.9
Yes27144.1
Table 2 Correlations among death anxiety, death attitude, resilience and coping with death competence
Outcome variables
Mean
SD
1
2
3
4
Death anxiety7.11.91.00
Death attitude89.510.6-0.710a1.00
Resilience78.815.7-0.651a0.671a1.00
Coping with death competence134.326.2-0.721a0.532a0.611a1.00
Table 3 Regression results in the chain mediation analysis
Criterion
Predictors
R
R2
F
coefficients
β
t
95%CI
Death attitudeDeath anxiety0.8280.68568.608-0.265-0.243-6.254-0.285 to 0.332
ResilienceDeath anxiety0.7830.61378.568-0.154-0.467-8.863-0.243 to 0.144
Death attitude0.4230.4908.2470.322 to 0.723
Coping with death competenceDeath anxiety0.8920.796135.439-0.041-0.296-7.353-0.055 to 0.054
Death attitude0.1780.3578.374-0.076 to 0.297
Resilience0.1540.3989.264-0.143 to 0.255
Table 4 Test results of bootstrap mediation effect
Effect relationship
Effect size
Effect ratio
Boot LLCI
Boot ULCI
Total effect0.4980.3950.614
Direct effect0.20141.560.1120.322
Total indirect effect0.29758.440.1650.392
Death anxiety to death attitude to coping with death competence0.11823.810.0560.163
Death anxiety to resilience to coping with death competence0.10821.250.0320.176
Death anxiety to death attitude to resilience to coping with death competence0.07113.380.0420.123