Effect of extended nursing based on self-efficacy theory on the anxiety of patients with intertrochanteric fracture

Table 1 Comparison of general data

General data	Observation group (n = 44)	Control group (n = 44)	t/χ2	P value
Mean age (years)	68.80 ± 4.11	68.70 ± 5.00	0.102	0.919
Sex			0.185	0.667
Male	24	26
Female	20	18
Injury type			0.229	0.892
Traffic injury	16	15
High falling injury	17	16
Impact injury	11	13
Mean body mass index (kg/m2)	23.44 ± 3.14	23.22 ± 3.28	0.321	0.749
Education			0.792	0.673
Middle school and below	11	13
High school	15	17
Junior college and above	18	14

Table 2 Mental state score (mean ± SD, points)

Group	HAMA		t	P value	GSES		t	P value
	Pre-nursing	Post-nursing			Pre-nursing	Post-nursing
Observation group (n = 44)	36.44 ± 3.42	20.53 ± 1.84	27.175	0.000	28.75 ± 4.12	36.58 ± 6.22	6.209	0.000
Control group (n = 44)	36.39 ± 3.30	21.61 ± 2.13	24.961	0.000	28.75 ± 4.22	31.25 ± 4.78	2.148	0.036
t	0.070	2.545			0.000	3.823
P value	0.945	0.013			1.000	0.000

HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety Scale; GSES: General Self-Efficacy Scale.

Table 3 Pain scores (mean ± SD, points)

Group	Pain		t	P value
	Pre-nursing	Post-nursing
Observation group (n = 44)	6.33 ± 0.62	2.64 ± 0.22	37.306	0.000
Control group (n = 44)	6.39 ± 0.71	2.85 ± 0.41	28.640	0.000
t	0.422	3.136
P value	0.674	0.002

Table 4 Degree of functional recovery of limbs, n (%)

Degree of functional recovery of limbs	Observation group (n = 44)	Control group (n = 44)	χ2	P value
Excellent	24 (54.55)	16 (36.36)
Good	11 (25.00)	10 (22.72)
Average	8 (18.18)	8 (18.18)
Poor	1 (2.27)	9 (20.45)
Recovery rate			4.328	0.038

Table 5 Self-nursing ability score (mean ± SD, points)

Group	Self-nursing ability score		t	P value
	Pre-nursing	Post-nursing
Observation group (n = 44)	40.33 ± 5.62	74.63 ± 5.22	29.663	0.000
Control group (n = 44)	40.39 ± 5.71	70.67 ± 6.33	23.561	0.000
t	0.050	3.202
P value	0.960	0.002