Shugan Jieyu capsule effects on peripheral blood micro-124, micro-132, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with mild to moderate depression

doi:10.5498/wjp.v14.i9.1354

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 9

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (1164)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-8) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

642

Figures (1-1)

Tables (1-8)

Sum=836

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

152

Sum=215

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=85

Sep 19, 2024 (publication date) through Nov 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Psychiatry

ISSN

2220-3206

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2024; 14(9): 1354-1363
Published online Sep 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i9.1354

Table 1 Primer sequences for miR-124, miR-132, and U6

Gene	PCR primer sequences
miR-124	Forward: 5’-GCGGTGAATGCCAAAAA-3’
miR-124	Reverse: 5’-CGCAAGGATGACACGCAAATTCGT-3’
miR-132	Forward: 5’-ACCGTGGCTTTCGATTGTTA-3’
miR-132	Reverse: 5’-GGCGACCATGGCTGTAGACT-3’
U6	Forward: 5’-TTGTGGAAAGGACGAAACAC-3
U6	Reverse: 5'-GGCCATGCTAATCTTCTG- 3'

PCR: Polymerase chain reaction.

Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups

Characteristic	Experimental group (n = 30)	Control group (n = 30)	P value
Age (year)	60.07 ± 4.89	61.79 ± 4.53	0.232
BMI (kg/m²)	23.92 ± 2.14	24.08 ± 2.67	0.768
Males (%)	46.7	56.7	0.436
< 2 stents (%)	63.3	53.3	0.432
≥ 2 stents (%)	36.7	46.7	0.432

BMI: Body mass index.

Table 3 Comparison of depression treatment effectiveness

Group	Experimental	Control	χ²	P value
Number of cases	30	30
Clinical control, n (%)	9 (30.00)	6 (20.00)
Significant effect, n (%)	11 (36.67)	14 (46.67)
Effective, n (%)	8 (26.67)	7 (23.33)
Ineffective, n (%)	2 (6.67)	3 (10.00)
Total, effectiveness rate n (%)	28 (93.33)	27 (90.00)	0.218	0.640

Table 4 Paired t-test analysis of 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score

Characteristic	Experimental group (n = 30)	Control group (n = 30)	P value
Age (year)	60.07 ± 4.89	61.79 ± 4.53	0.232
BMI (kg/m²)	23.92 ± 2.14	24.08 ± 2.67	0.768
Males (%)	46.7	56.7	0.436
< 2 stents (%)	63.3	53.3	0.432
≥ 2 stents (%)	36.7	46.7	0.432

BMI: Body mass index.

Table 5 Comparison of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores in depression (mean ± SD, points)

Group	Number of cases	Main symptoms		Secondary symptoms
Group	Number of cases	Before treatment	After treatment	Before treatment	After treatment
Experimental	30	9.51 ± 2.09	3.12 ± 0.93^a	7.06 ± 1.27	2.84 ± 0.64^a
Control	30	9.32 ± 2.01	4.63 ± 1.09^a	7.14 ± 1.35	3.49 ± 0.72^a
t		0.359	5.772	0.236	3.696
P value		0.721	< 0.001	0.814	0.001

^aP < 0.05, in comparison to before treatment.

Table 6 Comparison of biochemical indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD, n = 30)

Group	Experimental	Control	t	P value
LDL-C (mmol/L)
Before treatment	3.21 ± 0.87	3.35 ± 0.68	0.694	0.490
After treatment	1.61 ± 0.66^a	1.97 ± 0.63^a	2.161	0.035
hs-CRP (mg/L)
Before treatment	8.47 ± 1.23	8.89 ± 1.56	1.157	0.252
After treatment	5.67 ± 0.59^a	6.25 ± 0.67^a	3.558	0.001
BDNF (ng/mL)
Before treatment	4.29 ± 0.97	4.58 ± 0.88	1.213	0.230
After treatment	13.71 ± 3.16^a	10.43 ± 3.93^a	3.563	0.001
miR-124
Before treatment	0.89 ± 0.25	0.93 ± 0.26	0.607	0.546
After treatment	1.22 ± 0.30^a	1.01 ± 0.27^a	2.850	0.006
miR-132
Before treatment	3.39 ± 0.78	3.22 ± 0.74	0.866	0.390
After treatment	1.41 ± 0.36^a	1.73 ± 0.49^a	2.883	0.006

^aP < 0.05, compared to before treatment within the same group.

LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hs-CRP: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein; BDNF: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

Table 7 Comparison of lymphocyte subgroup indicators between the two groups (mean ± SD, n = 30)

Group	Experimental	Control	t	P value
CD3+T cells
Before treatment	53.45 ± 4.56	52.13 ± 5.11	0.924	0.568
After treatment	69.89 ± 5.03^a^,^b	58.32 ± 5.25^a	4.857	0.012
CD3+CD4+Th cells
Before treatment	29.23 ± 3.28	28.65 ± 3.42	0.874	0.646
After treatment	40.05 ± 3.96^a^,^b	32.35 ± 4.17^a	5.231	0.009
CD3+CD8+CTL cells
Before treatment	25.34 ± 2.92	26.76 ± 2.87	0.922	0.0324
After treatment	20.19 ± 3.18	24.24 ± 3.62	0.845	0.425
CD3-CD19+B cells
Before treatment	14.85 ± 2.33	12.56 ± 2.12	0.984	0.266
After treatment	10.63 ± 2.96	15.32 ± 3.33	1.011	0.123
CD3-CD56+16+NK cells
Before treatment	11.45 ± 2.91	12.77 ± 3.04	0.651	0.758
After treatment	15.66 ± 3.05^a	13.46 ± 3.12	3.864	0.011

^aP < 0.05, compared to before treatment within the same group.

^bP < 0.05, compared to the control group.

Th: T helper; NK: Natural killer.

Table 8 Comparison of the incidence rates of adverse reactions in two groups (cases)

Group	Experimental	Control	Fisher P value
Number of cases	30	30
Abdominal pain, n (%)	0 (0.00)	2 (6.67)
Nausea, n (%)	0 (0.00)	2 (6.67)
Vomiting, n (%)	0 (0.00)	1 (3.33)
Total incidence, n (%)	0 (0.00)	5 (16.67)	0.020

Citation: Zhang X, Liu Y, Tang HF, Jiang F, Chen CL, Wang TT, Gu HZ, Zhao Q, Ma R. Shugan Jieyu capsule effects on peripheral blood micro-124, micro-132, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with mild to moderate depression. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(9): 1354-1363
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v14/i9/1354.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i9.1354