Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Psychiatry. Jun 19, 2024; 14(6): 945-953
Published online Jun 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.945
Published online Jun 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.945
Table 1 Comparing basic information of two groups
Factor | Observation (n = 40) | Control (n = 40) | χ2 | P value |
Age (year) | 0.503 | 0.478 | ||
≤ 35 | 25 | 28 | ||
> 35 | 15 | 12 | ||
Number of births | 0.808 | 0.369 | ||
Primigravida | 24 | 20 | ||
Menstruation | 16 | 20 | ||
Education | 0.774 | 0.679 | ||
Junior high and below | 10 | 8 | ||
High school | 23 | 22 | ||
College and above | 7 | 10 | ||
Fetal gender | 0.201 | 0.654 | ||
Male | 22 | 20 | ||
Female | 18 | 20 | ||
Profession | 0.863 | 0.650 | ||
Fixed profession | 12 | 15 | ||
Freelance | 18 | 18 | ||
Unemployed | 10 | 7 | ||
Weeks of pregnancy | 39.92 ± 1.02 | 40.01 ± 1.05 | 0.151 | 0.698 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.04 ± 1.84 | 22.96 ± 1.94 | 0.036 | 0.850 |
Table 2 Comparison of depression scores between the two groups (score, mean ± SD)
Group | EPDS | HAMD | ||
Before | After | Before | After | |
Observation (n = 40) | 17.13 ± 2.18 | 8.14 ± 1.67 | 21.15 ± 4.28 | 11.48 ± 2.48 |
Control (n = 40) | 16.92 ± 2.25 | 11.08 ± 1.95 | 20.96 ± 4.35 | 15.83 ± 3.16 |
t value | 0.348 | 5.950 | 0.162 | 5.627 |
P value | 0.729 | < 0.001 | 0.872 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of mindfulness scores between groups (score, mean ± SD)
Group | Nervousness-anxiety | Depression-frustration | Anger-hostility | Tiredness-slowness | Bewilderment-confusion | Energy-vigor | ||||||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
Observation (n = 40) | 21.04 ± 3.89 | 8.14 ± 1.8a | 40.25 ± 4.84 | 13.52 ± 2.4a | 19.02 ± 2.87 | 6.15 ± 1.5a | 15.05 ± 2.08 | 5.24 ± 1.28a | 16.38 ± 2.15 | 6.89 ± 1.3a | 9.08 ± 3.14 | 17.52 ± 1.6a |
Control (n = 40) | 20.96 ± 3.94 | 11.69 ± 1.9a | 39.81 ± 4.96 | 16.98 ± 2.5a | 18.73 ± 3.01 | 8.98 ± 1.6a | 14.92 ± 2.12 | 7.18 ± 1.35a | 16.10 ± 2.25 | 8.52 ± 1.4a | 8.89 ± 3.20 | 13.24 ± 1.8a |
t value | 0.091 | 8.417 | 0.402 | 6.127 | 0.441 | 7.926 | 0.277 | 6.595 | 0.569 | 5.144 | 0.268 | 4.382 |
P value | 0.927 | < 0.001 | 0.689 | < 0.001 | 0.660 | < 0.001 | 0.783 | < 0.001 | 0.571 | < 0.001 | 0.789 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of coping with illness between groups (score, mean ± SD)
Group | Face-to-face | Circumvent | Surrender | |||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
Observation (n = 40) | 15.95 ± 3.18 | 26.48 ± 3.35a | 19.12 ± 2.48 | 12.08 ± 2.50a | 12.04 ± 2.68 | 8.14 ± 1.15a |
Control (n = 40) | 16.20 ± 3.25 | 21.73 ± 3.20a | 18.92 ± 2.51 | 15.75 ± 2.69a | 11.92 ± 2.75 | 9.95 ± 1.20a |
t value | 0.348 | 6.485 | 0.358 | 6.321 | 0.198 | 6.887 |
P value | 0.729 | < 0.001 | 0.721 | < 0.001 | 0.844 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Yuan RF, Jiang MQ, Li J, Zhang JJ. Problem-solving model guided by stimulus-organism-response theory: State of mind and coping styles of depressed mothers after cesarean delivery. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(6): 945-953
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v14/i6/945.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.945