Yuan HX, Zhang LN, Li G, Qiao L. Brain protective effect of dexmedetomidine vs propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation in non-brain injured patients. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(3): 370-379 [PMID: 38617978 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i3.370]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Gang Li, BSc, Consultant, Intensive Care Unit, Peking University International Hospital, No. 1 Life Park Road, Zhongguancun Life Science Park, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China. ligang1@pkuih.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Anesthesiology
Article-Type of This Article
Case Control Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Psychiatry. Mar 19, 2024; 14(3): 370-379 Published online Mar 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i3.370
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of non-brain injured patients, n (%)
Dexmedetomidine (n = 52)
Propofol (n = 63)
P value
Age (yr), median (IQR)
61.0 (55.0-64.0)
61.0 (53.0-66.0)
0.663
Male
30 (57.7)
39 (61.9)
0.646
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)
21.8 (19.6-24.3)
21.1 (19.0-22.3)
0.191
SAPS II, median (IQR)
46.0 (38.0-54.0)
46.0 (36.0-53.0)
0.675
Main reason for ICU
Medical
37 (71.2)
44 (69.9)
0.983
Surgical
10 (19.2)
13 (20.6)
Trauma
5 (9.6)
6 (9.5)
Infection at ICU admission
24 (46.2)
30 (47.6)
0.875
SOFA score of organ > 2
Respiratory
30 (57.7)
35 (55.6)
0.818
Cardiovascular
26 (50.0)
27 (42.9)
0.444
Renal
8 (15.4)
10 (15.9)
0.943
Coagulation
4 (7.7)
6 (9.5)
0.729
Liver
1 (1.9)
1 (1.6)
0.891
Total SOFA score, median (IQR)
7.0 (4.0-9.0)
6.0 (3.0-9.0)
0.954
RASS score at enrollment, median (IQR)
-2 (-3 to -1)
-3 (-3 to -1)
0.247
Time from ICU admission to drug initiation (h), median (IQR)
32.0 (20.0-35.0)
31.0 (20.0-42.0)
0.798
Table 2 Dosage of study drugs during mechanical ventilation
Dexmedetomidine (n = 52)
Propofol (n = 63)
P value
Duration of study drug infusion (h), median (IQR)
52.0 (36.0-73.5)
53.0 (37.0-72.0)
0.958
Dose of study drug (μg or mg/kg/h), median (IQR)
0.58 (0.34-0.79)
0.82 (0.65-1.32)
-
Dose of remifentanil (μg/kg/h), median (IQR)
4.5 (4.0-5.0)
4.6 (4.0-5.0)
0.395
Receiving rescue sedation, n (%)
36.0 (69.2)
32.0 (50.8)
0.045
Table 3 Comparison of sedative effect between the two groups
Dexmedetomidine (n = 52)
Propofol (n = 63)
P value
Percentage of time within the target RASS (%), median (IQR)
85.6 (65.8-96.6)
86.7 (72.3-95.3)
0.592
Percentage of target RASS score (%), median (IQR)
72.2 (60.8-91.7)
73.3 (60.0-100.0)
0.880
Table 4 Comparison of S100-β serum levels between the two groups
Time
Dexmedetomidine
Propofol
P value
n
S100-β
n
S100-β
Day 0
52
0.12 (0.06-0.18)
63
0.14 (0.08-0.23)
0.4080
Day 1
52
2.12 (2.03-2.22)
63
3.02 (2.92-3.18)
< 0.001
Day 2
52
2.30 (2.18-2.48)
63
3.53 (3.32-3.85)
< 0.001
Day 3
52
2.88 (2.67-3.05)
63
3.62 (3.39-4.06)
< 0.001
Day 4
35
3.58 (3.36-3.85)
40
4.70 (4.35-4.97)
< 0.001
Day 5
22
4.46 (4.34-4.58)
28
4.98 (4.86-5.44)
< 0.001
Day 6
15
4.83 (4.68-5.03)
19
5.33 (4.98-5.65)
0.0026
Day 7
10
5.06 (4.81-5.32)
14
5.38 (5.19-5.67)
0.0562
Table 5 Comparison of neuron-specific enolase serum levels between the two groups
Time
Dexmedetomidine
Propofol
P value
n
NSE
n
NSE
Day 0
52
9.95 (9.08-10.65)
63
9.86 (9.35-10.56)
0.9570
Day 1
52
20.09 (17.63-21.43)
63
21.42 (20.71-23.08)
< 0.001
Day 2
52
20.35 (17.96-21.50)
63
22.35 (21.38-23.92)
< 0.001
Day 3
52
24.89 (21.87-26.85)
63
26.25 (25.15-27.35)
< 0.001
Day 4
35
26.62 (23.43-29.35)
40
29.17 (26.61-31.14)
0.0082
Day 5
22
26.75 (24.93-29.37)
28
29.66 (27.72-31.14)
0.0047
Day 6
15
28.93 (26.35-30.52)
19
30.72 (28.65-31.98)
0.0774
Day 7
10
28.34 (26.95-31.23)
14
30.54 (28.90-32.46)
0.2060
Citation: Yuan HX, Zhang LN, Li G, Qiao L. Brain protective effect of dexmedetomidine vs propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation in non-brain injured patients. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(3): 370-379