Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Psychiatry. Dec 19, 2023; 13(12): 1027-1036
Published online Dec 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i12.1027
Table 1 Comparison of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and activities of daily living scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
GroupMMSE score
MoCA score
ADL score
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Study group (n = 30)20.63 ± 2.9426.80 ± 2.59a19.50 ± 2.8426.77 ± 2.08a45.00 ± 4.7863.70 ± 6.25a
Control group (n = 30)19.73 ± 3.1024.97 ± 3.29a19.70 ± 1.6024.70 ± 2.42a45.97 ± 4.6257.40 ± 4.99a
P value0.2530.0200.7380.0010.429< 0.001
t value1.1542.4000.3363.5450.7974.314
Table 2 Comparison of cholinergic system component levels between the two groups (mean ± SD, nmol/mL)
GroupACh
AChE
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Study group (n = 30)10.96 ± 2.8422.53 ± 2.49a16.53 ± 2.098.26 ± 0.89a
Control group (n = 30)10.54 ± 2.9915.20 ± 1.66a16.92 ± 2.7512.36 ± 1.17a
t value0.57013.4120.61615.308
P value0.571< 0.0010.540< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of vascular endothelial function markers between the two groups (mean ± SD, d)
GroupET-1 (μg/L)
NO (μmol/L)
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Study group (n = 30)79.02 ± 5.7771.29 ± 4.90a60.81 ± 6.1371.19 ± 7.08a
Control group (n = 30)79.32 ± 6.7065.40 ± 5.45a60.19 ± 4.4065.45 ± 4.64a
P value0.854< 0.0010.6550.001
t value0.1854.4000.4503.709
Table 4 Comparison of serum β2-microglobulin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and visinin-like protein 1 concentrations between the two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupΒ2-MG (mg/L)
VILIP-1 (ng/L)
GFAP (mg/L)
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Study group (n = 30)2.64 ± 0.651.49 ± 0.48a520.59 ± 55.39409.67 ± 40.77a9.17 ± 1.326.04 ± 1.70a
Control group (n = 30)2.79 ± 0.421.93 ± 0.28a531.47 ± 54.03435.83 ± 37.09a9.87 ± 1.567.44 ± 1.06a
P value0.294< 0.0010.4440.0120.064< 0.001
t value1.0614.3390.7712.5991.8883.817
Table 5 Comparison of pulsatility index values of cerebral vessels between the two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupLACA
RACA
LMCA
RMCA
LPCA
RPCA
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Study group (n = 30)1.34 ± 0.280.94 ± 0.11a1.33 ± 0.220.97 ± 0.12a1.35 ± 0.260.95 ± 0.16a1.34 ± 0.240.94 ± 0.19a1.37 ± 0.280.93 ± 0.18a1.34 ± 0.320.98 ± 0.15a
Control group (n = 30)1.35 ± 0.271.11 ± 0.42a1.37 ± 0.271.12 ± 0.36a1.39 ± 0.221.10 ± 0.31a1.35 ± 0.371.12 ± 0.34a1.36 ± 0.401.11 ± 0.30a1.35 ± 0.411.12 ± 0.35a
P value0.8320.0400.5360.0490.4900.0240.9050.0130.8570.0070.9830.047
t value0.2132.1390.6222.0430.6952.3390.1202.5890.1802.8050.0212.052
Table 6 Comparison of the resistance index values of the cerebral vessels in the two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupLACA
RACA
LMCA
RMCA
LPCA
RPCA
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Study group (n = 30)0.86 ± 0.180.54 ± 0.10a0.86 ± 0.220.53 ± 0.13a0.85 ± 0.250.53 ± 0.16a0.95 ± 0.280.48 ± 0.13a0.84 ± 0.280.49 ± 0.11a0.93 ± 0.250.53 ± 0.13a
Control group (n = 30)0.93 ± 0.230.64 ± 0.11a0.84 ± 0.150.64 ± 0.15a0.82 ± 0.220.65 ± 0.21a0.92 ± 0.210.62 ± 0.24a0.86 ± 0.200.58 ± 0.14a0.90 ± 0.180.63 ± 0.15a
P value0.2250.0010.7290.0040.7200.0140.5820.0070.7010.0060.5660.008
t value1.2263.6610.3493.0330.3602.5470.5532.8470.3862.8640.5782.750