Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2022.
    
    
        World J Psychiatry. Aug 19, 2022; 12(8): 1031-1043
Published online Aug 19, 2022. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i8.1031
Published online Aug 19, 2022. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i8.1031
            Table 1 Measurement of variables
        
    | Factors | Measurement | Characteristics | 
| Demographic factors | Sex | Male or female | 
| Age | 60-74, 75+ | |
| Mainly used hand | Left hand or right hand | |
| Education level | Middle school graduate and below or high school graduate and above | |
| Family history of the disease | Parkinson's disease; Alzheimer's disease | Yes or no; Yes or no | 
| Health behaviors | Pack-years (smoking) | Non-smoking, 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, or ≥ 61 pack-years | 
| Coffee-drinking | Yes or no | |
| Mean coffee intake per day (cups/d) | No, ≤ 1, 2-3, or ≥ 4 cups | |
| Coffee drinking period (yr) | No, ≤ 5, 6-9, or ≥ 10 | |
| Disease history | Carbon monoxide poisoning | Yes or no | 
| Diabetes | Yes or no | |
| Alcoholism | Yes or no | |
| Hyperlipidemia | Yes or no | |
| Traumatic brain injury | Yes or no | |
| Hypertension | Yes or no | |
| Exercise characteristics related to Parkinson's disease relatedmotor signs | Tremor | Yes or no | 
| Rigidity | Yes or no | |
| Akinesia/bradykinesia | Yes or no | |
| Postural instability | Yes or no | |
| Late motor complications | Yes or no | |
| Neuropsychological test | K-MoCA | Continuous variable | 
| K-MMSE | Continuous variable | |
| Global CDR score | Continuous variable | |
| Sum of boxes in CDR | Continuous variable | |
| Hoehn and Yahr staging | Continuous variable | |
| UPDRS (Total UPDRS score) | Continuous variable | |
| UPDRS (Motor UPDRS score) | Continuous variable | |
| K-IADL | Continuous variable | |
| Schwab and England ADL | Continuous variable | 
            Table 2 General characteristics of the subjects based on Parkinson's disease with dementia, n (%)
        
    | Variables | PD-MCI (n = 179) | PDD (n = 110) | P value | 
| Age | 0.168 | ||
| 60-74 | 117 (65.0) | 63 (35.0) | |
| 75+ | 62 (56.9) | 47 (43.1) | |
| Sex | 0.550 | ||
| Male | 78 (63.9) | 44 (36.1) | |
| Female | 101 (60.5) | 66 (39.5) | |
| Education level | 0.072 | ||
| Middle school graduate and below | 110 (58.2) | 79 (41.8) | |
| High school graduate and above | 69 (69.0) | 31 (31.0) | |
| Family history of the Parkinson's disease | 0.600 | ||
| No | 144 (64.3) | 80 (35.7) | |
| Yes | 12 (70.6) | 5 (29.4) | |
| Family history of the Alzheimer's disease | 0.285 | ||
| No | 130 (63.4) | 75 (36.6) | |
| Yes | 8 (80.0) | 2 (20.0) | |
| Carbon monoxide poisoning | 0.743 | ||
| No | 158 (62.5) | 95 (37.5) | |
| Yes | 10 (66.7) | 5 (33.3) | |
| Traumatic brain injury | 0.277 | ||
| No | 158 (62.0) | 97 (38.0) | |
| Yes | 10 (76.9) | 3 (23.1) | |
| Diabetes | 0.508 | ||
| No | 144 (64.0) | 81 (36.0) | |
| Yes | 35 (59.3) | 24 (40.7) | |
| Hypertension | 0.304 | ||
| No | 110 (65.5) | 58 (34.5) | |
| Yes | 69 (59.5) | 47 (40.5) | |
| Hyperlipidemia | 0.220 | ||
| No | 155 (61.8) | 96 (38.2) | |
| Yes | 24 (72.7) | 9 (27.3) | 
            Table 3 Results of the neuropsychological profiles
        
    | Results | K-MMSE | K-MoCA | Global CDR score | Sum of boxes in CDR | K-IADL | Total UPDRS | Motor UPDRS | H&Y staging | ADL | 
| Mean | 22.73 | 16.27 | 0.67 | 2.80 | 1.90 | 43.56 | 25.33 | 2.45 | 74.40 | 
| Standardized mean error | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 2.02 | 0.77 | 0.04 | 1.42 | 
| Standard deviation | 5.51 | 6.33 | 0.56 | 3.49 | 4.08 | 23.77 | 12.59 | 0.78 | 18.30 | 
| Minimum | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 10 | 
| Maximum | 30 | 27 | 4.0 | 25.0 | 28.0 | 130.00 | 74.0 | 5.0 | 100 | 
            Table 4 Result of the neuropsychological profiles based on Parkinson's disease with dementia, mean ± SD
        
    | Variables | PD-MCI (n = 179) | PDD (n = 110) | P value | 
| K-MMSE | 24.3 ± 3.4 | 18.8 ± 5.6 | < 0.001 | 
| K-MoCA | 19.4 ± 4.9 | 11.9 ± 5.4 | < 0.001 | 
| CDR (sum of boxes) | 1.6 ± 1.4 | 5.1 ± 4.9 | < 0.001 | 
| K-IADL | 1.3 ± 2.9 | 3.0 ± 5.4 | 0.001 | 
| UPDRS (Total UPDRS score) | 36.4 ± 17.9 | 56.1 ± 27.2 | < 0.001 | 
| UPDRS (Motor UPDRS score) | 22.6 ± 10.1 | 29.4 ± 14.6 | < 0.001 | 
| H&Y staging | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 2.7 ± 0.8 | 0.001 | 
| Schwab and England ADL | 80.0 ± 14.4 | 65.6 ± 19.8 | < 0.001 | 
            Table 5 Results of regression with optimal scale
        
    | Test | b | SE by boost 1 | df | F | P value | 
| K-MMSE | -0.522 | 0.168 | 2 | 9.684 | < 0.001 | 
| KMoCA | -0.206 | 0.238 | 3 | 0.750 | 0.527 | 
| CDR (Global CDR score) | 0.127 | 0.269 | 1 | 0.222 | 0.639 | 
| CDR (sum of boxes) | -0.271 | 0.412 | 3 | 0.431 | 0.732 | 
| K-IADL | 0.237 | 0.224 | 2 | 1.119 | 0.334 | 
| UPDRS (Total UPDRS score) | 0.433 | 0.444 | 3 | 0.949 | 0.423 | 
| UPDRS (Motor UPDRS score) | -0.338 | 0.330 | 3 | 1.045 | 0.380 | 
| H&Y staging | 0.440 | 0.197 | 3 | 5.008 | 0.004 | 
| Schwab and England ADL | 0.353 | 0.333 | 2 | 1.123 | 0.333 | 
            Table 6 Quantification index of Korean version of mini mental state examination
        
    | Category (point) | Quantification index | 
| 3-14 | -1.260 | 
| 15-18 | -1.198 | 
| 19-20 | -1.013 | 
| 21-22 | -.706 | 
| 23-24 | -.320 | 
| 25 | 0.135 | 
| 26 | 0.656 | 
| 27 | 1.183 | 
| 28 | 1.508 | 
| 29-30 | 1.616 | 
            Table 7 Quantification index of Hoehn and Yahr staging
        
    | Category (point) | Quantification index | 
| 1.0 | -2.787 | 
| 1.5 | -0.609 | 
| 2.0 | -0.187 | 
| 2.5 | -0.081 | 
| 3.0 | 0.151 | 
| 4.0 | 1.179 | 
| 5.0 | 2.167 | 
            Table 8 Optimal classification scores: odds ratios and 95% confidence interval
        
    | Optimal classification scores | B | SE | Wald | P value | OR (95%CI) | 
| K-MMSE 25+ (Ref) | 69.856 | < 0.01 | |||
| 23-24 | 1.499 | 0.473 | 10.035 | 0.002 | 4.478 (1.77-11.32) | 
| 21-22 | 2.731 | 0.494 | 30.522 | < 0.01 | 15.345 (5.82-40.43) | 
| 19-20 | 2.587 | 0.549 | 22.195 | < 0.01 | 13.294 (4.53-39.00) | 
| 15-18 | 3.111 | 0.505 | 37.937 | < 0.01 | 22.441 (8.33-60.39) | 
| 3-14 | 4.008 | 0.799 | 25.185 | < 0.01 | 55.020 (11.50-263.19) | 
| H&Y staging 1.0-2.5 (Ref) | |||||
| 3.0-5.0 | 1.110 | 0.350 | 10.079 | 0.001 | 3.035 (1.52-6.02) | 
- Citation: Byeon H. Can the prediction model using regression with optimal scale improve the power to predict the Parkinson's dementia? World J Psychiatry 2022; 12(8): 1031-1043
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v12/i8/1031.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v12.i8.1031

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        