Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2022; 12(4): 636-650
Published online Apr 19, 2022. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i4.636
Table 1 Characteristics of studies
Ref.
Country
Sample
Age range (mean)
Women, n (%)
Randomisation
Intervention group (comparison group)Intervention durationGroup size for effect size calculation, nDrop-out rate1 (%)Outcome measure for sleep
Wahbeh[29], 2018United StatesOlder adult with depression symptoms55-80 (64.8)21 (81)RIMMI (waitlist control)6 wkI = 26 C = 2420.00Sleep disturbance, ISI
Boettcher et al[50], 2014GermanyCommunity dwellers with anxiety disorders18+ (37)34 (75.6)RIMMI (discussion forum control group)8 wkI = 45 C = 467.69ISI
Wahbeh et al[47], 2016United StatesCombat veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder25-65 (I = 53.3; C = 53.0)2 (7)RMM (sitting quietly)6 wkI = 27 C = 250PSQI
Britton et al[49], 2012United StatesAntidepressant medication users with sleep complaints24-61 (47.0)21 (80.8)RMBCT (control)8 wkI = 14 C = 107.69TIB, TST, SE, SOL, WASO, TWT, Stage 1, SWS, Quality
Vøllestad et al[51], 2011NorwayCommunity dwellers with anxiety disorders18-65 (42.5)26 (66.7)RMBSR (waitlist control)8 wkI = 39 C = 3714BIS
Britton et al[48], 2010United StatesCommunity dwellers with partially remitted depression33-64 (45.4)9 (69.2)RMBCT (control)8 wkI = 13 C = 819.23TIB, TST, SE, SOL, WASO, NWAK, Arousals, Stage 1, SWS, Quality
Hoge et al[52], 2013United StatesReferral/community dwellers with generalized anxiety disorder18+ (I = 41; C = 37)23 (47.9)RMBSR (stress management education)8 wkI = 48 C = 454.30Sleep quality, PSQI
Horenstein et al[45], 2019United StatesAdults with social anxiety disorder18+ (32.7)Not specifiedRMBSR (control)12 wkI = 36 C = 3615.28Sleep quality, PSQI
Pinniger et al[46], 2013AustraliaAdults with self-reported feelings of stress, anxiety, and/or depression18-68 (39.5)10 (90.9)RMM (waitlist control)8 wkI = 11 C = 2330.60Sleeping difficulty/insomnia, ISI
Stötter et al[31], 2013AustriaPatients of the psychiatric hospital of Hall in Tirol18+ (I = 42.8; C = 41.4)11 (68.75)RMBTT (control)8 wkI = 14 C = 140Sleep-onset disorder, Sleep maintenance disorders, Terminal sleep disorders, HDRS
Table 2 Interventions' technique, components and selected outcome measures for effect size calculation
Mindfulness-based program
Intervention components
Selected outcome measures for effect size calculation
Ref.
Intervention group
Comparison group
IMMIDI + MM + MPSWLISIWahbeh[29], 2018
ME + psychoeducationDFISIBoettcher et al[50], 2014
MMBSSBPSQIWahbeh et al[47], 2016
BSBS + SBPSQIWahbeh et al[47], 2016
BSSQPSQIWahbeh et al[47], 2016
BS + MB + MW + music meditationWLISIPinniger et al[46], 2013
MBCTMA + HW (Guided audio CD)ControlSleep diaryBritton et al[48], 2010
MA (MB + MS + MW + lying + other simple movement) + HW (MM using audio CD + worksheet)ControlSleep diaryBritton et al[49], 2012
MBSRBS + SM + MB + AR + DI + ME + MMV + HWWLBergen insomnia scaleVøllestad et al[51], 2011
BS+ BA+ gentle Hatha YogaSMEPSQIHoge et al[52], 2013
BS + SM + MS + MPSWLPSQIHorenstein et al[45], 2019
MBTTBA + touch + HW + counsellingBMTHDRSStötter et al[31], 2013
Table 3 Research design and level of evidence
Ref.
Research design
Level of evidence
Wahbeh[29], 2018RCT, crossover designII
Boettcher et al[50], 2014RCT, crossover designII
Wahbeh et al[47], 2016RCT, multi-group pre-/post-test designII
Britton et al[49], 2012RCT, pre-/post-test control group designII
Vøllestad et al[51], 2011RCT, crossover designII
Britton et al[48], 2010RCT, pre-/post-test control group designII
Hoge et al[52], 2013RCT, two group pre-/post-test designII
Horenstein et al[45], 2019RCT, multi-group pre-/post-test designII
Pinniger et al[46], 2013RCT, multi-group pre-/post-test designII
Stötter et al[31], 2013RCT, pre-/post-test control group designII
Table 4 Risk of bias in the studies
Ref.       
Randomisation process
Deviation from intended intervention
Missing outcome data
Measurement of outcome
Selection of the reported results
Overall
Wahbeh[29], 2018Low riskLow riskSome concernsSome concernsLow riskHigh
Boettcher et al[50], 2014Low riskLow riskLow riskSome concernsLow riskSome concerns
Wahbeh et al[47], 2016Low riskLow riskLow riskSome concernsLow riskSome concerns
Britton et al[49], 2012Low riskLow riskLow riskSome concernsLow riskSome concerns
Vøllestad et al[51], 2011Low riskLow riskLow riskSome concernsLow riskSome concerns
Britton et al[48], 2010Low riskSome concernsLow riskLow riskLow riskSome concerns
Hoge et al[52], 2013Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow
Horenstein et al[45], 2019Low riskLow riskLow riskSome concernsLow riskSome concerns
Pinniger et al[46], 2013Low riskHigh riskSome concernsLow riskLow riskHigh
Stötter et al[31], 2013Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow
Table 5 Overall effects of different interventions
Ref.
Mindfulness-based program
k
Subjects, n
SMD (95%CI)
P value
Overall SMD (95%CI)
Overall P value
Q
Wahbeh[29], 2018IMMI2124-0.881 (-1.531 to -0.231)0.008-0.618 (-0.980 to -0.257)0.0010.912 (P = 0.34)
Boettcher et al[50], 2014-0.500 (-0.935 to -0.066)0.024
Wahbeh et al[47], 2016MM286-0.267 (-0.814 to 0.279)0.337-0.264 (-0.699 to 0.172)0.2360.001 (P = 0.981)
Pinniger et al[46], 2013-0.257 (-0.978 to 0.464)0.485
Britton et al[48], 2010MBCT243-1.073 (-1.953 to -0.192)0.017-1.003 (-1.645 to -0.360)0.0020.052 (P = 0.82)
Britton et al[49], 2012-0.923 (-1.862 to 0.016)0.054
Hoge et al[52], 2013MBSR3187-0.449 (-0.942 to 0.043)0.074-0.551 (-0.842 to -0.260)< 0.00010.332 (P = 0.847)
Horenstein et al[45], 2019-0.555 (-1.056 to -0.053)0.03
Vøllestad et al[51], 2011-0.660 (-1.178 to -0.141)0.013
Stötter et al[31], 2013MBTT128-1.138 (-1.937 to -0.340)0.005-1.138 (-1.937 to -0.340)0.0050 (P = 1)