Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2026; 16(4): 116428
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.116428
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.116428
Figure 1 Performance comparison.
A: Multimodal performance comparison; B: Bimodal performance comparison. XGBoost: Extreme gradient boosting; AUC-ROC: Under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC-PR: Area under the precision-recall curve.
Figure 2 Coefficient of variation comparison across performance metrics.
AUC-ROC: Under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC-PR: Area under the precision-recall curve.
Figure 3 Learning curves of training and validation accuracy.
A: Multimodal extreme gradient boosting models; B: Bimodal extreme gradient boosting models.
Figure 4 Confusion matrices.
A: Confusion matrices for multimodal extreme gradient boosting models; B: Bimodal extreme gradient boosting models.
- Citation: Zeng Y, Yang J, Kuang L. Bridging the gap between subjective and objective measures: A multimodal protocol for adolescent depression detection. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(4): 116428
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i4/116428.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.116428
